Russian missile attack kills nine in Ukraine
KYIV
: A Russian missile attack on Ukraine's southeastern
Dnipropetrovsk
region on Tuesday killed at least nine people, damaged civilian infrastructure and wounded dozens of train passengers, officials said. The two-wave strike killed seven in the regional capital of Dnipro, said governor Serhiy Lysak, where the blast wave also shattered train carriage windows and showered passengers with broken glass.
Nearly 70 people including 10 children were injured, he said, adding the numbers could still rise. Two people were also killed in the town of Samar, around 10 km from Dnipro, the state emergencies service said.
Ukrainian Foreign Minister
Andrii Sybiha
called on Kyiv's Western partners to respond to the attack.
NATO
leaders are currently in The Hague for an alliance summit, where President
Volodymyr Zelenskyy
hopes to secure more military support.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
13 minutes ago
- India Today
UK to buy F-35 fighter jets capable of carrying US nuclear warheads
The United Kingdom is planning an upgrade to its nuclear defence. Prime Minister Keir Starmer has announced that the UK will buy 12 new F-35A fighter jets from the United States. These jets can carry normal weapons along with powerful US nuclear is one of the biggest changes in Britain's nuclear defence since the Cold War. These US bombs are expected to be kept in the UK, which has not happened since Prime Minister Starmer said, "In an era of radical uncertainty we can no longer take peace for granted. These aircraft will strengthen our armed forces and support communities across the country through our defence industry." The new aircraft will be stationed at Norfolk's RAF Marham. In order to prevent enemy attacks, they will be a part of NATO's program that shares nuclear power amongst its members. The UK will continue to abide by all international agreements and regulations. As in Germany, Italy, Belgium, the Netherlands, and Turkey, the United States will continue to control nuclear WILL CARRY STRONG NUCLEAR BOMBSThe F-35A aircraft are capable of carrying the B61-12, a unique kind of bomb. These bombs are extremely powerful. They can detonate at 0.3, 1.5, 10, and 50 kilotons, according to the Federation of American Scientists. In contrast, the bomb that was dropped on Hiroshima during World War II killed up to 140,000 people and had a 15 kiloton UK's Ministry of Defence does not usually share where nuclear weapons are stored. However, there are vaults at RAF Marham where weapons were kept in the past. There are also older nuclear storage sites at nearby RAF Lakenheath, which is used by the US Air stated that they are expected to support more than 20,000 jobs and involve over 100 UK-based businesses. The jets are made by US company Lockheed Martin. The government also says the F-35A is cheaper than the older F-35B model, saving up to 25% on each aircraft. The UK plans to eventually buy up to 138 of these said, "Supporting 100 businesses across the country and more than 20,000 jobs, these F35 dual capable aircraft will herald a new era for our world-leading Royal Air Force and deter hostile threats that threaten the UK and our allies."NATO's secretary general, Mark Rutte, welcomed the announcement. He called it "a robust British contribution to the alliance." UK Defence Secretary John Healey said the decision fits into a "NATO-first" strategy and will also boost the UK comes as the most recent UK defence review issued warnings about the possibility of future attacks on British territory. The review said, "For the first time in many years, we have to actively prepare for the possibility of the UK homeland coming under direct threat, potentially in a wartime scenario."The review also said Russia remains the biggest threat.- EndsMust Watch
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
20 minutes ago
- First Post
PM Carney believes Trump is no longer interested in turning Canada into 51st state
Last time when an official made the claim that Trump was no longer looking at annexing Canada, the US president took to social media to reiterate his ambition to the turn the country into the 51st state read more US President Donald Trump meets with Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, on May 6, 2025. AFP File Canada Prime Minister Mark Carney now believes US President Donald Trump is no longer interested in annexing Canada and making it the 51st state. While speaking to CNN, Carney said Tuesday (June 24) that the US leader 'admired Canada'. When asked whether Trump still had his eyes set on his country, Carney replied: 'No'. 'I think it's fair to say, maybe for a period of time (he) coveted Canada,' the prime minister said. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Earlier, US ambassador to Canada Peter Hoekstra had clarified on May 22 that Trump was 'not talking about' turning Canada into the 51st state anymore. However, on May 28, Trump reiterated his call for Canada to become the 51st state if it wanted to reap the benefits of 'our fabulous Golden Dome System'. Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform: 'I told Canada, which very much wants to be part of our fabulous Golden Dome System, that it will cost $61 Billion Dollars if they remain a separate, but unequal, Nation, but will cost ZERO DOLLARS if they become our cherished 51st State. They are considering the offer!' Carney credits Trump for Canada's higher defence spending While Carney has on several occasions declared that the old, close partnership between Canada and the United States was 'over', he credits Trump for pressing Ottawa into spending more on defence. 'The president is focused on changing a series of bilateral relations,' Carney was quoted as saying by CNN. 'We're at NATO. He's been focused on making sure that all members, Canada included … pay their fair share. I think we're doing that now,' the PM said. On Trump's role in West Asia The Canadian PM acknowledged that Trump had the influence to be a decisive force in the West Asia crisis, referring to the Iran-Israel war and the situation in Gaza. 'He's used his influence and US power in other situations. We've just seen it in Iran. It does create possibility of moving forward and there's a moral imperative to move forward,' Carney said.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
24 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Beijing treads cautiously in Iran-Israel war despite ties with Tehran
Given the tangled politics of the Middle East, where China holds substantial economic and energy stakes yet wields minimal military influence, Beijing 'isn't inclined to stick its neck out' AP New York When Israel attacked Iran nearly two weeks ago, the Chinese government, a longtime friend of Iran, jumped into action at least, when it came to words. It condemned the attacks. Its leader, Xi Jinping, got on the phone with the Russian leader and urged a ceasefire. Its foreign minister spoke with his counterpart in Iran. But that's where China stopped. The usual rhetoric was delivered. De-escalation and dialogue were trumpeted. Yet China offered no material support. Despite Beijing's clout as a near-peer rival to the United States and its ambition to play a bigger role on the world stage, Beijing refrained from offering military support to Iran, let alone getting directly involved in the conflict. The decision underscored the limitations it faces in the Middle East. "Beijing lacks both the diplomatic capabilities and the risk appetite to quickly intervene in, and to think it can successfully navigate, this fast-moving and volatile situation," said Jude Blanchette, director of the China Research Center at RAND. Given the tangled politics of the Middle East, where China holds substantial economic and energy stakes yet wields minimal military influence, Beijing "isn't inclined to stick its neck out," Blanchette added. Instead, the Chinese government opts to remain "a measured, risk-averse actor." China weighs commercial interests Zhu Feng, dean of the School of International Relations at Nanjing University in eastern China, said volatility in the Middle East is not in China's interests. "From China's point of view, the Israel-Iran conflicts challenge and impact China's business interests and economic security," Zhu said. "This is something China absolutely does not want to see." After the Iranian parliament floated a plan to shut down the strategically located Strait of Hormuz over the weekend, China spoke against it. "China calls on the international community to step up efforts to de-escalate conflicts and prevent regional turmoil from having a greater impact on global economic development," said Guo Jiakun, a spokesman for the Chinese foreign ministry. On Tuesday, following the ceasefire announcement, US President Donald Trump wrote in a social media post: "China can now continue to purchase Oil from Iran," suggesting the ceasefire would prevent the disruption of Iranian oil production. A 2024 report by the US Energy Information Administration contained estimates suggesting that roughly 80 per cent to 90 per cent of the oil exported by Iran went to China. The Chinese economy could struggle to preserve its industrial production without the roughly 1.2 million barrels of oil and other fossil fuels provided by Iran. Craig Singleton, senior China fellow at the Washington-based think tank Foundation for Defense of Democracies, summed up Beijing's responses as "steady oil buys and ritual calls for dialogue'." "That's about it," Singleton said. "No drones or missile parts, no emergency credit line. Just words calibrated to placate Tehran without rattling Riyadh or inviting US sanctions." Beijing's muted responses also expose the gap between China's great-power rhetoric and its real reach in the region. Said Singleton: "China's Gulf footprint is commercial, not combat-ready. When missiles fly, its much-touted strategic partnership with Iran shrinks to statements. Beijing wants discounted Iranian oil and a peace-broker' headline, while letting Washington shoulder the hard-power risks." In statements, China sides with Iran and pledges to mediate Since the onset of the war, Beijing which brokered a diplomatic rapprochement between Iran and Saudi Arabia in 2023 stood by Iran's side and urged talks. At the United Nations, China, a permanent member of the Security Council, teamed up with Russia and Pakistan in putting forward a draft resolution condemning "in the strongest terms" the attacks against peaceful nuclear sites and facilities in Iran. They called for "an immediate and unconditional ceasefire" even though the United States, another permanent member on the council, is almost certain to veto the proposal. Shortly after Israel attacked Iran, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi had a phone call with his Iranian counterpart, Abbas Araghchi, and told him that "China explicitly condemned Israel's violation of Iran's sovereignty, security and territorial integrity." Wang, using common diplomatic language, said China was "ready to maintain communication with Iran and other relevant parties to continue playing a constructive role in de-escalating the situation." Wang later spoke with foreign ministers of Oman and Egypt; both nations are key mediators in the region. And late last week, before the US got involved militarily, Xi spoke with Russian President Vladimir Putin; the two agreed to stay in closer contact over Iran and work toward de-escalation. But China stayed away from any direct involvement, and Russia also had muted responses to the Israel-Iran conflict. Iran is an important link in Xi's ambitious global project Belt and Road Initiative, and in 2023 joined the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, a security group by Russia and China to counter the US-led NATO. It has conducted joint exercises with China, including this year's 'Maritime Security Belt 2025' in the Gulf of Oman, in which Russia also took part. On Wednesday, Beijing will convene a meeting of defense ministers of SCO member nations. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
