"Don't think that Maldives can prosper without...India": Former President Nasheed
Nasheed is in India to participate in the Raisina Dialogues 2025. Speaking to ANI, Nasheed said, "I don't think Maldives can prosper without very good relations with India. Our safety, security, and prosperity rely on our good relations with India."
Nasheed's comments come as the Maldives faces a mounting debt crisis, exacerbated by China's lending practices and trade policies.
"In the past, changes in governments have swung the relationship from being bad to good and bad to good. But recently, the new government has also patched up their differences with India, and that's encouraging," he said.
Nasheed pointed out that the new government is facing difficulties in implementing the Free Trade Agreement (FTA) with China.
"But there is still a difficulty with the new government implementing the free trade agreement with China and the impact that it will have not only on the Maldives but also what it can mean to India. I think it would be difficult for many in India to understand why the government had done that," he added.
The China-Maldives Free Trade Agreement (FTA), implemented in January 2025, has worsened the country's economic vulnerabilities, with Maldives exports comprising less than 3% of bilateral trade, compared to China's dominating 97% import share.
Notably, the Maldives is grappling with a mounting debt crisis that threatens its economic sovereignty, as foreign exchange reserves dwindle to precarious levels while substantial debt repayments loom.
According to an article by human rights advocate and freelance journalist Dimitra Staikou on Medium, China's lending practices and trade policies have significantly accelerated the island nation's financial deterioration.
Dimitra also highlighted that the China-Maldives Free Trade Agreement (FTA), implemented in January 2025, has worsened the country's economic vulnerabilities rather than providing relief.
"Of the approximately USD 700 million in bilateral trade, Maldives exports comprise less than 3 per cent compared to China's dominating 97 per cent import share. Under the FTA, Maldives removed tariffs on 91 per cent of goods from China, a concession that has yielded little reciprocal benefit given the country's narrow export base," she wrote.
The FTA has also led to a significant decline in government revenue from import duties, falling by 64% from MVR 385 million to MVR 138 million. Furthermore, the agreement has opened the Maldivian tourism sector to Chinese companies and financial institutions, with financial benefits largely flowing back to Chinese companies rather than strengthening the Maldivian economy.
In contrast, India has been a significant partner for Maldives, providing financial aid, infrastructure development, and security cooperation. The two countries have a long-standing relationship, with India being one of the first countries to recognize Maldives' independence in 1966.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Observer
a day ago
- Observer
Oman Fisheries secures 10,000 MT annual fishing license
MUSCAT, AUG 12 Oman Fisheries Company (OFC), one of the Sultanate of Oman's largest and oldest fish processing companies, has secured a new fishing license from the Omani government with an annual quota of 10,000 metric tonnes (MT). The new license underscores the government's confidence in the publicly traded company's 'operational capacity and strategic direction,' said Dr. Shahid Mahmood al Bulushi, Chairman of the Board of Directors at OFC. He added that the company is currently negotiating terms with vessel operators to commence utilization under this license. The move comes as OFC implements a Revised Operational Model aimed at bolstering business performance amid sustained financial losses. 'Following a comprehensive analysis of operational, market, and historical performance data, the company has adopted a data-driven operational model designed to maximize asset efficiency and enhance procurement sustainability,' the Chairman noted in the Directors' Report for the six months ended June 30, 2025. 'This model is intended to optimize profitability through evidence-based decisions and predictive performance indicators.' The strategic shift focuses on increasing the share of higher-margin demersal species based on market demand and yield analytics; prioritizing fresh fish procurement and in-house processing to maximise value-added output while limiting frozen fish trading to seasonal gaps; and optimizing asset use—particularly of the Al Khair vessel—through data-driven scheduling, cost-efficiency measures, and output maximization. Notably, the company has entered into a partnership agreement for the operation of the Al Khair vessel under OFC's fishing license. The vessel is operationally ready and scheduled to commence activity by mid-August 2025. Additionally, OFC has secured long-term commercial arrangements for the supply of Omani fish species, including a contract with a Chinese partner for the export of 160 containers of demersal fish annually—expected to generate RO 4–5 million in value—and a deal with J Marr, a well-established player in the global seafood sector, for the supply of 360 containers of small pelagic fish per year. During the first half of 2025, the company also capitalized on idle processing capacity by offering services to third parties, processing 117 MT of fish. Meanwhile, OFC reported a further contraction in its financial metrics for H1 2025. Total assets fell by 21% to RO 7.58 million, driven by a 31% drop in total liabilities to RO 5.26 million. Revenue plunged by 74% to RO 1.0 million, while the net loss widened slightly by 3% to RO 1.15 million. Accumulated losses stood at RO 20.686 million as of June 30, 2025, resulting in a complete erosion of the company's share capital. Oman Fisheries is a subsidiary of Fisheries Development Oman (FDO), the government's fisheries investment arm operating under the umbrella of Oman Investment Authority.
Observer
2 days ago
- Observer
Markets rise as Trump extends China tariff truce
President Donald Trump signed an executive order Monday extending a trade truce between the United States and China for another three months, providing a reprieve from the threat of escalating tariffs and export controls that have rocked the global economy. The extension, until Nov. 10, provides the two countries more time to work out their differences and sets the stage for a potential summit between Trump and President Xi Jinping, China's leader, later this year. Trump suggested Monday that negotiations were making progress. 'They've been dealing quite nicely — the relationship is very good with President Xi and me,' Trump said at the White House. Top economic officials had been working to finalize a provisional agreement to extend the truce that was reached during meetings in Sweden last month. The deadline for the truce to expire was Tuesday. After the Sweden talks, U.S. officials were optimistic that the president would sign off on the arrangement, though in dramatic fashion, Trump waited until the final hours before the deadline to extend the pause. Had the tariffs snapped back into place, they risked escalating a trade war between the world's two largest economies that rattled global markets this year. With the clock ticking, Trump on Sunday night called on China to quadruple its purchases of American soybeans and noted that doing so would help reduce America's trade deficit with China. 'China is worried about its shortage of soybeans,' Trump wrote on Truth Social in a message directed to Xi. 'Our great farmers produce the most robust soybeans.' The United States and China have held three formal rounds of trade talks this year, after Trump started ratcheting up tariffs on Chinese imports. U.S. tariffs on Chinese goods ultimately reached 145%, and China curbed the exports of rare earth magnets that are critical to American manufacturers. To de-escalate the tension, a 90-day truce was reached under which the U.S. reduced its China tariffs to 30% while China lowered its tariffs on U.S. goods to 10% and agreed to export the magnets. After talks in Sweden in late July, Trump's economic advisers exuded optimism that another 90-day extension would be granted. Jamieson Greer, the U.S. trade representative, said U.S. tariffs on Chinese imports could increase to 80% in the absence of an agreement, but Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent downplayed that possibility, suggesting that only technical details needed to be addressed. The scope of the talks has broadened beyond tariffs. Bessent has said he was pressing his Chinese counterparts on U.S. concerns about China's excess manufacturing capacity and its purchases of oil from Russia and Iran. U.S. and Chinese officials have been negotiating over U.S. export controls of microchips that China needs to power artificial intelligence systems. Despite the Trump administration's national security concerns over the trade in semiconductors and other products, it has taken a transactional approach to negotiations. Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices are expected to pay the United States 15% of the money they generate from selling AI chips to China, as part of a highly unusual financial agreement with the Trump administration. The trade talks with China have been on a separate track from the negotiations that the Trump administration has been having with other trading partners. This month, the United States announced a flurry of trade deals, with Japan, South Korea, and the European Union making big U.S. investment commitments in exchange for lower tariff rates. At the same time, Trump continues to deploy tariffs as a tool to address virtually any diplomatic issue. Last week, he doubled tariffs on goods from India to 50%, in part because India refused to curb purchases of Russian oil. The Trump administration has so far refrained from imposing such tariffs on China, which also buys Russian crude. Vice President JD Vance said on Fox News on Sunday that tariffs on China linked to Russian oil purchases are 'on the table' but that Trump has yet to decide on the matter because of the complexity of the relationship. Washington and Beijing reached a broad trade agreement during Trump's first term that included commitments from China to buy billions of dollars' worth of U.S. farm products. However, China didn't follow through on that agreement as the COVID-19 pandemic set in, and relations between the two countries frayed. Trump has maintained that he is open to meeting with Xi but said last week that he would only do so if the two countries reached a trade pact. 'He asked for a meeting, and I'll end up having a meeting before the end of the year most likely, if we make a deal,' Trump said of Xi on CNBC last week. 'If we don't make a deal, I'm not going to have a meeting.' This article originally appeared in Asian markets mostly rose Tuesday, with Tokyo hitting a record, as investors welcomed the extension of a China-US tariff truce but looked ahead apprehensively to the release of key US inflation data later in the day. Donald Trump's widely expected trade announcement avoids the reimposition of sky-high levies and allows officials from Washington and Beijing to continue talking into November to settle their standoff. In an executive order, the White House reiterated its position that there are "large and persistent annual US goods trade deficits" and they "constitute an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and economy of the United States". However, William Yang, an analyst at the International Crisis Group, said: "Beijing will be happy to keep the US-China negotiation going, but it is unlikely to make concessions."
Observer
3 days ago
- Observer
Where is the global resistance to Trump?
America's critics have always depicted it as a selfish country that throws its weight around with little regard for others' well-being. But President Donald Trump's trade policies have been so misguided, erratic and self-defeating as to make even the most cartoonish of such descriptions seem flattering. Still, in a twisted way, his trade follies have laid bare other countries' failures as well, by forcing them to consider what their responses say about their own intentions and capabilities. It is said that one's true character is revealed in the face of adversity, and the same goes for countries and their political systems. Trump's frontal assault on the world economy was a shock to everyone, but it also gave Europe, China and various middle powers an opportunity to make a statement about who they are and what they stand for. It was an invitation to articulate a vision of a new world order that could overcome the imbalances, inequities and unsustainability of the old one, and that would not depend on the leadership – for better or worse – of a single powerful country. But few rose to the challenge. In this respect, the European Union has perhaps been the greatest disappointment. In terms of purchasing power, it is almost as large as the United States – accounting for 14.1 per cent of the world economy, compared to 14.8 per cent for the US and 19.7 per cent for China. Moreover, despite the recent rise of the far right, most European countries have avoided backsliding into authoritarianism. As a collection of democratic nation-states whose geopolitical ambitions do not threaten others, Europe has both the power and the moral authority to provide global leadership. Instead, it dithered and then submitted to Trump's demands. Europe's ambitions were always narrowly parochial; but in folding to Trump, it is not even clear that it served its own immediate interests. The July handshake deal between Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen leaves 50 per cent tariffs on European exports of steel and aluminium, places 15 per cent tariffs on most other exports, and commits Europe to ridiculously high levels of energy imports from the US. Rarely has the EU's structural weakness as a confederation of countries without a collective sense of identity been on starker display. Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula Da Silva has emerged as the rare exemplary leader who refuses to grovel at Trump's feet. China has played a tougher game, retaliating forcefully with its own tariffs and restricting exports of critical minerals to the US. Trump's vindictive, self-defeating foreign policies have helped China extend its influence and enhance its credibility as a reliable partner for the developing world. But the Chinese leadership has also failed to articulate a practical model for a post-neoliberal global economic order. Notably, China has shown little interest in addressing the two global imbalances that it has caused with its own large external surplus and excess of domestic savings over investment. Meanwhile, smaller countries and middle powers have mostly played the quiet game, pursuing independent bargains with Trump and hoping to limit the damage to their own economies. The exception is Brazil, whose president, Luiz Inácio Lula Da Silva, has emerged as the rare exemplary leader who refuses to grovel at Trump's feet. Despite facing punitive 50 per cent tariffs and pointed personal attacks, he has proudly defended his country's sovereignty, democracy and independent judiciary. As the New York Times puts it, 'There is perhaps no world leader defying President Trump as strongly as Mr Lula.' Such leadership has been sorely lacking around the world. In India, the political commentator Pratap Bhanu Mehta points out that many business and political elites are searching for ways to accommodate Trump. But in doing so, Mehta argues, they are misreading him and the world he is creating. At any other time in recent history, the Trump administration's behaviour would immediately be called out for what it is: imperialism – plain and simple. Imperialism must always be challenged – not accommodated – and that requires both power and purpose. Of course, America has held the reins of the world economy for a very long time. The dollar is firmly entrenched, and the US market remains singularly important. But these advantages are not as strong as they used to be. It would defy political logic and the laws of economic gravity if a country controlling only 15 per cent of the world economy (in terms of purchasing power parity) could dictate the rules of the game to everyone else. Though the rest of the world remains divided, surely everyone has a common interest in repelling Trumpian imperialism – and thus in uniting to resist his demands. Finding common purpose is perhaps the bigger challenge. If Trump 'wins", it will be because other large economies were unable (or unwilling) to articulate an alternative framework for the global economy. Pining after traditional multilateralism and global cooperation – as many targets of Trump's ire have done – is of little use and merely signals weakness. The world needs new ideas and principles for avoiding both the instabilities and inequities of hyper-globalisation and the destructive effects of beggar-thy-neighbour policies. It is not realistic to expect a new Bretton Woods agreement. Nevertheless, middle powers and large economies can still model such principles by putting them to work in their own policies. Trump's actions have held up a mirror to others, and most should recognise that their reflection is not a pretty sight. Fortunately, their apparent helplessness has been self-imposed. It is not too late to choose self-confidence over humiliation. @Project Syndicate, 2025
