
NATO Adapts to Ukraine's Drone Tactics in Modern Warfare
BRUSSELS: Ukraine's 'creativity', including its massive 'Spider's web' drone attack deep inside Russia, holds profound lessons for Western militaries, the top NATO commander overseeing battlefield innovation told AFP.
'What the Ukrainians did in Russia was a Trojan horse -- and the trojan horse was thousands of years ago,' French Admiral Pierre Vandier, NATO's Supreme Allied Commander Transformation, said in an interview.
'Today, we see this kind of tactic being reinvented by technical and industrial creativity.'
Vandier said the operation showed how crucial innovation and adaptation were for victory, as modern warfare changes at lightning speed.
'It was a real coup.'
'We are entering a dynamic era where armies must rely on both major planning but also adaptive planning,' the navy commander said.
'We will witness continuous innovation where, week by week, month by month or year by year, we will be able to invent things we hadn't anticipated.'
'Must act quickly'
Faced with the Russian threat, NATO this week adopted new objectives for its defence capabilities to ensure it will be able to repel Moscow.
But Western intelligence agencies have warned that the Kremlin is reconstituting its forces at a pace far outstripping NATO and could be ready to attack the alliance in as little as four years.
'Time is truly a crucial parameter. We must act quickly,' Vandier said.
The admiral, who previously commanded France's flagship Charles De Gaulle aircraft carrier, said NATO needed to amass the forces to dissuade any adversary from trying an attack.
'When you say 'I'm defending myself', you have the weapons to defend. When you say you deter, you have the weapons to deter,' he said.
'That's what should prevent war -- making the adversary think: 'Tomorrow morning, I won't win.'
NATO countries under pressure from US President Donald Trump are expected to agree a major increase in their defence spending target at a summit in The Hague this month.
That should see a dramatic surge in spending on military hardware.
But if cheap Ukrainian drones can inflict billions of dollars in damage on Russian bombers, is it still worth investing in vastly expensive systems?
'No-one in the military sphere will tell you that we can do without what we'll call traditional equipment,' Vandier said.
'However, we are certain we need new equipment to complement it.'
Officials say that over 70 percent of battlefield casualties in Ukraine are caused by drones.
But while drones are indispensable in modern warfare, they are not omnipotent.
'Today, you won't cross the Atlantic with a 10-meter-long (33-foot-long) drone. You won't easily locate submarines with such tools,' Vandier said.
'If they accompany your large platforms, you'll be able to achieve much better results at much lower costs.'
Integrating new technologies
The admiral, who works out of NATO's US base in Norfolk, Virginia, said the major challenge was 'integrating new technologies and new combat methods, based on what we've witnessed in Ukraine'.
NATO and Ukraine have established a centre in Poland designed to help the alliance learn lessons from Russia's invasion of its neighbour.
Artificial Intelligence and robotics are also increasingly having an impact and are set to help reshape the battlefield.
'All modern armies will have piloted and non-piloted capabilities,' Vandier said.
'It's much more efficient to deliver ammunition with a ground robot than with a squad of soldiers who could face a 155-millimeter (six-inch) shell.'
This transformation of military capabilities within the alliance, which NATO aims to expand by at least 30 percent over coming years, will come at a significant cost, estimated in hundreds of billions of euros (dollars).
Vandier insisted that while the financial effort was 'substantial' it was 'fully realistic'.
'Today, we have all the tools. We have the engineering. We have the expertise. We have the technology. So, we need to get started,' he said.
ob/del/ec/gil

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Borneo Post
31 minutes ago
- Borneo Post
Trump says to set unilateral tariffs within weeks
Trump holds the US$5 million dollar Gold Card as he speaks to reporters while in flight on board Air Force One, en route to Miami, Florida on April 3, 2025. – AFP photo WASHINGTON (June 12): President Donald Trump plans to inform trading partners of unilateral US tariff rates in the coming weeks, as a July deadline approaches for steeper levies to kick in on dozens of economies. 'We're going to be sending letters out in about a week and a half, two weeks, to countries telling them what the deal is,' Trump told reporters late Wednesday, at the Kennedy Center in Washington where he was attending a theatre performance. In April, Trump imposed a blanket 10 percent tariff on most US trading partners and unveiled higher individual rates on dozens of economies including India and the European Union — although he swiftly paused the elevated rates. While negotiations have been ongoing, the pause on those higher duties is due to expire on July 9. So far, Washington has only announced a trade deal with the UK, alongside a temporary tariff de-escalation with China. Tensions remain elevated between the world's two biggest economies, with Washington recently accusing Beijing of slow-walking export approvals for rare earth minerals. It remains unclear if the steeper levies will return for all countries in early July. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told lawmakers earlier Wednesday that an extended pause is possible for those 'negotiating in good faith.' 'There are 18 important trading partners. We are working toward deals on those,' he said. Bessent said it is likely that for countries or trading blocs such as the EU, Washington would decide to 'roll the date forward to continue the good faith negotiations.' The Treasury chief added that following conversations with US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer, 'it's my belief that with smaller countries where we have lower levels of trade, we may be able to do a one-size-fits-all regional deal.' Trump's wide-ranging tariffs and higher rates on goods from China have roiled financial markets, snagged supply chains and weighed on consumer sentiment. While many of the levies also face court challenges, US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick has dismissed concerns that these could prompt countries to slow-run negotiations. – AFP


New Straits Times
an hour ago
- New Straits Times
'Trump's brain' behind migration crackdown
FOR Stephen Miller, the architect of United States President Donald Trump's hardline migration policy, the protests in Los Angeles were nothing less than the frontline of a "fight to save civilisation itself". Hyper-loyalist Miller, 39, has carved out a niche as Trump's most powerful and hawkish adviser on the Republican's signature issue of immigration. A combative presence on the White House driveway, Miller is frequently rolled out in public to double down on the president's comments in front of the cameras and frequently spars with reporters. But the sharp-suited adviser's comments on Los Angeles — which echo hard-right talking points about the decline of the West as it faces an "invasion" of migrants — underscored that the topic is not just political for him, but existential. His fingerprints have been all over the White House's unprecedented assertion of its right to use presidential power to pursue its agenda, often using centuries-old or rarely cited laws to deport migrants. And Miller, who is formally Trump's Deputy Chief of Staff for Policy and Homeland Security Adviser, is at the sharp end of things, too. It was Miller who, according to the Wall Street Journal, issued US Immigration and Customs Enforcement with orders last month to step up its work after the number of daily deportations under Trump fell below those carried out by Joe Biden's administration last year. Those orders led to the immigration raids on a Home Depot in Los Angeles that triggered clashes between protesters and federal agents — and Trump's decision to send in thousands of troops. Miller has since taken to social media to battle Democrats who accuse Trump of authoritarianism. "We've been saying for years this is a fight to save civilisation. Anyone with eyes can see that now," he said on X on Sunday. A few days earlier, he set out his right-wing worldview more explicitly as he pushed for Trump's new "big, beautiful" spending bill, which contains provisions for migration. "We will be debating these matters over the ruins of the West if we don't control migration," he wrote on June 4. Critics say such comments echo the far-right "replacement theory" about migration undermining Western society. Indeed, during Trump's first term, Miller's hardline stance made him something of an outlier. As a young firebrand, Miller was one of the architects of the so-called "Muslim travel bans" in Trump's first presidency, which later ran into legal difficulties after they were poorly drafted. Miller largely avoided the chaotic feuding that engulfed Trump's first White House, resulting in somewhat more moderate voices winning out on immigration policies. Miller, however, remained loyal, and stuck by his boss even as Trump's first term ended in the disgrace of the US Capitol attack on Jan 6, 2021. In the second Trump administration, Miller's views have become mainstream. "I call Stephen 'Trump's brain'," Republican former House speaker Kevin McCarthy told the New York Times just before Trump's inauguration. Miller was the driving force in particular behind the use of an obscure 200-year-old wartime law to deport undocumented migrants — and a vocal defender when that crackdown saw a man wrongly deported to El Salvador. He also outraged Democrats when he said on May 9 the White House was "looking into" suspending habeas corpus, which would prevent migrants targeted for mass deportations from appealing for their right to appear in court. One blip, however, came when Miller and his wife Katie found themselves caught up in the split between Trump and his billionaire adviser Elon Musk. Katie Miller had been a senior adviser and spokesman in Musk's Department of Government Efficiency. But the couple now find themselves, professionally speaking, on opposite sides of the break-up between the world's richest person and its most powerful.


New Straits Times
an hour ago
- New Straits Times
NST Leader: How to stop the slaughter in Gaza
The unexpected has happened. Britain has joined Canada, New Zealand, Australia and Norway to impose sanctions on Israel's National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir and Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, both illegal West Bank settlers known for inciting hatred against Palestinians. Unexpected because this is the first time Western countries have imposed sanctions against Israeli ministers. The sanctions come with asset freezes and travel bans. In a joint statement, foreign ministers of the five countries said: "Extremist rhetoric advocating forced displacement of Palestinians and the creation of new Israeli settlements is appalling and dangerous." There must not be any unlawful transfer of Palestinians out of Gaza or the West Bank, nor any reduction in the territory of the Gaza Strip, they added. Britain has been under tremendous pressure by the British legal fraternity, including former members of the Supreme Court, warning 10 Downing Street that if London did not act against Israel, it would face allegations of complicity in the war crimes that Tel Aviv is committing in Gaza and the West Bank. More than 54,500 Palestinians have been killed since Oct 7, 2023. The British government is also facing a legal challenge in the High Court brought by Palestinian human rights organisation Al-Haq and the Global Legal Action Network alleging that it is complicit in violations of international law, including the Genocide Convention, due to its continued licensing of arms export to Israel. The indiscriminate slaughter of Palestinian civilians has turned the debate in Westminster into a highly charged one. In a speech there on Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territories on May 20, British Foreign Minister David Lammy, referring to Smotrich's announcement a day earlier of "cleansing" Gaza, of "destroying what's left" and of Palestinians "being relocated to third countries", he responded thus: "We must call it what it is: it is extremism, it is dangerous, it is repellent, it is monstrous and I condemn it in the strongest possible terms." The British Parliament hasn't heard such words from ministers for the longest time. Neither has the Foreign Office been questioned by its own staff as it is being challenged now. According to The Guardian, four letters have been sent to top officials in the ministry expressing fears that the government had become complicit in Israel's alleged war crimes. The staff's views are in line with those of the British legal fraternity, the International Criminal Court and the International Court of Justice (ICJ) that Israel is committing war crimes. The ICJ even went further, advising countries to stop supplying arms to Israel to avoid complicity in Tel Aviv's war crimes. Sanctioning the Israeli ministers is a good move, but a better first move would have been to stop supplying weapons to Israel, which Tel Aviv is using to destroy the very foundation of a two-state solution that five countries and other Western nations are pushing for. But the five nations, especially Britain, must not stop the pressure on Israel until Palestinians have their own state. Any other solution is a recipe for a muddled Middle East.