Constitution (Amend) Bill: NA panel calls for taking all parties on board
The 10th meeting of the Standing Committee on Law and Justice was held on Monday under the chairmanship of Chaudhry Mahmood Bashir Virk, MNA.
The committee discussed, 'The Constitution (Amendment) Bill, 2025' (Article 140-A) moved by Muhammad Jawed Hanif Khan, MNA.
During deliberations, the mover emphasised that the 18th Amendment aimed to devolve powers to the grassroots level, but without a local government system, this goal remains unachieved. While members supported the bill's intent in principle, they agreed its success depends on political will and stressed the need to consult political leaders across parties.
The committee was informed that, despite a prior formal request to all parliamentary leaders for their views on the proposed amendment, no responses have been received. Therefore, the committee recommended issuing a fresh reminder through the Ministry of Law and Justice and the committee to urge political leaders to submit their opinions, enabling further progress on the matter.
The committee condemned the recent terrorist attacks in Balochistan, especially the tragic school bus incident, and expressed deep sorrow over the loss of innocent lives. Condolences were extended to the bereaved families.
Meanwhile, the minutes of the meeting held on 30th April 2025 were approved.
The committee considered the bills: The Constitution (Amendment) Bill, 2024 (Article 175-A and 215) (moved by Asad Qaiser), The Constitution (Amendment) Bill, 2025 (Article 59), and The Constitution (Amendment) Bill, 2024 (Article 51 and 106) (moved by Naveed Aamir, MNA).
During deliberations, the committee noted that despite repeated inclusion on the agenda, the movers consistently failed to attend. Accordingly, the committee, unanimously, recommended that the bills should not be passed by the assembly.
The committee considered the bill, 'The Code of Civil Procedure (Amendment) Bill, 2024' (Section 54-A) (moved by Sofia Saeed Shah, MNA). During the discussion, it was noted that the mover was unwell, leading to a request to defer the bill. The committee also recalled that the Ministry of Law and Justice had promised to share a draft of related amendments to the Land Revenue Act but had not yet done so due to short notice. The Ministry assured the draft would be provided before the next meeting.
Considering these factors, the bill was deferred.
MNAs Zara Wadood Fatemi, Kiran Haider, Syed Hafeezuddin, Ali Muhammad Khan, Umair Khan Niazi, Hassan Sabir, Aliya Kamran, Sohail Sultan, Javid Hanif Khan, Minister of State for Law and Justice, secretary, Ministry of Law and Justice, along with relevant staff attended the meeting.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
2 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Gondal appointed as AGP
ISLAMABAD: Federal government has appointed Maqbool Ahmad Gondal, a senior officer of Accounts and Audit Group as Auditor General of Pakistan (AGP) under Article 168 (1) of the Constitution. A notification has been issued in this respect. 'The president is pleased to appoint Maqbool Ahmad Gondal (PS&AS/BS 22) presently serving as controller general of accounts as AGP for a period of four years'. He is second most senior officer of audit and accounts service. Iram Anjum Khan is most senior officer. Shehzad Hasan and Syed Muhammad Ammar Naqvi are third and fourth in seniority. He will assume office upon completion of term of the incumbent Muhammad Ajmal Gondal who will complete his four years terms in September 2025. 7th NFC Award: 'Centre deducts Rs87.87bn annually without AGP certification' Finance Division appoints the AGP in the light of recommendations send by the incumbent AGP usually, sources said. The finance ministry plays a major, often decisive, role in the appointment of the AGP which may be characterised as a potential conflict of interest as the AGP is primarily going to look at the accounts and related procedures and practices of the ministry. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Express Tribune
6 hours ago
- Express Tribune
The chasm between law and culture
Listen to article Pakistan's progressive legal framework often collides with a deep-rooted cultural mindset, creating a jarring paradox. What the law protects, society condemns. What the law forbids, society continues to normalise. The recent killing of a young couple in Balochistan, reportedly for eloping, is a tragic reminder of this persistent conflict. These are not isolated acts of violence but symptoms of a deeper struggle over authority, identity and autonomy. Nowhere is this tension more visible than in matters of marriage. Legally, adults have the right to choose their life partners. Court marriages, which are consensual but without familial approval, are valid under the law. But culturally, particularly in tribal and conservative areas, love marriages are often perceived as acts of rebellion against family authority. This cultural aversion has little to do with legal validity and everything to do with perceived threats to collective "honour". This obsession with honour gives rise to the horrific practice of so-called honour killings. The term itself conceals the cruelty behind it. These murders are often portrayed as necessary to restore lost dignity, when in fact they are brutal punishments for asserting basic human rights. Despite legal reforms, including changes that prevent the victim's family from pardoning the killer, enforcement remains weak. Community pressure from tribal elders or jirgas often discourages families from seeking justice. In some cases, the decision to kill is collective and calculated, rather than impulsive or isolated and murderers often receive heroic reception from the communities. This happens not because the law is unclear, but because parallel systems of power and belief still dominate large parts of society. Patriarchal norms, tribal traditions and feudal loyalties often carry more weight than the Constitution. They frame personal freedom as a threat rather than a right. The legal system is undermined not only by lack of enforcement but by a culture that sees conformity as virtue and autonomy as rebellion. A similar contradiction exists in the practice of dowry. The Dowry and Bridal Gifts Act of 1976 legally restricts dowry, aiming to reduce economic exploitation and safeguard women. Yet dowry remains widespread and socially accepted. It is often seen as a sign of "generosity" or status, not as a burden or legal violation. Families go into debt to meet expectations, and women face harassment or violence if their dowry is considered inadequate. Here too, the law is present, but the culture is louder. These contradictions persist because cultural norms offer a sense of control and continuity in a society where state institutions are often weak. In many areas, especially rural ones, informal systems of justice are more accessible than formal courts. Social order is maintained not through the rule of law but through community expectations. Change threatens these systems and is therefore met with resistance. Yet cultural norms are not unchangeable. In religio-culturally conservative regions like Chitral, for example, research by scholars like Marsden shows that love marriages and elopements are more common and comparatively accepted. This variation indicates that traditional and cultural rigidity is not inevitable. Where education spreads, where justice is accessible and where dialogue takes place, attitudes begin to shift. Bridging this gap between law and culture requires more than legislation. It requires moral courage and sustained effort. Educators, religious leaders, civil society and media must all play a role in challenging outdated norms. Public awareness campaigns, strong legal enforcement and community-based dialogue are essential. Change cannot come from the top-down alone. It must emerge from within families, classrooms and neighbourhoods. The cost of inaction is too high. So long as culture continues to override law, individual rights will remain fragile, and lives will remain at risk. The future of justice and equality in Pakistan depends not only on legal reforms but on a collective willingness to question what has long been considered untouchable. This is not only a legal battle but a moral one, and it can no longer be postponed.
Express Tribune
a day ago
- Express Tribune
PTI MNA faces ouster over absence
Shaikh Waqas Akram said that the first phase of the civil disobedience movement is ongoing, and it is aimed at Pakistanis living abroad. PHOTO: WIKIMEDIA COMMONS PTI lawmaker Sheikh Waqas Akram may be in trouble as a decision on a motion by PML-N member Nosheen Iftikhar is expected on August 11. In an earlier session, MNA Nosheen had moved a motion proposing the termination of Akram's membership, stating that his absence for 40 consecutive days warranted action under the Constitution. Responding to the motion, National Assembly Speaker Sardar Ayaz Sadiq on August 5 indicated that the membership of Akram could be terminated. The speaker pointed out that Akram had not attended the assembly for the last 40 days and had not submitted a leave application.
