Uruguay's lower house of parliament votes in favor of euthanasia
The bill to decriminalize assisted dying passed by 64 votes in the 99-seat Chamber of Representatives after an emotional overnight debate. It now moves to the senate, which is widely expected to approve legislation before year-end.
Under the new law, mentally competent adults suffering from terminal or incurable illnesses can request euthanasia.
One key amendment appeared to help win over Uruguayan lawmakers against the original 2022 proposal by requiring a medical board to review a case if the two doctors involved disagree.
Legislator Luis Gallo, who opened the debate, recalled deceased patients who had inspired the bill.
"Let's not forget that the request is strictly personal: it respects the free and individual will of the patient, without interference, because it concerns their life, their suffering, their decision not to continue living," said Gallo of the center-left Broad Front ruling coalition.
Opinion polls show widespread public support for euthanasia from President Yamandu Orsi down. Uruguay also pioneered legalizing gay marriage, abortion and cannabis use.
The national conversation around euthanasia was brought to the political mainstream in 2019 by a former sports official, Fernando Sureda, who was diagnosed with a degenerative disease.
Sureda, who headed Uruguay's football association, publicly advocated for the right to die.
Uruguay joins a growing list of countries, including Canada, Spain, and New Zealand, that have legalized some form of assisted dying. Britain is also doing so.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Edinburgh Live
2 hours ago
- Edinburgh Live
Scottish MSP calls for Donald Trump to pay to cover costs of his recent visit
Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. More info An MSP has demanded that American President, Donald Trump, stump up to cover the costs of policing his recent visit to Scotland. The Republican leader jetted into Prestwick airport on July 25 before spending the weekend at his Turnberry Hotel and golf resort, where he held a rambling 60-minute press conference with Keir Starmer. He then flew to Aberdeenshire where he dined with First Minister John Swinney and later formally opened a second golf course at his Menie Estate. An estimated 5,000 Police Scotland officers - working 12 hour shifts - were involved in policing the duration of the President's "private" trip, reports The Daily Record. The New Yorker is set to return to the UK in September for a formal state visit, where he will be an official guest of the King. Now, John Mason, an independent MSP, has lodged a motion in the Scottish Parliament claiming there is "no justifiable reason for either the Scottish or UK public to subsidise the private travel or commercial activity of the President". The controversial member for Glasgow Shettleston, who was booted out of the SNP last year over remarks about Gaza, said he "hopes to see the recovery of public expenditure from Mr Trump or his associated business interests". Mason's motion states that Trump's visit "focused on time at his golf courses in Ayrshire and Aberdeenshire, required a substantial deployment of Police Scotland and other police officers, as well as other public service resources". It claims "as the visit was not undertaken in any official capacity, the significant costs involved should not be footed by Scottish or UK taxpayers". Sign up for Edinburgh Live newsletters for more headlines straight to your inbox So far the motion has only received the support of two MSPs from the SNP, Christine Grahame and Kevin Stewart. The cost of policing Trump's visit became a major talking point last month after the Scottish Police Federation (SPF) warned response times could double as a result of the force being overstretched. Asked if the quality of policing will be impacted by the visit, SPF chief David Kennedy said: "It will be seriously affected, it has to be. There's not enough police officers for it not to be affected." He added: 'We want the president of the United States to be able to come to Scotland. That's not what this is about. It's the current state of the police service and the numbers we have causes great difficulty." Mason was ejected by the SNP last year for a social media post in which he claimed there was "no genocide" in Gaza. He previously caused controversy in 2017 when he suggested some people view IRA killers as "freedom fighters". The veteran MSP for Glasgow Shettleston will retire from the Scottish Parliament next year and currently sits as an independent. He previously admitted his stance of speaking his mind had got him "into a lot of trouble" during his career - but insisted "we could do with a bit more of it". The Record asked the Trump Organisation for comment.
Leader Live
3 hours ago
- Leader Live
Scotland's deficit grew by £5.1bn, Government estimate shows
The latest Government Expenditure and Revenue Scotland (Gers) figures reported 'overall public finances in Scotland weakening, as expenditure grew faster than revenue'. For 2024-25, Scotland has a net fiscal deficit of minus £26.2 billion – an increase of £5.1 billion from the previous year – with this the representing minus 11.6% of the country's GDP. The UK deficit for 2024-25 was minus 5.1% of GDP, less than half the rate of Scotland. The Scottish Government report said the 'deterioration' between this year and last was in part linked to a fall in North Sea revenue, but it added: 'The difference is primarily explained by movements in non-North Sea revenue and spending, with Scottish revenue growing more slowly and Scottish expenditure growing more quickly than the UK.' Revenue in Scotland grew by 1.5% in 2024-25 to £91.4 billion. Spending increased to £117.6 billion in 2024-25, up from £111.4 billion in 2023-24. 'As a share of GDP, public spending remained at historically high levels in 2024,' the report noted. Scottish Secretary Ian Murray said the figures show Scots benefit from higher public spending than the UK average – with this £2,669 more per person north of the border. He said this 'means more money for schools, hospitals and policing, if the Scottish Parliament chooses to invest in those areas' – although he also claimed 'people in Scotland will rightly expect to see better outcomes' for these higher spending levels. Mr Murray said: 'These figures underline the collective economic strength of the United Kingdom and how Scotland benefits from the redistribution of wealth inside the UK. 'By sharing resources with each other across the UK, Scots benefit by £2,669 more per head in public spending than the UK average. 'It also means that devolved governments have the financial heft of the wider UK behind them when taking decisions.' Scottish Finance Secretary Shona Robison said decisions taken by ministers at Holyrood 'are helping support sustainable public finances'. She said: 'For the fourth year in a row, devolved revenues have grown faster than devolved expenditure. 'Scotland's public finances are better than many other parts of the UK, with the third highest revenue per person in the UK, behind only London and the South East.' She also stressed the Gers statistics reflect the current constitutional arrangements, with Scotland part of the UK and 'not an independent Scotland with its own policy, decisions on defence spending and the economy'. Arguing the figures highlight the 'limit' of devolved powers, Ms Robison said while the Scottish Government is responsible for more than 60% of public expenditure north of the border, it only controls 'around 30% of revenue'. The Finance Secretary told journalists: 'As an independent Scotland we would have the powers to make different choices, different budgetary results, to build a stronger economy and enable Scotland to be a fairer, wealthier and greener country.' She pointed to Ireland, saying GDP there had grown 12.5% over the last year, with a budget surplus of 24 billion euros (£20.7 billion) in 2024. Ms Robison hailed that as an example of 'what a small independent country, one of our nearest neighbours, is able to do with the full powers of independence'. She said: 'What we want, through the powers of independence, is to be able to make our own decisions. 'If you look at Ireland and what they have been able to do with the powers they have, it's like night and day compared to the economic conditions of the UK economy or the Scottish economy. 'Independence is the direction we want to take because we believe it will unleash the potential, from day one, to be able to emulate some of the economic performance of many of our neighbours, whether it is Ireland, or some of our Scandinavian neighbours.'
Daily Record
5 hours ago
- Daily Record
MSP demands Donald Trump pay up to cover costs of policing for Scottish visit
EXCLUSIVE: The ex-Nat MSP said there is "no justifiable reason for the public to subsidise the commercial activity of the President". An MSP has demanded Donald Trump stump up to cover the costs of policing the President's recent visit to Scotland. The Republican leader jetted into Prestwick airport on July 25 before spending the weekend at his Turnberry Hotel and golf resort, where he held a rambling 60-minute press conference with Keir Starmer. Trump then flew to Aberdeenshire where he dined with John Swinney and later formally opened a second golf course at his Menie Estate. An estimated 5,000 Police Scotland officers - working 12 hour shifts - were involved in policing the duration of the President's four day visit, which was classed as a "private" trip. The New Yorker will return to the UK again in September for a formal state visit, where he will be an official guest of the King. John Mason, an independent MSP, has now lodged a motion in the Scottish Parliament claiming there is "no justifiable reason for either the Scottish or UK public to subsidise the private travel or commercial activity of the President". The controversial member for Glasgow Shettleston, who was booted out of the SNP last year over remarks about Gaza, said he "hopes to see the recovery of public expenditure from Mr Trump or his associated business interests". Mason's motion states that Trump's visit "focused on time at his golf courses in Ayrshire and Aberdeenshire, required a substantial deployment of Police Scotland and other police officers, as well as other public service resources". It claims "as the visit was not undertaken in any official capacity, the significant costs involved should not be footed by Scottish or UK taxpayers". The motion has so far only been supported by two MSPs from the SNP, Christine Grahame and Kevin Stewart. The cost of policing Trump's visit became a major talking point last month after the Scottish Police Federation (SPF) warned response times could double as a result of the force being overstretched. Asked if the quality of policing will be impacted by the visit, SPF chief David Kennedy said: "It will be seriously affected, it has to be. There's not enough police officers for it not to be affected." He added: 'We want the president of the United States to be able to come to Scotland. That's not what this is about. It's the current state of the police service and the numbers we have causes great difficulty." Mason was ejected by the SNP last year for a social media post in which he claimed there was "no genocide" in Gaza. He previously caused controversy in 2017 when he suggested some people view IRA killers as "freedom fighters". The veteran MSP for Glasgow Shettleston will retire from the Scottish Parliament next year and currently sits as an independent. He previously admitted his stance of speaking his mind had got him "into a lot of trouble" during his career - but insisted "we could do with a bit more of it".
