Labour council bans military hardware from Armed Forces Day
The city of York council said the kit, which could range from weapons to vehicles, would no longer be welcome at the show in light of 'residents' concerns'.
Cllr Claire Douglas, the Labour member for Heworth Ward and leader of the council, insisted that the decision 'in no way diminishes how seriously we take Armed Forces Day'.
But others claimed the council had caved in under pressure.
Cllr Chris Steward, leader of the Conservative group, said the hardware was a 'crucial part' of Armed Forces Day.
He told The Telegraph: 'What use is any military without equipment?
'We totally condemn this decision of the Labour councillors. There has been no cross-party involvement.
'It shows how far the Labour Party has fallen from a proud, patriotic party which recognised the courageous and vital job our military do, to one more concerned how their actions may offend their increasingly extreme supporters who seem to want to protest against our long-held values.'
City of York council will host the Armed Forces Day celebration on Saturday to honour past, present and future members of the military community for their dedication and sacrifice.
Martin Rowley, a Conservative councillor and Lord Mayor of York, told The Telegraph that decisions taken in a multi-cultural city required careful consideration.
He said: 'We live in a very diverse city, a city of refuge, a city where we have Ukrainian families who have been deeply scarred by war.
'As a cosmopolitan city we have to be wary of everyone's views. They have to be considered decisions.'
Cllr Michael Nicholls, another Conservative, said it was 'disappointing' that the council seemed to think it could 'pick and choose' their support for the military.
He said: 'Armed Forces Day is an opportunity for us to say thank you and for the Armed Forces to show the next generation of recruits what they are all about, including the showing of equipment.
'The priority of Labour in York appears to be not to offend those opposed to our values. How sad.'
Cllr Douglas said the council was a 'proud signatory of the Armed Forces Covenant' and would continue to support serving personnel, veterans and their families all year around.
She said: 'With our military partners, we carefully considered residents' concerns and decided that the day will go ahead as planned, with the only change being no military equipment on show.'
It is unclear whether the Sea Cadets will be able to showcase their display boat or if the Queen's Own Yeomanry will have its Jackal military vehicle and replica weapons on show.
She added: 'This decision in no way diminishes how seriously we take Armed Forces Day and our deep respect and commitment to those who serve and have served. We look forward to a fantastic day'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
13 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Be careful what you wish for, Owen, ethnic tribalism may engulf us all
It is not very British to wish death to things. That's a translation of an Arabic chant that has been injected into our culture by the hard-Left. Welcome to Britain of 2025. The departure from traditional slogans like 'down with' in favour of 'death to' in the progressive lexicon is symbolic. For years, the Corbynites and jihadis have been travelling in tandem, or as Magic Grandpa himself once put it, as 'friends'. Now we are seeing them converge. In the process, the Left is being dragged away from Britain's shared values and customs and into ugly new depths. Take the The Guardian firebrand Owen Jones. Don't sniff: he has 500,000 fans on Instagram, almost 800,000 on YouTube and a million followers on X. On the day Zarah Sultana announced her new political venture with Jeremy Corbyn, Jones couldn't contain his excitement. 'We need a Red-Green Alliance to tax the rich, invest in people and services, support public ownership, stop arming genocide,' he posted. This was the first time I'd seen that term used outside of a disparaging context. 'Red,' of course, means the hard-Left, while 'Green' in this context appears to refer to sectarian Muslim voters. Is that what you meant, Owen? Ever since the Enlightenment, our political preferences have been distinct from ethnic or religious backgrounds. Hindus or Jews or Sikhs may have a particular fingerprint of priorities, but they vote like any other citizen according to their consciences, not as a tribe. Some Hindu Britons may tack to the Left, others to the Right. Members of Conservative Friends of Israel may include many Jews, as well as Gentiles, but it is not an alliance between Conservatives and Jews, seen as two distinct groups. And, of course, there is also a Labour Friends of Israel. According to our way of doing things, it would be nonsensical to call for a coalition between a political party and an ethnic bloc. Ironically, it was Britain's emphasis on individual rights that allowed the successful integration of outsiders. Half of my family is Jewish, from both Sephardi and Ashkenazi lineages, while the other is mixed British and Burmese. They could all belong to this country – indeed, fight for it – due to the separation of ethnicity and Britishness. Different relatives voted in different ways. This is unique to the West. As Sir Roger Scruton observed: 'Our obligations to others, to the country and to the state have been revised in a direction that has opened the way to the admission of people from outside the community – provided that they, too, can live according to the liberal ideal of citizenship.' This is our miracle. Only now it is being undone. Before our eyes, great numbers who reject Scruton's 'liberal ideal of citizenship' are organising along tribal lines. Once this foundation-stone is lost, the cathedral of our civilisation will be in danger of collapsing into tribalism, demolishing the synagogue within it. In truth, this has been done to us by centrist fundamentalist elites. Did they really think that abandoning our schools, universities, public institutions and – worst of all – our borders to radical progressive ideologues would have no effect? The backlash against the proscription of Palestine Action was another sign of this cultural shift. In one revealing video, a middle-class activist in a short skirt and two keffiyehs, flying a Palestine flag, accused the government of choosing 'war and profiteering'. Her closing remark was chilling. 'As always,' she chuckled gleefully, 'I cannot wait for the West to fall.' God knows what she hoped would replace it. But it couldn't be clearer. This is not Israel's problem, it's ours.
Telegraph
13 minutes ago
- Telegraph
People's savings are not working hard enough, so we will overhaul the pensions system
Tomorrow our new Pension Schemes Bill will have its second reading in the House of Commons. It will overhaul the pension system to ensure your savings work as hard as you worked to build them in the first place. Fundamentally it will prioritise higher rates of return for pension savers, putting more money into people's pockets in a host of different ways. For the first time we will require pension schemes to prove they are value for money, focusing their mindset on returns over costs and protecting savers from getting stuck in underperforming schemes for years on end. This plays a significant part of this Government's plan to grow the economy and put people in a better position during retirement as part of our Plan for Change. We are also at last addressing the small pension pots issue. Recently I was out door-knocking in Swansea. A women in her mid-30s told me something was really winding her up – the headache of trying to keep track of the small amounts of pensions savings she had from old jobs. There are now 13 million small pension pots floating around the UK pension system, each holding £1,000 or less. That number is increasing by around one million a year. That isn't just a hassle, it costs when savers can end up paying multiple flat fees on several pots. And it's costing the pension industry around £225 million each year administering them all. Our answer is to automatically bring an individual's small pots together into one pension scheme that's been certified as delivering good value for savers. And, of course, anyone that wants to can opt out. This change on its own could boost the pension pot of an average earner by around £1,000. Size doesn't always matter, but it does for pensions because bigger funds have lower costs and can invest in a wider range of assets. Both can drive up returns for savers. So we will also accelerate the consolidation of pension schemes into 'megafunds', with assets of at least £25 billion. Bigger funds will be better placed to invest in productive assets like infrastructure and housing, so this approach will also unlock more investment into the UK. Making your savings simple I appreciate younger readers in particular may not have thought in great detail about their pension plan. In fact, over three quarters of pre-retirement defined-contribution pension savers don't have a clear plan to access their retirement savings. And when it comes to retirement, too many of those reaching that point immediately draw down all their savings in one go. So, through our Bill, we will simplify things, requiring pension schemes to provide default retirement options – clear, secure routes for people to use their pension pot throughout retirement. People will still have the freedom to choose of course, but we want to support more people through complex choices that too often feel overwhelming, and where mistakes can cost thousands of pounds. Pensions sound techy, but this is about the basic job of government: helping to raise everyone's living standards. And at the end of the day, it's our pensions we live on in retirement. Even if that is a long way off for you, in fact especially if it is, these reforms will make a massive difference. After all, it's my job as the pensions minister to make sure that your pension savings work as hard for you as you did to earn them.
The Sun
13 minutes ago
- The Sun
Kneecap chants ‘f*** Keir Starmer' in another foul rant just days after sparking police probe at Glastonbury
RAPPERS Kneecap called out Keir Starmer for saying the group should be banned from Glastonbury Festival. The hip-hop group, from Belfast, Northern Ireland, spoke at London's Finsbury Park today - a week after performing at Glastonbury Festival. 6 6 6 6 It came after the PM told The Sun on Sunday last month that the Irish trio should be banned from the music festival after a band member was charged with a terror offence. Rapper Liam Og O hAnnaidh told the crowd yesterday: 'Keir Starmer gave an interview with The Sun saying we shouldn't be playing Glastonbury - so f**k Keir Starmer.' 'F**k Keir Starmer - you're just a s**t Jeremy Corbyn.' Bandmate Naoise O Caireallain added: 'We appreciate all of this f*****g mad energy that we are getting in Finsbury Park. 'Look, they tried to stop us playing Glastonbury, and they f*****g couldn't. 'They tried to stop us playing in Cornwall, and they f*****g couldn't stop that either." Sir Keir Starmer told The Sun last month that it was 'not appropriate' for the Irish group to cash in at the festival. Og O hAnnaidh, 27, who goes by the stage name Mo Chara, appeared in court last month, accused of displaying a flag in support of banned terror group Hezbollah at a gig. He was bailed until later in the summer — leaving him free to play at Glastonbury. Asked by The Sun on Sunday if he thought Kneecap should play at Glastonbury, the PM said: 'No I don't. Prime Minister Keir Starmer calls for Glastonbury to axe Kneecap from the line-up 'I think we need to come down really clearly on this. I won't say too much, because there's a court case on, but I don't think that's appropriate.' During Kneecap's performance at Glastonbury, the group took to the stage and led a "free Palestine" chant before leading five chants against the Prime Minister. Meanwhile, Bobby Vylan - frontman of English punk-rap duo Bob Vylan - chanted "death, death to the IDF" and other alleged anti-Semitic slurs on the West Holts stage last Saturday. The BBC were slammed for broadcasting performance on live TV, including by PM Keir Starmer himself. Avon and Somerset Police confirmed on Monday that cops are investigating Kneecap and Bob Vylan after video and audio footage was examined. Posting on X, the force said: "Video footage and audio from Bob Vylan and Kneecap's performances at Glastonbury Festival has been reviewed. "Following the completion of that assessment process we have decided further enquiries are required and a criminal investigation is now being undertaken. "A senior detective has been appointed to lead this investigation. "This has been recorded as a public order incident at this time while our enquiries are at an early stage." The force confirmed that it had received a "large amount" of contact from across the world about the controversial performances. The Sun has contacted Avon and Somerset Police. 6 6
