Labour admits BREXIT is to thank for Britain securing a better US trade deal than Europe - as bloc's leaders hit out at their 'badly negotiated' agreement
Jonathan Reynolds, the Business Secretary, said there was 'absolutely no doubt' that the UK was better off as a result of having its own trade policy.
His comments came after Donald Trump announced he had agreed 'the biggest deal ever made' between the US and the European Union.
The agreement will subject the EU to 15per cent tariffs on most of its goods entering America.
It is lower than a 30per cent levy previously threatened by the US president - but worse than the UK's deal - and was quickly lambasted by European leaders.
After a day playing golf in Scotland yesterday, Mr Trump met the president of the EU Commission Ursula von der Leyen to discuss the broad terms of an agreement.
But Viktor Orban, the Hungarian PM, hit out: 'Donald Trump ate von der Leyen for breakfast'.
'This is what happened and we suspected this would happen as the U.S. president is a heavyweight when it comes to negotiations while Madame President is featherweight.'
Former Belgian prime minister Guy Verhofstadt branded the deal 'scandalous' and 'badly negotiated', saying there was 'not one concession from the American side'.
French prime minister François Bayrou said: 'It is a dark day when an alliance of free peoples, united to affirm their values and defend their interests, resolves to submission.'
And Bernd Lange, the EU Parliament's trade chief, said: 'My first assessment: Not satisfactory.
'This is a lopsided deal. Concessions have clearly been made that are difficult to accept. Deal with significant imbalance. Furthermore lot of questions still open.'
But Ms von der Leyen said the deal was 'huge', adding: 'It will bring stability. It will bring predictability. That's very important for our businesses on both sides of the Atlantic.'
Mr Trump said the 'partnership' would 'bring us very close together'.
He added: 'I think it's great that we made a deal today instead of playing games and maybe not making a deal at all.'
Full details of the deal have not yet been confirmed, and a written text still needs to be agreed.
But the agreement is worse than a similar deal struck between the UK and US, which will see tariffs of only 10per cent placed on British exports.
Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds this morning admitted that the UK's favourable deal was a direct benefit of Brexit.
He told Sky News: 'All of the trade negotiations that we've got use the fact that we are not part of the customs union anymore, I'm absolutely clear of that. I think we can make the best of that.'
Pressed on whether he would call it a Brexit benefit, he added: 'I'm absolutely clear, I've said in Parliament many times, this is a benefit of being out of the European Union, having our independent trade policy, absolutely no doubt about that.'
When the UK and US signed a trade deal in June, it reduced tariffs on car and aerospace imports to the US.
But agreement on a similar arrangement for Britain's steel imports was not reached, leaving tariffs on steel at 25per cent.
American concerns over steel products made elsewhere in the world, then finished in the UK, are said to be among the sticking points.
Sir Keir Starmer is expected to spend most of the day with President Trump on Monday, when he will have a chance to press the president on a steel deal.
But Business Secretary Mr Reynolds suggested it may take more than a meeting between the two leaders to resolve the matter, telling BBC Breakfast: 'We were very happy to announce the breakthrough that we had a few months ago in relation to sectors like automotive, aerospace, which are really important to the UK economy.
'But we always said it was job saved, but it wasn't job done. There's more to do. The negotiations have been going on on a daily basis since then. There's a few issues to push a little bit further today.
'We won't perhaps have anything to announce a resolution of those talks, but there's some sectors that we still need to resolve, particularly around steel and aluminium, and there's the wider conversation about what the US calls its reciprocal tariffs.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
16 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
New Trump proposal could force some visitors to pay $15,000 bond
The U.S. could require bonds of up to $15,000 for some tourist and business visas under a pilot program launching in two weeks. It comes after the Trump administration secured another victory in restricting visas for transgender athletes to come to the 2028 Olympics in Los Angeles. A government notice made the announcement on Monday, an effort that aims to crack down on visitors who overstay their visas. The program gives foreign service officers at American embassies the discretion to impose bonds on visitors from countries with high rates of visa overstays, according to a Federal Register notice. Bonds could also be applied to people coming from countries where screening and vetting information is deemed insufficient, the notice said. The Daily Mail has reached out to the White House and the State Department for comment. Donald Trump has made cracking down on illegal immigration a focus of his presidency, boosting resources to secure the border and arresting people in the U.S. illegally. He issued a travel ban in June that fully or partially blocks citizens of 19 nations from entering the U.S. on national security grounds. Trump's immigration policies have led some visitors to skip travel to the United States. Transatlantic airfares dropped to rates last seen before the COVID-19 pandemic in May and travel from Canada and Mexico to the U.S. fell by 20% year-over-year. Effective August 20, the new visa program will last for approximately a year, the government notice said. Consular officers will have three options for visa applicants subjected to the bonds: $5,000, $10,000 or $15,000, but will generally be expected to require at least $10,000, it said. The funds will be returned to travelers if they depart in accordance with the terms of their visas, the notice said. A similar pilot program was launched in November 2020 during the last months of Trump's first term in office, but it was not fully implemented due to the drop in global travel associated with the pandemic, the notice said. A State Department spokesperson listed the criteria that will be used to identify the countries that will be affected, adding that the country list may be updated. 'Countries will be identified based on high overstay rates, screening and vetting deficiencies, concerns regarding acquisition of citizenship by investment without a residency requirement, and foreign policy considerations,' the spokesperson said. The State Department was unable to estimate the number of visa applicants who could be affected by the change. Many of the countries targeted by Trump's travel ban also have high rates of visa overstays, including Chad, Eritrea, Haiti, Myanmar and Yemen. U.S. Travel Association, which represents major tourism-related companies, estimated the 'scope of the visa bond pilot program appears to be limited, with an estimated 2,000 applicants affected, most likely from only a few countries with relatively low travel volume to the United States.' Numerous countries in Africa, including Burundi, Djibouti and Togo also had high overstay rates, according to U.S. Customs and Border Protection data from fiscal year 2023. A provision in a sweeping spending package passed in the Republican-controlled U.S. Congress in July also created a $250 'visa integrity fee' for anyone approved for a non-immigrant visa that could potentially be reimbursable for those who comply with visa rules. The $250 fee goes into effect on October 1. U.S. Travel said that fee could hinder travel and said 'if implemented, the U.S. will have one of, if not the highest, visitor visa fees in the world.' Earlier Monday, Citizenship and Immigration Services stepped in line with Trump's wider efforts to ban transgender athletes from women's sports. The USCIS announced it has updated its immigration policy to restrict visa eligibility for transgender women seeking to compete in women's sports . Under the policy update, USCIS will consider 'the fact that a male athlete has been competing against women' as a negative factor when evaluating visa petitions in categories such as O-1A for extraordinary ability, EB-1 and EB-2 green cards for highly skilled workers, and national interest waivers. 'USCIS is closing the loophole for foreign male athletes whose only chance at winning elite sports is to change their gender identity and leverage their biological advantages against women,' said USCIS spokesperson Matthew Tragesser. 'It's a matter of safety, fairness, respect, and truth that only female athletes receive a visa to come to the U.S. to participate in women's sports.' The move comes amid the president's broader efforts to bar transgender athletes from competing in women's sports with the United States set to host the Olympics in Los Angeles in 2028.
Reuters
17 minutes ago
- Reuters
Why did copper escape US tariffs when aluminium did not?
LONDON, Aug 5 (Reuters) - A U.S. decision last week to exempt refined copper metal from import duties is in contrast to an earlier move to levy steep duties on aluminium, and highlights the central importance of electricity costs and the lobbying dynamics shaping U.S. policy. The United States stunned the copper market with its decision to only tax imports of semi-finished products such as wire, tube and sheet. Copper prices on Comex are down more than 20% since the announcement on Wednesday. Since June, aluminium metal shipped to the U.S., where smelters face higher electricity bills than copper producers, has attracted 50% tariffs. Taxes on metal production are part of a broader U.S. effort to revive domestic smelting capacity and cut reliance on imports. U.S. aluminium producer Century Aluminum (CENX.O), opens new tab has been vocal in its support of tariffs that it says are essential to protect what remains of the U.S. aluminium smelting industry. "Century Aluminum Company applauds President Trump's unwavering defence of the nation's domestic production of critical metals by increasing aluminum tariffs to 50%," the company said in a June release. The waiver for refined copper reflects its importance to U.S. manufacturing and the influence of the industry, including major producer Freeport-McMoRan (FCX.N), opens new tab, which earlier this year said a global trade war would undermine U.S. copper production. "A global trade war could result in slower economic growth," Freeport said in a submission to a U.S. government request for comment on its investigation into copper import tariffs. "Slower growth in the U.S. or globally would negatively impact copper prices, which could threaten the viability of the domestic copper industry due to its elevated cost structure." The case for tariffs on U.S. aluminium imports includes the energy proportion of smelting costs in the United States. Macquarie's ballpark estimate for energy costs for producing primary aluminium and copper is 50% and 30% respectively. "There is no economic case for building any greenfield aluminium smelting capacity without substantial intervention. Even then, intervention may not be sufficient," said Macquarie analyst Marcus Garvey. Analysts say one major difficulty for potential investors in U.S. aluminium smelting capacity is getting long-term power purchase agreements at competitive prices, when power costs are higher in the U.S. compared with other producing countries such as United Arab Emirates, Bahrain and the world's biggest producer China. The cost of electricity is the main reason why there are only four active U.S. aluminium smelters down from 23 in 1995. According to U.S. Geological Survey, the United States produced 3.35 million metric tons of primary aluminium in 1995, 1.6 million tons in 2015 and 670,000 tons last year.
Metro
17 minutes ago
- Metro
Russia issues warning to 'everyone' after Trump moves nuclear submarines
Days after President Donald Trump said he deployed nuclear submarines 'in the region' of Russia, the Kremlin has issued a warning to the world. Trump said nuclear submarines are near Russia after previous threats from officials in the country. He's repeatedly given Russia an ultimatum to end the war in Ukraine soon, or face sanctions. The official deadline Trump has given Russia is August 8, but a war of words online has begun before that deadline. 'I have ordered two Nuclear Submarines to be positioned in the appropriate regions, just in case these foolish and inflammatory statements are more than just that,' wrote Trump on his Truth Social platform. 'Words are very important, and can often lead to unintended consequences. I hope this will not be one of those instances.' After being told to 'watch his words' by Trump, Russian President Dmitry Medvedev shocked many when he reminded the US of Russia's nuclear strike capabilities. 'Remember how dangerous the fabled 'Dead Hand' can be,' Medvedev wrote on Telegram, referencing Soviet-era Doomsday nuclear weapons. Now, the Kremlin has issued an official statement after Trump said nuclear submarines had been moved towards their country: 'Russia is very attentive to nuclear non-proliferation. We believe that everyone must be extremely careful with nuclear rhetoric.' But former Russian president Medvedev himself has threatened nuclear war if Russia loses the war in Ukraine. 'It doesn't occur to any of the wretches to draw the following elementary conclusion: That the loss of a nuclear power in a conventional war could provoke a nuclear war,' he said in 2023. 'Nuclear powers have not lost major conflicts on which their fate depends. And this should be obvious to anyone.' Though the Kremlin has claimed 'everyone' must be careful with nuclear rhetoric, they themselves haven't been. On state-funded television, hosts have openly threatened nuclear attacks on Britain and other Western countries. 'The people of Britain are there, they also want to live a good and happy life at our expense, right? But if there is no Britain, there is no problem,' Reservist general and hardline MP Andrei Gurulev previously said. In the face of these increasing threats, the US president's tone toward Russia in recent weeks has changed to a more aggressive and far less friendly. In July, when asked if he was done with Putin, Trump said: 'I'm disappointed in him, but I'm not done with him. But I'm disappointed in him.' More Trending And when pressed on whether he trusts the Russian leader, he replied: 'I trust almost no one.' Trump then said that the first lady was among the people who convinced him to change his tune toward Putin. 'I go home, I tell the first lady, 'You know, I spoke to Vladimir today. We had a wonderful conversation.' She said, 'Oh, really? Another city was just hit,'' he said. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Donald Trump rushes to Sydney Sweeney's defence after voting controversy MORE: Russian TikTokkers 'arrested for taking selfies outside oil depot inferno' MORE: Risk and reward, Trump's Mini-Me and planting trees for the planet
