Budget 2025: Nicola Willis announces $190m 'Social Investment Fund'
It forms the centrepiece of a $275m commitment over four years to the government's social investment approach, with more details expected in next week's Budget.
Speaking in South Auckland on Thursday morning, Willis said the funding would target deeply entrenched issues by investing in services that deliver "measurable improvements" in people's lives.
The fund would be governed by the new Social Investment Agency and was expected to invest in at least 20 initiatives in its first year.
The first three initiatives to receive support from the fund were an Autism NZ early intervention scheme, an Emerge Aotearoa youth offending programme, and a Te Tihi o Ruahine progamme supporting families in need.
As well, the Social Investment Agency was allocated $45 million for parenting initiatives and state care prevention programmes.
Willis said each investment would have robust evaluation built in from the beginning, so the government could track the fund's impact.
"We're not talking about waving a magic wand, applying a quick fix or simply servicing misery," Willis said.
"This is about investing in smart, targeted early interventions that not only make a difference in the lives of... whānau, but mean the Government reduces the money it might otherwise have spent on treating the symptoms rather than the cause of dysfunction."
Willis said the fund would scale up over time, taking over contracts currently secured by government agencies. The government currently spends about $7b a year on social services from non-government agencies.
"The Social Investment Fund is a rejection of the failed approaches of the past. It's being set up as a totally new way of working with you," Willis said.
"I see it as a force for enduring change that will survive changes of government."
rnz.co.nz
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
an hour ago
- Scoop
Transparency Priority For Councillor Hoping To Be Nelson's Mayor
Nelson mayoral contender Aaron Stallard has formally launched his campaign with a promise to make the council more transparent and democratic, if elected. The first-term councillor wanted to re-establish the council's main standing committees to reverse the 'unhealthy concentration of power' that has developed over the last three years under Mayor Nick Smith. Smith, on his election, led a restructuring of how the elected members provided oversight of council activities. The earlier approach, favoured by Stallard, saw committees focused on broad areas of council work – such as infrastructure, or community and recreation. All elected members sat on those committees, which sat publicly, published meeting agendas and minutes, and had the power to make some decisions. The new approach, initiated by Smith, sees smaller taskforces with membership of only a few elected members that focus on single issues or policies – such as the re-opening of the Elma Turner Library or climate change. The taskforces are intended to provide quick guidance to staff and develop recommendations for the full council of elected members to then consider and decide on. However, they meet behind closed doors, don't publish agendas or minutes, and their notes can only be accessed by lodging Local Government and Official Information and Meetings Act (LGOIMA) requests. Though some committees remain in place – such as the Audit, Risk, and Finance Committee – Stallard said the loss of the council's main committees reduced democracy and transparency. 'The resulting lack of governance oversight also resulted in problems such as the planting of 20,000 exotic redwoods in the Maitai and a loss of $5m of transport funding,' he added. The council agreed to a taskforce recommendation to transition away from commercial clear-fell pine forestry in November 2023. However, Stallard was later surprised by a decision made by council staff several months later to replant 20.5 hectares of the redwoods in the Maitai Valley rather than native trees which, he said, was against the recommendations outlined in the taskforce's report. He also said councillors were told 'out of the blue' in August 2023 that the council would lose access to funding from the Government's Transport Choices programme to construct a cycleway linking the Brook and Waimea Road due to a lack of project capacity. Both issues wouldn't have occurred with the greater councillor oversight which committees provided, Stallard said. But Smith, who was also running to be re-elected, defended the decision to get rid of the larger committees, which he said re-litigated issues which had already been debated. 'It was inefficient, costly, and frustrating for both councillors as well as staff.' Smith said the changes had successfully improved council culture, highlighting that there had been 10 code of conduct issues over the two terms preceding his mayoralty which had cost 'tens of thousands of dollars', and none during his tenure. The changes also enshrined democracy by ensuring decisions were only made at full council meetings to allow participation of all elected members, and improved transparency by reducing the number of meetings journalists needed to report on, he said. Smith disagreed that committees would have solved the two issues specifically raised by Stallard, attributing them instead to 'tensions' between some councillors and staff decisions about the council's forestry transition, but that a newly-hired forest manager would get the plan 'on track', as well as a 'ridiculous' Government timeframe to complete the cycleway project while the council was grappling with storm recovery. However, he added that he was 'open-minded' about having another look at the council structure next term. The council reviewed the taskforce structure in August 2023 after they had been in place for several months. At the time, Stallard attempted to return to committees, while keeping some taskforces, but his proposal was defeated by five votes to eight. The Chief Ombudsman also called for all council workshops to be open to the public by default in October 2023. Though this is already the case in Nelson, the recommendation calls into question the privacy of the council's taskforces. In addition to returning to committees to increase transparency, Stallard pledged to investigate opportunities to increase community involvement in council decisions, such as through citizens' assemblies and the participatory budget setting, as was recommended by the Review into the Future of Local Government. 'Such improved participation… is especially suited to working through complicated or controversial issues, and for avoiding the sort of messy and divisive process we experienced with Plan Change 29 that dealt with housing intensification.' Stallard's other project priorities included the Rocks Road walking and cycling boulevard, a central city civic hub, addressing climate change, and tackling air pollution. Running against Stallard and Smith were Richard Osmaston and John Wakelin.
Scoop
4 hours ago
- Scoop
Govt Gets It Wrong With Cancelled Ferries
The cost of cancelling the iRex ferries shows the wastefulness and short-term thinking of the Coalition Government. 'We could have had new ferries by next year and millions of dollars left over to spend on critical infrastructure if it weren't for this irresponsible Government,' says the Green Party's spokesperson for Transport, Julie Anne Genter. 'This decision to cancel the contract for new ferries has cost us $671 million. This is a missed opportunity and a massive mark against this Government's credibility. 'For context, that amount of money could have funded the electrification of the main rail line from Waikanae to Palmerston North, or built thousands of much-needed homes. 'New Zealanders should have been taking those new ferries this and next year - instead we've had the Aratere taken out of commission, and more trucks on the road as a result of retiring our only rail-enabled ferry. 'The Hyundai order for two new rail-enabled ferries for $550m was one of the best deals the country ever signed up to. This Coalition Government tore it up and will likely be forced into signing a deal that leaves us worse off in the short and long term. 'The Government must stop cutting corners and commit to funding a transport network that works for people and planet,' says Julie Anne Genter.
Scoop
a day ago
- Scoop
Why Has Trust In News Fallen? The Answer Is More Complicated Than We Thought
We live in an age of declining trust in public institutions: parliament, the health and education systems, courts and police have all suffered over the past decade, both in New Zealand and internationally. And, of course, trust in the news has declined precipitously, according to regular surveys, including our own research. So, it might be tempting to roll declining trust in news media into this wider decline of trust in public institutions in general. But this is where our research disagrees. News isn't just another institution like the state, a corporation or a non-profit organisation. Ideally, it's the democratic expression of the public interest in these things. An institutional approach may help us explore the structural issues democracies face (for example, critiquing the nature of media ownership). But it also generalises, and risks obscuring the specifics of the trust problem public interest journalism faces. Nor does it recognise the distinctiveness of the ' social contract of the press ' – the necessary bond of trust between journalism and its audiences, which is key to the success of the wider social contract between the public and its institutions. News is out of sync Our research shows trust in news has plummeted from 58% of New Zealanders agreeing they can trust 'most of the news most of the time' in 2020, to just 32% in 2025. Survey respondents tell us they perceive the news to be politically biased (both left and right), and because too much seems to be opinion masquerading as news. These seemed very different from the trust issues faced by government, business and non-governmental organisations (NGOs). Declining trust in those institutions has been driven more by wars, financial crises, the rise of populism and the COVID pandemic. To differentiate journalism's trust issues, we explored whether falling trust in news was (or wasn't) linked to declines in trust in other social institutions. We looked at research from the Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism and the global Edelman Trust Barometer, as well as our own research. We found the trajectories of trust levels for other social institutions – governments, business, NGOs – showed clear links to each other as they rose and fell, more or less in sync, over time. Trust in news, however, has been in its own lane, perhaps influenced by the others, but clearly not tethered to them. A fall in trust in government and politics, in other words, is not a predictor of a fall in trust in news. Global levels of trust Globally, we found trust in government, business and NGOs fell and then rose, roughly together, from 2020 to 2024. While not tracking each other exactly, there's a clear grouping of data points. From 2020, trust in all of them (including media in general – television, internet, radio and movies) fell rapidly and levelled out in 2021 before rising again slightly by 2024. Trust in news itself, however, behaved in almost exactly opposite ways, rising from 2020 to 2021 before falling again and levelling out in 2023. Given its impact, the global pandemic is likely a cause for these changes in 2020. However, as trust in government fell, news media – to which the public has historically turned in a crisis – actually rose. Trust levels in Aotearoa New Zealand In Aotearoa New Zealand, things were very different. While it fell globally, trust in institutions in New Zealand rose from 2020, before falling in 2022. Trust in news, however, was not rising in the early days of the pandemic as it was elsewhere. It was falling. And it continued to fall steadily until 2023. (In 2024, it would fall even more dramatically, but that data was not captured by this study.) Both sets of data – global and local – show trust in news doing largely the opposite of what trust in government and other institutions has been doing, rising when they were falling and vice versa. When journalism does its job well and exposes failings in government, we would indeed expect one to rise and the other to fall. So, we can see there may well be links between changes in levels of trust. But we can also see trust levels are not responding in unison to external sociopolitical pressures. In focus groups, we explored if there were connections between trust in news and trust in government. Older New Zealanders who didn't trust the news told us there were institutions they mistrusted: banks, insurance companies and universities, some to very high levels, and mostly born from personal experience. But they did not particularly mistrust government as an institution. And we found no direct link between their mistrust of news and their mistrust of other social institutions. Which supports the evidence we found in the global and local trust data trends. It seems the trust problems democracies have with their news services need to be addressed on their own terms, not as part of an overall picture.
