logo
Police say ill-fitting uniforms leading to crushed testicles and lumps in breasts

Police say ill-fitting uniforms leading to crushed testicles and lumps in breasts

The Guardian3 days ago
Musculoskeletal damage, crushed testicles and lumps in breasts are just some examples of the harm police officers say they experience because of ill-fitting, uncomfortable and low-quality uniforms.
Officers responding to the first national uniform and equipment survey across all 43 forces in England and Wales reported symptoms so severe that some had to have multiple operations.
Others told how criminals warned them their uniforms left vital areas of their body exposed and even acted as a 'guide' as to where they could be stabbed.
Belinda Goodwin, a former frontline officer who works for the Police Federation, had two operations to remove fistulas from her breasts that she said were caused by ill-fitting body armour.
'We had one model and size of stab vest for both men and women, and we had to wear them eight to 10 hours a day,' she said. 'The pressure for women on our breasts was intense; we were completely flattened.
'Being unable to adjust them for hours on end when you were wearing them in a public-facing role was torture. Driving in them was horrific and dangerous: they rammed up into your chin.
'After my second operation, the consultant told me that they couldn't operate again if the fistulas returned because I'd have no breast left to remove. I realised I had no choice but to leave frontline policing entirely.'
Almost 21,000 police officers and staff responded to the Police Federation of England and Wales's (PFEW) survey. The research was conducted in collaboration with the National Police Chiefs' Council and led by Lancaster University Law School.
One officer said: 'The current body armour doesn't seem to provide adequate coverage on officer's bodies, with large areas, including armpit areas, exposed compared to other forces' vests that feel a lot more protective.
'On numerous occasions, offenders have commented on how exposed our kit leaves us, and state that our kit acts as a target of where to be stabbed.'
More than 60% of men and 85% of women reported a physical health condition that they believed was caused by or made worse through wearing uniform.
The most commonly worn garments were the most problematic: 61% complained about body armour; 69% flagged cargo trousers.
The survey also found inconsistent uniform quality across forces, with access to high-performance kit depending more on local budgets than operational need: negative experiences ranged from 29% in North Yorkshire to 75% in nearby South Yorkshire.
One officer said: 'Cargo trousers are too restrictive when struggling with suspects. On foot patrol or foot chases, [they] do not allow for flexibility to climb, jump or fight as you should.'
Another said: 'The standard fit of the patrol/cargo trousers is not fit for purpose. They are extremely tight around the groin/thigh area and often cause rubbing and soreness.'
But for another officer, the trousers were too loose: 'The cargo trousers are completely unsuitable for frontline policing – they are baggy and dangerous.'
The survey also found uniforms did not enable officers to carry all their equipment. 'The utility vest does not offer enough room to add all items that the force requires us to carry,' said one officer.
Another said: 'The utility vest causes horrific back pain as the amount of equipment, and weight of that equipment, is too much to all be placed on the front.'
When officers reported the problems, however, the survey found that their complaints were often trivialised and dismissed: almost 40% of officers had made a complaint but only 8% received replacement uniform.
One force's female members cbought their own rather than use their department's trousers because the crotch was too short.
'Concerns were raised and women's health issues were not given appropriate consideration by the men deciding what we should wear. It was viewed as more of a fashion issue, and anxiety about body image and the medical issues, such as thrush, were ignored,' she said.
The PFEW is calling on the Home Office to create coordinated procurement standards for uniforms with a higher minimum national standard.
Melissa Russhard, the National Police Chiefs' Council lead for uniform, said: 'This survey will help give us the mandate to push forward with our moves towards setting national standardisation for uniform requirements and end the postcode lottery that exists.'
A spokesperson for the Home Office said: 'We refer to individual police forces, given decisions on uniform are a matter for them.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Grandma writes book for grandson after brain tumour diagnosis
Grandma writes book for grandson after brain tumour diagnosis

BBC News

time2 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Grandma writes book for grandson after brain tumour diagnosis

A grandmother who was diagnosed with a brain tumour has written and illustrated a book for her four-year-old from Stroud in Gloucestershire, said she went to hospital after suffering a seizure and a suspected stroke, but tests revealed she had a brain tumour the size of a receiving the diagnosis in February 2022, the 62-year-old said she was "terrified" she would not live to see her grandson Finn grow up, prompting her to write Finn's Wonderful World."I wanted to leave Finn something deeply personal, a message of wonder and joy, in case I wasn't there to share it with him myself," Jan said. Finn was one when Jan was diagnosed with the slow-growing tumour. To remove it, Jan underwent a craniotomy at Southmead Hospital in Bristol in May 2022. The surgery was successful, but she was left with partial vision. Shortly after the diagnosis, Jan returned to her hobby of drawing and painting after years of putting it aside while she "juggled everything" in her busy book, which explores themes of friendship and nature, features illustrations of a blonde child with blue eyes, just like said: "The diagnosis and the uncertainty about my future reignited that creativity in a deeply meaningful way. "This book has given me purpose and focus. "To see [Finn} enjoy the story I created for him, it's the most special gift," she added. Jan said all profits from the book would be donated to Brain Tumour Research."Without the knowledge and the skill, I wouldn't be here today," she said."They give people a chance of getting on with their lives."I poured my heart into [the book], and to know it's helping fund vital research means everything," she added.

Overnight Consett clinic closure faces resident backlash
Overnight Consett clinic closure faces resident backlash

BBC News

time2 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Overnight Consett clinic closure faces resident backlash

People have raised concerns over the temporary overnight closure of a hospital's urgent treatment centre (UTC).The 24-hour facility at Shotley Bridge Hospital in Consett, County Durham, has been shut from 00:00 to 08:00 every night since 14 July. County Durham and Darlington NHS Foundation Trust said the centre would have reduced opening hours for three months due to difficulties staffing overnight shifts "safely and consistently".The nearest medical facility for urgent overnight help will now be 13 miles (21km) away at University Hospital of North Durham, but one resident Jackie Tupper said: "We deserve local services." UTCs provide urgent medical help for non-life-threatening emergencies, such as cuts and Tupper said she felt Consett was getting the "thin edge of the wedge". She said her husband had been referred to a specialist recently but had to travel an hour away to Darlington to see them. "The Consett area has grown no end in recent years and the community deserves to have every available service here," she said. Another Consett resident Mark Pearson said he has asthma and the overnight closure of the UTC was "worrying for families like mine"."This change affects vulnerable people, especially those without transport or those with ongoing health conditions," he said. He said was not confident the overnight closure of the UTC was temporary. 'Protect daytime care' The trust said between January and June this year it had shut the UTC overnight 65 times due to staffing also said on average just five people attended the site each night.A spokesperson said staff shortages had risen this year due to a combination of vacancies, sickness and maternity said the decision to temporarily shut the site overnight was so "daytime care could be protected"."We'll be reviewing the impact of this change closely and listening to feedback from local people and partners throughout the closure period," they added. Follow BBC North East on X, Facebook, Nextdoor and Instagram.

How a teenage kiss at a funfair led to Jack Woodley being kicked and stabbed by a pack of bloodthirsty yobs... and the 'chilling' detail that stunned the court
How a teenage kiss at a funfair led to Jack Woodley being kicked and stabbed by a pack of bloodthirsty yobs... and the 'chilling' detail that stunned the court

Daily Mail​

time2 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

How a teenage kiss at a funfair led to Jack Woodley being kicked and stabbed by a pack of bloodthirsty yobs... and the 'chilling' detail that stunned the court

Surrounded and preyed upon by a pack of ten bloodthirsty teenagers, Jack Woodley never stood a chance as he curled up on the ground and braced himself for a frenzied attack as he walked home from the funfair. Punched, kicked, stamped upon and fatally wounded with a Rambo knife, the 5ft 7in, 10st 8lb victim was completely defenceless as the vicious gang murdered him 'like zombies attacking an animal' in front of horrified onlookers on October 16 2021. Jack's grieving mother, Zoey McGill, previously released a heartbreaking video of herself cradling her dying son and singing to him in his final moments while he was on life support. He tragically died in hospital a day after the attack. The unarmed 18-year-old, from Newton Aycliffe in County Durham, had done nothing to provoke the killers, only coming to the group's attention by chance when a random row broke out over a girl kissing a boy at the funfair. For four years, most of the teenagers, aged between 14 and 17 at the time of the sickening attack, have been protected by a reporting restriction banning their identity from being revealed until their 18th birthdays. But on Wednesday, Lewis Rose, the youngest of the ten murderers, became an adult, paving the way for the twisted mob to finally be unmasked as one. Their mugshots were finally released, allowing the public to see the faces of evil. Rose, Calum Maddison, Sonny Smith, Leighton Mayo, Blaine Sewell, Grant Wheatley, Clayton Owen, Joe Lathan, Tyler Brewis and Rhys Wear, were the boys handed life sentences with a combined minimum term of more than 124 years. Tragically, it was these 10 animals against one. Jack was hunted down and stabbed in the back during an 80-second attack while making his way home from the Houghton Feast funfair, in Houghton-le-Spring near Sunderland. The 10 boys who murdered Jack Woodley All of the killers, who can now be named after turning 18, were handed life sentences with the following minimum terms: Calum Maddison, 17 years Blaine Sewell, 13 years and five months Sonny Smith, 15 years Grant Wheatley, 15 years Lewis Rose, eight years Tyler Brewis, 13 years Rhys Wear, 10 years Leighton Mayo, 11 years Joe Lathan, 11 years Clayton Owen, 11 years It was Maddison, who had recently turned 15, who delivered the fatal stab wound, but all ten were convicted of Jack's murder under the principle of joint enterprise as they were deemed to be equally responsible. Most of the boys lied to police in a desperate bid to deflect their involvement. Yet none of them even attempted to suggest Jack had provoked the savage assault that has plunged his family into unimaginable grief. As one of the boys' lawyers suggested, it would have been easy for the 10-strong group to pin the blame on Jack as being the aggressor. But the truth was, he simply did nothing wrong that night. He had simply gone to the Houghton Feast funfair with friends when the atmosphere became hostile. Jack was challenged to a fight by a stranger, but sensibly walked away thinking better of it. But as he neared the crowded Britannia Inn, then 16-year-old Sewell ran up and punched him and seized him in a headlock, triggering a terrifying ten on one melee before Maddison plunged his 9in (25cm) knife into Jack's back. He was left to die in an alleyway and tragically died in hospital the following day - his life cut short by a random 'mob attack'. The 11-week trial at Newcastle Crown Court heard he was targeted for a 'trivial reason' - something not one of the 10 defendants ever explained. Jack's family were forced to sit through weeks of evidence and recounting their son's brutal death - but have been left no nearer to understanding why he was targeted. During one moment in the trial, the 16-year-old who attacked Jack from behind, triggering scenes of anarchy, was asked by prosecutors: 'Why did you attack Jack?' 'I can't remember', he replied in a final insult to his victim and Jack's family. Had he seen Jack 'do anything wrong?' 'No,' he replied. The teenager said he did not know if there was a reason Jack was attacked but that there probably was one that he couldn't remember. When asked if he was angry, the boy said: 'A little bit yeah. I must have been to actually hit him.' Pressed why he was angry, he reverted to being unable to remember. So asked again why he attacked Jack, he said: 'I just can't remember.' Quizzed by prosecutors how it could have been forgotten after just a few months, he said: 'Dunno. It just went out my head, I can't remember it.' The boy's lack of memory was described as 'particularly chilling' by prosecutor Mark McKone QC. Jack had only come to the group's attention by chance. The trial heard how when a girl kissed a boy, the boy's ex-girlfriend kicked off and a minor scuffle broke out between the pair. Jack witnesses the girls fighting and asked another boy - one of his would-be killers - what it was about. They joked about it and went their separate ways. Less than an hour later, that boy would be part of the gang who so brutally set upon Jack. Rumours spread that Jack had threatened to 'punch the head in' of one of the boys - lie that had been completely fabricated. This, in the eyes of the prosecutors, was their plot to 'create a conflict with Jack so they could attack him'. When challenged to a one-on-one fight, Jack sensibly decided to walk off. But he was followed and set upon by the bloodthirsty gang. Mobile phone footage of the attack showed there were shouts of 'get the chopper out' - referring to the knife - heard. One of the mob was 'armed with a very dangerous knife', while another admitted taking a knuckle duster out that night. One witness said the youths were like a 'herd of lions' when they attacked. Another witness who saw the violence said: 'Jack got down on the floor so he could curl up in a ball. 'He was so scared. There were so many punches raining down on him. They were brutal. 'Everyone in the group was just kicking the life out of Jack, stamping on his head 'The lads were savagely kicking Jack, like zombies attacking an animal. 'I remember the terrified look on Jack's face as he was being kicked, punched and stamped on.' For all the brutality that led to the death of an 18-year-old boy, none of the 10 killers could say why they did what they did that night. Most said they could not remember or said it happened too fast. The incident lasted around 80 seconds and there was only a small amount of CCTV and mobile footage. Questions were asked over why so many of the boys had their hoods up. One claimed it was because he felt anxious about his hair. But the main element to dissect was why the teenage knifeman - who admitted the stabbing but denied intent - was armed. Jurors were told he had bought it six months prior out of fear of living in a city plagued with knife crime. He wanted it to be a deterrent. But on that night, he hadn't taken it out with him. In fact, he went home to get the knife just 20 minutes before launching a fatal attack on Jack. He claimed he'd gone home to get his coat because it was cold - and decided at the last minute to take the knife back out due to the supposed trouble brewing. Ultimately, he would go on to use it to murder Jack Woodley. He would stand trial alongside nine others - despite claiming they were not responsible for Jack's death. While Jack suffered multiple injuries as he lay helpless on the floor, he was killed by the single knife wound. The nine others were charged as the prosecution argued the fatal blow would not have been delivered if the other members hadn't launched the frenzied attack. By targeting Jack outside the Britannia Inn, each of them contributed to the killing even if their involvement was less than the other. 'The prosecution say all ten defendants participated in this joint attack, using violence themselves or intentionally encouraging others to use violence,' Mr McKone QC said. The reason, argued by the prosecution, for Jack's death was that this was simply a gang of boys wanting to inflict harm on an individual. In a heartbreaking tribute, Jack's mother, Zoey McGill, said: 'Jack was my reason to live and succeed in life. From the moment Jack was born he brought light and love to us all. 'The devastation of losing Jack is immense and far reaching. The trauma of reliving this whole incident over a long trial has had a devastating effect on us all. We cannot see a way of recovering from this. 'We feel imprisoned by our grief and trauma. No parent, loved one or friend should suffer someone going to a fair and losing them forever. We will never be able to share treasured family moments with our cheeky chappy blue-eyed boy ever again.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store