Qatar Defends ‘Normal' Jet Gift to Trump's US
The Qatari prime minister defended his country's offer of a $400 million 747 jet as a gift to the Trump Administration, calling it a "normal thing" for allies and done "in full transparency and very legally".
President Donald Trumpwants to accept the gift to the U.S. as a temporary replacement for the ageing Air Force One plane, which is due for an upgrade.
But the gift has sparked bipartisan criticism over ethical and national security concerns. Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-NY), the Senate minority leader, called it "naked corruption".
"I see it as a normal thing that happens between allies," Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman bin Jassim Al Thani told the Qatar Economic Forum in Doha on Tuesday.
Al Thani said he did not understand why critics viewed the gift as a form of bribery or corruption toward the Trump Administration.
"I don't see any honestly valid reason for that," he said, adding that nothing has been done "under the table" or as a "covert operation".
He noted that a lot of nations have gifted things to the U.S. and that this is subject to a "proper legal review" in what is a "clear exchange".
"I am not comparing that to the Statue of Liberty," Al Thani said.
The Qatari prime minister said he thought the reaction to the jet gift may be down to the fact that it is coming from a small Arab nation.
"I'm hoping that people in the United States and even the politicians over there, they look at us as a friend, as a partner, as a reliable partner [and] that we've been always there for the U.S. whenever we were needed," Al Thani said.
"Whether it's in the war against terror, whether it's in freeing American hostages from all around the world.
"It's not something that we've been doing to buy an influence. But this is a duty on us as a partner, as an ally of the United States, and as there is a duty for the United States towards others."
This is a breaking news story and more information will be added soon.
Related Articles
From President Trump's Tariffs to Qatari Jet Controversy: This Week in Your WordsDonald Trump Says Qatar 'Donating' Boeing 747 to USElon Musk's Cybertrucks Are Used As Police Cars in These American CitiesTrump's Qatar Nexus: The Officials With Close Ties to the Middle East State
2025 NEWSWEEK DIGITAL LLC.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'It's dangerous right now': Roughly 100 turn out to Spokane VA Medical Center to support VA workers, veterans amid planned cuts to federal agency
Jun. 6—Holding signs that read, "Hands off vets care" and "Impeach Trump, deport Elon," about 100 people stood Friday afternoon on the sidewalks outside Mann-Grandstaff VA Medical Center to rally against the planned elimination of more than 80,000 jobs at the Department of Veterans Affairs. The cuts are part of President Donald Trump's administration's efforts to reduce federal spending. "It's dangerous right now, the way everything's getting cut back or slashed completely," said Dianne Denenny, who worked as a nurse at the Spokane VA Medical Center for five years before retiring one year ago. "We will be seeing deaths from polio to lack of services at the VA. Some of it will be a matter of time before we see the true consequences, and everybody deserves to be taken care of. These men and women sacrificed a lot, and they deserve all the care we can give them." Besides supporting the VA and its workers, Denenny, who wore a black shirt that said, "V.A. Nurse" in red letters, held signs that supported education funding and opposed U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Denenny and the men and women beside her Friday along Assembly Street carried an array of signs and American flags. They received several honks from drivers during the afternoon commute home. The Spokane protesters were joined by rallies across the country that voiced their displeasure with the Trump administration's planned VA cuts. The cuts would slash employment by more than 17% at the federal agency. More than 25% of the VA workforce is made up of veterans. Friday also marked the 81st anniversary of the D-Day invasion, when Allied Forces stormed the beaches of Normandy, France, from the sea and parachuted into the countryside from the air. Kim Montoya and Petra Hoy coordinated the Spokane VA rally, called "Federal Friday — Hands off the VA — Defend the Constitution." Hoy, of the grassroots organization Be the Change 509 — East Side Gladiators, said they put on a rally for a different cause every Friday. She said they delivered cookies, treats and thank-you cards to VA workers before Friday's event to show them their appreciation. "I think they were really touched," Hoy said. "It was really nice." Montoya, a U.S. Army veteran, said she wanted to support veterans and federal workers and all the work they do for people across the nation. "We're supporting them and hopefully keeping our democracy intact," said Montoya, who held a "Honk for democracy" sign. Hoy said the Federal Friday events build "community" and friendships. "That's really important, too, I think, especially when things get tough," Hoy said. Jerry Smith, a U.S. Marine Corps and Army reserve veteran of 33 years, said he volunteered for eight years for Disabled American Veterans, an organization that helps veterans, by picking up veterans and bringing them to their appointments at the Spokane VA. Holding a sign supporting the hands-off-veterans' benefits theme, Smith called the VA cuts and other federal government cuts "ridiculous." "It's pretty damn sad to do that to America — to have (Elon Musk) come in and just, not an elected official, and start making cuts," said Smith, who wore a camouflage Army hat and camouflage shorts. "I mean, thousands of people are unemployed now because of him." Smith, who was joined by his wife, Susan Smith, said veterans need support. "They need their benefits," Jerry smith said, "they earned 'em,"
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump plays to MAGA base with return of Kilmar Abrego Garcia: Cuomo
(NewsNation) — The Trump administration's about-face in returning Salvadoran migrant Kilmar Abrego Garcia to face charges of human trafficking in the U.S. is simply the latest strategy to get political mileage from the deportation saga, Chris Cuomo says. 'Trump wants this issue because it works for him,' he says. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Business Insider
an hour ago
- Business Insider
Americans are questioning the value of a college degree. Trump is joining the debate.
President Donald Trump wants to tweak a traditionalfeature of the American dream: a college degree. Trump has continued to escalate his battle with Harvard University, threatening to cut off the Ivy League school from federal funding if it does not meet the administration's demands, which include eliminating diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives and cracking down on campus activism. The latest threat against Harvard, however, floated shifting funding to trade schools, an alternative path to a four-year college degree. "I am considering taking Three Billion Dollars of Grant Money away from a very antisemitic Harvard, and giving it to TRADE SCHOOLS all across our land," Trump wrote in a May 26 post on Truth Social. "What a great investment that would be for the USA, and so badly needed!!!" The White House's press secretary, Karoline Leavitt, added onto the president's comments in an interview with Fox News: "Apprenticeships, electricians, plumbers, we need more of those in our country, and less LGBTQ graduate majors from Harvard University. And that's what this administration's position is." Over the past few years, a growing number of Americans have started to question the value of a college degree due to high costs and a tough labor market, making trade schools and apprenticeships a favorable alternative. It marks a shift in the standard American dream, in which a four-year college degree had been viewed as a step to middle-class success. However, Jon Fansmith, assistant vice president of government relations at the American Council on Education, told Business Insider that taking funding away from Harvard and other research institutions isn't the answer to boosting investment in trade schools. "The money that he is talking about withholding from Harvard is money that Congress provided to research agencies to perform advanced scientific and biomedical research," Fansmith said, adding that Harvard earned grant money because "they had the best researchers, the best laboratory facilities, the best understanding of how to advance that science," he continued. "You can't simply take that money and use it for another purpose." Madi Biedermann, deputy assistant secretary for communications at the Department of Education, told BI that "American universities that are committed to their academic mission, protect students on campus, and follow all federal laws will have no problem accessing generous taxpayer support for their programs." 'Two very separate stories' Higher education doesn't have the same draw that it once did. Some Gen Zers previously told BI that despite being taught that college was the primary path to success, they felt they could make a living by directly entering the workforce or going to trade school. Please help BI improve our Business, Tech, and Innovation coverage by sharing a bit about your role — it will help us tailor content that matters most to people like you. What is your job title? (1 of 2) Entry level position Project manager Management Senior management Executive management Student Self-employed Retired Other Continue By providing this information, you agree that Business Insider may use this data to improve your site experience and for targeted advertising. By continuing you agree that you accept the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy . That's why Trump's push to invest more in trade schools is important, Fansmith said — they help Americans get a stable career to support themselves and their families, and the federal government can help support those schools by asking Congress to approve more funding, not redirecting the funding unilaterally. "There are two stories here. One is this administration's attack on Harvard, and the other is, what is the role of trade schools, and is there a need for more support for trade schools? And as much as the president's trying to conflate the two, those are two very separate stories," Fansmith said. While Trump's big spending bill proposes some provisions to expand Pell grant eligibility to short-term programs, it does not detail a significant funding increase for trade schools. The Trump administration's rhetorical focus on trade schools isn't new. Before he won the 2024 election, Linda McMahon, now Trump's education secretary, wrote an opinion piece in The Hill advocating for the expansion of Pell Grant eligibility to workforce training programs. "Our educational system must offer clear and viable pathways to the American Dream aside from four-year degrees," she wrote. Trump also signed an executive order on April 23 to strengthen and expand workforce development and apprenticeships programs, which McMahon called a "significant step in ensuring every American can live their American Dream." Congress' role in rethinking education For years, Democratic lawmakers have been pushing for greater access to postsecondary education options, like free community college, and there has been bipartisan agreement on the need to boost apprenticeships and workforce programs without redirecting funding from higher education institutions. Amid the heightened focus on alternatives to a four-year college degree, the New York Federal Reserve said in a recent report that college still pays off; the median worker with a college degree earns about $80,000 a year, compared to $47,000 for a worker with just a high school diploma. Trump hasn't yet implemented his idea to redirect Harvard's federal funding to trade schools, and it's unclear how, or if, he will attempt to follow through. While he has already withheld billions of dollars from Harvard and other schools across the country for failing to meet his administration's political demands, the moves have been met with lawsuits, and Fansmith said it's likely more legal action would ensue should Trump attempt to move around funding without congressional approval. "We're talking about spending money that Congress said would go to support really critically needed research into things like cancer and Alzheimer's and diabetes, and other things that impact everyday Americans' lives, and give it to trade schools," Fansmith said. "Trade schools are great schools. They have lots of benefits. They deserve a lot of federal support, but not just to make a political point at the expense of Harvard." Jason Altmire, president and CEO of Career Education Colleges and Universities — a group that represents for-profit colleges — said in a statement that Trump's focus on trade schools "is an investment in America's workforce." "The best way to support trade schools is to reduce the regulatory burden facing private career schools while increasing funding that allows students interested in the trades to choose the highest quality school," Altmire said.
