B-BBEE ICT Sector Council raises alarm over new BEE policy proposals
Concerns mount as B-BBEE policy changes threaten ICT sector transformation
Image: Supplied
The B-BBEE ICT Sector Council has voiced strong concerns regarding recent B-BBEE government policy proposals that could undermine South Africa's ongoing efforts toward inclusive economic transformation within the ICT sector.
In a statement issued Tuesday evening, the council welcomed the Minister of Communications and Digital Technologies' announcement to open new individual electronic communications network service (IECNS) licenses but raised serious concerns.
The recent gazetting of a new B-BBEE policy, which could potentially facilitate the entry of companies like Starlink, comes after a high-profile meeting between President Cyril Ramaphosa and US President Donald Trump, whose delegation included Elon Musk, the owner of Starlink.
'We see this as an opportunity to expand market access and promote increased participation of small, medium, and micro enterprises (SMMEs), provided it is implemented within a robust transformation framework,' the Council stated.
However, their optimism was sharply tempered by apprehensions about accompanying policy proposals to allow Equity Equivalent Investment Programmes (EEIPs) to replace the legislated 30% Historically Disadvantaged Individual (HDI) ownership requirement set out in the Electronic Communications Act (ECA).
The Council warned that 'introducing EEIPs as an alternative to the 30% HDI ownership requirement could reverse the fragile gains made in sector transformation,' risking a resurgence of exclusionary practices.
In their statement, they stated that the ownership requirement under the ECA serves more than just compliance; it is a statutory tool designed to promote direct ownership and control by historically disadvantaged South Africans, reflect the country's demographic priorities, and support inclusive economic growth.
'This mechanism ensures that licensees contribute to infrastructure roll-out, universal access, and broad-based redress - not charity or peripheral impact,' the Council explained.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Next
Stay
Close ✕
Alarmingly, the council said that some actors opposing these measures have historically resisted BEE and other transformation efforts, raising questions about their motivations.
'These developments threaten to sideline South Africa's legal framework and long-standing transformation objectives,' the statement warned, adding that some local beneficiaries of B-BBEE are now advocating measures that could exclude the very communities they were meant to uplift.
The Council rejected the current form of EEIPs, citing 'glaring gaps' in transparency and measurable impact.
The organisation stated that adopting such programs could set a dangerous precedent, allowing dominant incumbents and multinational corporations to bypass local ownership requirements while reaping the benefits of operating in a strategic sector.
Potential Risks and Broader Implications
The institution highlighted several risks associated with these proposed changes arguing that, first and foremost among them - is the threat to local industry and jobs.
'An infrastructure-light, foreign-controlled model risks decimating local Internet Service Providers (ISPs), SMMEs, and Wireless Internet Service Providers (WISPs), especially in underserved rural areas,' the Statement cautioned.
It argued that such a shift could undermine national broadband initiatives like SA Connect and lead to South Africa's digital payments flowing out of the country without contributing to local economic development.
Moreover, the council warned that establishing these principles in the ICT sector could set a dangerous precedent for other strategic industries with B-BBEE ownership requirements.
'This could weaken empowerment models across various sectors, undermining meaningful economic participation by historically disadvantaged groups,' the statement cautioned.
Calls for Transparency and Upholding Transformation Principles
The ICT council demanded a comprehensive review of EEIPs, emphasising that their impact on sector transformation remains marginal and unaccountable.
They called for mandatory, transparent public reporting on EEIP performance, including sector oversight and measurable Key Performance Indicators (KPIs), to prevent fiscal opacity and ensure tangible impact.
Additionally, the council urged clarity on how new licensees will contribute to the Universal Service Fund and align with the mandate of the Universal Service and Access Agency of South Africa (USAASA).
'Any exemption from contributing to the fund risks creating unfair economic asymmetries and impeding efforts to bridge the digital divide,' the statement read.
The Council appealed to the government to uphold the constitutional and developmental vision of economic justice.
'Transformation is a moral, constitutional, and legislative imperative. It cannot be sacrificed for expediency, foreign lobbying, or narrow commercial interests.'
According to the institution, the B-BBEE ICT Sector Council intends to submit a formal response during the 30-day public consultation period, urging all stakeholders committed to genuine transformation to review and contribute to the dialogue.
They argued that while ICASA is expected to consider the Minister's policy directions, these do not preclude comprehensive sector input.
When contacted for comment, Ramasela Matlou, an ICASA spokesperson, stated that the regulator has noted the policy directive and is currently reviewing its contents.
Matlou added that Starlink has not yet applied to enter the South African market.
thabo.makwakwa@inl.co.za
IOL Politics
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The South African
an hour ago
- The South African
Starlink triggers black ownership row in South Africa's parliament
South Africa's proposal to amend the Black Economic Empowerment (BEE) Act has provoked political outrage, with Elon Musk's Starlink at the forefront. The retaliation responds to Solly Malatsi's (Minister of Communications and Digital Technologies) Friday announcement, recommending they restructure the Electronic Communications Act, which requires 30% of foreign telecoms equity to be black-owned. Malatsi's proposition occurred two days after South African President Cyril Ramaphosa visited the White House, during which Cape Town-based billionaire Johann Rupert requested Musk's technology to tackle the nation's high murder rate. Starlink is yet to operate in South Africa as several neighboring countries grant access. Portfolio committee chair and African National Congress (ANC) member Khusela Diko declared Malatsi's scheme as bending the rules for Musk in a Parliamentary hearing on Tuesday. Moments later, Economic Freedom Fighters member Sixolise Gcilishe said, 'We are not going to accept a situation where our laws are going to be rewritten in Washington.' Meanwhile, ANC's Tshehofatso Chauke saw the policy as a threat to domestic business owners, believing it to offer an 'opportunity for international players to come through the back door' and 'favor big business rather than the interests of South Africans and those who are previously disadvantaged.' Democratic Alliance member Malatsi denied that Starlink played a role in the recommended policy change, stating that the amended framework had been internally discussed since around September of last year. 'We are not attempting to open a special dispensation for Starlink or any other company or an individual… There is no conspiracy on our part with regard to this policy direction,' Malatsi stated. The Minister revealed his intentions were driven by the need to attract investment and tighten business regulations. He believes the policy to be as domestically benefiting as the current BEE requirements, outlining that the reform offers foreign companies two avenues: an equity equivalent scheme or 30% black ownership. 'We advocate for smarter, scalable approaches that deliver meaningful impact and restore policy clarity, consistency, and investor confidence,' South Africa's Association of Communications and Technology said in a statement supporting Malatsi. The proposal has divided South Africa's cabinet, with some calling for legal intervention while others believe it doesn't object to current domestic laws. South Africa's BEE act, introduced after the conclusion of Apartheid, has been infamously criticized by Pretoria-born Starlink CEO Musk, who views the policy as 'openly racist.' Starlink has become increasingly prevalent in Africa – connecting pockets of rural Africa to fast internet – while steering clear of South Africa but operating in neighbors Eswatini, Botswana, Zimbabwe, and Mozambique. Other African locations include Nigeria, Kenya, Ghana, and Benin. South Africa's lawmakers will continue to discuss Malatsi's policy reform, suggesting that, amid the backlash, the door remains narrowly open to restructuring the ICT sector's current black ownership requirements, enabling Starlink to open up shop. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 Subscribe to The South African website's newsletters and follow us on WhatsApp, Facebook, X and Bluesky for the latest news.
Eyewitness News
an hour ago
- Eyewitness News
MK Party's bid to challenge outcome of 2024 elections postponed
JOHANNESBURG - Proceedings in the Electoral Court will not go ahead on Tuesday in the uMkhonto weSizwe (MK) Party's application challenging the outcome of the 2024 national and provincial elections. The specialist court was scheduled to hear the matter on Tuesday, but the matter has been postponed at the request of the official opposition. This after the party filed a notice to appeal the judgment of the court in an earlier interlocutory application, which dismissed its application to have the court order the Electoral Commission of South Africa (IEC) to provide it with access to documents it used before pronouncing on the results of the watershed elections. Over a year has passed since South Africans headed to the polls, and the MK Party argues that the system experienced significant downtime and exhibited grave inconsistencies and inaccuracies in the reported results, undermining the constitutional requirement for free and fair elections. It also wants President Cyril Ramaphosa to declare a new election date within 90 days from which an order may be made. But the main application has stalled as the party continues its bid to appeal a judgment of the Electoral Court, which dismissed its application to have the IEC relinquish some documents which the party feels would be key in advancing its case. The IEC, however, said it had handed over the documents requested by the party. A new date for the hearing is yet to be determined. ALSO READ: DA: MK Party hasn't provided evidence to back claims of election vote rigging
The South African
an hour ago
- The South African
Are second batch of refugees ONLY white South Africans?
A second batch of South African 'refugees' has arrived in the US under President Donald Trump's resettlement programme. The offer is open to all 'racial minorities' in South Africa, including Afrikaners, who believe they have been persecuted. But do the numbers reflect that? According to reports, a second batch of 'refugees' arrived in the US last week. The group consists of nine white South Africans and their families. Jaco Kleynhans, of the Afrikaner rights group Solidarity Movement, claimed that the group travelled on a commercial flight. While it's not clear if other races will be included in the group, there has been speculation that many Afrikaners will be part of the programme. Kleynhans told the media: 'Several more groups will fly to the USA over the next few weeks. The US Embassy in Pretoria, in collaboration with the State Department in Washington DC, is currently processing 8,000 applications. And we expect many more Afrikaner refugees to travel to the USA over the next few months. 'They are settling in states across the USA, but particularly southern states such as Texas, North and South Carolina, Kansas, Oklahoma, and Nebraska.' He continued: 'Our primary focus is not refugee status for Afrikaners. But rather to find ways to ensure a free, safe, and prosperous future for Afrikaners in South Africa. We remain 100% convinced that South Africa can and must create a home for all its people.' While many Afrikaners and white South Africans have seemingly been prioritised in the group, other smaller communities are also welcome to apply for refugee status in the US. Last month, the US Embassy issued a statement detailing the resettlement programme, which was extended to 'racial minorities' in South Africa. Despite initially being targeted at Afrikaner farmers and white people, US authorities have since included coloured, Indian, and 'mixed-race' South Africans. Applicants must prove that they are 'persecuted' South Africans who are victims of 'racial discrimination'. Let us know by leaving a comment below, or send a WhatsApp to 060 011 021 1 . Subscribe to The South African web
