No papers, no preschool: 21 states sue Trump over immigrant service ban
Spearheaded by New York Attorney General Letitia James, the coalition argues the administration bypassed legal protocols and is imposing changes that will not only devastate immigrant families but jeopardize essential services for American citizens as well.
'These programs work because they are open, accessible, and grounded in compassion,' James said in a statement. 'This is a baseless attack on some of our country's most effective and inclusive public programs, and we will not let it stand.'
From care to compliance
The rule changes, announced jointly by the Departments of Health and Human Services, Education, Labor, and Justice, represent a stark reversal of Clinton-era policies that allowed community-based programs to serve families regardless of immigration status. Now, providers receiving federal funds must check documentation before offering support.
This shift places enormous burdens on local organizations, many of which run on razor-thin budgets.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
This Could Be the Best Time to Trade Gold in 5 Years
IC Markets
Learn More
Undo
The lawsuit warns, 'It is likely that for some programs, the costs of compliance will be so high as to lead to the programs' closure.'
Programs like Head Start, which provide preschool education, child care, and developmental services to homeless or impoverished families, have historically never required proof of immigration status. The new demand for verification, they argue, could unravel decades of progress in early childhood intervention.
Collateral damage: American families
The coalition's legal brief doesn't just highlight harm to undocumented individuals, it paints a broader picture of widespread fallout. Schools, mental health centers, addiction treatment clinics, and domestic violence hotlines, all partially federally funded, could see services disrupted or defunded due to their inability to verify immigration status quickly or legally.
Such mandates, the lawsuit argues, are not only unrealistic but dangerous.
By forcing organizations to act as de facto immigration agents, the administration risks driving vulnerable populations underground, including American citizens in mixed-status families.
Legality in question
Central to the lawsuit is a pointed accusation: that the administration violated the Administrative Procedure Act by circumventing the required rulemaking process and failing to provide public notice or invite stakeholder input.
Legal experts warn that if this move goes unchallenged, it could open the door to unchecked executive overreach, where vital federal funds come with ever-changing political strings attached.
Ideology over infrastructure
Supporters of the administration say the rules simply ensure taxpayer dollars are used lawfully. But critics argue this isn't about budgets, it's about political messaging. With the 2024 immigration debate still reverberating through Washington, this move appears aimed at energizing a base that equates enforcement with exclusion.
In doing so, the administration risks dismantling local programs that serve as lifelines for the country's poorest and most marginalized communities.
What comes next
As the legal battle unfolds, the fate of countless community organizations hangs in the balance. If the rules are enforced, many may be forced to shut their doors, not because they failed in mission, but because they couldn't meet the paperwork.
This isn't just a dispute about funding. It's a confrontation over values: Whether America's public services exist to uplift or to divide, to include or to exclude.
For millions of families, citizen and non-citizen alike, the outcome of this case may decide more than policy. It may decide survival.
Ready to navigate global policies? Secure your overseas future. Get expert guidance now!
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
a few seconds ago
- Indian Express
Obama hits back at Trump over ‘treason' claims: ‘Bizarre, ridiculous, weak attempt at distraction'
Former US president Barack Obama has spoken out against Donald Trump's calls for him to be prosecuted, vehemently rejecting the accusations as 'bizarre' and 'ridiculous'. Trump accused Obama of 'treason' for allegedly 'manufacturing' Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election and alleged that the former US president attempted to engineer a 'coup' following Trump's election victory. Obama's office hit back at the claims in a strong rebuke and called Trump's claims a 'weak attempt at distraction' to divert attention from issues surrounding the Jeffrey Epstein case. 'Out of respect for the office of the presidency, our office does not normally dignify the constant nonsense and misinformation flowing out of this White House with a response,' the statement said. 'But these claims are outrageous enough to merit one. These bizarre allegations are ridiculous and a weak attempt at distraction,' it added. The statement by Obama's spokesperson also denounced the claims made in a report released by Tulsi Gabbard, Director of National Intelligence, that alleged a 'treasonous conspiracy' by Obama administration officials. 'Nothing in the document issued last week undercuts the widely accepted conclusion that Russia worked to influence the 2016 presidential election but did not successfully manipulate any votes,' the statement said. 'These findings were affirmed in a 2020 report by the bipartisan Senate Intelligence Committee, led by then-Chairman Marco Rubio.' Trump posts AI video of Obama's 'arrest' by FBI Obama's remarks come after Trump posted an AI-generated video showing his predecessor's arrest by the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) in the Oval Office. The clip starts with Obama saying, 'No one, especially the President, is above the law', followed by other Democrats, including Joe Biden, stating, 'No one is above the law.' The video, without a disclaimer, demonstrates Obama being handcuffed by two FBI agents, while Trump sits nearby, smiling throughout the arrest. The latter part of the video shows Obama in a prison jumpsuit, sitting inside a jail cell. Previously, Gabbar, in a series of posts on X, alleged that Obama's senior national security team deliberately 'manufactured' and politicised intelligence assessments regarding Russian interference in the 2016 race. She contended that these efforts were part of a coordinated attempt to discredit Trump and 'subvert the will of the American people.' Gabbard declared that her office has submitted relevant documents to the US Department of Justice, calling for a full criminal investigation. (With inputs from Reuters)
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
a few seconds ago
- First Post
Who's paying Trump's tariff bill? Not foreign countries as he claims but American firms, people
Even though US President Donald Trump has claimed that foreign countries pay tariffs to the US government, the fact remains that tariffs are borne by American people and companies. The declining profits of companies and rising costs are proof of Americans paying for tariffs. read more US President Donald Trump may have convinced his far-right base that foreign countries pay for tariffs, but the fact remains that tariffs are borne by US companies and public — and it is finally reflecting in data. Tariffs are taxes that importers in the United States pay to the US government on goods bought from countries facing tariffs. For example, if there is a 35 per cent tariff on Chinese goods, importers in the United States buying goods from China would pay 35 per cent of the goods' value to the US government in tax. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD American businesses, including some of the most recognisable companies like General Motors (GM), have reported tariff-induced losses. The reason is that they are hesitant to pass on the increased costs of tariffs to costumers out of fears of a fall in sales. ALSO READ: Even as Trump wages tariff wars, 75% Americans don't know what it means Economists, however, have said that it is only a matter of time that businesses pass most of these increased costs to customers. Americans are paying for tariffs — despite whatever Trump says In a research note, Deutsche Bank concluded that Americans are definitely paying for tariffs. If foreigners were paying for tariffs, we would expect to see a sharp reduction in the price of imported goods as they absorbed it into their own margins, but the data show only mild price reductions, mainly from Canada and, to a lesser extent, the United Kingdom, the bank noted. The analysis concluded three things: Firstly, exporters abroad 'are not yet feeling much pain from the tariffs', which could strengthen their bargaining power ahead of the August 1 trade deadline. Secondly, there may be 'more pressure on US consumer prices in the pipeline'. Thirdly, as the economic cost is falling more heavily on American businesses and people, the situation adds 'an added dollar negative' to the broader macroeconomic outlook. ALSO READ — Trump's tariffs & mass-firing: Economists fear 'stagflation' is on the horizon Trump's reasons behind tariffs are many — and all of them are either false or misplaced. Firstly, Trump has said he would make countries pay with tariffs for purported unfair trade practices. As explained above, it is a false claim as importers pay tariffs, not the other countries. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Secondary, Trump has said tariffs will disincentivise imports and fuel domestic manufacturing. This is a misplaced idea as modern-day manufacturing relies on spares and machinery from across the world and a tariff war makes sourcing difficult. For example, China has a near-monopoly on the world's rare earth supplies, which are used in nearly everything today from household electronics to cars and fighter planes. After Trump slapped tariffs, China leveraged the near-monopoly and forced Trump to blink. US businesses take a hit The GM on Tuesday reported a loss of 35 per cent in the second quarter, including a $1.1 billion hit from Trump's tariffs. In the first half of the year, Jeep- and Fiat-owner Stellantis projected a $351.1 million tariff-induced loss. For the entire year, the projected loss is $1.17-1.76 billion. Raytheon Technologies has also lowered the targets. Tech giants like Apple, Nvidia, Tesla, Google-parent Alphabet, Amazon, and Meta have also seen decline in value from market losses. Moreover, Trump is way off the target in tariffs. While he set out to get $6 trillion in revenue from tariffs, he has so far only crossed the $100-billion mark. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Time of India
a few seconds ago
- Time of India
‘Drug companies will have problems': Trump unveils 200% tariff plan to slash soaring drug prices
Trump launches bold plan to cut drug prices, proposing a 200% tariff on imported medicines to reduce foreign dependency and boost US manufacturing. Backed by GOP, the move targets pharma giants to force price drops. With seniors hit hardest by soaring costs, the US faces a drug affordability crisis. Imports have surged to $151B, fueling concerns over supply chain control and healthcare access. Show more Show less
