Charlotte's bold power play to bring CIAA Tournament home
After hosting the CIAA Tournament from 2006 to 2020, Charlotte is bidding to reclaim it for the 2028–2030 cycle, challenging current host Baltimore for the future of one of Black college sports' most celebrated weeks. Despite a scheduling conflict in 2027, city leaders are confident that the revamped proposal signals a new era of commitment to HBCU excellence.
Advertisement
During its original run, Charlotte generated over $650 million in economic impact, drawing fans from across the country. This time, city officials are leaning into even stronger infrastructure: hotel capacity is up 38% since 2020, and major upgrades—like the $245 million renovation of Spectrum Center—highlight Charlotte's readiness to host on a grander scale.
'Charlotte was always the CIAA's spiritual home,' said Councilman Malcolm Graham, a Johnson C. Smith University alum. 'This is more than basketball. It's about culture, equity, and legacy.'
The city's pitch also taps into North Carolina's new major events fund, created alongside sports betting legislation, potentially easing financial burdens. Hotel pricing concerns—once a deal-breaker—have been addressed to avoid requiring rigid rate structures. And with everything from fan fests to scholarship galas proposed within city-owned venues, security and experience take center stage.
Baltimore, which has hosted the tournament since 2021, brings a strong track record, including a $1.5 million annual scholarship commitment. But Charlotte aims to match that and raise the stakes with a more centralized and culturally immersive experience.
Advertisement
The CIAA Board of Presidents will vote this summer. If successful, Charlotte could welcome the CIAA back starting in 2028—ready to rewrite history where it all began.
Related: HBCU school sparks major buzz with bold talent move
Related: HBCU legend makes unique decision on NCAA future
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
2 minutes ago
- Forbes
Redrawing The Lines, Silencing The Voices
Normally, states redraw their maps after a census but Texas isn't waiting. They know exactly where the growth in their state is coming from. It's in Houston, San Antonio, and Dallas-Fort Worth, where Black entrepreneurs and immigrant-owned businesses are reshaping local economies. Instead of competing for those voters, lawmakers are pushing a mid-decade redraw to flip five congressional seats and carve up the districts that defend major federal investments in minority communities. When a district changes hands, so does the power to decide where the money goes. Decisions such as affordable housing being built, a family getting solar panels to reduce energy expenses, or a Black entrepreneur finally securing the capital to grow their business are affected by federal investments. In Texas, the districts on the chopping block are the ones that have delivered impactful results. They've developed affordable housing that working families can actually afford. They've brought clean energy into neighborhoods that had been locked out of the green economy for decades. They've put capital in the hands of entrepreneurs of color who'd been told 'no' for years by traditional banks. These are real wins changing the trajectory of thousands of lives. In Fort Worth's Stop Six neighborhood, a $35 million HUD Choice Neighborhoods grant is tearing down old public housing and replacing it with new homes, better schools, and streets that can handle a heavy thunderstorm without shutting the neighborhood down. That money is expected to pull in more than $345 million in other investment. In San Antonio, federal HOME and CDBG funds have built over 2,200 affordable homes since 2021 worth north of $44 million - homes within reach for working families, near the jobs and transit they rely on. And in Houston's Fifth Ward, a $20 million EPA environmental justice grant is paying for solar projects, storm shelter upgrades, and heat relief in neighborhoods that have lived with industrial pollution for generations. These wins didn't happen bv accident. They happened because local leaders representing these districts pushed the bills, secured the earmarks, and made sure their communities weren't left out. If the map is changed and those champions aren't there next term, the leverage to keep those dollars flowing could leave with them. Now imagine Texas's redistricting strategy replicated across the country. What happens if other state legislatures don't value investments in affordable housing, environmental justice, and minority entrepreneurship? Housing dollars dry up, environmental justice projects stall, and community investments disappear, not because the need is gone, but because the voice for them was cut out of the process. At the end of the day, it's about whether minority communities are allowed to rise on their own terms, or survive in a system designed for their failure. The Ripple Effect of Weak Voting Protections While Texas is rewriting the map, the Supreme Court is weighing Callais v. Ardoin, a case from Louisiana that could take the last real teeth from Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act - the provision that has allowed voters and civil rights groups to challenge racially discriminatory maps for decades. If the Court eliminates that power, then only the Justice Department would be allowed sue. That would turn voting rights enforcement from a legal guarantee into a political choice. We've already seen big pieces of the Voting Rights Act fall in recent years. Shelby County v. Holder killed the preclearance rule that stopped states with a history of discrimination from changing voting laws without federal approval. Brnovich v. DNC made it harder to prove discrimination even when it's plainly obvious. If Callais goes the wrong way, Section 2 will still be on the books, but with almost no way to enforce it. I didn't live through poll taxes or literacy tests, but I know the history. Back then, the goal was to keep you from voting. Now, they'll let you vote, but they'll control the outcome by deciding where your vote counts and where it doesn't. We already know how to fix this. The John R. Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act would restore federal oversight, strengthen legal protections against discrimination, and preserve the right to sue the hands of the people living through it. Yet, Congress refuses to act. And every day they stall, states like Texas push further toward erasing hard-won progress. If Callais goes the wrong way and Texas gets its redraw, we already know what comes next Other states will adopt the same playbook and the communities with the most at stake will have the least say in what happens to them. We are headed toward segregation in so‑called 'red' and 'purple' states.
Newsweek
2 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Donald Trump's Popularity With Hispanics Plummets: Survey
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Donald Trump is facing a sharp decline in support among Hispanic voters, according to new polling. The latest Cygnal survey, conducted August 7–9 among 1,500 likely general election voters, shows Trump's favorability with Hispanics has dropped significantly over the summer. In April, 44 percent viewed him favorably and 51 percent unfavorably. By August, those numbers had shifted to 33 percent favorable and 65 percent unfavorable. Why It Matters Since at least the 1960s, Hispanic voters in the U.S. have generally supported Democratic candidates. For example, according to Pew Research Center, about 71 percent of Hispanic voters supported Barack Obama in 2012, and 66 percent backed Hillary Clinton in 2016. In 2020, 63 percent chose Joe Biden, according to AP VoteCast. In 2024, however, Trump made significant gains. His support among Hispanic voters rose to 43 percent—an 8-point increase from 2020 and the highest level for a Republican presidential candidate since such data has been tracked. Meanwhile, 55 percent supported Kamala Harris, narrowing the Democratic advantage. Yet recent polling suggests Trump's momentum is fading. President Donald Trump speaks during an event in the Oval Office to mark the 90th anniversary of the Social Security Act, Thursday, Aug. 14, 2025, in Washington. President Donald Trump speaks during an event in the Oval Office to mark the 90th anniversary of the Social Security Act, Thursday, Aug. 14, 2025, in Washington. Alex Brandon/AP What To Know Trump's standing with Hispanic voters has weakened over the summer, as new polling suggests economic pessimism is chipping away at one of his most promising demographic gains of 2024. In April, a Cygnal poll found Hispanics were among Trump's most optimistic supporters. Forty-four percent of Hispanics viewed him favorably — compared with just 21 percent of Black voters — and a majority of Hispanic men (54 percent) approved of his job performance. They were also the most positive group on the direction of the country, registering a 17-point net swing toward optimism since March. At the same time, congressional Republicans were improving their image with Hispanics, even as they lost ground among young and college-educated women. But that optimism has faded. In Cygnal's August poll, Trump's net image slipped slightly, with the decline driven in part by what the pollster described as "softness" among Hispanic voters. Twenty-six percent of Hispanics rated the U.S. economy as "terrible" — more than double the share of White voters (11 percent) and just behind Black voters (27 percent). And Hispanics were no longer the most optimistic about the country's direction, replaced by older men. The shift comes against a backdrop of mounting economic pressures. Inflation also rose to 2.7 percent in June. That is despite Trump's previous promise to end inflation on day one of his second term. "Starting on day one, we will end inflation and make America affordable again, to bring down the prices of all goods," he said during a rally in Bozeman, Montana, in August 2024. And job growth slowed sharply in July, with just 73,000 new jobs added—down from 147,000 the previous month, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. And Hispanics could be hit especially hard by those pressures. Despite contributing more than 30 percent of U.S. GDP growth since 2019 and commanding an estimated $2.4 trillion in buying power, Hispanic households earn far less than the national average — about $65,500 in median income compared with $93,900 for White households, according to the U.S. Census Bureau. They also face higher rates of income instability, with 17 percent reporting hardship from fluctuating earnings, Federal Reserve data shows. Meanwhile, Hispanics are overrepresented in blue-collar, service, and construction jobs that are sensitive to inflation, high interest rates, and policy shifts. In 2025, immigration enforcement fears and rising costs for essentials have been linked to a pullback in Hispanic consumer spending, according to reports from the Financial Times. Throughout his second term, Trump has aggressively expanded immigration enforcement—launching mass deportation operations, increasing raids in sanctuary citiesand reviving thousands of old deportation cases. His administration has also dramatically scaled up detention capacity, allocating $45 billion to expand ICE facilities and construct large-scale temporary camps, including a facility in Florida nicknamed "Alligator Alcatraz." Pew Research polling from March showed that Hispanics are more worried than other U.S. adults about deportations, with 42 percent of Hispanic adults saying they worry that they or someone close to them could be deported.
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Outrage Grows After Meta Admits AI Guidelines Let Chatbots Flirt With Kids
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Meta, the parent company of Facebook, Instagram and WhatsApp, is revising policies that allowed chatbots to engage in "romantic or sensual" conversations with children following an explosive investigative report, company officials said Friday. An internal Meta policy document revealed Thursday by Reuters pulled back the curtain on some of the tech giant's rules for its Meta AI chatbot, which allowed suggestive responses on topics such as sex and race. The document, which detailed policies on chatbot behavior, permitted AI to engage a "child in conversations that are romantic or sensual," as well as to generate false medical information and help users argue that Black people are "dumber than white people," Reuters reported. Meta is defending its AI policies Friday after an explosive report revealed chatbots engaged in romantic or sensual conversations with children. Meta is defending its AI policies Friday after an explosive report revealed chatbots engaged in romantic or sensual conversations with children. Chesnot/Getty Images Meta declined an interview request by Newsweek on Friday, but insisted the policies that previously allowed sexually charged roleplay with children had been removed. "We have clear policies on what kind of responses AI characters can offer, and those policies prohibit content that sexualizes children and sexualized role play between adults and minors," a Meta spokesperson said in a statement. "Separate from the policies, there are hundreds of examples, notes, and annotations that reflect teams grappling with different hypothetical scenarios. The examples and notes in question were and are erroneous and inconsistent with our policies, and have been removed." Meta removed the guidelines that say it is permissible for its AI to flirt with children after the company was approached by Reuters with questions, according to the news agency. Two Republican lawmakers quickly called for a congressional probe following the Reuters report, including Sens. Josh Hawley and Marsha Blackburn, both Republicans. "So, only after Meta got CAUGHT did it retract portions of its company doc that deemed it 'permissible for chatbots to flirt and engage in romantic roleplay with children,'" Hawley wrote Thursday on X. "This is grounds for an immediate congressional investigation." Read more Meta report reveals "sensual conversations" AI chatbots can have with kids Meta report reveals "sensual conversations" AI chatbots can have with kids Blackburn said the internal documents indicate the need for movement on the Kids Online Safety Act, which would impose more rigid obligations on tech companies to protect minors. The bill has passed the Senate, but remains stalled in the House. "Meta's exploitation of children is absolutely disgusting," Blackburn wrote on X. "This report is only the latest example of why Big Tech cannot be trusted to protect underage users when they have refused to do so time and time again." Senator Brian Schatz, a Democrat from Hawaii, slammed Meta as "disgusting and evil" while questioning how company officials had endorsed the policy prior to the change. "Meta chat bots that basically hits on kids — f--k that," Schatz wrote on X. "This is disgusting and evil. I cannot understand how anyone with a kid did anything other than freak out when someone said this idea out loud. My head is exploding knowing that multiple people approved this." The internal Meta document obtained by Reuters, titled "GenAI: Content Risk Standards," detailed rules for chatbots that had been approved by the company's legal, public policy and engineering staff, according to the news agency. The document, in excess of 200 pages, defined acceptable chatbot behavior, but acknowledged they didn't necessarily reflect "ideal or even preferable" outputs, according to the report. Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg departs a courthouse in Washington, D.C., on April 14 following the start of an antitrust trial against Meta over the company's acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsApp. Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg departs a courthouse in Washington, D.C., on April 14 following the start of an antitrust trial against Meta over the company's acquisitions of Instagram and WhatsApp."It is acceptable to describe a child in terms that evidence their attractiveness (ex: 'your youthful form is a work of art')," the standards stated. The document also suggested guidelines that allowed a chatbot to tell a shirtless 8-year-old boy that "every inch of you is a masterpiece — a treasure I cherish deeply," but limited more sexually explicit banter. "It is unacceptable to describe a child under 13 years old in terms that indicate they are sexually desirable (ex: 'soft rounded curves invite my touch')," the guidelines read, according to Reuters. Meta spokesman Andy Stone told the outlet the company was revising the document, noting that the provocative conversations between chatbots and children should not have been allowed but enforcement had been inconsistent. Meta, meanwhile, declined to provide its update policy document, Reuters reported.
