Uni could shed 285 jobs in 'worst case scenario'
The University of Lincoln said it had entered a "significant new phase of organisational restructuring and reform".
The University and College Union told the BBC it believes 285 jobs could be lost.
However, a university spokesperson said that figure would be a "worst case scenario", adding it is doing all it can to mitigate the number of job losses and reducing the need for compulsory redundancies.
Dr Owen Clayton, chairman of the University and College Union, said it does not accept compulsory redundancies are necessary, adding it is "a red line" for members.
The university spokesperson said it recognised that the UK higher education sector is "undergoing significant change".
"We must face into, and adapt to, the financial implications, including structuring to further enable diversity of income, to ensure we keep delivering for our students, city and region," they said.
The university has announced a voluntary redundancy scheme, with enhanced terms, and launched a consultation on departmental restructures, which it said "may result in some redundancies".
"We're continuing to take prudent, practical measures to balance income and expenditure as we plan for a bright future ahead. This includes careful management of staff costs, our single biggest area of expenditure," the spokesperson added.
The university made clear it is not in deficit and expects to "return a break-even position" in this financial year, but the spokesperson added that "financial headwinds facing universities have not gone away".
Listen to highlights from Lincolnshire on BBC Sounds, watch the latest episode of Look North or tell us about a story you think we should be covering here.
University warns of potential job cuts
Uni job cuts could affect reputation - watchdog
University of Lincoln
University and College Union

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Miami Herald
15 hours ago
- Miami Herald
Supermarket chain tries daring new way to catch shoplifters
Shoplifting has become a growing problem for retailers partly because stores have made stealing easy. Self-checkout has made it very challenging for a retailer to know when a customer has made a reasonable effort, but an item did not scan and when the customer intended to steal the item. Accusing a person of shoplifting also has its problems, In theory, cashiers and other store personnel can do this, but that creates a somewhat dangerous situation. Related: CVS, Target, Walmart: Which sell Plan B and/or the abortion pill? In most cases, it takes multiple thefts for a person to be confronted over shoplifting. That does eliminate frequent thieves, and it's generally driven by store security, making it safer for workers, but that's only a small piece of the problem. Iceland, a grocery chain in the United Kingdom, has decided to make its customers part of the problem. The company plans to pay its customers, in the form of a credit, to report a theft in progress to staff. Iceland Executive Chairman Richard Walker told the BBC that shoppers who alert staff to a theft in progress will receive a £1 credit on their Iceland Bonus Card. The grocery chain estimates that shoplifting costs its business around £20m each year. "Walker said this figure not only impacts the company's bottom line, but also limits its ability to reduce prices and reinvest in staff wages," according to the BBC. The impact of theft isn't theoretical; it's very real, according to a research report, "The Pass-through of Retail Crime," by Carl Hase and Johannes Kasinger of Cornell University. Walker, using simpler words, said essentially the same thing. "Some people see this as a victimless crime; it is not. It's a cost to the business, to the hours we pay our colleagues, and it involves intimidation and violence," he said. "We'd like customers to help us lower our prices even more by pointing out shoplifters." Related: Target thinks cheap prices can help it win Halloween Shoplifting incidents in 2023 rose 93% compared to 2019. Losses from these incidents increased 90% over the same time frame. On average, retailers experienced 177 shoplifting incidents per day in 2023. In certain sectors, daily incidents exceeded 1,000. Violence and aggression in shoplifting: 73% of retailers reported more violent or aggressive behavior from shoplifters compared to the previous year. 91% noted increased aggression since 2019. Organized Retail Crime (ORC) involvement: 62% of retailers say multi-person theft (2-3 individuals working together) is a growing concern. 76% see ORC-linked shoplifting as a bigger issue than a year ago. Among retailers tracking ORC specifically, ORC incidents rose 57% from 2022 to 2023.2025 NRF Update: 42% of surveyed retailers reported an increase in shoplifting events involving threats or actual trend shows that 2024 mid-year shoplifting rates exceeded those for the same period in 2023, suggesting that the full-year 2024 numbers likely surpassed 2023's. The 2024 NRF report signals a dramatic escalation in shoplifting and retail crime as well as increase financial impact versus pre-pandemic levels. Violence associated with these crimes has surged, and involvement of organized retail crime has notably intensified. Early 2025 data further shows that these troubling trends continued into 2024, with rising incidents and growing retailer concern. The idea of paying people to report shoplifting has not been studied much, but a report from the U.S. Department of Justice suggests it won't. "Hundreds of innovative community-action programs have been designed to encourage citizen involvement by offering a monetary reward and anonymity to encourage citizens to report a crime," the report shared. An experiment was conducted to see how well this idea works. In the experiment, conditions of anonymity and reward were unobtrusively varied during a simulated interview conducted with 120 shoppers before they entered a large supermarket. The results were not encouraging. "Results revealed a significant relationship between the subjects' behavioral intentions and reporting behaviors, and indicated that reward and anonymity do not affect the reporting of a crime. No significant increase in reporting behavior was found when a reward was offered," the experiment found. The study suggested that reporting behavior "is intrinsically motivated at a high level and is therefore not initially affected by the presence of an external thus indicate that reward and anonymity may not be as effective as the public was led to believe by community action programs." Related: Walmart workers' new benefit good for all grocery workers Question: Does paying customers to report shoplifting actually work?Answer: Research suggests not. A U.S. Department of Justice experiment found that offering monetary rewards and anonymity did not significantly increase reporting behavior. Question: Have any supermarkets tried paying customers to report theft?Answer: Yes. Iceland, a UK grocery chain, offers customers a £1 credit on their Bonus Card for alerting staff to theft in progress. The program is meant to reduce losses without putting staff or customers in What do experts say about monetary rewards for crime reporting?Answer: Studies indicate that while rewards can seem appealing, they may not meaningfully change behavior, and the effectiveness of such programs is largely unproven. The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
How Much More Expensive 3 Apple Products Might be Due to Trump's Tariffs
According to BBC, a large percentage of Apple products are assembled in China and are subjected to President Trump's tariffs. 'Apple may decide to raise prices to fully cover the tariffs, but a more likely scenario is that the company chooses to accept some lower margins as well so that revenue is not so heavily affected,' Dave Novosel, senior bond analyst at Gimme Credit, said. 'These price increases could span across its portfolio of products, but not necessarily at a similar rate.' For You: Try This: Apple CEO Tim Cook appeared at the White House on August 6 to confirm his commitment to having iPhones made in America and stated he plans to spend $600 billion over the next four years in the U.S., CNBC reported. But for now, products are manufactured and assembled overseas. Here are three popular Apple products that may become more expensive for U.S. buyers if tariffs on China return in full force. iPhone 17 Pro: How Tariffs Could Add $100 or More to the Price The iPhone 17 Pro is expected to drop on September 25, per MacRumors, which would have taken a big hit since it's made in China. 'This is Apple's most profitable product and it depends heavily on components manufactured in China, from chips to casings,' said Danny Ray, founder of PinnacleQuote. 'Even a 10% to 15% tariff on imported parts could raise the retail price by $80 to $120, depending on the model.' Check Out: MacBook Air (M4): What a 10% Tariff Means for Your Wallet The MacBook Air is one of the brand's best-selling laptops and as of August 11, you can grab one on Amazon for $800 — just in time for last-minute back-to-school shopping. That's a $200 savings. But that deal won't last long, especially if tariffs do happen. 'Laptops require a vast array of specialized parts, most of which are sourced from China or assembled there,' Ray explained. 'In fact, a 10% tariff on these imports could translate into an extra $100 to $150 per unit for consumers.' AirPods Pro (2nd Gen): Price Bump on the Horizon? Known for their superior noise cancellation feature, AirPods Pro (2nd Gen) are ideal for tuning people out and listening to music uninterrupted for up to six hours before having to recharge. But they could soar in price. 'These are made almost entirely in Chinese facilities,' Ray said. 'If tariffs hit at the expected 10% to 15% rate, production costs could rise enough to push the retail price up by $20 to $30.' Will Customers Feel the Pain? While Apple has been eating the cost of tariffs to prevent the added expense from trickling down to consumers, that won't last forever. 'Overall, tariffs rarely stay on paper; the added costs often end up in the hands of the consumer, especially in industries like electronics, where margins are tightly managed and production is globally integrated,' Ray said. But potential rising prices may not matter to Apple's loyal fan base, according to Joe Camberato, CEO of 'Most people aren't dropping a $1,000 all at once anymore; Apple is rolling these costs into monthly payments,' he said. 'So even if prices jump 10% or 20%, I don't see it stopping people from lining up for the next iPhone.' Editor's note: Pricing and availability may vary depending on location. More From GOBankingRates 3 Luxury SUVs That Will Have Massive Price Drops in Summer 2025 8 Common Mistakes Retirees Make With Their Social Security Checks I'm a Retired Boomer: 6 Bills I Canceled This Year That Were a Waste of Money This article originally appeared on How Much More Expensive 3 Apple Products Might be Due to Trump's Tariffs Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Retiree devastated after dream home quickly turns into nightmare: 'This was my perfect spot'
Retiree devastated after dream home quickly turns into nightmare: 'This was my perfect spot' Beverly Morris thought she had found her forever home. Nestled in the quiet, rural area of Mansfield, Georgia, it was the ideal retirement retreat. That was, until a nearby tech development upended everything. Just 400 yards from her porch now sits a massive data center owned by Meta. Recently, Morris told the BBC that her well water has become filled with sediment, which she attributes to the data center's construction. What's happening? Data centers are spreading across small-town America to support cloud computing and energy-hungry artificial intelligence tools. But many local residents say they are dealing with real impacts. In Morris's case, she says Meta's facility disturbed her private well, filling it with sludge and leaving her to haul buckets of water just to flush a toilet. "I'm afraid to drink the water, but I still cook with it, and brush my teeth with it," she told the BBC. Meta denies responsibility, citing an independent study that found no adverse effects on local groundwater. But for Morris, the disruption feels personal. "This was my perfect spot," she said. "But it isn't anymore." Why are data centers concerning? Data centers, while essential to modern life, are extremely resource-intensive, especially when it comes to water. Some rely on evaporative cooling systems that can use millions of gallons of water on hot days. Globally, AI-driven data centers are projected to consume 1.7 trillion gallons of water annually by 2027. In regions like rural Georgia, which are attractive to developers due to their humid climate and access to water, this can come at the expense of local residents. Activists and researchers have raised alarms over sediment runoff, water contamination, and the social equity concerns when major corporations disrupt environments without accountability. What's being done to make the data industry more sustainable? Some tech companies, including Meta and Amazon Web Services, say they're investing in long-term water stewardship, from using recycled water to improving watershed health. Amazon has pledged to replenish more water than it uses by 2030 and is funding water projects in the U.S. and abroad. Other tech companies are developing innovative solutions to mitigate their environmental impacts. Advocacy groups like Flint Riverkeeper are pushing for stricter oversight and accountability in data center construction. They argue that no corporation's bottom line should outweigh a homeowner's own property rights and at home can help by using technology like ChatGPT and similar services more sparingly. Consider this: one ChatGPT query uses 10 times more electricity than a Google search — so if more people reserved AI tools for only necessary, complicated tasks, it could make a notable difference. Do you worry about having toxic forever chemicals in your home? Majorly Sometimes Not really I don't know enough about them Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet. Solve the daily Crossword