
Trump is warning about shortages. Will kids have toys this Christmas?
Warning: This graphic requires JavaScript. for the best experience.
You're reading the Prompt 2025 newsletter. Sign up to get it in your inbox.
Like many of our readers, I'm sure, I've been stocking up on various items that are made in China before the price rises. That seems to me a good metaphor for the odd period we're in: We know what's coming, but it hasn't arrived yet. President Donald Trump is preparing us for what it might look like, though, recently warning that 'maybe the children will have two dolls instead of 30 dolls.'
Is this what the post-'Liberation Day' economy will look like come the holidays? And how will Americans react to empty shelves or price hikes for goods they expect to be cheap and plentiful? I spoke with my colleagues Philip Bump and Jim Geraghty about the politics of shortages.
💬 💬 💬
Megan McArdle In a recent piece for the Dispatch, John McCormack quotes a business owner who is waiting for equipment that will cost him [more than] twice what he thought he was paying: 'We're just hoping either the ship sinks or somebody comes to their senses before it hits the dock.' So: When will the tariff ship sink? And where is the pain likely to show up first, economically or politically?
Philip Bump The answer appears to be 'imminently.' There are already reports of ports seeing far less traffic. It seems like a straightforward chain of repercussions: fewer goods and higher prices lead to more economic pain which leads to political pain — though it's still not clear how much of the latter will be borne by the president himself.
Jim Geraghty I can't believe the administration is so nonchalant about the prospect of supply chain problems, at least so far. The supply chain shortage driven by the pandemic is not ancient history. I don't think it was a decisive factor in Biden's defeat, but I do think it added to the widespread perception among voters that the economy wasn't doing well, despite the low unemployment rate. You would think Trump and his team would want to do everything possible to minimize empty shelves or higher prices. But apparently … nah!
Story continues below advertisement
Advertisement
Megan In Trump's first term, tariffs affected cars and washing machines, among other products; he doesn't seem to have paid much of a price for that. I assume this time will be different — but how different?
Jim Where Trump might have a bit more leeway is that people feel inflation most intensely (and quickly) in things they purchase on a regular basis — groceries and gasoline come to mind. People know, generally, what they paid for those items last week, last month, etc. Things like toys, lumber and big-ticket electronics they buy less often, and thus I think memories will be fuzzier of what things used to cost.
Philip It seems clear that the tariffs this time around will have a much bigger effect, to Jim's point, so we can probably assume that there will be more public pressure to ameliorate the problem. So the question is really: How insulated is Trump from negative feedback in general? So far, he seems to be strikingly insulated from it; it took a wobbly bond market for him to scale the tariffs back last month. It's not clear that there's otherwise a metric that might prompt him to reconsider.
Megan Groceries and gasoline will be affected slowly, if at all though, right? It's going to be consumer electronics, clothes, bedding, etc. at first.
Jim I talked about this in my last column. We'll see the first effects at America's ports — ships from China will stop coming in, which will mean less work for the truckers, etc. Things still feel relatively 'normal' in most shops compared to the beginning of the year, but we're going to see a ripple effect as the last of the ships from China get unloaded and their goods dispersed …
Philip Yeah, it seems like there's going to be a lot of people online shopping who are suddenly like, wait, why is this twice as expensive? And then not buying. I'm sort of morbidly fascinated to see if surging prices prompts his base to lose faith in his presentations about the world — and then, if he actually changes his position to adjust to what they want to see.
Megan The administration has seemed unbelievably inept at messaging —'Your kids don't need so many dolls.' Who in the administration can be a better messenger? Is such a thing possible?
Jim Trump's 'Well maybe the children will have two dolls instead of 30' reminded me a great deal of Bernie Sanders's statement in 2015, 'You don't necessarily need a choice of 23 underarm spray deodorants or of 18 different pairs of sneakers when children are hungry in this country.' For all the differences in these two men's philosophies, they look at American store shelves with a lot of options as a problem that the government needs to step in and solve.
Philip Although, in fairness, Sanders's argument wasn't 'We need fewer products because by importing those goods we are somehow having money stolen from our country.'
Story continues below advertisement
Advertisement
Megan Why is the administration doing this in a way that will produce blowback?
Philip It really seems as though Trump (with justification) has internalized the idea that there are no extended repercussions for his actions. Combine that with his apparent sense that this is a necessary shock to fix the system, and here we are.
Jim There's been so much (deserved) attention on the tariffs that I think anything that happens on the economic front for the next year or so will be attributed to them, good or bad. The tariffs are indeed a huge deal, but there are other factors influencing the economy. Trump genuinely loves tariffs and thus he's completely comfortable with them being front and center.
Megan Last question: If you were White House chief of staff, what would you do to minimize the political pain, other than the obvious step of rolling back the tariffs?
Jim Every time there's a sign of progress on trade deals, the markets go up and presumably the damage done to everyone's 401(k)s and college savings accounts gets mitigated a bit. So I'd be talking up how close we are to a deal with our other large trading partners — Japan, South Korea, etc.
Philip If I were his chief of staff, I might also gently suggest that he vet his commentary with people who exist within the middle class just to see how 'They don't need to have 250 pencils, they can have five' flies before rolling it out to Newsmax.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Oil Advances as OPEC+ Supply Boost Vies With Geopolitical Risk
(Bloomberg) -- Oil advanced as OPEC+ hiked production less than some had feared and geopolitical concerns flared over Ukraine and Iran. Billionaire Steve Cohen Wants NY to Expand Taxpayer-Backed Ferry Where the Wild Children's Museums Are The Economic Benefits of Paying Workers to Move Now With Colorful Blocks, Tirana's Pyramid Represents a Changing Albania NYC Congestion Toll Brings In $216 Million in First Four Months Brent crude for August rose toward $65 a barrel after losing 2.2% last week, while West Texas Intermediate was above $62. The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries and its allies agreed on Saturday to add 411,000 barrels a day of supply in July, matching expectations, but defying reports late last week that the group was considering an even bigger volume. Meanwhile, Ukraine struck air bases deep in Russia and Iran criticized a report showing its growing stockpiles of enriched uranium, in escalations that reduce the chance of more supply from the sanctioned OPEC+ members entering the market. Trade frictions also remained in focus, after President Donald Trump said he would be increasing tariffs on steel and aluminum. Monday's move higher comes after a turbulent two months that saw prices tumble to a four-year low in the wake of Trump's tariff wars, before recuperating some of those losses. Crude remains almost 15% lower this year, pressured by the simmering trade conflicts and the abandoning by OPEC+ of its former strategy of defending higher prices by curbing output. OPEC+ officials said the quota boost reflected Saudi Arabia's desire to punish over-producing members such as Kazakhstan and Iraq. Some members — including Russia, Algeria and Oman — had wanted a pause. The group next meets on July 6 to discuss output levels for August. 'Brent should be well supported in the middle of our expected $60-$65 summer range until we get a better understanding of how quickly actual OPEC production is rising,' said Robert Rennie, head of commodity and carbon research at Westpac Banking Corp. in Sydney. 'We may be seeing signs that the pace of increase could slow in the coming months' as some members had wanted a lull in the quota hikes. YouTube Is Swallowing TV Whole, and It's Coming for the Sitcom Millions of Americans Are Obsessed With This Japanese Barbecue Sauce Mark Zuckerberg Loves MAGA Now. Will MAGA Ever Love Him Back? Will Small Business Owners Knock Down Trump's Mighty Tariffs? Trump Considers Deporting Migrants to Rwanda After the UK Decides Not To ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


The Hill
26 minutes ago
- The Hill
The election of a Trump ally in Poland could alter EU and Ukraine policies
WARSAW, Poland (AP) — Poland has elected Karol Nawrocki, a conservative historian and staunch nationalist, as its next president in a closely watched vote that signals a resurgence of right-wing populism in the heart of Europe. Nawrocki, who is set to take office on Aug. 6, is expected to shape the country's domestic and foreign policy in ways that could strain ties with Brussels while aligning the Central European nation of nearly 38 million people more closely with the administration of President Donald Trump in the United States. Here are some key takeaways: Nawrocki's victory underscores the enduring appeal of nationalist rhetoric among about half of the country along the eastern flank of NATO and the European Union, and its deep social divisions. The 42-year-old historian who had no previous political experience built his campaign on patriotic themes, traditional Catholic values, and a vow to defend Poland's sovereignty against the EU and larger European nations like Germany. His win also reflects the appeal of right-wing nationalism across Europe, where concerns about migration, national sovereignty, and cultural identity have led to surging support for parties on the right — even the far right in recent times. Far-right candidates did very well in Poland's first round of voting two weeks earlier, underlining the appeal of the nationalist and conservative views. Nawrocki picked up many of those votes. As his supporters celebrate his win, those who voted for the defeated liberal candidate, Warsaw Mayor Rafał Trzaskowski, worry that it will hasten the erosion of liberal democratic norms. Nawrocki's presidency presents a direct challenge to Prime Minister Donald Tusk, who returned to power in late 2023 pledging to mend relations with the EU and restore judicial independence which Brussels said was eroded by Law and Justice, the party that backed Nawrocki. But Tusk's coalition — a fragile alliance of centrists, leftists, and agrarian conservatives — has struggled to push through key promises including a civil union law for same-sex couples and a less restrictive abortion law. Nawrocki, who opposes such measures, will have the power to veto legislation, complicating Tusk's agenda and potentially triggering political gridlock. Nawrocki's election could signal a stronger relationship between Poland and the Trump administration. Poland and the U.S. are close allies, and there are 10,000 U.S. troops stationed in Poland, but Tusk and his partners in the past have been critical of Trump. Nawrocki, however, has a worldview closely aligned with Trump and his Make America Great Again ethos. Trump welcomed Nawrocki to the White House a month ago and his administration made clear in other ways that he was its preferred candidate. While Nawrocki has voiced support for Ukraine's defense against Russian aggression, he does not back Ukrainian membership in NATO and has questioned the long-term costs of aid — particularly support for refugees. His rhetoric has at times echoed that of Trump, for instance by accusing Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy of what he said was insufficient gratitude for Poland's assistance. With growing public fatigue over helping Ukrainian refugees, Nawrocki's approach could shift Poland's posture from strong ally to conditional partner if the war drags on much longer. The election result is a setback for the EU, which had welcomed Tusk's return in 2023 as a signal of renewed pro-European engagement. Nawrocki and the Law and Justice party have criticized what nationalists view as EU overreach into Poland's national affairs, especially regarding judicial reforms and migration policy. While the president does not control day-to-day diplomacy, Nawrocki's symbolic and veto powers could frustrate Brussels' efforts to bring Poland back into alignment with bloc standards, particularly on rule-of-law issues. Though an EU member, Poland has its own currency, the zloty, which weakened slightly on Monday morning, reflecting investor concerns over potential policy instability and renewed tensions with EU institutions. Billions of euros in EU funding has been linked to judicial reforms which Tusk's government will now be unlikely to enact without presidential cooperation.

27 minutes ago
List of 'sanctuary jurisdictions' removed from US government website following criticism
WASHINGTON -- A widely anticipated list of ' sanctuary jurisdictions' no longer appears on the Department of Homeland Security's website after receiving widespread criticism for including localities that have actively supported the Trump administration's hard-line immigration policies. The department last week published the list of the jurisdictions. It said each one would receive formal notification the government deemed them uncooperative with federal immigration enforcement and whether they're believed to be in violation of any federal criminal statutes. The list was published Thursday on the department's website but on Sunday there was a 'Page Not Found" error message in its place. The list was part of the Trump administration's efforts to target communities, states and jurisdictions that it says aren't doing enough to help its immigration enforcement agenda and the promises the president made to deport more than 11 million people living in the U.S. without legal authorization. The list is being constantly reviewed and can be changed at any time and will be updated regularly, a DHS senior official said. 'Designation of a sanctuary jurisdiction is based on the evaluation of numerous factors, including self-identification as a Sanctuary Jurisdiction, noncompliance with Federal law enforcement in enforcing immigration laws, restrictions on information sharing, and legal protections for illegal aliens,' the official said in a statement. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said on Fox News' 'Sunday Morning Futures' that there had been anger from some officials about the list. However, she didn't address why it was removed. 'Some of the cities have pushed back,' Noem said. 'They think because they don't have one law or another on the books that they don't qualify, but they do qualify. They are giving sanctuary to criminals.' The list, which was riddled with misspellings, received pushback from officials in communities spanning from urban to rural and blue to red who said the list doesn't appear to make sense. In California, the city of Huntington Beach made the list even though it had filed a lawsuit challenging the state's immigration sanctuary law and passed a resolution this year declaring the community a 'non-sanctuary city.' Jim Davel, administrator for Shawano County, Wisconsin, said the inclusion of his community must have been a clerical error. Davel voted for Trump as did 67% of Shawano County. Davel thinks the administration may have confused the county's vote in 2021 to become a 'Second Amendment Sanctuary County' that prohibits gun control measures with it being a safe haven for immigrants. He said the county has approved no immigration sanctuary policies.