logo
Experts stunned by bizarre reaction from birds exposed to unusual disturbance: 'Significant impact'

Experts stunned by bizarre reaction from birds exposed to unusual disturbance: 'Significant impact'

Yahoo20-04-2025
In a new study published in the journal Animal Behaviour, scientists observed a worrisome behavioral change in the Galápagos yellow warbler, a bright yellow songbird native to the Galápagos Islands. Researchers found the birds are behaving more aggressively — and it appears to be linked to human-induced noise in their habitat. ​
As Anglia Ruskin University reported via Phys.org, researchers conducted a study in the Galápagos Islands, where they played recorded traffic noise at 38 locations home to the yellow warblers. What they discovered was that the more traffic the warblers had been exposed to, the more aggressively they responded to the sounds. The behavior was even observed in birds on Floreana Island, which has only 10 cars — showing that it doesn't take much noise pollution to seriously affect wildlife.
"Our study shows the importance of considering behavioral plasticity in conservation efforts and developing strategies to mitigate the effects of noise pollution on wildlife," said co-author Caglar Akcay, a senior lecturer in behavioral ecology at ARU. "It also highlights the significant impact of human activities on wildlife behavior, even in relatively remote locations such as the Galápagos Islands."
​Noise pollution can stress animals, alter their behavior, and disrupt their communication methods — one reason researchers believe these yellow warblers become more physically aggressive. When this happens, the negative consequences can ripple across ecosystems.
Not only does noise pollution affect wildlife, but it's also unhealthy for humans. According to the Environmental Protection Agency, studies have found direct links between noise pollution and health issues such as high blood pressure, sleep loss, loss of productivity, and stress-related illnesses. Protecting wildlife from noise may also mean creating healthier spaces for ourselves.
Researchers say we should proactively address noise pollution to better protect ourselves and the environment. Some strategies include creating buffer zones, regulating traffic near wildlife areas, and raising public awareness. Government regulation helps on a broader scale — for example, the European Commission included minimizing noise pollution in its Zero Pollution Action Plan. Also, nonprofits, including the Noise Pollution Clearinghouse, raise awareness and work for stronger laws to control noise pollution.
Individuals can also help. Supporting policies that prioritize green spaces, buffer zones, and quieter transportation; walking or biking instead of driving; and practicing a quieter version of "leave no trace" while in nature are all meaningful steps. Investing in cleaner, quieter technologies such as electric vehicles and sustainable public transit can make a big difference — not just for people but for wildlife too.
Do you worry about air pollution in and around your home?
Yes — always
Yes — often
Yes — sometimes
No — never
Click your choice to see results and speak your mind.
Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

What to know about game-changing new weight-loss pill that could be prescribed on the NHS
What to know about game-changing new weight-loss pill that could be prescribed on the NHS

Yahoo

time08-08-2025

  • Yahoo

What to know about game-changing new weight-loss pill that could be prescribed on the NHS

Is it more or less effective than weight-loss jabs? A new study found the pill could help shed 12% of body weight. A daily pill that could help people lose a significant amount of weight – without injections – has shown promising early results in a major trial. The drug, called orforglipron, works in a similar way to known weight-loss jabs like Wegovy and Mounjaro, targeting hormones that regulate appetite and digestion. But instead of a weekly injection, it's taken daily in tablet form. In a study of more than 3,000 adults, those on the highest dose lost an average of 12.4% of their body weight over 72 weeks (almost 17 months) – that's nearly two stone for some. The trial also reported improvements in cholesterol, blood pressure and heart health, according to the study. Manufacturer Eli Lilly, the American pharmaceutical company which also created Mounjaro, says it plans to seek regulatory approval by the end of the year. Experts are cautiously optimistic, but stress the results are still preliminary and not yet peer reviewed. Here's what we know about the weight-loss pill so far. How does the weight-loss pill compare to injections? In head-to-head comparisons, injectables still lead on weight loss. Trials show Mounjaro users lose around 20% of their body weight, and Wegovy users about 13–14%. orforglipron's 12.4% average is slightly lower – but experts say its convenience could make it appealing. Kenneth Custer, the president of Eli Lilly, said: "With orforglipron, we're working to transform obesity care by introducing a potential once-daily oral therapy that could support early intervention and long-term disease management, while offering a convenient alternative to injectable treatments." In the trial, nearly 60% of people on the top dose lost at least 10% of their body weight, and almost 40% lost 15% or more. What about side effects? The safety profile looks similar to other GLP-1 or weight-loss drugs, like Wegovy and Mounjaro. In the trial, the most common side effects – of which some participants reported more than one – were stomach-related: Nausea: 33.7% Constipation: 25.4% Diarrhoea: 23.1% Vomiting: 24.0% Indigestion: 14.1% Most side effects were mild to moderate, but they were enough to make some people stop treatment. Around one in 10 people on the top dose dropped out because of side effects, compared to about one in forty in the placebo group, those given a dummy pill with no active medicine. "These are preliminary, non-peer-reviewed results and we will need to see the full trial methodology and data before a more comprehensive analysis can be undertaken," Dr Simon Cork, senior lecturer in physiology at Anglia Ruskin University told The Times. "It should be noted that their effects on weight loss are not as profound as those seen in injectable GLP-1 receptor agonists, such as Wegovy, with a lower percentage weight loss and fewer people achieving 10 per cent weight loss at the highest dose. "Nevertheless, that this medication is an oral form, rather than injectable, will likely be seen as more tolerable for many patients," he added. Who could get the weight-loss pill on the NHS? If approved, orforglipron would likely be prescribed under similar rules to existing weight-loss drugs. Currently, Wegovy is offered to people with a BMI of at least 35 plus a weight-related condition, or a BMI of 30–34.9 if referred to specialist services. Mounjaro is approved for those with a BMI over 30, or 27–30 with health issues such as pre-diabetes or high blood pressure. Any rollout would almost certainly involve combining the pill with the recommended reduced-calorie diet and more physical activity, just like the current injections. How much will the weight-loss pills cost? There's no official price tag yet for orforglipron. Eli Lilly hasn't confirmed how much it will sell for if approved, but experts expect it to be cheaper to manufacture than injections like Wegovy or Mounjaro. That could mean a lower cost for the NHS, and potentially make it more accessible for patients if offered privately. Read more about weight loss: Who can get new weight-loss jab Mounjaro on the NHS? (Yahoo Life UK, 4-min read) Alison Hammond reveals why she is 'frightened' of weight loss medications (Yahoo Life UK, 3-min read) Obesity rates may start falling this year due to weight loss jabs, seller says (Sky News, 4-min read)

Researchers make breakthrough in fight to save coastal feature in Hawai'i: 'Crucial for developing effective management strategies'
Researchers make breakthrough in fight to save coastal feature in Hawai'i: 'Crucial for developing effective management strategies'

Yahoo

time18-07-2025

  • Yahoo

Researchers make breakthrough in fight to save coastal feature in Hawai'i: 'Crucial for developing effective management strategies'

Researchers make breakthrough in fight to save coastal feature in Hawai'i: 'Crucial for developing effective management strategies' Hawai'i's volcanic peaks, tropical blooms, and sparkling waters are world-famous, but beneath the surface, something troubling is happening. Thick mats of red algae are rapidly smothering coral reefs in the protected Papahānaumokuākea Marine National Monument, throwing the region's delicate ecosystem out of balance. Now, scientists say they've made a key breakthrough that could help stop the spread of this reef-killing invader. What's happening? In the shallow waters of the Northwestern Hawaiian Islands, an aggressive algae species, Chondria tumulosa, is taking over, as shared. First identified in 2016, it has since expanded at a rate of nearly 45 square kilometers a year, according to satellite images from 2015 to 2021. Unlike typical marine algae, C. tumulosa forms tumbleweed-like mats that easily break off and drift with the current, rapidly colonizing new areas and suffocating coral reefs. Because scientists haven't been sure where it came from, it's been hard to stop — until now. "Understanding the origin of this potentially invasive species is crucial for developing effective management strategies," the study's lead author stated. In the new study published in PeerJ Life & Environment, researchers used genetic modeling to trace its potential source. Their goal? To give reef managers the tools they need to track, predict, and contain the algae more effectively. Why is this species concerning? Hawai'i's reefs aren't just stunning — they're essential. Reefs protect shorelines from storms, sustain local fisheries, and shape the island's culture and way of life. When something like C. tumulosa moves in, it's not just coral that suffers. These invaders can disrupt entire ecosystems. Should the government be paying people to hunt invasive species? Definitely Depends on the animal No way Just let people do it for free Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. Invasive species often outcompete native plants and wildlife for space, nutrients, and sunlight. That throws nature off balance and makes the system more vulnerable to disease and climate stress. What's being done about the algae? Thanks to this new research, conservation teams now have a significantly better chance of staying ahead of the problem. By determining where the algae originates and how it spreads, they can take more targeted steps to prevent it from growing out of control. Locals and visitors can also help by avoiding the transport of marine life, supporting reef-safe tourism, and learning more about critical climate issues. Every effort counts, and protecting native species is key to keeping Hawai'i's reefs and our shared future alive and thriving. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet. Solve the daily Crossword

Scientists make surprising discoveries in fight against emerging public health threat: 'The goal now should be to make their efforts count'
Scientists make surprising discoveries in fight against emerging public health threat: 'The goal now should be to make their efforts count'

Yahoo

time18-07-2025

  • Yahoo

Scientists make surprising discoveries in fight against emerging public health threat: 'The goal now should be to make their efforts count'

Scientists make surprising discoveries in fight against emerging public health threat: 'The goal now should be to make their efforts count' Microplastics are everywhere. They're in our oceans, our food, and even our bodies. According to a new University of Portsmouth study highlighted how public volunteers can help combat this invisible threat. What's happening? Researchers at the University of Portsmouth in the U.K. published a study examining the effectiveness of different protocols to capture plastic pollution on coastlines and whether volunteers can help fill crucial data gaps, like those reported by the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis. The research compared three leading microplastic and mesoplastic sampling methods across southern England, including two citizen science protocols and one used by European researchers. The goal was to determine which approaches are the most accurate, efficient, and easy to use. The findings revealed that while there's no one-size-fits-all method, public participation is a powerful tool. One technique, the Big Microplastic Survey, often detected more plastic than others, while AUSMAP was the fastest and most accessible. The EU's MSFD method provided the most accurate lab results but isn't practical without lab access or formal training. "In a perfect world, yes, we'd all be using the same protocol," Dr. David Jones, lead author of the study, said, per the University of Portsmouth. "But the variations in coastal geomorphology around the world make this challenging. We are not going to stop volunteers from getting involved — nor should we. The goal now should be to make their efforts count, even if their methods differ." Why are microplastics important to study? Plastic pollution is one of the most widespread environmental issues and is increasingly becoming a human health crisis. According to the study, up to 13 million tons of plastic enter our oceans every year. Larger plastics break down into smaller pieces called microplastics and mesoplastics, which can be easily ingested by marine life and passed on to humans through the food chain. Recent studies have detected plastic particles in human blood, lungs, and even the placenta. While we're just beginning to understand the long-term health impacts, early research suggests potential links to inflammation, hormone disruption, and increased toxicity. Better data collection leads to better chances to address the issue and protect our long-term health. "When it comes to understanding our plastic-choked coastlines, every piece of data counts — no matter how it's collected," Dr. Michelle Hale, co-author of the study, said, per the University of Portsmouth. What's being done about plastic pollution? While international organizations work toward global protocols, this research highlights the role of everyday people in tracking and combating pollution. Volunteer-based methods may not be perfect, but they are valuable, especially as researchers work to bridge the gap between different tools and environments. Do you think America has a plastic waste problem? Definitely Only in some areas Not really I'm not sure Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. The study advocates for improved systems that allow for more effective comparison of data from various methods. In the meantime, individual action still matters. Reducing reliance on single-use plastics, choosing reusable alternatives, and supporting policies to limit plastic pollution can all contribute to the solution. Join our free newsletter for weekly updates on the latest innovations improving our lives and shaping our future, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet. Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store