
Trump's tax and spending cuts bill clears key Senate vote as Republicans race to pass it by July 4
Senate Republicans voting in a dramatic late session on Saturday, June 28, narrowly cleared a key procedural step as they race to advance President Donald Trump's package of tax breaks, spending cuts and bolstered deportation funds by his July 4 deadline.
The tally, 51-49, came after a tumultuous session with Vice President JD Vance on hand if needed to break the tie. Tense scenes played out in the chamber as voting came to a standstill, dragging for hours as holdout senators huddled for negotiations. In the end, two Republicans opposed the motion to proceed to debate, joining all Democrats.
It's still a long weekend of work to come. Republicans are using their majorities in Congress to push aside Democratic opposition, but they have run into a series of political and policy setbacks. Not all GOP lawmakers are on board with proposals to reduce spending on Medicaid, food stamps and other programs as a way to help cover the cost of extending some $3.8 trillion in Trump tax breaks .
Ahead of the expected roll call, the White House released a statement of administrative policy saying it "strongly supports passage" of the bill that "implements critical aspects" of the president's agenda. Trump himself was at his golf course in Virginia on Saturday with GOP senators posting about it on social media.
"It's time to get this legislation across the finish line," said Senate Majority Leader John Thune, Republican of South Dakota. But as the day dragged, billionaire Elon Musk lashed out, calling the package "utterly insane and destructive": "The latest Senate draft bill will destroy millions of jobs in America and cause immense strategic harm to our country!"
The 940-page bill was released shortly before midnight Friday, and senators are expected to grind through the hours of all-night debate and amendments in the days ahead. If the Senate is able to pass it, the bill would go back to the House for a final round of votes before it could reach the White House. With the narrow Republican majorities in the House and Senate, leaders need almost every lawmaker on board in the face of essentially unified opposition from Democrats. Senator Thom Tillis of North Carolina and Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky voted against.
Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer of New York said Republicans unveiled the bill "in the dead of night" and are rushing to finish the bill before the public fully knows what's in it. He is expected to call for a full reading of the text in the Senate, which would take hours.
Make-or-break moment for GOP
The weekend session could be a make-or-break moment for Trump's party, which has invested much of its political capital on his signature domestic policy plan. Trump is pushing Congress to wrap it up and has admonished the "grandstanders" among GOP holdouts to fall in line.
The legislation is an ambitious but complicated series of GOP priorities. At its core, it would make permanent many of the tax breaks from Trump's first term that would otherwise expire by year's end if Congress fails to act, resulting in a potential tax increase on Americans. The bill would add new breaks, including no taxes on tips, and commit $350 billion to national security, including for Trump's mass deportation agenda .
But the cutbacks to Medicaid, food stamps and green energy investments − which a top Democrat, Senator Ron Wyden of Oregon, said would be a "death sentence" for America's wind and solar industries − are also causing dissent within GOP ranks.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


France 24
20 minutes ago
- France 24
US senators debate Trump's controversial spending bill
02:05 28/06/2025 Trump says terminating trade talks with Canada over tax on tech firms Americas 28/06/2025 'Class action' or 'injunction': Legal paths to block Trump's ban on birthright citizenship Americas 28/06/2025 US Supreme Court hands Trump win on powers of judges, birthright citizenship in legal limbo Americas 28/06/2025 Jury to start deliberating in Sean 'Diddy' Combs' sex trafficking trial Americas 28/06/2025 US authorities capture nine fugitives following New Orleans jailbreak Americas 27/06/2025 European defence and 'the will to fight': NATO countries must 'beef up' forces and political unity Europe 27/06/2025 Kay Bailey Hutchison: 'Europe can count on America, our Congress is overwhelmingly pro-NATO' Americas 26/06/2025 Trump reduces Iran's nuclear capacity but "increases their intent to dash towards nuclear weapons" Middle East 26/06/2025 NATO Summit: 'Everyone is trying their best to roll out the red carpet for Trump' Europe


Euronews
4 hours ago
- Euronews
Musk-Trump fallout means stronger EU Tech enforcement, experts say
ADVERTISEMENT The fallout between US President Donald Trump and Elon Musk, along with the expansion of the Digital Services Act (DSA) on July 1st, could make the law easier for the European Commission to enforce. Experts told Euronews Next that while Musk worked as a special employee at the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), it is possible that he was perceived as an official voice of the administration. Musk's former position could have made it harder for the Commission to put penalties on Musk's social media network X because they were worried about a larger 'spillover effect' with the Trump administration, said Oreste Pollicino, professor of digital constitutionalism and artificial intelligence at Bocconi University in Italy. 'Musk was seen not only as the owner of X but as a part of the US administration; this will not be the case anymore,' he said, adding that 'the political cost of targeting Musk could decrease'. 'They worry about the fallout' The DSA is a piece of legislation that regulates the spread of illegal and harmful online activities on platforms such as marketplaces, social media sites and app stores. On July 1st, a voluntary code of practice on disinformation will be folded into the DSA, which means platforms will have to abide by it going forward. (Twitter had signed the code in 2018 under previous leadership but withdrew in 2023 after Elon Musk bought the platform and renamed it X.) There's no proof that the Commission is avoiding taking action against X due to Musk's ties with Trump at the time because that would make it look 'very bad, ' said Jan Penfrat, senior policy advisor with European Digital Rights. However, he said that one of the major indicators that the Commission was worried about the Trump-Musk relationship is the fact that there is not yet a decision in its initial investigation into X, which was launched over 500 days ago. Last July, preliminary findings from the Commission found that X was in violation of the DSA in areas of 'dark patterns, advertising transparency, and data access for researchers'. 'There's tonnes of evidence. The Commission said so themselves. So why are we still waiting on [a] binding decision against X?' Penfrat told Euronews Next. 'One good explanation would be that yes, they are hesitant because they worry about the fallout … so if Trump and Musk aren't getting along anymore, [it could] lead to stronger and more decisions [under the legislation]'. How could the Commission prevent future enforcement issues? In the wake of the Trump-Musk fallout, Pollicino said there could be additional appetite from EU lawmakers to introduce complementary 'instruments' to close certain enforcement gaps. One of the things these instruments could focus on is refining a 'more precise criteria' for what might constitute a 'systemic risk' for harmful content, he added. The DSA currently evaluates four categories of systemic risks: the dissemination of illegal content, negative effects for the exercise of fundamental rights, negative effects on civic discourse, and negative effects on the protection of minors, gender-based violence and public health. 'If X is no longer perceived as an ideological instrument for a powerful United States political actor, it might recalibrate how systemic risks are assessed vis-a-vis … platforms like Meta, TikTok, [and] YouTube,' Pollicino said. The instrument could potentially address platform capture risk, Pollicino added, when a service becomes 'functionally aligned with a political actor or agenda [to] undermine democratic discourse.' Penfrat said that while the DSA is a 'solid' piece of legislation, more investment needs to be made into how to enforce it at the national level. What's next for the DSA investigation into X? The most recent update of the X investigation is that the Commission asked for more information about the algorithms the platform uses to push some content over others. Euronews Next reached out to the Commission to see if there have been any additional steps taken on the DSA investigation but did not receive an immediate reply. Pollicino said he believes the scope of the investigation that the European Commission already launched under the DSA into X should be expanded to include any harmful commentary or content that Musk would've perpetrated on the platform during his time as DOGE special government employee. 'For sure, there was a bigger impact when there was this alliance between Musk and Trump,' Pollicino said. Musk could eventually be charged with up to six per cent of X's profits in Europe under the DSA, but Penfrat argued that the penalty should be applied to Musk's entire net worth instead. 'If you limit it to X, then there's not much to fine,' he said. 'X doesn't have a huge revenue compared to how rich Elon Musk is … you'll end up with a fine that's, you know, less than pocket money [for him],' he said. Euronews Next reached out to X but didn't get an immediate reply.


France 24
6 hours ago
- France 24
Trump metal tariffs wreak havoc on US factory
At Independent Can's factory in Belcamp, Maryland northeast of Baltimore, CEO Rick Huether recounts how he started working at his family's business at age 14. Huether, now 73, says he is determined to keep his manufacturing company afloat for generations to come. But Trump's tariffs are complicating this task. "We're living in chaos right now," he told AFP. Since returning to the presidency in January, Trump imposed tariffs of 25 percent on imported steel and aluminum -- and then doubled the rate to 50 percent. This has weighed on operations at Independent Can, and Huether expects he eventually will have to raise prices. Not enough tinplate With the steady beat of presses, steel plates that have been coated with tin -- to prevent corrosion -- are turned into containers for cookies, dried fruit, coffee and milk powder at Huether's factory. But there is not enough of such American-made tinplate for companies like his. "In the United States, we can only make about 25 percent of the tinplate that's required to do what we do," in addition to what other manufacturers need, Huether said. "Those all require us to buy in the neighborhood of 70 percent of our steel outside of the United States," he added. While Huether is a proponent of growing the US manufacturing base, saying globalization has "gone almost a little bit too far," he expressed concern about Trump's methods. Trump has announced a stream of major tariffs only to later back off parts of them or postpone them, and also imposed duties on items the country does not produce. For now, Independent Can -- which employs nearly 400 people at four sites -- is ruling out any layoffs despite the current upheaval. But Huether said one of the company's plants in Iowa closed last year in part because of a previous increase in steel tariffs, during Trump's first presidential term. Price hikes With steel tariffs at 50 percent now, Huether expects he will ultimately have to raise his prices by more than 20 percent, given that tinplate represents a part of his production costs. Some buyers have already reduced their orders this year by 20 to 25 percent, over worries about the economy and about not having enough business themselves. Others now seem more inclined to buy American, but Huether expressed reservations over how long this trend might last, citing his experiences from the Covid-19 crisis. "During the pandemic, we took everybody in. As China shut down and the ports were locked up, our business went up 50 percent," he explained. But when the pandemic was over, customers turned back to purchasing from China, he said. "Today if people want to come to us, we'll take them in," he said, but added: "We need to have a two-year contract." Huether wants to believe that his company, which is almost a century old after being founded during the Great Depression, will weather the latest disruptions. © 2025 AFP