Former FBI Director Comey takes dig at Kash Patel, explains controversial Trump post
Former FBI Director Comey takes dig at Kash Patel, explains controversial Trump post
Show Caption
Hide Caption
Secret Service investigating ex-FBI chief James Comey's '8647' post
Ex-FBI Director James Comey posted an image of the numbers '8647,' sparking outrage as some saw it as a call for violence.
Former FBI Director James Comey aired his "doubts" about the current bureau leadership, Director Kash Patel and Deputy Director Dan Bongino, in a televised interview after his own recent dust-up related to President Donald Trump.
"There are lots of people in the FBI who know what they're doing," Comey said in a May 28 interview with CNN. "I hope these two guys are letting them guide them."
Comey has been a fierce adversary of Trump since the commander-in-chief fired him in 2017.
Pressed by CNN anchor Wolf Blitzer on whether he felt Patel and Bongino, both Trump picks, were capable of steering the FBI, Comey was clear: "Nothing in their life or their career gives me confidence that they know anything about leading an organization like that."
Comey criticized a recent announcement by Bongino that the bureau would be zeroing in on three cases of "potential public corruption," including the discovery of cocaine in the White House in 2023 and the 2022 leak of a Supreme Court draft opinion overturning Roe v. Wade.
"It's a little confusing to me, honestly. I'm sure it's a huge adjustment to go from being a podcaster to being the deputy director of the FBI," Comey said, taking a swipe at Bongino's previous career as a conservative talk show host.
Supreme Court Marshal Gail Curley investigated the leaked opinion at the time of the incident, Comey said, adding, "I don't know what the FBI's role is there." The monthslong investigation concluded in January 2023, with Curley writing in a 20-page report that the source of the leak could not be identified.
The Secret Service also failed to uncover the culprit responsible for cocaine found in the White House. The agency closed its investigation after less than two weeks due to "a lack of physical evidence." Former President Joe Biden was away from the White House at the time the illegal drug was found in the West Wing.
Comey said the third case on Bongino's list, concerning an unknown suspect who planted pipe bombs near the Republican and Democratic national committees' Washington headquarters on January 6, 2021, was never closed.
Yet Bongino's post on X announced that case was part of a new probe.
"I also don't understand who the audience is for this tweet," Comey told CNN.
Comey noted that while the FBI does ask for public assistance in some cases, "this seems much more narrowly targeted − maybe to a former podcast audience."
Since being dismissed by Trump years ago, Comey said he feels like he has a target on his back.
"When the president of the United States aims at you, it changes your life in a number of ways," he said. "It causes people to aim at you, aim at your family members, which is my biggest concern."
Asked if he is worried about security, Comey told Blitzer, "I am always worried."
"I'm a giraffe, so I stick out," said Comey, who is 6'8".
More recently, the former FBI director came under fire for a since-deleted social media post showing an image of seashells that spelled out "8647."
More: What does 8647 mean? Why James Comey's Instagram post triggered federal response
Some interpreted the post as a message of violence. In U.S. slang, the number 86 can be used as code for removing someone, perhaps for disorderly behavior, and 47 is often used to refer to Trump, the 47th president.
Comey has called the photo a misunderstanding.
"I thought it was a message of political opposition to Donald Trump, done in a very clever way," he said on CNN. "I had never heard − actually still haven't credibly heard − the numbers 86 associated with murder. But if people are going to say that, which never occurred to me, I don't want that on my Instagram post. And so I took it down."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
No homicides so far in 2025, Worcester Police report; 16 recorded in 2024
WORCESTER — As the city begins the second week of June, Worcester can boast something that it couldn't this time last year: no homicides so far this year. This time last year, Worcester had seven homicides, six of which were from firearms, Chief Paul Saucier said. 'These things happen in cycles,' Saucier said. 'Could they erupt right now? Yeah. But we have things in place so when it does erupt to go after it.' Worcester's first homicide in 2024 was in February, a month that had two homicides, which was followed by two homicides in March and three homicides in April. There were no homicides in the city in May and June 2024. In August, a mother and daughter were stabbed to death. While September had no homicides, October saw two homicides in the city, followed by three in November and ending with two in December. According to the FBI's online Crime Data Explorer, the 16 homicides in 2024 are the most reported by Worcester since 1986, the earliest year the data is shown. Police records and Telegram & Gazette coverage confirm these findings. As of 5 p.m. Friday, June 6, the city hasn't had a single homicide. In 2025, there has been seven nonfatal shootings with eight victims and 27 nonfatal stabbings in the city so far this year. 'We're able with this unit to go out there and investigate every single shot fired, including every single ShotSpotter incident. And then these guys are able to get there. They can gather evidence on the scene. They can gather video. And they have the time to put this all together, where in the past detectives were so busy,' Saucier said. 'If nobody was hit and there was no property crime, you really wouldn't see much more investigation into it. So by working this group and that's all they do, they can concentrate on those dangerous offenders and take them off the street. 'You have to have a lot of different methods in order to combat gun violence,' Saucier added. 'Between programs and suppression, everything has to combine and then you do have to be lucky as well, because you could have one person out there who could be a crime spree themselves.' Although no one can know why there have been no homicides in the city this year so far, Saucier said he thinks several Worcester Police Department outreach programs have contributed to the drop. 'We always have a somewhat lower homicide rate than comparable cities and I believe a lot of it has to do with the programs that we do conduct,' Saucier said. 'We started a new program this year. It's called the Worcester Police Scholar Engagement Program and that's within the Worcester Public Schools, where we were in 32 schools, spoke to 2,000 students.' Saucier said the program explores the difference between a gang and a group, myths about gang membership, and the consequences of drug involvement and social media. 'What we try to do is we go into every health class in the city, sixth grade,' Saucier said. 'We figure that is the age where we need to pay the most attention to the students, because once you get into junior high, it can go either way.' Saucier said the Worcester Police Department wants to have a positive impact in the school. Since resource officers are no longer in the schools, Saucier said the Worcester police still want to create that relationship and the understanding where children trust in police, knowing when they have a problem, the police will come to them. In addition, the Worcester Police offers PAAL League Basketball for 14-week spring and fall programs, as well as the Worcester Police and Clergy Youth Mentoring, and Arts and Music Police Partnership programs. The Police Department's Summer Impact program, aimed at deterring violence during the warmer months, began Memorial Day weekend. 'We're going to increase that and keep it going, hopefully, until September, October this year because, when school starts, violence erupts again,' Saucier said. Then, there is the Worcester Police Department's enforcement and suppression. Saucier said his department works extensively with Ronald B. Waddell, executive director and co-founder of Legendary Legacies. Waddell is a certified gang specialist through the National Gang Crime and Research Center and a certified youth mental health specialist. Calling programs including Legendary Legacies 'violence interrupters,' Saucier stressed the importance of having people who can communicate and relate with 'kids in the street.' The Worcester Police Department also launched its Crime Gun Intelligence Unit in April 2024, which works closely with the State Police and the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. 'Departmentwise, so far this year we have confiscated 43 crime guns. Sixteen of those came from the Crime Gun Intelligence Unit. And the big thing is they were able to trace 209 crime guns,' Saucier said. 'One gun could be responsible for nine shootings. So it's very important. Those 43 guns we got, how many lives were saved by confiscating those crime guns.' Having police visible and involved in community engagement program is also a huge deterrent to violent crime, Saucier said. 'Every day, during their shift, they need to get out of the cruiser, walk around for 30 minutes, talk to people, but they're being seen,' Saucier said. 'You're creating that human-to-human contact instead of just a cop driving by in a car. That's a huge thing for us and I think it works.' This article originally appeared on Telegram & Gazette: No homicides so far in 2025, Worcester Police report; 16 in 2024
CNBC
24 minutes ago
- CNBC
Elon Musk appears to delete some explosive X posts amid feud with Trump
Elon Musk has appeared to delete some of his posts on his social media platform X that escalated his bitter feud with President Donald Trump this week. One post, no longer available as of Saturday morning, accused Trump of being mentioned in "files" of the late sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. Musk's accusation, which the White House has disputed, marked an escalation in the public spat between the men. " page doesn't exist. Try searching for something else," said the X page that once displayed Musk's post. On Thursday, Musk also responded "yes" to a user's post that called for Trump to be impeached and replaced with Vice President JD Vance. That post was also no longer available as of Saturday morning. In an interview on Friday with "manosphere" comedian Theo Von, Vance said Musk was making a "huge mistake" going after Trump, while attempting to downplay the billionaire's attacks as an "emotional guy" who got frustrated. It was not immediately clear why Musk deleted the posts. The White House did not immediately respond to CNBC's request for comment. Nonetheless, it's the latest twist in the rapidly deteriorating relationship between the onetime allies. Just over one week ago, Trump and Musk exchanged compliments at the conclusion of Musk's official time leading the Department of Government Efficiency. But their relationship devolved this week as the two men exchanged barbs on social media, stemming in large part from Musk's vocal opposition to Trump's "big, beautiful bill," CNBC previously reported. In one of the now-deleted posts, Musk accused Trump of being mentioned in files related to Epstein, without providing any evidence of his claim. Musk alleged, "that is the real reason they have not been made public." White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt rejected Musk's allegations. "This is an unfortunate episode from Elon, who is unhappy with the One Big Beautiful Bill because it does not include the policies he wanted," she said in a statement to CNN.
USA Today
33 minutes ago
- USA Today
Could Trump fail on tax bill? Why going 'big' doesn't always work out as planned
Could Trump fail on tax bill? Why going 'big' doesn't always work out as planned Disputes inside the GOP about parts of Trump's major tax bill threaten approval in the Senate and past compromises reached by the Republican-led House. Show Caption Hide Caption Elon Musk 'disappointed' with Trump's tax bill Elon Musk told CBS he is 'disappointed' with President Donald Trump's 'big, beautiful' tax bill. Republicans begin debate in the narrowly divided Senate with factions seeking to increase spending cuts or curbing tax breaks, which threaten the compromise needed for approval back in the House. Trump's billionaire adviser Elon Musk complicated the debate by urging lawmakers to kill the bill. Congressional leaders insist approval is still possible despite the fissures in the narrow Republican majorities in each chamber and the unified opposition of Democrats. WASHINGTON – Will President Donald Trump's 'big beautiful bill' go bust? The second-term president's highest-priority legislation is under attack from some Senate Republicans – and from his former billionaire adviser Elon Musk – for costing too much. Complaints are also mounting from Republicans who are opposed to cutting Medicaid health insurance and other popular programs used by many Americans, especially as a way to help pay for tax breaks that would benefit some of the country's highest-income earners. With Republicans holding the slimmest of majorities in both chambers of Congress and with Democrats showing no sign of wanting to help Trump notch a major win to begin his new administration, lawmakers from Trump's own party are sounding apprehensive about threading the needle before their self-imposed July 4 deadline to get something to the president's desk for signature into law. More: Trump and Musk's bromance ends after personal attacks over criticism of tax bill 'We're anxious to get to work on it," Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-South Dakota, told reporters earlier in the week as Republicans and Musk started publicly airing their complaints about the effort. Adding to the challenge: Some of the very House GOP members who last month voted in favor of their 1,100-page version of Trump's tax and policy plan started finding faults of their own that they say meant they'd probably have been a 'no' if they had the chance to do it again. Presidents often aim high to start terms Presidents often try in their first year to build on the momentum of their elections to get major legislation approved. For Joe Biden, it was an infrastructure bill. For Barack Obama, it was overhauling healthcare insurance. For George W. Bush, it was overhauling public education. Trump leapt into action in 2025 with an unprecedented pace of executive orders: 157 through May 23. When he turned to legislation, he persuaded Republican congressional leaders to package all his priorities into one bill, rather than splitting taxes and border security into two different bills, to complete the debate in one fell swoop. More: Everything's an 'emergency': How Trump's executive order record pace is testing the courts Lawmakers often shy away from piling too much into one bill because each contentious provision spurs its own opposition. But faced with the prospect of unanimous Democratic opposition, Trump opted for a strategy that focuses on GOP priorities such as tax relief and border security while personally lobbying reluctant Republicans to stay in line. 'Americans have given us a mandate for bold and profound change,' Trump told Congress in a speech March 4. 'I call on all of my Republican friends in the Senate and House to work as fast as they can to get this Bill to MY DESK before the Fourth of JULY,' he added in a social media post about three months later, on June 2. Musk opposition makes waves Trump's efforts worked in the Republican-led House, which after several days of negotiations and an all-night floor debate voted 215-214 in favor of a plan that had the full backing of the White House. Getting the measure through the Senate - even with the GOP in charge needing just a simple majority of 51 votes - is proving to be its own elusive challenge. Musk, the former head of Trump's bureaucracy-slashing Department of Government Efficiency, spent this past week unloading on the House-passed bill for spending too much money. He called the legislation "pork-filled" and a "disgusting abomination," and urged lawmakers to "KILL the BILL." More: The post-fight fallout from Trump-Musk battle could get even uglier While Musk's barrage ignited a war with Trump and left many Republicans cringing, deficit hawks in the GOP said they appreciated the world's richest man also pushing for deeper spending cuts from the U.S. government. "I welcome people like Elon Musk that try to hold our feet to the fire," said Rep. Eric Burlison, R-Missouri. "We often disappoint our voters when we don't do the cuts that we campaign on, when we're not fiscally responsible." But Rep. Don Bacon, R-Nebraska, who served in the Air Force for 30 years, said the division between Trump and Musk wasn't a good look for his party, especially when it's trying to advance the primary piece of legislation on the president's agenda. "It's just not helpful," Bacon said. "When you have division, divided teams don't perform as well." 'The opposite of conservative': Sen. Paul on bill Several pockets of Republican senators have voiced concerns about the House-passed legislation. Each group has their issue that they want addressed, and each one presents a hurdle for Trump and GOP leaders like Thune as they try to cobble together a winning 51-vote coalition that can also make it back through the House for another final vote. The Senate factions include one group seeking to cut more spending because the Congressional Budget Office said the House-passed plan would add $2.4 trillion to the debt over the next 10 years. Others are worried about cutting Medicaid, the federal health insurance program for low-income families. And another handful of senators say they are worried about the House-passed bill rolling back renewable energy tax credits for solar, wind, geothermal and nuclear energy. "There are many of us who recognize that what came out of the House was pretty aggressive in how it seeks to wind down or phase out many of the energy tax credit provisions," said Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska. "I happen to think that we've got tax policies that are working to help advance our energy initiatives around the country, as diverse and as varied as they are. Wouldn't we want to continue those investments? 'This bill is the opposite of conservative, and we should not pass it,' added Sen. Rand Paul, R-Kentucky, in a June 4 social media post that raised concerns about the nation's debt limit. Missouri Sen. Josh Hawley is one of the outspoken Republicans taking issue with the House-passed bill's provisions that would cut nearly $800 billion during the next decade from Medicaid and, according to the Congressional Budget Office, cost 7.8 million people their health insurance. "I don't want to see rural hospitals close and I don't want to see any benefits cut in my state," Hawley said. Trump and his allies contend spending cuts of $1.6 trillion are the most ever approved in a House bill and that the tax cuts will spur economic growth to offset the costs. Trump got personal this week in calling Paul's ideas 'crazy' in a social media post and said the people of Kentucky 'can't stand him.' More: Trump lashes out at Sen. Rand Paul over opposition to big tax bill House Speaker Mike Johnson, a staunch Trump ally, told reporters June 4 that few people are going to like everything in an 1,100-page bill. But the Louisiana Republican said the measure he helped craft in the House was carefully calibrated to gain wide support. "I hope everybody will evaluate that – in both parties, and everybody – and recognize, 'Wow, the benefits of this far outweigh anything that I don't like out it,'" Johnson said. Senate dropping local tax deductions would be 'radioactive': Rep. Lalota Any changes made by the Senate will force another vote in the House before the bill can become law - and that's where the math can get tricky. Republican senators are talking about tinkering with a key compromise that Trump and Johnson signed off on in the House that raised the federal deduction for state and local taxes (SALT) from $10,000 to $40,000 for people earning less than $500,000 per year. That provision is important to GOP lawmakers from high-tax states such as California, New York and New Jersey who supported the House bill that passed through the 435-seat chamber by only a one-vote margin. More: Senate Republicans plan to amend SALT tax deduction in Trump's sweeping bill The Senate aims to cut back that provision. But Rep. Nick Lalota, R-New York, told reporters on June 4 that revisiting the tax issue "would be like digging up safely-buried radioactive waste." House members scouring through the bill they voted on weeks ago are also finding unfamiliar provisions in the version that they say they would have opposed. For example, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, R-Georgia, said in a social media post June 3 that the Senate needs to strip out language she hadn't noticed earlier that would prevent states from regulating artificial intelligence. Rep. Mike Flood, R-Nebraska, said he opposed a section that aims to hinder federal judges from enforcing their court orders. Trump sought the provision to prevent judges from blocking policies largely spelled out via his executive orders. Senate could drop contentious provisions House members risked supporting Even though Republicans control both chambers of Congress, the Senate could drop or fail to approve contentious parts that GOP House colleagues in competitive districts already went out on a limb to support. It's happened many times before - with sizable political consequences. The concept even has a name: Getting BTU'd. That refers to a 1993 House vote on a controversial energy tax during the first year of Bill Clinton's presidency based on British thermal units. House Democrats lost 54 seats in the 1994 election – and control of the chamber for the first time in 40 years – in part because of supporting the BTU tax that the Senate never debated. John Pitney, a political science professor at Claremont McKenna College, has said a book about such votes could be called 'Profiles in Futility.' Another example was the 2009 American Clean Energy and Security Act, a bill which Obama supported as president that aimed to limit the emissions of heat-trapping gases from power plants, vehicles and other industrial sources. The Democrat-controlled House narrowly approved the measure 219-212 but the Senate never took it up. Critics said it would raise the cost of energy. The Competitive Enterprise Institute, a non-profit libertarian think tank that opposed the measure, counted 28 House Democrats from coal states who lost their seats in the 2010 mid-term election after voting for the bill. Fast forward to 2025 and Republicans are the ones facing a similar dynamic. Musk, who contributed about $290 million of his personal fortune to help Republicans including Trump win last November, slammed House lawmakers who voted for the president's legislative package.'Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong,' Musk wrote June 3 on social media. But House Republicans who voted for the legislation, including some who also demanded deeper spending cuts when it was in their hands, said they're not worried about the package falling apart and coming back to haunt them. They say that's because they did fight for more budget cuts. "This wasn't a hard vote. It was hard going through the process to get more, and you can always do better," said Rep. Ralph Norman, R-South Carolina. "But look at what Donald Trump's done, the great things that are contributing to cutting the deficit." Rep. David Schweikert, R-Arizona, who represents a competitive toss-up district, noted that he's introduced multiple bills to trim federal spending. "If Mr. Musk wants to be helpful, what he should do is start to understand that those of us in a 50-50 district who have shown up with actual policy solutions that offset every penny of this bill," he said. Leaving Washington for the weekend, Trump told reporters aboard Air Force Once on June 6 that he wasn't worried about Musk and that he remained confident he'd get "tremendous support" in the Senate to pass the bill. 'I don't know of anybody who's going to vote against it," the president said, before adding: "Maybe Rand Paul." For his part, Johnson told reporters June 4 that he wasn't concerned about House Republicans losing seats in 2026. Predicting that the Senate would find the necessary votes on the president's tax bill, the speaker said he expects Americans will see the benefits of Trump's efforts before the next election. 'Am I concerned about the effect of this on the midterms? I'm not," Johnson said. "I have no concern whatsoever. I am absolutely convinced that we are going to win the midterms and grow the House majority because we are delivering for the American majority and fulfilling our campaign promises." Contributing: Reuters
