
‘The Last Supper': Paul Elie feasts on artistic ferment over religion in the '80s
In his gripping and essential new book 'The Last Supper,' Paul Elie captures a pivot point in 20th century social history, when certain ideas about religion, art and sex in the '80s crashed headlong into each other during an epoch that tends to be shrugged off by historians as a quiet interval between the gas shortages and political malfeasance of the '70s and the emergent technological revolution of the '90s. But it was in fact a breeding ground of artistic ferment, in which creatives grappled with what Elie calls crypto-religion, that 'liminal space between belief and disbelief' that produced a wealth of thought-provoking popular art.
Elie's masterful survey is a group portrait of artists and their fellow travelers who participated during a bloody crossroads in American life, when Ronald Reagan's ascension to the White House in 1980 collapsed the walls between church and state, sparking a counterrevolution across the arts. It is this dialogue, this back-and-forth, that drives Elie's fascinating survey, placing the reader in the thick of a convulsive era when ideas about the role of religion in modern life were fighting it out in the public sphere in ways that we haven't seen since.
Among these voters that swept him into the presidency in 1980, Reagan was a savior, wresting the country away from the unchecked permissiveness and aggressive secularism of the prior two decades into a new era of 'family values' that encompassed adherence to the straight and narrow, of which biblical scripture was the key text. Gathering up zealots like Jerry Falwell under his new revival tent, Reagan preached the virtues of heterosexual marriage, of preserving the life of the unborn fetus, of chastity and moderation.
The Roman Catholic Church had Reagan's back. Pope John Paul II, who had ascended to the papacy in 1978, toured the world like a beatific rock star, preaching the gospel of this new sobriety in football stadiums across the country. This was Christianity leached of all nuance or moral ambiguity, a battering ram of religious doctrine.
What emerged from this great leap backward was a diverse efflorescence of art that directly addressed the very things the church ignored. Elie calls it crypto-religion, in which artists negotiated the 'liminal space between belief and non-belief,' and in so doing, created a rich body of work that raised the question 'of what the person who made it believes, so that the question of what it means to believe is crucial to the work's effect.'
Elie's cast of characters — an eclectic list that includes Andy Warhol, Sinéad O'Connor, Bob Dylan, Bono, Czeslaw Milosz, Martin Scorsese and Robert Mapplethorpe — were, to varying degrees, children of the church who had internalized its tenets at a time when religion was still a central fact of life in America and Europe in the '50s and '60s. As Elie astutely points out, even an artist as outwardly estranged from religious life as Warhol carried with him the lessons of the Polish Byzantine Order of his youth. 'He made silk-screen images of skulls, memento-mori style,' writes Elie. 'He dressed dolls as priests and nuns and photographed them.' As an adult, Warhol attended church, albeit sporadically, and accepted a commission to refashion Leonardo's da Vinci's 'The Last Supper' for an exhibition in Milan.
What these crypto-religious artists shared was a vision of divinity shot through with doubt and wonder, weighing the desires of the flesh against the ephemerality of the holy spirit. It was necessary for these insurrectionists to embrace faith on their own terms, transmuting their internal theological dialogues into popular art. On his 1979 album, 'Slow Train Coming,' Dylan had come out in no uncertain terms as a man who now held fast to Jesus love. That record would have a profound influence on O'Connor, the Irish singer who wrestled with God like a scorned lover: 'Tell me, where did the light die?' she sang in her song 'Troy.' U2, whose lead singer Bono also looked to Dyan as an exemplar, turned the tropes of arena rock inside out, so that a garage-rock classic like 'Gloria' becomes a 'crisis of faith,' an 'anthem of self-surrender' in which the devotion Bono feels 'involves something larger than himself, and he's trying to empty himself of everything that's not in it.'
As religion and crypto-religion were locked in mortal combat, the AIDS plague was sweeping across gay communities like a firestorm, to the complete indifference of the federal government and their Christian handmaidens. The gay artistic community was ravaged, many of its greatest creative geniuses felled by the disease. But a groundswell of protest art was answering the call with a new kind of ardent feeling that damned the false piety and hypocrisy of homophobic Christian doctrine.
Peter Hujar, who would die from AIDS in 1987, used solemn, stark portraiture to create a new kind of crypto-religious iconography, while his compatriot David Wojnarowicz, another victim of AIDS, channeled his rage toward homophobic indifference into mixed-media pieces that restored his subjects' bruised humanism.
Then there was Scorsese. The filmmaker, who had been raised in a strict Catholic household in New York's Little Italy and had in his prior films grappled with ideas of belief in a violent world, was obsessed with adapting Nikos Kazantzakis' 1955 novel 'The Last Temptation of Christ.' It took years to drum up the financing, but when the 1988 film was completed, the religious right did everything in its power to block its release. No wonder: Here was crypto-religious art writ large, a vision of Jesus who was all too human, plagued by doubt and a troubled inner life. It was, according to Elie, the 'Jesus of history more than the Christ of faith' — a man first, in other words. This dovetailed with the work of scholars such as Elaine Pagels, who were framing Jesus as a historical figure, rather than the 'Christ of faith.'
Where has all of this crypto-religious practice left us in 2025? That liminal space that Elie describes between belief and disbelief has closed, at least for the time being. Yet even as 'the American population has become less religious and religiosity more diverse,' the idea of mainstream artists grappling with religion no longer exists, perhaps because such matters are irrelevant in an aggressively outward-directed, spiritually bereft time. Elie's brilliant book is a bracing reminder of art's far-reaching power in matters of the heart and soul. His expansive vision of the '80s rings out like a clarion call for a new era of rigorous artistic engagement with the unknowable and the unseen.
Weingarten is the author of 'Thirsty: William Mulholland, California Water, and the Real Chinatown.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Forget smartphones and wokery. There's an even greater threat to our children's education
Given that today's children appear to spend much of their time in school being taught that the Vikings were champions of diversity and that human beings should be encouraged to choose between one or more of 72 different genders, you may fear that educational standards in this country are slipping somewhat. But perhaps we should be grateful. Because, believe it or not, things could actually be worse. Say, for example, we were to follow a radical proposal made the other day by Daniel Susskind. Dr Susskind is an eminent economist, as well as the author of a book entitled A World Without Work: Technology, Automation and How We Should Respond. And, speaking at the Hay festival, he argued that the traditional school timetable should be ripped up, so that children can instead focus on learning to use artificial intelligence. 'We should be spending a third of the time that we have with students teaching them how to use these technologies,' he declared. 'How to write effective prompts and use these systems, get them to do what we want them to do…' I appreciate that Dr Susskind is an exceptionally learned and intelligent man. None the less, I for one think his proposal sounds horrifying. We often talk about the need to ban smartphones in schools. Which is fair enough. But my priority would be to ban AI. The fundamental purpose of education, after all, is to teach children how to think. AI, however, does the opposite. It teaches them that they don't need to think. Because it will do their thinking for them. For proof, look at what's already happening in universities. In April, The Chronicle of Higher Education – an American journal – reported that ever-growing numbers of students were essentially outsourcing their studies to AI. When a professor at New York University tried to prevent his students from using AI to complete their assignments, he was met with consternation. Some students protested that he was interfering with their 'learning styles'. Another complained: '[If] you're asking me to go from point A to point B, why wouldn't I use a car to get there?' Meanwhile, one student asked for an extension to a deadline, 'on the grounds that ChatGPT was down the day the assignment was due'. Still, I suppose we'd better get used to this sort of thing. It seems that a new educational era is upon us. One in which teachers get AI to set homework, pupils get AI to complete it, and then teachers get AI to mark it. Soon enough, there will be no need for human involvement at any stage of the process. So, as schools will effectively be superfluous, the Government might as well just shut them all down. In fact, I urge it to do so as quickly as possible. Such a move would immediately free up tens of billions of pounds a year. And since, in due course, AI will be taking all the jobs that today's children could have grown up to do, we'll need the money to pay their benefits. Heartfelt thanks to Ash Regan, the Scottish nationalist and one-time candidate to succeed Nicola Sturgeon as First Minister. Because on Sunday, she provided us with the one of the most memorable political quotes of the year. Even if not necessarily on purpose. Ms Regan was being interviewed by The Herald newspaper about her plans to clamp down on prostitution in Scotland, by criminalising the buying of sex. Wasn't there a risk, asked The Herald's reporter, that these plans might inadvertently drive prostitution underground? Ms Regan scoffed. Plainly she'd never heard anything so absurd. 'If you even think for one second, you cannot possibly drive prostitution underground,' she snorted. 'If you had a lot of women in underground cellars with a locked door, how would the punters get to them?' Having digested these extraordinary words, we can, I believe, draw only one conclusion. Ms Regan is 51 years old. And yet, during over a half a century on this planet, she has never heard – or at least, never understood – the phrase 'driven underground'. And so she'd taken it literally. After the interview, we must hope, a kindly aide will have taken her to one side, and gently explained that the expression is purely figurative. Otherwise, I fear that, despite Ms Regan's initial scoffing, she'll begin to worry that the reporter had a point – and that Scottish pimps really will take to opening brothels deep beneath the Earth's surface. If so, we must wait to see what revisions Ms Regan might make to her plans. Perhaps she will recommend that the Scottish NHS supply all prostitutes with free vitamin D tablets, to make up for the lack of sunlight they'll be getting. 'Way of the World' is a twice-weekly satirical look at the headlines while aiming to mock the absurdities of the modern world. It is published at 6am every Tuesday and Saturday Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Chief Capitol Riot Prosecutor Quits After Trump's ‘Terrible Message'
The federal prosecutor who helped oversee the Justice Department's mammoth probe of Capitol rioters has left for the private sector, slamming Donald Trump's sweeping pardons on the way out. A longtime assistant U.S. attorney, Greg Rosen served as chief of the DOJ's Capitol Siege Section, overseeing a team that investigated hundreds of cases connected to the Jan. 6, 2021, attack carried out by Trump's supporters. In an interview, Rosen told CBS News' Scott MacFarlane that the president's decision to pardon or commute the sentences of more than 1,500 people involved with the storming of the Capitol 'sends a terrible message to the American people.' 'Individuals who were duly—and appropriately—convicted of federal crimes ranging in culpability are immediately let loose without any supervision, without any remorse, without any rehabilitation to civil society," he said. After Trump took office, the Capitol Siege Section was disbanded. Rosen has taken a job at Rogers Joseph O'Donnell, a private law firm in Washington, D.C. 'Beyond excited for my new adventure,' he wrote on LinkedIn, telling CBS News he 'felt like it was time for a change.' The firm said in a press release that Rosen was joining its practice groups focused on white collar criminal defense and government contracts. 'Rosen was entrusted with supervising more than 1000 prosecutions connected with the January 6, 2021 breach and attack of the U.S. Capitol, the largest federal prosecution in American history,' the release said. Ed Martin, Trump's initial pick to lead the U.S. Attorney's Office in D.C., was a 'Stop the Steal' advocate who spread conspiracy theories about the riot. His nomination was unsuccessful; former Fox News host Jeanine Pirro is Trump's next pick for the job. Rosen also slammed the 'ridiculous' decision to fire or sideline prosecutors who worked on Jan. 6 cases. 'To see those talented prosecutors be marginalized or removed from office is an affront to the independence of the department,' Rosen told CBS. In one of his most brazen acts since returning to office, Trump issued mass pardons for individuals charged or convicted over the Capitol riot, wiping clean the records of defendants who were charged with offenses ranging from trespassing to assaulting law enforcement, including members of extremist groups like the Proud Boys and Oath Keepers. Critics have slammed the move as a dangerous whitewashing of political violence and an attempt to signal to supporters that loyalty will be rewarded. Trump had long cast the defendants as victims of unfair political persecution and pledged on the campaign trail to pardon them if elected.
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump FEMA Boss Baffles Staff With Bonkers Hurricane Comment
Donald Trump's FEMA chief left his staff scratching their heads when he said he was unaware that the U.S. has a hurricane season. David Richardson, acting administrator of the Federal Emergency Management Agency, sparked confusion and concern among staff after making the comment during a Monday all-hands meeting, according to four sources who spoke to Reuters. Richardson's remark came right on the heels of hurricane season, which started June 1 and lasts until November 30. The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration earlier predicted an 'above-normal' season that is likely to see 6 to 10 hurricanes, three to five of which could be classified as major. It was unclear to staff whether Richardson's quip was just a joke, Reuters reported. FEMA's parent agency, the Department of Homeland Security, maintained that it was. 'Despite mean-spirited attempts to falsely frame a joke as policy, there is no uncertainty about what FEMA will be doing this hurricane season,' a Homeland Security spokesperson told the Daily Beast in a statement. The spokesperson said Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem and Richardson were shifting FEMA 'from bloated, D.C.-centric dead weight to a lean, deployable disaster force that empowers state actors to provide relief for their citizens.' Richardson told staff that he would not be issuing a new plan for the hurricane season, despite vowing to release one in May, because he did not want to make changes that the FEMA Review Council may not like, Reuters reported. The council was created by Trump and includes Noem, governors, and other officials. One source told Reuters that the lack of strategic guidance has caused confusion among FEMA staff. Richardson, a Marine veteran with no prior disaster response experience—he lectured in history and taught Marine martial arts—was named FEMA chief last month. His predecessor, Cameron Hamilton, was abruptly terminated after a disagreement with Trump's vision of delegating FEMA's jobs down to the states. 'I do not believe it is in the best interest of the American people to eliminate the Federal Emergency Management Agency,' Hamilton told a Congressional hearing last month. 'Having said that, I'm not in a position to make decisions and impact outcomes on whether or not a determination as consequential as that should be made.' Trump earlier told Fox News that he believed FEMA just 'complicates everything,' adding that he 'would rather see the states take care of their own problems.' Although Noem said in a March Cabinet meeting that the Trump administration was 'eliminating' FEMA, internal documents dated May and obtained by NBC News showed that she approved a request from Richardson to retain more than 2,600 employees whose terms were set to expire between April and December. Trump's campaign against the disaster agency has already been felt on the ground. In April, FEMA rejected North Carolina's request to extend the filing period for hurricane damage reimbursement after a devastating tropical storm claimed over 100 lives. Last month, St. Louis Mayor Cara Spencer said FEMA had yet to provide assistance days after a tornado killed at least seven people and caused over $1 billion in damage. Missouri officials wrote to Trump last week urging him to approve Governor Mike Kehoe's disaster declaration. The DHS spokesperson insisted in the statement that FEMA remains 'laser-focused on disaster response and protecting the American people.' 'The old processes are being replaced because they failed Americans in real emergencies for decades,' it read.