logo
Lawsuit prompts bill changing ‘racial quota' rules for SC's minority affairs board

Lawsuit prompts bill changing ‘racial quota' rules for SC's minority affairs board

Yahoo08-04-2025
Chief Michelle Mitchum of South Carolina's Pine Hill Indian community testified Tuesday, April 8, 2025, before a Senate panel in favor of legislation to remove from state law a requirement that a majority of the governing board for the state Commission for Minority Affairs be African American. Mitchum is one of two plaintiffs in a federal lawsuit challenging the law's constitutionality. (Screenshot of SCETV legislative livestream)
COLUMBIA — A pair of senators wants to remove a provision in state law that requires South Carolina's Commission for Minority Affairs to have a majority-Black governing board.
The bill comes in the wake of a federal lawsuit filed by two women who say they were denied a spot on the commission when they sought to represent other minority groups. It's co-sponsored by Senate Majority Leader Shane Massey, a white Republican from Edgefield, and Sen. Darrell Jackson, a Black Democrat from Hopkins.
A Senate panel voted unanimously Tuesday to advance the bill to the full Senate Judiciary Committee. Half of the six 'yes' votes came from Black legislators.
Sandy Chiong, a Myrtle Beach-area woman of Chinese and Cuban heritage, was the first to file suit in December seeking a seat on the commission's governing board.
The commission's governing board is made up of one person from each of South Carolina's seven congressional districts, as well as two at-large seats and the governor or his designee. The specification in the 1993 law that most of the board's nine members 'must be African American' violates the 14th Amendment of the Constitution, the lawsuit claimed.
SC woman sues over 'racial quota' for minority affairs board
'In America, government positions are supposed to be open to all citizens — not restricted to members of favored groups,' Chiong's lawyers wrote in court documents. 'A racial quota prevents her from being considered for a position on an equal basis with other candidates.'
Chief Michelle Mitchum of South Carolina's Pine Hill Indian community later joined the lawsuit. Pine Hill, whose members once inhabited what became the U.S. Army's Fort Jackson, is not a federal- or state-recognized tribe. However, South Carolina does recognize it as a special interest organization led by Mitchum.
A Senate panel heard from Mitchum on Tuesday, as well as from the director of the small state agency, Delores Dacosta. Both women spoke in favor of the bill.
When the Legislature established the Commission for Minority Affairs, the agency focused on addressing 'inequities impacting African American communities,' hence the legislative mandate that its membership reflect the population it was formed to serve.
In 2003, its scope was broadened to include Asian Americans, Hispanic and Latino Americans, and Native Americans, according to agency documents. But the language governing the board's makeup remained in place.
'We support this change to allow for the selection of commissioners to reflect the populations that we serve,' Dacosta said.
The agency holds community and networking events for minority businesspeople in the state.
It also puts out research each year tracking the growth of minority populations — where they're living in South Carolina, where their children go to school, and their average income compared to the overall population — as well as disparities when it comes to health and affordable housing.
'I don't see where this is going to hurt the commission,' Dacosta said about the bill. 'As a matter of fact, I think it's going to benefit because we have grown so much.'
Dacosta said when she started as head of the agency in 2018, it employed just nine people, six of those full time. Today, the agency has 24 employees.
'Our research is so broad … we need to see different faces on the board,' Dacosta added.
The legislation strikes language in the law relating to Black board members without replacing it with any new racial requirements for the commissioners.
Mitchum told senators they should instead set new criteria for minority membership, though she didn't give any suggestions.
'I would like for you to replace the language — not just strike it,' she said. 'Don't respond to a lawsuit. Actually represent the minority population; actually lift our voice.'
Black residents are the largest racial minority in South Carolina, at 26% of the state population, according to U.S. Census Bureau data. Hispanic residents make up 7.5% of the population, followed by 2% Asian and less than 1% Native American.
Chiong, who is the daughter of Cuban immigrants and is of Chinese, Cuban, and Spanish descent, did not come to Columbia to testify.
Five of the board's six current members are Black. Vacancies are in the 3rd District, which runs from Edgefield County to the state's northwestern corner; the 4th District, which includes most of Greenville and Spartanburg counties; and one at-large member.
Two board members are serving past the expiration of their term in what's known as holdover status, including the representative for the 7th District, where Chiong lives.
Dacosta said the commission has pending applications for two board appointments — the vacant 4th District seat and the expired term in the 6th District — and is 'waiting to fill the other slots.'
The governor's office also is in the process of nominating someone to fill the vacant 3rd District seat, spokesman Brandon Charochak said.
Four members of the commission are serving active terms. But three of their terms expire in July, according to the lawsuit.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mississippi joining 3 other GOP-led states sending National Guard troops to DC
Mississippi joining 3 other GOP-led states sending National Guard troops to DC

The Hill

time22 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Mississippi joining 3 other GOP-led states sending National Guard troops to DC

Mississippi on Monday became the fourth Republican-led state to announce plans to send National Guard troops to Washington, D.C. to bolster President Trump's crackdown on crime in the nation's capital. 'I've approved the deployment of approximately 200 Mississippi National Guard Soldiers to Washington, D.C., to support President Trump's effort to return law and order to our nation's capital,' Mississippi Gov. Tate Reeves (R) said in a post on the social platform X. 'Crime is out of control there, and it's clear something must be done to combat it,' he continued. 'Americans deserve a safe capital city that we can all be proud of. I know the brave men and women of our National Guard will do an excellent job enhancing public safety and supporting law enforcement.' West Virginia Gov. Patrick Morrisey (R), South Carolina Gov. Henry McMaster (R) and Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine (R) all announced over the weekend that they would send hundreds of soldiers from their states to nearly double the 800 D.C. National Guard members already mobilized. All three GOP governors said in their advisories that they were acting on requests from the Trump administration. The president announced a massive crime-fighting effort in Washington last week, with a federal takeover of the Metropolitan Police Department and infusion of federal agents and National Guard troops. 'Until 4 days ago, Washington, D.C., was the most unsafe 'city' in the United States, and perhaps the World,' Trump wrote in an update on Truth Social early Monday. 'Now, in just a short period of time, it is perhaps the safest, and getting better every single hour!' Attorney General Pam Bondi wrote on X on Monday morning that federal authorities made 137 arrests over the weekend, bringing the total arrests since the initiative began to more than 400. 'We are not slowing down,' she wrote. 'We are committed to making DC safe again!' Trump has set his sights on tackling crime in the nation's capital, even as local officials have pushed back on characterizations of violent surges. According to the District's statistics, which Trump has deemed 'fake,' violent crime is down about 26 percent compared to this point last year.

Oval Office meeting again puts rocky, tense Trump-Zelenskyy relationship to the test
Oval Office meeting again puts rocky, tense Trump-Zelenskyy relationship to the test

USA Today

time22 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Oval Office meeting again puts rocky, tense Trump-Zelenskyy relationship to the test

Trump's appraisal of the Ukrainian president has been an exercise in zigzag diplomacy as their relationship has unfolded since Trump's first term. WASHINGTON – He has his bromance with Vladimir Putin. But President Donald Trump's relationship with Volodymyr Zelenskyy is more whiplash than kinship. Trump's appraisal of the Ukrainian president has been an exercise in zigzag diplomacy, deriding him one moment as a modestly successful comedian who doesn't want peace and the next minute calling him a nice man with whom he has a good relationship. "Did I say that?" Trump asked back in February, when reporters reminded him that just a week earlier he had mocked Zelenskyy as a dictator. "I can't believe I said that," he exclaimed. He said it. Zelenskyy returned to the White House on Monday, Aug. 18, to discuss a potential peace deal to end Ukraine's three-and-a-half year war with Russia. The visit marks his first time back since a disastrous Oval Office meeting back in February in which Trump berated him on live television and then kicked him off the White House grounds. This time, Zelenskyy brought some backup. French President Emmanuel Macron, British Prime Minister Keir Starmer and other European leaders joined Zelenskyy at the White House meeting with Trump. Trump's like-him-one-minute, lampoon-him-the-next relationship with Zelenskyy stands in stark contrast to his rapport with Putin. Trump gave the Russian leader a red-carpet welcome to Alaska on Aug. 15 for a summit that was big on pageantry but produced no results. The two leaders left The Last Frontier without a deal to end the war. Troubled history for Trump and Zelenskyy Trump and Zelenskyy have a troubled history. It started with a phone call that led to Trump's first impeachment. The two leaders connected in July 2019, just three months after Zelenskyy's stunning rise from television comedian to newly elected president of Ukraine. The call started off well enough. Trump congratulated Zelenskyy on "a great victory" and complimented him for a doing a terrific job, according to a summary later released by the White House. But then Trump asked for a favor. He pressured Zelenskyy repeatedly to reopen an investigation into a Ukrainian energy company to focus on a political rival, Joe Biden, and Biden's son, Hunter. At the time, Joe Biden was considered a likely candidate for president and would, in fact, go on to defeat Trump in the 2020 election. Democrats said Trump's asking a foreign government to investigate a political rival amounted to an egregious abuse of power. Trump was impeached for the first time just a few months later but was acquitted in a Senate trial. From then on, Trump and Zelenskyy have never been on the best of terms. Trump has insisted repeatedly that Ukraine's war with Russia would never have started if he had been president and at times has even appeared to blame Zelenskyy for the conflict. But it was Putin who started the war when he ordered Russian troops to invade their Eastern European neighbor. Trump has also taken Zelenskyy to task on social media when efforts to strike a peace deal have come up short. "Think of it, a modestly successful comedian, Volodymyr Zelenskyy, talked the United States of America into spending $350 Billion Dollars, to go into a War that couldn't be won, that never had to start, but a War that he, without the U.S. and 'TRUMP,' will never be able to settle," Trump wrote in a post on Truth Social on Feb. 19. "A Dictator without Elections, Zelenskyy better move fast or he is not going to have a Country left." A week later, Trump suggested he didn't remember calling Zelenskyy a dictator and insisted he gets along with Zelenskyy just fine. "I have a very good relationship with President Putin. I think I have a very good relationship with President Zelenskyy," he said. Discord on full display in Oval Office The next day, though, the discord between them exploded in spectacular fashion when Zelenskyy came to the Oval Office to sign a deal for the U.S. to receive revenue from Ukraine's minerals in exchange for military assistance. As tempers flared, Zelenskyy told Trump an ocean separates the U.S. from the conflict now, "but you will feel it in the future." "Don't tell us what we're going to feel," Trump shot back. 'We're trying to solve a problem. Don't tell us what we're going to feel." Trump mocked Zelenskyy's clothes, Vice President JD Vance called him "disrespectful" and Trump booted the Ukrainian president from the White House without signing the minerals deal. Trump later wrote on social media that Zelenskyy "is not ready for Peace if America is involved, because he feels our involvement gives him a big advantage in negotiations." Trump said Zelenskyy "disrespected the United States of America in its cherished Oval Office," adding "he can come back when he's ready for Peace." Trump and Zelenskyy met again in private at Pope Francis' funeral in Rome in April – the White House called the meeting 'productive' – and again at a NATO summit in June. Trump greeted Zelenskyy with a handshake when he arrived at the White House on Monday, Aug. 18 and said it was an 'honor' to have him back. Michael Collins writes about the intersection of politics and culture. A veteran reporter, he has covered the White House and Congress. Follow him on X @mcollinsNEWS. Contributing: Francesca Chambers and Joey Garrison

Ohio governor says sending National Guard to D.C. 'the right thing to do'
Ohio governor says sending National Guard to D.C. 'the right thing to do'

USA Today

time22 minutes ago

  • USA Today

Ohio governor says sending National Guard to D.C. 'the right thing to do'

Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine is sending 150 Guard members to Washington, D.C., at the request of the secretary of the Army. COLUMBUS, Ohio - Gov. Mike DeWine says it's the "right thing to do" to send 150 Ohio National Guard members to Washington, D.C., as President Donald Trump deploys troops and seizes control of the city's Metropolitan Police Department. Trump announced on Aug. 11 that he would deploy National Guard troops to Washington to crack down on crime in the nation's capital. Late Aug. 15, Secretary of the Army Daniel P. Driscoll asked DeWine, a two-term Republican, to send military police to D.C. "The initial decision to deploy D.C. National Guard was not my decision. That was the president of the United States' decision," DeWine told the USA TODAY Network's Ohio statehouse bureau. "But when the secretary of the Army asks for backup support to our troops that are already deployed, yes, we will back up our troops." DeWine is one of three Republican governors who said they'll send additional troops, Reuters reported. Ohio state House Democrats are calling on DeWine to bring the Ohio National Guard home. 'Ohio's National Guard exists to protect and serve Ohioans and other Americans in moments of true crisis. When disasters like floods, storms, or community emergencies happen here at home, they're there to rebuild," said Ohio state House Minority Leader Dani Isaacsohn, a Democrat from Cincinnati. "Their mission is helping Ohioans, not serving as props in a president's political theatre." But DeWine says his decision, which was optional, is consistent with how he's deployed the Ohio National Guard in the past. More: DeWine ordered National Guard troops to assist in DC. What to know about Trump's plan What will the Ohio National Guard do in D.C.? The Ohio National Guard will patrol Washington, D.C., and protect federal buildings, DeWine said. "If in doing a patrol or if in standing guard of a federal building, an arrest has to be made, our guard will be in direct contact with the D.C. police department who will make arrests," DeWine said. "Our people won't make the arrests." How long will the Ohio National Guard be in the nation's capital? The Ohio National Guard will leave Aug. 20 for a 30-day deployment, DeWine said. The secretary of the Army could ask for an extension, which DeWine could grant or deny. How often does DeWine deploy the Ohio National Guard? DeWine deployed Ohio National Guard members and Ohio State Highway Patrol troopers to the southern border in 2021. He also sent members to assist with hurricane recovery in Florida, North Carolina and Louisiana. In 2020, DeWine sent the National Guard to Columbus and Cleveland to respond to protests following the murder of George Floyd in Minneapolis. In both instances, mayors requested help. The Ohio National Guard played a key role in Ohio's COVID-19 response and assisted with the aftermath of a train derailment in East Palestine, Ohio, in February 2023. Is the D.C. deployment different? Washington, D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser didn't ask for help with the city's violent crime rate, which declined 35% between 2023 and 2024. Attorneys for the District of Columbia are suing the Trump administration over its police takeover. DeWine says that doesn't matter, legally. "The people who don't like it in D.C. don't have the authority. The president of the United States has that authority," DeWine said. "Anybody can argue whether or not he should or shouldn't have the authority, but it's very clear. There is no debate he has the authority to do what he did." But Democrats say the deployment is political. Rep. Joyce Beatty, D-Columbus, said in a statement: "The men and women of Ohio's National Guard signed up to serve their country, not a lawless president who has repeatedly ignored our nation's constitution and principles." Is sending the National Guard optional? It depends. Typically, governors control the National Guard within their states. The federal government can request assistance from state National Guard members, which governors can approve or reject. That is the case with Secretary Driscoll's request for Ohio National Guard assistance in D.C. "The law is not a blank check allowing the president to use military forces anywhere in the country and for any purpose so long as they can find one willing governor," according to a Brennan Center for Justice analysis. In certain circumstances, presidents can federalize the National Guard by invoking the Insurrection Act. But this is rare. Earlier this year, Trump deployed the California National Guard to respond to protests over immigration enforcement − against the wishes of California Gov. Gavin Newsom. An appeals court ruled that Trump could retain control of the troops while a judge reviews the legality of Trump's decision. Will the Ohio National Guard be deployed to Cincinnati? DeWine said he's received no requests to deploy the Ohio National Guard to Cincinnati, where a viral brawl led to debates about the city's security, and has no plans to deploy them. DeWine instead offered other help to Cincinnati officials that included traffic enforcement and aviation surveillance. "They've taken me up on part of it, but not all of it," DeWine said. "But that's their choice. They have the choice." USA TODAY contributed to this article. State government reporter Jessie Balmert can be reached at jbalmert@ or @jbalmert on X.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store