
Chimney goes up as countdown begins: 10 things to know about papal conclaves
Preparations are underway at the Vatican as the Catholic Church braces for the start of a new papal conclave on May 7. The chimney that will signal the election of Pope Francis' successor was installed atop the Sistine Chapel Friday, marking a key moment in the sacred event.
After every two voting rounds, ballots are burned in a special furnace to communicate the outcome. Black smoke, created using potassium perchlorate, anthracene, and sulfur, signals no decision. White smoke—produced with potassium chlorate, lactose, and chloroform resin—announces a successful election.
It was this white smoke that billowed over St. Peter's Square on the fifth ballot in March 13, 2013, moments before Cardinal Jorge Mario Bergoglio emerged as Pope Francis.
While the conclave stirs global anticipation, here are 10 lesser-known facts about its history and process:
1. The Sistine Chapel hasn't always hosted the conclave
The first conclave under Michelangelo's iconic ceiling took place in 1492. Since 1878, the Sistine Chapel has become the fixed venue, with cardinal-electors now staying in the nearby Domus Santa Marta.
2. The longest conclave in history lasted nearly three years
The election of Pope Gregory X took an extraordinary 1,006 days, from November 1268 to September 1271. Frustrated by the delay, Viterbo residents locked the cardinals in and eventually tore the roof off the building to speed up the process.
3. The shortest conclave took just hours
While modern rules enforce a waiting period, some past conclaves moved swiftly. The 1503 conclave that elected Pope Julius II took only a few hours—likely the shortest ever under current waiting rules.
4. Conclaves weren't always held in Rome
While most papal elections took place in Rome, some happened elsewhere. Viterbo, Perugia, Arezzo, Venice, Konstanz (Germany), and Lyon (France) have all hosted conclaves.
5. Popes have ranged from teenagers to octogenarians
Pope John XII was just 18 when elected in 955, while Popes Celestine III and Celestine V were nearly 85 at the time of their elections. Benedict XVI was 78 when chosen in 2005.
6. Not all popes were cardinals or Italians
Urban VI, elected in 1378, was the last pope who wasn't a cardinal. Over the centuries, non-Italians like Alexander VI (Spain), Gregory III (Syria), Adrian VI (Netherlands), John Paul II (Poland), Benedict XVI (Germany), and Francis (Argentina) have all broken the Italian dominance.
7. One meal a day
To prevent future delays, Gregory X decreed in 1274 that cardinals would be limited to one meal a day after three days of voting. After eight days, they'd receive only bread, water, and wine. This rule has since been dropped.
8. The Western Schism led to multiple popes
From 1378 to 1417, rival papal claimants—known as antipopes—split the Church. Clement VII, Benedict XIII, Alexander V, and John XXIII were all elected by opposing factions. The schism ended with the 1417 election of Martin V.
9. Strict secrecy governs every conclave
The term 'conclave' derives from cum clave—'with a key'—signifying the locked and secluded setting of the election. Gregory X established this rule to prevent political interference after the 13th-century delays.
10. Hygiene used to be a real concern
Before the Domus Santa Marta residence opened in 1996, cardinals slept on cots in overcrowded rooms. Conclaves in earlier centuries were described as foul-smelling and disease-prone. Some electors left seriously ill.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The Hindu
5 hours ago
- The Hindu
Thousands of demonstrators march through Rome, calling for immediate end to war in Gaza
Tens of thousands of demonstrators marched through the streets of Rome on Saturday (June 7, 2025) against the war in Gaza in a protest called by Italy's main opposition parties, who accuse the right-wing government of being too silent. Protesters held a banner reading 'Stop the massacre, stop complicity!' at the start of the march, which moved peacefully through the center of Rome amid a massive display of rainbow, Palestinian and political party flags. The protest attracted a diverse crowd from across the country, including many families with children. According to organisers, up to 300,000 people participated in the rally organized by the leftist opposition to ask the government for a clear position on the conflict in Gaza. Also Read | Netanyahu says Israel has 'activated' some Palestinian clans opposed to Hamas 'This is an an enormous popular response to say enough to the massacre of Palestinians and the crimes of (Israeli leader Benjamin) Netanyahu's government,' the leader of Italy's center-left Democratic Party, Elly Schlein, told reporters at the march. 'There is another Italy that doesn't remain silent as the Meloni government does,' she said, referring to Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni. Ms Meloni was recently pushed by the opposition to publicly condemn Mr Netanyahu's offensive in Gaza, but many observers considered her criticism too timid. Also Read | Recognising Palestinian state now would send 'wrong signal': Germany '(The Italian government) is not reacting despite an abnormal massacre, despite an absolutely cruel and inappropriate reaction. The (Italian) government remains silent,' said Nadin Unali, a Tunisian demonstrator at the march. Earlier this week, the Italian premier urged Israel to immediately halt its military campaign in Gaza, saying its attacks had grown disproportionately and should be brought to an end to protect civilians. Israel faces mounting international criticism for its offensive and pressure to let aid into Gaza during a humanitarian crisis. Gaza has been under an Israeli blockade for nearly three months, with experts warning that many of its 2 million residents are at high risk of famine. The war broke out on October 7, 2023, when Hamas-led militants launched a surprise attack on Israel, killing some 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and abducted 251 hostages. They are still holding 56 hostages, around a third of them believed to be alive. Since then, Israel has killed more than 54,000 Palestinians in its military campaign, primarily women and children, according to the Gaza Health Ministry, which does not distinguish between civilians and combatants in its figures.


Hindustan Times
8 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Has Khaby Lame been deported? ICE issues statement on Las Vegas arrest
Social media influencer Khabane 'Khaby' Lame was detained by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) in Nevada on Friday over alleged immigration violations. ICE confirmed the incident in a statement to Men's Journal, noting that Lame was later granted 'voluntary departure' and has since left the country. Political activist Bo Loudon was the first to share the news publicly, claiming in a post on X (formerly Twitter) that Lame had been arrested in Las Vegas and was being held at the Henderson Detention Center. 'President Trump's ICE just officially arrested far-left TikToker, Khaby Lame, whom I reported as an illegal alien. According to the official DHS website, he's currently being held at the Henderson Detention Center and is in ICE CUSTODY,' Loudon wrote on X on Friday. In a follow-up post, Loudon wrote, 'Meet far-left TikTok star 'Khaby Lame.' He's an ILLEGAL ALIEN! I've been working with the patriots at President Trump's DHS to make this happen. He was just ARRESTED in Vegas and is in ICE CUSTODY! To verify, go to ICE's Locator, type the A-number, and Senegal as country." Loudon also shared what he claimed was a screenshot from ICE's online detainee locator tool, listing Lame as in custody. However, confusion spread online after Lame appeared active on social media. He posted multiple times on both his Instagram Story and TikTok page following the reports, leading fans to question the authenticity of the claims. Despite this, ICE confirmed the detention in a formal statement to Men's Journal. Following ICE's confirmation, Loudon posted again: "President Trump's ICE just announced the largest TikTok user, ILLEGAL ALIEN Khaby Lame, has "departed" the U.S. after being taken into custody. No one works faster than President Trump's administration." Loudon also shared a screenshot of an email allegedly from an ICE spokesperson. The mail stated: "U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement detained Seringe Khabane Lame, 25, a citizen of Italy, June 6, at the Harry Reid International Airport, Las Vegas, Nevada for immigration violations. Lame entered the United States April 30 and overstayed the terms of his visa. Lame was granted voluntary departure June 6 and has since departed the U.S.' Also Read: Paramount ICE raids: What is happening near Home Depot and why are people getting arrested? Khabane 'Khaby' Lame, 25, is a Senegalese-born Italian content creator and the most-followed individual on TikTok, boasting over 162 million followers as of 2025. He rose to international fame during the COVID-19 pandemic for his silent, humorous reactions to overcomplicated life hacks. Lame has since made it to Fortune's 40 Under 40 and Forbes' 30 Under 30 lists.


The Wire
9 hours ago
- The Wire
Nijjar & After: Facing Flak, Canadian PM says Progress in ‘Accountability' Paved Way for Modi G7 Invite
New Delhi: Faced with questions over the invitation to Indian prime minister Narendra Modi for G7 summit, Canadian prime minister Mark Carney defended his decision, saying New Delhi had agreed to resume law enforcement dialogue in a way that 'recognises issues of accountability,' even as high-profile criminal investigations remains underway. On the evening of June 6 in Delhi, Modi posted on X about a phone call with Carney, noting that he had accepted the invitation to attend the G7 summit in the course of the call. The invitation came just over a week before the summit is scheduled to begin on June 15. Other non-G7 invitees, such as South Africa, Brazil, and Mexico, were invited at least a month in advance. Carney's office issued a readout, saying there 'was agreement to continued law enforcement dialogue and discussions addressing security concerns.' Following Modi's post, in Ottawa, Carney was pressed by reporters about the optics of inviting Modi, given that the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) has previously alleged the involvement of Indian government agents in a campaign of ' violent criminal activity ' in Canada and also accused them of orchestrating the June 2023 killing of Khalistani separatist Hardeep Singh Nijjar. India and Canada currently have vacant high commissioner posts in each other's capitals, after the top envoys were forced out last year. 'Won't disrupt process' Carney acknowledged the sensitivity of the issue but maintained that his government would not interfere in the legal process. 'We have now agreed, importantly, to continued law enforcement dialogue. So there's been some progress on that, which recognises issues of accountability,' he said, when asked directly why the Indian leader was being invited despite the allegations . He reiterated that the ongoing investigation would remain fully independent. 'We are a country of the rule of law. The rule of law is proceeding as it should in Canada, and I am not going to disrupt that process,' he said. India, for its part, has firmly rejected the allegations levelled by Canadian security agencies, including broader claims of foreign interference in electoral affairs. Canada had last year even accused Indian home minister Amit Shah of being involved in the alleged plot to target Canadian nationals. New Delhi has insisted that Canada has ' not shared with us any shred of evidence ' regarding the involvement of Indian agents in the Nijjar case so far. However, Indian authorities have cooperated with the United States , which has connected its own attempted assassination case involving a US-based Khalistani separatist to Nijjar's murder. Carney refused to say whether he believed Modi was involved in Nijjar's killing. 'First off, there is a legal process that is literally underway and quite advanced in Canada. It's never appropriate to make comments in any respect with regard to those legal processes,' he said. Carney also laid out the broader rationale for the invitation, pointing to Canada's role as this year's G7 chair and the need to engage India on global strategic and economic issues. 'First, we are in the role, Canada is in the role, of the G7 chair, and in those discussions, as agreed with our G7 colleagues, we're addressing important issues like energy security, the digital future, and critical minerals, among others,' he said. 'Partnerships in building infrastructure in the emerging and developing world are also part of the agenda. There are certain countries that should be at the table for those discussions,' Carney stated. 'In my capacity as G7 chair, and in consultation with others, some of whom also make these determinations, it makes sense to include India, the fifth-largest economy in the world, effectively the most populous country, and central to a number of those supply chains.' 'Won't even get a slap on the wrist' According to Globe and Mail , the decision to invite Modi drew criticism from within Carney's party as well. Liberal MP Sukh Dhaliwal, whose constituency in British Columbia includes the temple where Nijjar was killed, said he did not agree with the government's decision to invite Modi. 'My constituents are telling me the message that we are sending is they can come and kill Canadians on Canadian soil and they won't even get a slap on the wrist,' he said. Opposition leader of the Conservative Party, Pierre Poilievre, said that the invitation was 'necessary', but that conversations on security issues should remain on the table along with economic matters. 'We need to sell our natural gas, our civilian nuclear power technology and other resource projects to India,' he said Friday, as quoted by CBC news , adding, 'We want to see the government work on addressing security issues at the same time when the prime minister has those conversations'. The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments.