With 4 Hidden Tunnels And 100 Metre Depth, Is Pickaxe Mountain Iran's Nuclear Plan B?
Last Updated:
Built over 100 metres deep, Pickaxe Mountain is believed to be far more fortified than Iran's Fordow facility, and possibly beyond the reach of even America's bunker-buster bombs
In the heart of Iran's central Isfahan province lies a mountain with an ominous name and even more ominous purpose — Pickaxe Mountain. Known formally as Kūh-e Kolang Gaz Lā, this rugged terrain just south of Fordow and minutes from Natanz has quietly become the focus of global nuclear anxiety.
Despite US President Donald Trump's recent claim that American stealth bombers 'obliterated" Iran's nuclear programme with a weekend airstrike, experts and intelligence assessments indicate that Tehran may have moved its most vital materials out of reach, into the depths of this mountain fortress.
What And Where Is Pickaxe Mountain?
Pickaxe Mountain is located about 145 km south of Fordow and just minutes from the Natanz nuclear facility, two of the three key sites bombed by US B-2 stealth jets using 30,000-pound GBU-57 bunker-busting bombs. But unlike Fordow, which has two known tunnel entrances, Pickaxe has at least four—two on the eastern and two on the western slopes—each around six metres wide and eight metres tall.
What makes Pickaxe more formidable than its predecessors is its extraordinary depth. According to The Telegraph, analysts estimate the underground facility is being constructed at more than 100 metres beneath the surface, far deeper than Fordow's 60–90-metre depth. This has raised concerns that even America's most powerful non-nuclear bombs may not be able to destroy it.
'The Kolang Gaz Lā or 'Pickaxe' mountain underground complex is intended to give the clerical regime a nuclear weapons site that even the US Air Force would have difficulty destroying with its largest conventional bombs," Reuel Marc Gerecht, a resident scholar at the Foundation for Defence of Democracies, told The Telegraph.
Open-source satellite images first drew attention to Pickaxe Mountain in 2023. Associated Press, after reviewing photos from Planet Labs PBC, confirmed that Iran was digging deep into the mountain. Security checkpoints and excavated tunnels were also observed.
Experts fear that Iran is building not just a centrifuge manufacturing centre, but an enrichment hub for uranium itself.
Steven De La Fuente, a research associate at the James Martin Centre for Nonproliferation Studies, told AP in 2023: 'So the depth of the facility is a concern because it would be much harder for us. It would be much harder to destroy using conventional weapons, such as like a typical bunker buster bomb."
According to the Institute for Science and International Security, Iran could 'secretly deploy several thousand advanced centrifuges in the new tunnel complex", enough to continue uranium enrichment even if all other known sites are destroyed.
Did Iran Move Uranium Before The Bombing?
Despite Trump's repeated assertions that his surprise attack wiped out Tehran's nuclear infrastructure, evidence suggests otherwise. A leaked preliminary classified US report, quoted by The Telegraph, indicates that the strikes only set Iran's nuclear progress back by a few months.
Officials told The New York Times that while parts of the facilities were sealed off, most underground structures remained intact.
Adding to the concern, the NY Post reported that satellite images showed 16 cargo trucks queuing outside Fordow hours before the strikes. Sima Shine, a long-time Israeli intelligence official, told The Telegraph that 'hundreds if not thousands" of advanced centrifuges and a large portion of enriched uranium were likely moved to secret locations before the bombs fell.
The most likely of those locations? Pickaxe Mountain.
IAEA Stonewalled By Iran
The international watchdog responsible for monitoring nuclear activity, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), has been kept out of the loop.
In April, IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi revealed he had asked Tehran what was being constructed under Pickaxe Mountain. The response was blunt: 'It's none of your business."
Grossi later told NY Post: 'Since it is obvious it is in a place where numerous and important activities related to the programme are taking place, we're asking them, what is this for? They are telling us, it's none of your business."
He added: 'It cannot be excluded that the tunnels would store undeclared material," noting that he has 'been raising this issue repeatedly, and will continue to do so."
That concern has grown more urgent. On Wednesday, the Iranian parliament passed a bill to suspend all cooperation with the IAEA, calling it a 'political instrument".
How Much Uranium Is Unaccounted For?
According to the latest IAEA data cited by The Telegraph, as of May 17, Iran had 408.6 kg (about 900 pounds) of uranium enriched to 60 per cent purity. This was an increase of 133.8 kg from the agency's last report in February.
After the airstrikes began on June 13, roughly the same amount — 900 pounds — has been reportedly unaccounted for. The suspicion is that it was moved to Pickaxe or another undisclosed location.
Donald Trump disputes this. 'They didn't have a chance to get anything out because we acted fast," he said during a press briefing. 'It would have taken two weeks, maybe. But it's very hard to remove that kind of material, very hard and very dangerous for them to remove it."
Yet intelligence assessments reviewed by The Telegraph suggest that Iran not only managed the relocation, but retained enough capability to rebuild its programme in as little as six months.
Macron's Warning And Israel's Unease
French President Emmanuel Macron has echoed these concerns. 'The risk has indeed increased with what has happened recently," he said. 'We must absolutely prevent Iran going down this path."
Israel is also watching closely. A shaky US-brokered ceasefire between Iran and Israel did little to halt hostilities. Israeli jets struck Iranian targets just hours into the truce, prompting Trump to call Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and demand restraint. 'They don't know what the f— they're doing," Trump later said, referring to both countries.
What Happens Now?
The future of Iran's nuclear programme appears increasingly decentralised and fortified. Intelligence experts say Iran has adopted a dispersal strategy, spreading critical capabilities across multiple sites to ensure redundancy in case of attack.
Security analysts warn that in the event of an existential threat to regime survival, Iran may abandon its insistence on peaceful nuclear use and pursue weapons outright. Some hardliners in Tehran have already called for immediate nuclear bomb development.
Even so, Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei maintains that a religious fatwa prohibits nuclear weapons. Iranian MP Manan Raisi confirmed the fatwa 'remained in place", but noted such rulings in Shia Islam 'could change based on time and circumstances".
Ahmad Naderi, another Iranian MP, went further: 'I believe we need to conduct a nuclear bomb test, and there is no other way for us."
Pickaxe Mountain And The Next Phase
What began as a remote construction site has now become the centrepiece of Tehran's nuclear resilience, and the biggest blind spot for Western intelligence.
top videos
View all
With four reinforced tunnel entrances, a depth surpassing 100 metres, and signs of secure enrichment activity, Pickaxe Mountain could represent the next chapter of Iran's nuclear saga, one potentially shielded from the world's most powerful bombs, and even more so from its scrutiny.
Unless international inspectors are granted access and surveillance is restored, the fortress under Pickaxe may remain just that — impenetrable, untouchable, and dangerously unknown.
About the Author
Karishma Jain
Karishma Jain, Chief Sub Editor at News18.com, writes and edits opinion pieces on a variety of subjects, including Indian politics and policy, culture and the arts, technology and social change. Follow her @kar...Read More
Get Latest Updates on Movies, Breaking News On India, World, Live Cricket Scores, And Stock Market Updates. Also Download the News18 App to stay updated!
tags :
donald trump iran nuclear sites Israel-Iran tensions Uranium
Location :
New Delhi, India, India
First Published:
June 26, 2025, 15:49 IST
News explainers With 4 Hidden Tunnels And 100 Metre Depth, Is Pickaxe Mountain Iran's Nuclear Plan B?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
26 minutes ago
- Time of India
Donald Trump says ‘nothing was taken out' before Iran strike — Pete Hegseth & Dan Caine leave room for doubt
US President Donald Trump has asserted that Iran did not remove any enriched uranium or nuclear material from its key sites before the recent American military strikes. His statement, shared on Truth Social, aimed to put to rest questions raised by experts about whether Iran had the time or ability to transport sensitive nuclear material before the attack. Trump's post came shortly after Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth addressed similar concerns in a press briefing at the Pentagon. Trump insists 'nothing was taken out' In a post on Thursday morning, Trump wrote: 'The cars and small trucks at the site were those of concrete workers trying to cover up the top of the shafts. Nothing was taken out of facility. Would take too long, too dangerous, and very heavy and hard to move.' The post came as speculation mounted over whether Iran had managed to move its highly enriched uranium away from the strike zone in time. Defense officials echo Trump's view Speaking at the Pentagon, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth echoed Trump's claims. 'I'm not aware of any intelligence that I've reviewed that says things were not where they were supposed to be — moved or otherwise,' Hegseth said. Meanwhile, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Dan Caine avoided making a direct assessment, stating instead that the final battle damage evaluation was still pending and should be left to the intelligence community. 'We don't do battle damage assessments,' Caine said, emphasizing that the task lies with intelligence officials. Hegseth defends use of the term 'obliterated' Secretary Hegseth maintained that US weapons used in the strike had the capability to cause serious damage, referring to Iran's Fordow nuclear facility. 'That's why the Israelis, the Iranians, the IAEA, the UN — to a man and to a woman who recognized the capability of this weapon system — are acknowledging how destructive it's been,' he said. When pressed about his language, Hegseth defended the use of the term 'obliterated,' clarifying that his role allows him to use terms that might not be within Caine's purview. 'That's my lane,' Hegseth explained. 'So, I can use the word obliterated. He could use defeat, destroyed, assess, all of those things.' Intelligence community to deliver final word General Caine repeatedly referred questions back to the intelligence community. 'They look at a variety of things… all different sources of intel,' he noted. Hegseth added that recent confusion had been amplified by 'a great deal of irresponsible reporting based on leaks,' underscoring the need for clarity from verified sources.
NDTV
42 minutes ago
- NDTV
'Iran Can't Enrich Uranium At Fordow Plant, But...': Nuclear Watchdog Chief
New Delhi: Iran had earlier offered limited cooperation and no transparency to teams monitoring its nuclear programme, International Atomic Energy Agency chief Rafael Grossi said Thursday, days after the United States dropped ' bunker busters ' on three Iranian nuclear enrichment facilities. "They were cooperating... but it was limited. There were many questions Iran was not adequately answering. Traces of uranium were found in places where none should have been found and their answers were technically not credible. There was no transparency," Mr Grossi said. The strike followed a military conflict over Israel's claims Iran was on the verge of nuclear weapons. The US - which had been in talks with Iran over a new nuclear safeguards deal - dropped the 'bunker busters' after it became apparent Israel's missiles could not reach Iran's Fordow enrichment facility that is built hundreds of metres beneath a mountain. Asked if Iran was, in fact, close to making a nuclear weapon - a claim made by US President Donald Trump but disputed by American intel - Mr Grossi acknowledged Iran had the material and tech to make maybe 10, and said, "... we cannot say Iran did not have nuclear weapons." 'Iran's Centrifuges Offline' But what he did say was the centrifuges at Fordow were most likely "no longer operational" and that Iran's nuclear programme suffered "enormous damage" as a result of the GBU-37 bombs. Explained | Uranium Enrichment And How It's Used For Nuclear Bombs A centrifuge is a precision machine that uses rotational force to separate substances of different densities. It is essential for the production of enriched uranium. Iran Nuclear Plants Destroyed? However, the IAEA chief steered clear of US President Donald Trump's claim - that Iran's nuclear sites had been "obliterated" - suggesting instead its capabilities had been "reduced". "I think annihilated is too much. ... the attacks resulted in significant physical damage to Natanz, Isfahan, and Fordo(w), where Iran concentrated most activities related to uranium enrichment and conversion," he said on a Radio France Internationale show this morning. "There are other nuclear sites in Iran that were not affected. I know there are many assessments (the reference was to Trump's claim) but to what degree there is annihilation or total destruction, I can only tell you... there is very considerable damage." One of the three Iran nuclear facilities bombed by the US on June 23. Mr Grossi also acknowledged damage assesments based only on satellite imagery is difficult, and called on Tehran to grant IAEA inspectors immediate access to all three nuclear facilties. "Obviously, we can't assess the (full extent) of damage but given the power of these bombs and the technical characteristics of a centrifuge, we know these are no longer operational... because they are fairly precise machines; the vibrations completely destroyed them." 400kg Enriched Uranium 'Missing'? On Tuesday, a day after the US' strike, there were reports a 400kg stockpile of uranium enriched to 60 per cent, just below the threshold to make a nuclear wepaon - had gone 'missing'. There were also reports Iran coverly moved the uranium to another underground location days before the US bomb strike, a claim also made by Israeli officials to The New York Times. In fact, satellite images from before the strike showed a line of 16 trucks outside Fordow. Post-attack images showed damage to all three but the trucks were missing. Hours later sources close to Supreme Leader Ayotallah Ali Khamenei told news agency AFP 'the game is not over', and that Iran had no intention of meekly surrendering its nuclear programme. Mr Grossi, whose agency inspected the uranium hours before the attack, confirmed the amount was actually 408kg and that Iran authorities told him they would take "protective measures". Iran To Suspend IAEA Cooperation? Meanwhile, in a worrying development Wednesday, Iran's parliament approved a bill to suspend IAEA cooperation. The bill, which the unelected Guardian Council must approve to become law, says future inspections need Supreme National Security Council clearance. Tehran has repeatedly denied seeking nuclear weapons, but has complained an IAEA resolution this month declaring it in breach of non-proliferation obligations prompted Israel's attacks.
Indian Express
43 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Divided US Supreme Court rules to let states cut Medicaid funding to Planned Parenthood
A divided Supreme Court allowed states to cut off Medicaid money to Planned Parenthood in a ruling handed down Thursday amid a wider Republican-backed push to defund the country's biggest abortion provider. The case centers on funding for other health care services Planned Parenthood provides in South Carolina, but the ruling could have broader implications for Medicaid patients. The court split 6-3 in the opinion, with the three liberal justices dissenting. Public health care money generally can't be used to pay for abortions. Medicaid patients go to Planned Parenthood for things like contraception, cancer screenings and pregnancy testing, in part because it can be tough to find a doctor who takes the publicly funded insurance, the organization has said. South Carolina's Republican governor says no taxpayer money should go the organization. The budget bill backed by President Donald Trump in Congress would also cut Medicaid funding to Planned Parenthood. That could force the closure of about 200 centers, most of them in states where abortion is legal, the organization has said. Gov. Henry McMaster first moved to cut off Medicaid funding to Planned Parenthood in 2018 but was blocked in court after a lawsuit from a patient named Julie Edwards. Edwards wanted to keep going there for birth control because her diabetes makes pregnancy potentially dangerous, so she sued over a provision in Medicaid law that allows patients to choose their own qualified provider. South Carolina, though, argued that patients shouldn't be able to file those lawsuits. The state pointed to lower courts that have been swayed by similar arguments and allowed states such as Texas to block Medicaid funding from Planned Parenthood. Public health groups like the American Cancer Society, by contrast, said in court papers that lawsuits are the only real way that Medicaid patients have been able to enforce their right to choose their own doctor. Losing that right would reduce access to health care for people on the program, which is estimated to include one-quarter of everyone in the country. Rural areas could be especially affected, advocates said in court papers. In South Carolina, $90,000 in Medicaid funding goes to Planned Parenthood every year, a tiny fraction of the state's total Medicaid spending. The state banned abortion at about six weeks' gestation after the high court overturned it as a nationwide right in 2022.
