
What To Wear to a Gala To Look Chic and Timeless
What to wear to a gala is an ever-evolving question—as is the quest to find the perfect gala gown.
Is your summer social calendar suddenly blossoming with glamorous events? Black-tie affairs, over-the-top birthdays, a grand night at the ballet, or a glitzy charity function? Getting inspired for evening wear that turns heads as much as it sticks to sometimes strict fête dress codes can feel quite overwhelming. It doesn't have to be all about the ball gown or a salary-slashing investment dress this side of the century—these days, short and midi dresses can also fly in certain circumstances too, and there's plenty of ways to go glam that don't break the bank. Gala attire, too, has gotten with the times.
Whether you are on the hunt for a dress to wear to that next grand charity function or deducing what the dress code even means—we've called upon some of the most well-dressed gala attendees Vogue knows to give their glitz-busting advice. Below, the the Vogue guide for what to wear to a gala, to keep you feeling chic, timeless, and comfortable while fêting whatever the night calls for. A toast!
Know your gala
Heading to a charity ball, an art gallery dinner, or the opening season of the New York ballet? It's important to consider the cultural landscape of the room you're dressing for.
'Like all things in life, galas require context,' advises Vogue 's Lilah Ramzi-Goettemann, who knows her way around attending and dressing for a gala event. 'A black-tie fundraiser at the Whitney Museum of American Art? One might dabble in the artful and avant-garde. A medical benefit for breast cancer research? Save the fashion stunts—this is a night for reverence and restraint.'
'There is no shame in looking up a dress code,' says Elle McPherson-Yoon, an expert in dressing timelessly and chicly for a night gala-ing. She points to iconic etiquette and social behaviour resources like Emily Post and Debrett's for some further reading. 'Then, I'd say read and understand your invitation well!' she adds. 'The style of the actual invitation should reflect the tone of the event, and tell you about the host, purpose of the event, and season. I would also look up the venue and images from years past if possible.'
How to dress for dress codes
In need of gala dress code tips? What exactly is gala attire? Well, it can vary. But most broadly and commonly:
Black tie
Simply, it's a step above cocktail attire and one below 'white tie.' (More on that later). When it comes to 'black tie,' you can generally assume, most simply, that means a long dress for women. But make sure yours comes in an evening-worthy fabric, like lace, chiffon, tulle, or velvet. If the event feels a bit more relaxed, a short dress could cut it if it feels formal and elevated enough, but for peace of mind, we suggest a floor-hitting look. For men (or anyone who wants to wear the more masculine style, really), consider a tuxedo and white dress shirt, and a black bow tie with your dinner jacket.
White tie
While black tie has overwhelmingly replaced the white tie dress code, it can crop up—just like it did for the 2022 Costume Institute Gala, 'In America: An Anthology of Fashion.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Washington Post
42 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Jean Smart and John Krasinski in solo shows that illustrate the gender wars
NEW YORK — A dramatic faceoff of Judith Butler proportions is underway on New York stages, where a pair of star vehicles is condemning the tyranny of conventional gender roles from each side of the divide. Depending whom you ask, men and women are both in trouble. Several waves of feminism have decried the injustices facing the latter: subjugation under patriarchy with fallouts that range from unequal pay to death. Enter 'Hacks' star Jean Smart in 'Call Me Izzy,' as a hothouse flower whose artistic aspirations are suffocated by her unseen ogre of a husband. Pressure to escape the trailer park is paramount. Meanwhile, rumblings that began on the dark web and are now broadcast on something called the manosphere have reached the opposite conclusion: It's men whose well-being is threatened under the current regime, one that the red-pilled nice guy played by John Krasinski in 'Angry Alan' calls 'the gynocracy.' That would be a world governed in deference to women that ignores men's loneliness and insecurities while demanding they be heroes and moneymakers. (Straight people are a trip.) Arguments anchoring each end of this age-old tug-of-war are everywhere. Throw in the economic appeal of producing celebrity solo shows, and it's no wonder the debate is being hashed out on Midtown stages. Despite their opposing perspectives, they present the actors with identical challenges — proving that vulnerability is the ultimate common ground. The familiarity of domestic violence narratives allows for a naturalistic approach — Izzy, in all her delicacy and emotional candor, would be impossible not to root for. A few minutes with Smart's graceful, fluttering narrator, as she toils and daydreams on the can, and you would practically kill for her. A Louisiana belle who was married by 17, Izzy spills with dishy Southern talk, sweeter than gossip but with the same conspiratorial flavor. Call this corner of her modest digs 'A Bathroom of One's Own.' It's where she hides out to scrawl poetry on toilet paper, using the hamper as a desk and stashing reams of words in a box of Tampax. Dressed in a plush teal bathrobe, her face framed with frizzy golden curls, she recalls reciting Joyce Kilmer's 'Trees' in a childhood pageant and falling in love with 'mind pictures,' a phrase she borrows from Zora Neale Hurston. Of course, Izzy's husband wouldn't approve of her literary pursuits, and this being a drama, he's bound to find out. The world premiere from playwright Jamie Wax, who's also a correspondent for CBS News, treads sensitive but familiar territory. The plight of a woman's authorship curtailed has been covered with much greater sophistication elsewhere — including in previous centuries, by women writers themselves. The appeal of this borderline Southern Gothic production, from director Sarna Lapine, lies entirely with its beguiling star. Smart, returning to Broadway after some 25 years, brings astonishing clarity and depth to the part. Spinning an enticing yarn from shopworn material — the action is set in 1989, when it may have struck a modern tone — she delivers a performance that feels deceptively featherlight while demonstrating total command. She lends Izzy's tin-eared poetry a soaring lyricism and Wax's trope-heavy script the texture of a character study. Every expression feels alive, and the sum total is transfixing. 'Angry Alan,' the first show at the newly christened Studio Seaview off-Broadway, takes a different tack. Written by Penelope Skinner and created with Donald Sage Mackay, the show is premised on the fact that engendering compassion for a man in need is a trickier prospect. Especially when that man has plunged down a slippery wormhole into an online realm led by a man-fluencer named Angry Alan. Here, male grievances — many of them legitimate — assume a sour cast by turning the blame on women. It's true that men are in crisis. Among the dilemmas cited by Roger, a cheery everyman not unlike Krasinski's character on 'The Office,' are elevated rates of suicide and 'a period of unprecedented uncertainty' that's confused men about their place in the culture and at home. Given that men are not, as the stereotype goes, particularly forthcoming with expressing emotion, the gag is that Roger has the audience as his unlikely confessor. Skinner and Mackay, who premiered the show at the 2018 Edinburgh Festival Fringe in Scotland, set out an uneasy game in which Roger flips, repeatedly and on a dime, from relatable to revolting. Roger is an avatar, a stand-in for 'you know the type,' in this exploration of a sociological problem, directed with shadowy, uncanny undertones by Sam Gold. (The setup is not unlike Young Jean Lee's 'Straight White Men,' which played Broadway in 2018.) Roger has particulars — an ex-wife, who glowers down from the conference-like projections, a big-shot job that ended badly at AT&T (he now works at Kroger) and a new girlfriend who's recently (and conveniently, plot-wise) undergone a feminist awakening. Even as he buys into Alan's dark talk, Roger is posited as a generic good-natured dude trying to get by. So it goes that by design, Krasinski mostly plays mild-mannered, which fans know he's ideally suited for. Though they won't be disappointed here, Krasinski is better when he gets more to do, such as voicing Roger in conversation with his girlfriend, who's bewildered by his slide into men's rights. In the end, Roger's fixation on the double binds of masculinity faces a provocative test (which I won't spoil here) that snaps the whole play into focus. It's an affecting shift, but the stakes might have been clarified sooner. At the heart of 'Angry Alan' is the tension between how Roger really feels — the suffering he admits he's long buried inside — and the sturdy exterior he's been conditioned to wear as a mask. The difference in consequence between the two stories comes down to that adage about men, like Alan, being afraid that women will laugh at them. Women like Izzy, on the other hand, put on a pleasant face to avoid a far worse fate. Call Me Izzy, through Aug. 17 at Studio 54 in New York. 90 minutes without an intermission. Angry Alan, through Aug. 3 at Studio Seaview in New York. 85 minutes without an intermission.


National Post
an hour ago
- National Post
Swift, Kelce rub elbows with Gretzky during Game 4 of Stanley Cup final
Article content SUNRISE, Fla. — There was bad blood at Game 4 of the Stanley Cup Final between the Edmonton Oilers and Florida Panthers. Article content And not just on the ice. Article content Pop superstar Taylor Swift and boyfriend Travis Kelce were among the celebrities who flocked to Amerant Bank Arena on Thursday to watch Game 4 of the final — with the Bad Blood singer seen holding hands with Kelce as they headed to their seats. Article content Kelce, a Super Bowl-winning tight end for the Kansas City Chiefs, is a known hockey fan along with his brother Jason Kelce. And since Swift and Kelce began their high-profile romance in 2023, the 14-time Grammy Award-winning singer has been known to pop in on big sporting events — including the last two Super Bowls — and cause an excited frenzy for fans. Article content Article content There were rumblings ahead of Thursday's game that the couple might attend the final. Article content A helicopter landed near Amerant Bank Arena in Sunrise, Fla., ahead of the game. The VIP entrance to the area was also closed off and the media elevator was not available to be used for a period of time before pregame warmups began. Article content The pair was shown on the television broadcast during the first period of the game and throughout the Canadian broadcast feed. Article content Article content Swift recently announced that she regained control over her entire body of work. In a lengthy note posted to her official website, Swift said that all the music she's made now belongs to her after she has purchased her catalog of recordings — originally released through Big Machine Records — from their most recent owner, the private equity firm Shamrock Capital. Article content Over the last few years, Swift has been re-recording and releasing her early albums in an attempt to regain control of her music. Article content Other celebs in attendance included former Miami Dolphins star defensive end Jason Taylor, who banged the drum before the game, and hockey greats Wayne Gretzky and Jaromir Jagr. Miami Heat captain Bam Adebayo was joined by former Heat captain Udonis Haslem on the drum on Monday. Article content


CNA
an hour ago
- CNA
Sean 'Diddy' Combs' lawyer complains about trial secrecy as a famous rapper's name goes unmentioned
A lawyer for Sean 'Diddy' Combs protested the rising tide of secrecy at the hip-hop icon's federal sex trafficking and racketeering trial on Thursday (Jun 12) after Combs and the public were excluded from arguments over whether another famous rapper's name could be disclosed. Defence attorney Marc Agnifilo complained to Judge Arun Subramanian after Combs was excluded from a meeting outside the courtroom between lawyers and the judge. That meeting delayed the final day of weeklong testimony from a woman identified in court only by the pseudonym 'Jane', who dated Combs from 2001 until his September arrest. When her emotional testimony ended, she hugged a prosecutor, Maureen Comey, in front of the jury, which would have drawn an outcry from the defence except she hugged defence attorney Teny Geragos too. Her testimony likely helped both sides. She admitted still loving Combs, but she said she now resents that she felt forced to have sex with strangers to satisfy his sexual fantasies. Combs, 55, has pleaded not guilty to charges that carry a potential prison sentence of 15 years to life in prison. Prosecutors say he used fame, fortune, violence and threats to manipulate girlfriends into sex with paid sex workers in multi-day events that they later regretted. Defence attorneys say the government is prosecuting consensual sex between adults. Under cross-examination by Geragos, Jane testified Thursday that she flew to Las Vegas in January 2023 with a famous rapper and his girlfriend. Geragos didn't identify the rapper but asked Jane if he had recorded with Combs, 'an individual at the top of the music industry as well ... an icon in the music industry'. She also asked if Combs and the rapper were 'really close'. 'Yes,' Jane replied. Once in Las Vegas, Jane testified, she went with a group including the rapper to dinner, a strip club and a hotel room party, where a sex worker had sex with a woman while a half-dozen others watched. She said there was dancing and the rapper said, 'hey beautiful', and told her he'd always wanted to have sex with her. Jane said she didn't recall exactly when but she flashed her breasts while dancing. The testimony followed the closed-door session Thursday, when lawyers discussed what facts could be disclosed about the hotel room encounter. Agnifilo said the need for a public trial was 'an important issue, a constitutional issue' and objected to so much happening out of the earshot of his client. In response, the judge offered more secrecy, saying 'If your client wishes to be heard ... we can clear this courtroom if need be to address it.' Agnifilo rejected the offer. 'Part of the reason trials are fully public is so if other people realise they know something about an event discussed in a public courtroom, they can come forward and share their recollection of it,' the lawyer said, adding: 'That is kind of the practical side of the constitutional right to a public trial.' A monitor that is used to show exhibits to spectators has been shut off throughout Jane's testimony, although lawyers, the judge, Combs and jurors can view them. Some sidebar conversations between lawyers and the judge have been sealed. The judge also has banned the public from viewing any exhibits containing sexual content, even though the defence has said images from the group sex episodes proves they were consensual acts between adults, and not proof of crimes. And many of the letters to the judge from lawyers each day are filed under seal, preventing the public from quickly knowing, for instance, the details about why prosecutors want a black juror ejected from the jury in mid-trial. The judge has said he'll decide the juror's fate Friday. Defence attorney Alexandra Shapiro has called the prosecution's quest a 'thinly veiled effort to dismiss a black juror'. Jane and Casandra 'Cassie' Ventura, who testified for four days in the trial's first week about her relationship with Combs from 2007 through 2018, both said they participated in the sex marathons for years, with Cassie calling them 'freak-off' nights and Jane referring to them as 'hotel nights'. Agnifilo said the defence consented to Jane testifying with a pseudonym but did not consent to other events related to her testimony and the testimony of other witnesses not being public.