Exclusion of Aadhaar, ration cards in SIR 'patently absurd': Petitioner NGO to Supreme Court
Aadhaar
and ration cards from the list of acceptable documents in Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of
Bihar
's
electoral rolls
is "patently absurd" and that the
Election Commission
has given no valid reason for its decision.
In a rejoinder filed in the top court, the NGO said that the Aadhaar card is one of the documents accepted for obtaining Permanent Residence Certificate, OBC/SC/ST Certificate and for passports.
Explore courses from Top Institutes in
Please select course:
Select a Course Category
Healthcare
Project Management
Public Policy
Leadership
Digital Marketing
healthcare
Technology
MCA
Operations Management
Data Science
Others
Design Thinking
Product Management
Management
MBA
PGDM
others
Data Science
CXO
Data Analytics
Artificial Intelligence
Finance
Degree
Cybersecurity
Skills you'll gain:
Financial Analysis in Healthcare
Financial Management & Investing
Strategic Management in Healthcare
Process Design & Analysis
Duration:
12 Weeks
Indian School of Business
Certificate Program in Healthcare Management
Starts on
Jun 13, 2024
Get Details
This makes "ECI's rejection of Aadhaar (which is the most widely held document) under the instant SIR order patently absurd," the NGO said.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Average Cost To Rent A Private Jet May Surprise You (View Prices)
Private Jet I Search Ads
Learn More
Undo
It said that the EC has given no valid reason to exclude Aadhaar and ration cards from the list of acceptable documents.
The NGO has contended that Electoral Registration Officers are vested with broad and unchecked discretion that could result in disenfranchisement of a significant segment of Bihar's population.
Live Events
"The petition submits that the SIR order dated June 24, 2025, if not set aside, can arbitrarily and without due process disenfranchise lakhs of citizens from electing their representatives, thereby disrupting
free and fair elections
and democracy in the country, which are part of the basic structure of the Constitution," the NGO said.
The Election Commission had justified its ongoing SIR of electoral rolls in Bihar, saying it adds to the purity of the election by "weeding out ineligible persons" from the electoral rolls.
The top court, hearing a slew of petitions against SIR in Bihar, had on July 10 had asked the Election Commission to consider Aadhaar, Voter ID and ration cards as valid documents during its ongoing Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bihar, set to go to polls later this year.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
8 minutes ago
- Business Standard
'Submit proof or stop misleading': ECI on Rahul's K'taka voter fraud claim
The Chief Electoral Officer (CEO) of Karnataka on Thursday asked Congress leader Rahul Gandhi to submit names of voters he claimed were wrongfully included or excluded from the electoral rolls, along with a signed declaration, so that appropriate action could be taken. According to a report by the Press Trust of India (PTI) citing Election Commission of India (ECI) sources, Gandhi must either submit a formal declaration under the Conduct of Election Rules, listing the alleged discrepancies, or "stop misleading" the public and "making baseless allegations" against the poll body. In a letter to Gandhi following his press conference in Delhi, the CEO said, "You had mentioned about the inclusion of ineligible electors and exclusion of eligible electors in the Electoral Rolls..." The CEO requested Gandhi to: "Sign and return the enclosed declaration/oath under Rule 20(3)(b) of the Registration of Electors Rules, 1960, along with the name(s) of such elector(s) so that necessary proceedings can be initiated." Massive voter fraud in Karnataka: Rahul Gandhi supported his statements with a live presentation, showing examples of fake and duplicate voters, citing: "This is EC data, and the EC is saying it is getting free and fair polls done. In one assembly segment, one lakh fake voters are there... this evidence is 100 per cent in black and white." He alleged a nationwide pattern of fraud, saying: "We are absolutely convinced that this crime is being done on a huge scale across the country... the Election Commission is trying to destroy the evidence." Take it as an oath: Gandhi to EC Reacting to the EC's demand for a signed declaration, Gandhi said: "I am a politician, what I say to the people is my word. I am saying it to the people publicly, take it as an oath." He added: "Interestingly, they haven't denied the information... they know the truth. We know you (EC) have done this across the country." Gandhi also called upon the judiciary to intervene, stating: "The democracy we love so much does not exist... if this is true, it's gone." He accused the Election Commission of being complicit: "If the Election Commission now does not give us electronic voter data of the last 10-15 years... they are partaking in the crime." The Congress leader issued a stern warning to officials involved in the alleged fraud: "It doesn't matter how senior or junior you are. One day, the Opposition is going to come to power and then you see what we do to you." He added, "You are attacking the foundation of what our forefathers who fought for India's freedom built and we are not going to allow you to do that, no matter who you are." Choreographed polls: Rahul Gandhi accused the ECI of working with the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), calling it a "Crime being committed against the Indian Constitution, against the Indian flag." He claimed the BJP only needed to "steal" 25 seats to stay in power: "The BJP won 25 seats in the Lok Sabha polls with less than 33,000 votes." He also questioned the fairness of the voter rolls: "Are the right people allowed to vote? Are fake people being added? Is the voter list true or not?" He pointed out that: "Anti-incumbency hits every single party, but the BJP is the only party that does not suffer anti-incumbency in a democratic framework." He criticised the extended election schedule, calling the current system "choreographed", unlike earlier when polls were conducted across the country simultaneously with minimal technology. Gandhi alleged the ECI was deliberately withholding voter data: "The Election Commission is not giving us data because they are afraid... we will do in the remaining Lok Sabha seats what we did in Mahadevapura." He added, "Then the truth of the country's democracy will come out."
Scroll.in
8 minutes ago
- Scroll.in
Rush Hour: Rahul Gandhi alleges EC colluded with BJP, 274 rescued in Uttarkashi and more
We're building a brand-new studio to bring you bold ground reports, sharp interviews, hard-hitting podcasts, explainers and more. Support Scroll's studio fund today. Congress leader Rahul Gandhi said that party workers had combed through the electoral rolls of the Mahadevapura Assembly constituency in Central Bangalore and allegedly found discrepancies in more than one lakh names. This, he claimed, was evidence that the Election Commission had colluded with the Bharatiya Janata Party in 'destroying the election system'. Gandhi alleged that there were 11,965 duplicate voters on the rolls of the constituency, 40,009 electors with fake or invalid addresses, 10,454 'bulk voters' registered at the same address, 4,132 with invalid photographs and 33,692 in whose cases voter registration forms had been misued. The BJP had won the Bengaluru Central Lok Sabha constituency in the general election last year. The Chief Electoral Officer of Karnataka asked Gandhi to send the names of electors who had been allegedly wrongly included or excluded 'so that necessary proceedings can be initiated'. The official asked Gandhi to sign an oath for each such name, adding that making false declarations was an offence. In response, Gandhi said that the Election Commission had not denied his claims. Read more. The All Assam Students' Union said that it will protest against the state government's decision to drop foreigners tribunals cases against non-Muslims who entered the state before 2015. The Assamese nationalist students' organisation also demanded the withdrawal of the Citizenship Amendment Act from the state. Scroll was the first to report on Tuesday that Assam's Bharatiya Janata Party government has asked district authorities and members of the foreigners tribunals to drop cases against persons from six communities – Hindu, Christian, Sikh, Buddhist, Jain and Parsi – who are eligible for Indian citizenship under CAA. The All Assam Students' Union said that it opposed the government's directive and demanded the cancellation of the decision that 'granted protection' to undocumented migrants. The organisation said that its members will burn copies of the order in every district headquarters on Friday. Read more. Prime Minister Narendra Modi said that India will not compromise on the interest of its farmers, livestock keepers and fisherfolk. The comment came a day after United States President Donald Trump doubled tariffs imposed on Indian goods to 50% from 25%, citing India's purchase of oil and military equipment from Russia. 'I know that I will have to personally pay a heavy price for this,' Modi said. 'But I am ready for it.' The comment was made with a direct reference to the tariffs announced by Washington. Chief Minister Pushkar Singh Dhami said that 274 persons have been rescued from Uttarakhand's Uttarkashi district, which was hit by flash floods and landslides on Tuesday. The Dharali and Harsil areas were among the worst affected, the chief minister said. Key arterial roads leading to Dharali, a major stopover en route to Gangotri town, remained blocked by landslides.
Time of India
21 minutes ago
- Time of India
Trump admin backs off immediate ban, but pressures Harvard over visas and funding
What began as a policy memo has now metastasized into one of the most consequential legal face-offs in American higher education. At the center of the storm is Harvard University, an academic titan that now finds itself locked in a protracted battle with the Trump administration, not just over billions in frozen federal research funds, but over the very future of its international student body. The dispute goes far beyond campus boundaries. It is testing the limits of executive power over academic freedom, weaponizing immigration infrastructure to target perceived ideological dissent, and redrawing the contours of America's engagement with global talent. For Harvard, the stakes are existential. For the United States, the implications are international. The trigger: SEVP certification as a political weapon In May, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) attempted a dramatic revocation of Harvard's certification under the Student and Exchange Visitor Program (SEVP), a federal designation required for enrolling international students. The justification? A tenuous blend of accusations: Unchecked campus antisemitism, concerns over influence from the Chinese Communist Party, and noncompliance with reporting requirements. A federal judge swiftly blocked the ban, calling into question both its timing and legal foundation. But the damage was already done. More than 7,000 international students at Harvard faced an abrupt threat to their immigration status, and institutions across the country watched as the government targeted one of their own in a stunning show of power, as reported by US media sources. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Mr. Bala's Powerful Intraday Strategy Revealed – No More Guesswork TradeWise Learn More Undo The latest maneuver: Tactical retreat or strategic reframe? This week, the Justice Department filed a new motion offering to 'simplify' the case. It distanced itself from the now-infamous May 22 letter by DHS Secretary Kristi Noem, which had previously served as the basis for the attempted ban. The administration now seeks to proceed through formal administrative channels, an apparent shift in tone, but not in intent. Officials say the move is designed to 'narrow the issues.' Critics say it's a strategic recalibration aimed at insulating the administration from further legal embarrassment while continuing to squeeze Harvard through bureaucratic pressure points. Despite offering to negotiate, the government claims Harvard declined a proposed meeting. Meanwhile, the broader legal war continues, with Harvard filing a separate lawsuit over the withholding of $2 billion in federal research grants, a fiscal stranglehold designed to compel compliance. The settlement trap: Monitors, money, and mandates Behind closed doors, however, another game is playing out. According to sources familiar with the negotiations, the White House is seeking a $500 million payment from Harvard as a settlement floor, an extraordinary sum that signals how high the stakes have climbed. And this isn't just about money. The administration is reportedly insisting on a deal modeled after the one recently imposed on Columbia University: a $221 million settlement that included strict limits on international student enrollment, mandatory reporting of visa infractions, and the appointment of a federal monitor embedded within the institution. For Harvard, agreeing to such terms would amount to relinquishing a core tenet of academic autonomy. For Washington, it's a litmus test of loyalty and submission. The Trump administration is positioning oversight not just as compliance, but as capitulation. Academic freedom under siege The chilling effect of this standoff is already evident. Other elite institutions, many of which rely on international students for tuition revenue and intellectual capital, are recalibrating their risk calculus. If Harvard can be stripped of access and funding under the guise of national security, no institution is immune. The targeting of international students also aligns with broader policy trends. Visa appointments are stalling. Work permit pathways are tightening. Campus-based speech is being reframed as a national threat. In this environment, academic institutions are no longer neutral grounds, they are surveillance zones and ideological battlegrounds. The bigger picture: Exporting fear, importing control What the administration is executing is not just a legal battle, but a systemic realignment. By linking federal research dollars with immigration enforcement and ideological policing, the White House is effectively recoding the governance of higher education. It's a message to all universities: Comply with our worldview, or pay a price. The SEVP certification, once a benign bureaucratic requirement, is now a tactical lever. It turns student mobility into an instrument of statecraft, one that can be granted or revoked based on political favor. This sets a dangerous precedent, not just for Harvard, but for global academic cooperation. An inflection point for American academia As the court date looms and negotiations remain fraught, Harvard stands at a critical crossroads. Caving to federal pressure may protect access to funding and visa programs, but at the cost of institutional sovereignty. Defiance, on the other hand, risks isolation and prolonged legal warfare. This isn't merely a case of one university versus one administration. It's a referendum on the soul of American higher education, on whether it remains a sanctuary for global learning, or becomes an extension of political machinery. Either way, the outcome will resonate far beyond Cambridge. Because what's unfolding is not just a lawsuit. It's a test of whether academic independence can survive in a climate where internationalism is no longer an asset, but a liability. Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
