
Scotland's deficit grew by £5.1bn, Government estimate shows
For 2024-25, Scotland has a net fiscal deficit of minus £26.2 billion – an increase of £5.1 billion from the previous year – with this the representing minus 11.6% of the country's GDP.
The UK deficit for 2024-25 was minus 5.1% of GDP, less than half the rate of Scotland.
The Scottish Government report said the 'deterioration' between this year and last was in part linked to a fall in North Sea revenue, but it added: 'The difference is primarily explained by movements in non-North Sea revenue and spending, with Scottish revenue growing more slowly and Scottish expenditure growing more quickly than the UK.'
Revenue in Scotland grew by 1.5% in 2024-25 to £91.4 billion.
Spending increased to £117.6 billion in 2024-25, up from £111.4 billion in 2023-24.
'As a share of GDP, public spending remained at historically high levels in 2024,' the report noted.
Scottish Secretary Ian Murray said the figures show Scots benefit from higher public spending than the UK average – with this £2,669 more per person north of the border.
He said this 'means more money for schools, hospitals and policing, if the Scottish Parliament chooses to invest in those areas' – although he also claimed 'people in Scotland will rightly expect to see better outcomes' for these higher spending levels.
Mr Murray said: 'These figures underline the collective economic strength of the United Kingdom and how Scotland benefits from the redistribution of wealth inside the UK.
'By sharing resources with each other across the UK, Scots benefit by £2,669 more per head in public spending than the UK average.
'It also means that devolved governments have the financial heft of the wider UK behind them when taking decisions.'
Scottish Finance Secretary Shona Robison said decisions taken by ministers at Holyrood 'are helping support sustainable public finances'.
She said: 'For the fourth year in a row, devolved revenues have grown faster than devolved expenditure.
'Scotland's public finances are better than many other parts of the UK, with the third highest revenue per person in the UK, behind only London and the South East.'
She also stressed the Gers statistics reflect the current constitutional arrangements, with Scotland part of the UK and 'not an independent Scotland with its own policy, decisions on defence spending and the economy'.
Arguing the figures highlight the 'limit' of devolved powers, Ms Robison said while the Scottish Government is responsible for more than 60% of public expenditure north of the border, it only controls 'around 30% of revenue'.
The Finance Secretary told journalists: 'As an independent Scotland we would have the powers to make different choices, different budgetary results, to build a stronger economy and enable Scotland to be a fairer, wealthier and greener country.'
She pointed to Ireland, saying GDP there had grown 12.5% over the last year, with a budget surplus of 24 billion euros (£20.7 billion) in 2024.
Ms Robison hailed that as an example of 'what a small independent country, one of our nearest neighbours, is able to do with the full powers of independence'.
She said: 'What we want, through the powers of independence, is to be able to make our own decisions.
'If you look at Ireland and what they have been able to do with the powers they have, it's like night and day compared to the economic conditions of the UK economy or the Scottish economy.
'Independence is the direction we want to take because we believe it will unleash the potential, from day one, to be able to emulate some of the economic performance of many of our neighbours, whether it is Ireland, or some of our Scandinavian neighbours.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Scotsman
15 minutes ago
- Scotsman
Call for urgent action as Scottish female-led start-ups fail at ‘alarming' rate
'The choice is clear - the community has spoken, and we need to listen. The time for action is now' – Carolyn Currie, WES Sign up to our Scotsman Money newsletter, covering all you need to know to help manage your money. Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Scotland is missing out on a £17 billion economic opportunity amid an 'alarming' failure rate among female-led businesses, it has been claimed. Releasing new research, Women's Enterprise Scotland (WES) said it was calling for urgent action to tackle the high levels of women-led ventures failing to progress beyond the start-up phase. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The authors of the study highlight that while more women are starting up in business than men in Scotland, fewer of the former are making it through the post-start-up phase to establish and grow. Women's Enterprise Scotland (WES) CEO Carolyn Currie. Picture by Malcolm Cochrane Photography While female-led business start-ups have increased to 54 per cent of all new ventures in Scotland, according to a Business Gateway Impact Report, the post-start-up pipeline has a high attrition rate of 61 per cent, and women-led employer businesses have dropped to just 20 per cent of all employer businesses. This declining trend in Scotland is said to be at odds with the global increase in established women-led businesses. Tackling the issue north of the Border and improving current outcomes for women-led start-up businesses has the potential to unlock an estimated £17bn 'reward' for the Scottish economy every year, WES said. This would eliminate almost two-thirds of the current public sector spending deficit, which now stands at £26.2bn, according to the latest Government Expenditure and Revenue Scotland (Gers) report. Achieving parity would eliminate over 80 per cent of the deficit. Carolyn Currie, chief executive of Women's Enterprise Scotland, said: 'A perfect storm of economic conditions and structural inequalities is halting the progress of women-led businesses, despite their start-up successes. What we are seeing is an alarming number of new women-led businesses failing to thrive. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad 'They are simply falling into an abyss, leaving their economic potential and the ambitions of their founders unfulfilled. The WES survey reveals a clear demand for needs-based business support. 'Many of the issues - and suggested actions that need to be taken - have been highlighted in research numerous times over the past 30 years,' she added. 'We can continue to watch talented women entrepreneurs leave the market, taking billions in economic potential with them, or we can implement the evidence-based solutions this study provides. 'The choice is clear - the community has spoken, and we need to listen. The time for action is now.' The survey found that economic conditions are threatening business sustainability and reveals a devastating cost for women-led businesses. Some 78 per cent cannot recover all their increased costs, 55 per cent are using personal savings to capitalise their businesses and 52 per cent are making no pension provision, threatening retirement security. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The report also highlighted inequities in Covid pandemic business relief distribution, with female-led businesses receiving just 10.6 per cent of grant funds, despite comprising 15.4 per cent of all businesses.


The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
Nicola Sturgeon's legacy changed Scotland – not for the better
There are obvious reasons for that. Her electoral success as First Minister is unimpeachable (save for a slight setback in the 2017 general election). Her UK-wide popularity, which started with her role in the Brexit referendum and peaked during the Covid pandemic, was surely higher than any of us imagined a Scottish nationalist leader's could be. The breakdown in her relationship with Alex Salmond and the circumstances surrounding it constitutes a political soap opera more salacious than anything the UK has seen in my lifetime. Read More: Her own arrest and that of her husband, the latter of whose case is ongoing, was jaw-dropping. And, of course there was gender recognition legislation, hammered through the Parliament at a time where dissent was a rarity, and perhaps the clearest indicator that Ms Sturgeon's hitherto ultra-sensitive public radar had diminished. It would be easy to identify any of these areas and claim it as Ms Sturgeon's legacy, and I am certain that her supporters and detractors will do just that. Some of her fanbase, many members of which remain at the heart of government, will cite her handling of Covid as her legacy. Her opponents inside nationalism will cite her role in the defenestration of Alex Salmond, and her detractors outside the movement will more likely reference the gender recognition debacle. In the final analysis, however, her real, enduring legacy is none of those things. Her enduring legacy is something far less superficially interesting; something far less likely to make the front page of a newspaper. No, by the end of this decade we will see Nicola Sturgeon's legacy as a decisive shift in Scottish public policy to the ideological left. This strategic philosophical change has stayed with us, and has permeated into the agendas of her successors Humza Yousaf (who didn't want to change it) and John Swinney (who, with his Deputy Kate Forbes, is experiencing how difficult it is to put the egg back in the shell). Whether or not this ideological movement is good news or bad news is largely in the eye of the beholder. Those on the left of the SNP, and of course those in Ms Sturgeon's coalition partners, the Greens, will celebrate this legacy. And so they should. Centrist and centrist-right economic policy, and a public service reform agenda, have been successfully neutered. I must say, though, that this is not an opinion I share, and however laudable the policy intention, during the next term of Parliament the chickens will come home to roost in a number of areas. Take schooling. The education establishment has spent the last decade obsessed (not too strong a word) with 'closing the attainment gap'. Nobody has questioned whether more homogenous attainment is good for the country (it isn't). And more importantly everyone has looked the other way when they have seen attempts to close the attainment gap in action. In schools all over Scotland, the method of closing the gap is not to raise the level of those at the bottom, but to suppress the level of those at the top. This happens every day, in every Scottish state school, and I have been witnessing it first hand for a decade. Together with the collapse in knowledge as part of the Scottish curriculum, the rejection of an excellence agenda is having a dramatic impact. This impact is most succinctly displayed by the international PISA data, which has recorded constant absolute and relative declines in Scottish educational performance in reading, maths and science. The impact is being felt by universities, with multiple anecdotal evidence that Scottish students are having to be placed, in effect, in remedial classes to catch up with British and international peers. And the impact will be felt by Scottish employers and the Scottish economy, the future of which is the children currently at school. Education is hardly the only example. The NHS is a poor service, with poor outcomes, swallowing up an eye-watering volume of public money, all over the UK. Quietly, though, the service in England is adapting to financial and demographic inevitabilities by working much more closely with private providers to expand capacity, reduce waiting lists, and improve outcomes. This will ultimately improve public health and therefore economic productivity … in England. In Scotland, we are not working with the private sector, and appear unwilling to make the obvious arguments for so doing. This is a policy decision driven by a leftist, anti-private sector agenda. High income taxes which we know prevent high taxpayers coming to Scotland, when we need a higher tax base. Rent caps, which we know prevent investment to alleviate the housing shortage. A presumption against building out our trunk roads, which is a humiliating skeleton of a network by European standards. And of course a presumption against oil and gas, which is losing us the investment and the workers we need to exploit our renewables potential. All policy decisions, all framed by this decisive move to the left expertly executed by Ms Sturgeon. I am far from blind to Ms Sturgeon's abilities or accomplishments, or indeed her ability to make good calls. I was heartened, for instance, to read that she opposed the release of the Lockerbie bomber, which I still regard as the most reprehensible decision taken by any government since devolution. Furthermore, although bandwagons are easy to jump on, I have always liked Nicola Sturgeon in my personal interactions with her. I continue to judge her by those, and therefore my personal feelings towards her are unchanged. However she and I come from a different place on the ideological spectrum. That is how I judge her legacy now and, as should always be the case in politics, that is how history will judge her, too. Andy Maciver is Founding Director of Message Matters, and co-host of the Holyrood Sources podcast


The Herald Scotland
2 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
CL Golf owner gets into business for the love of the game
The three-bay venue has been supported by a £15,000 loan from DSL Business Finance through the British Business Bank's start up loans programme, giving Mr Murray the opportunity for a career shift into what has been a life-long passion. Why did you take the leap into starting your own business? I have been playing golf for 39 years now after taking the game up at the age of 10 when I joined Dalbeattie Golf Club as a junior, and progressed from there. I decided to open the business after reflecting on my career to date and what the future looked like for me and my family. I wanted to work in the golf industry doing something that I am passionate about. I was previously a full-time retail store manager and my employers have let me drop down to part-time hours to run CL Golf. And why indoor golf in particular? I had thought of opening my own golf studio a few years ago after using one of the Trackman simulators. We use the Trackman iO launch monitor, which first came out in 2023. Powered by artificial intelligence (AI), it offers players hyper-realistic graphics, instant feedback on swing data, and the ability to virtually play over 300 of the world's most iconic courses, including Royal Troon and the Old Course at St Andrews. So this is for serious golfers? No, not necessarily. What we offer is a space where everyone is welcome. We have a diverse range of customers from children starting out to avid golfers trying to improve their overall game. We have also had interest from a local school about using the facilities, which would be great. We want our customers to come in and have a fun time and leave with a smile on their face. There are no pressures of someone looking over your shoulder and saying you're doing this wrong or that wrong, you need a lesson, or any of that. Our only question when they leave is "Did you have fun and enjoy yourself?" The Trackman equipment at CL Golf offers detailed swing analysis (Image: Supplied) But isn't the modern game all about the numbers? For those who are more serious, the AI provides motion analysis of your swing dynamics for comprehensive insights into your swing mechanics. This gives you both static and dynamic aspects of your body movements, giving you visual clarity. Using the camera function you can play in slow motion or real time and really get into the detail of your swing. It's a really is a very impressive coaching aid. How has CL Golf been received by the paying public? All of our customers have been very positive. Everyone who comes into the studio is blown away with the technology and quality of the Trackman iO systems, and also the set-up we have here in the bays. We have a lot of repeat customers. What makes you so passionate about the game? I always loved playing golf and being involved with the game. There have been so many good memories that I have captured along the way. Golf doesn't just mean playing the game – it gives you so much more like social skills, interactions, building friendships, having etiquette, and being honest and respectful to others. The list could go on and on. I also love golf because it always makes you want to improve on your last game, and it brings people together from all walks of life and gives us all something in common. I love the competition and playing against different golf courses. Golf has given me social skills from a young age and has given me transferable skills that have carried on throughout my life. It is also great for stress relief.