'Simmering' division in town where hotel for asylum seekers is beacon for unrest
"Fascists! Racists!" shouts one lot.
On the opposing verge, they shout back: "Shame on you!"
Then both sides chant: "Whose streets? Our streets!"
Cars flash between them, some adding hoots to the noise.
It's 5pm on Sunday and much of the nation is united watching the Lionesses in the Euro finals.
Yet here is a dual carriageway of division formed in front of what has become a beacon for unrest - a hotel housing asylum seekers.
Sky News has been testing the mood in Altrincham since locals were first informed last November that the Cresta Court Hotel was being repurposed from accommodating short business stays and local events into lodgings for hundreds of male asylum seekers who crossed the Channel on small boats.
Over the course of eight months there have been angry town meetings, regular low-level protests and last Sunday around 80 people from each side turned up outside the hotel with banners, flags and loudspeakers.
"We stopped the Germans, why can't we stop dinghies," says local man Dave Haydock under a St George's cross cap.
"We're paying for them to be in there and there's British people out on the streets," added local businessman Steve, who is waving a Union Flag. "They're not fleeing a war to come to Britain - they're coming from France - they are coming because of all the benefits - and everyone in the UK now knows that."
Cost, benefits and risk to women are recurring themes.
"These people coming over without any documentation," says local Clare Jones as she points in the direction of two schools. "I'm not a racist. I'm just a concerned mum. I don't feel safe in my own community."
A man behind a mask who didn't want to appear on camera says the media "sneers" at these protests because the media is middle class and "this is a working-class movement".
Altrincham is one of Manchester's most affluent towns, but there are much poorer areas close by.
The social demographic at the protests was mixed.
On either side of the A56 I met business owners, nurses, teachers and pensioners.
Both groups were also largely made up of locals.
A handful of social media "professional" protesters also turned up, pointing cameras at anything they could film - making selfie videos for their TikTok and YouTube followers.
A small line of police officers was in place to keep the peace.
The counter-protesters forming a line to protect the hotel. Described as "lefties" by the anti-migrant demonstrators, the counter-protesters feel that the people opposite are either "far right, fascists" or "being manipulated by the far right".
Altrincham resident Alison O'Connell said "this is very frightening" as she pointed at the anti-migrant demonstrators. "We are just here to show support for the refugees in the hotel," she added.
Counter-protester Steph Phoenix said: "Knowing personally people in the hotels, I know they are not coming for our money. These people are desperate. They don't come over for a laugh, they are coming over because they are escaping something terrible in their own country."
Nahella Ashraf, co-chair of Greater Manchester Stand Up To Racism, said: "There needs to be an honest conversation about what the problems are in society. Refugees are not to blame. People are worried about the cost of living crisis, but it's not caused by refugees. By housing people in these hotels, we've not taken accommodation away from anyone in Britain."
Migrants disappeared into their rooms during the protest, some peering out of their bedroom windows.
Their voices are rarely heard in this debate.
The next day, hotel security advised them not to talk to us.
Those we did speak to all had stories of fleeing instability and threat. Some had just arrived, others had been here months.
Many were anxious about the protests, but equally not put off from their decision to come.
One said he had recently told a local who had been abusive: "I struggled to get here. It was just luck you were born here."
The fears of increased crime expressed by residents in November don't appear to have transpired. But Conservative councillor Nathan Evans, who called the first town meeting, says groups of men in the park, men praying in the public library and warning letters from schools to parents about groups of men near the school gates have all caused "an unease across the town". He says he has warned the police of a "simmering issue".
Protesters on either side don't agree on much but both see the hotel as a symbol of broken promises from successive governments - a failure to manage migration in a way that doesn't inflame communities. What remains is anger.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Powys County Times
10 minutes ago
- Powys County Times
Rachel Reeves should exempt defence pledge from budget rules, says Gordon Brown
Gordon Brown has said Chancellor Rachel Reeves should exempt the Government's defence spending pledge from her borrowing rules to help free up economic headroom. The former prime minister said the commitment to spend 5% of GDP on national security by 2035 should be dealt with jointly as a 'Nato initiative', with costs shared across Europe. Leading economists have warned the Chancellor will likely have to raise taxes in the autumn budget to plug a £51 billion black hole in the public finances. Ms Reeves is currently on track to miss one of her borrowing rules by £41.2 billion and needs to rebuild a fiscal buffer of nearly £10 billion that has been wiped out, the National Institute of Economic and Social Research (Niesr). Mr Brown, who served as chancellor for a decade in Sir Tony Blair's Labour administration, said on Thursday that the rise in defence spending should be treated as 'exceptional', as it has been in Germany. 'When you come to the fiscal position, look, there's one thing that's happened over the last few months that has been quite unprecedented – to spend 5% on defence expenditure as we want to spend by the 2030s,' he told BBC Radio 4's Today programme. 'But this is a Nato initiative, this is a European initiative. We should be doing this jointly. 'We should have either jointly issued bonds or a Nato defence fund, and we should be sharing the cost across the continent, and that should be regarded as something extraordinary and exceptional, outside the fiscal rules. 'That would create the kind of headroom that Rachel Reeves needs.' Germany has voted to exempt some defence spending from its self-imposed borrowing constraints as Nato allies seek to boost funding following pressure from US President Donald Trump for them to shoulder more of the burden of European defence. Mr Brown said: 'If you look around Europe at the moment, you see that the Germans are looking at what they can do outside the fiscal rules… the French are looking at ways of doing it, the Polish have already done that. 'What I'm actually asking for is a European-wide initiative. 'Let's do it jointly, either jointly issued bonds or individually issued bonds that are simultaneous and therefore seen by the markets as an extraordinary issue.' When she entered the Treasury, Ms Reeves set out two key fiscal rules: the first to ensure that day-to-day spending is matched by tax revenues, and the second to reduce net financial debt as a share of the economy. Ministers have already announced a cut to overseas aid to fund a boost in defence spending but economists have said the new Nato target of 5% by 2035 could increase expenditure by a further £38.6 billion.
Sky News
11 minutes ago
- Sky News
Sentebale war of words continues as charity calls for clarity on commission's probe into Prince Harry claims
The war of words over Sentebale is continuing, with the charity calling on the Charity Commission to provide clarity that its recent report did not specifically investigate claims of racism and misogyny against Prince Harry. Sources close to the Duke of Sussex claim they are "rehashing unsubstantiated allegations of bullying, misogyny and more", describing their latest move as not "just provocative, it's pitiful". A source at Sentebale has told Sky News: "We have written to The Charity Commission stating that the onus is on the commission to restate for the record that individual allegations of bullying have not been investigated or addressed in the commission's report." It comes after the Charity Commission report stated that "based on the evidence provided and reviewed by the commission, it found no evidence of: widespread or systemic bullying or harassment, including misogyny or misogynoir at the charity". 2:38 However, the commission added that it "acknowledged the strong perception of ill treatment felt by a number of parties to the dispute and the impact this may have had on them personally". But sources at Sentebale believe the reporting around this statement - that Prince Harry has been cleared of bullying - has been inaccurate, as the charity watchdog did not specifically look at allegations made by the chair, Dr Sophie Chandauka, including during an exclusive interview on Sky News. 1:42 A source close to Prince Harry and the former board of trustees has hit back, and said: "It's remarkable, just yesterday Ms Chanduaka was applauding the Charity Commission's findings, yet today, after a flurry of unflattering headlines, she's back on the warpath. "Issuing yet another media statement only reinforces the commission's criticism about using the press to air internal disputes. "Rehashing unsubstantiated allegations of bullying, misogyny and more, which the commission found no evidence of and dressing them up as veiled threats isn't just provocative, it's pitiful. "If Ms Chanduaka has genuine concerns, she should spell them out plainly or, better yet, redirect her energy toward something truly worthwhile, like raising money for the children Sentebale exists to support." It's understood Prince Harry and his supporters have also been left unsatisfied by the scope of the report, including their concerns about money spent on consultants that was authorised by Dr Chandauka. Responding to Sky News, the Charity Commission said: "We have issued the charity with an action plan which sets out steps the current trustees need to take to improve governance weaknesses and rectify findings of mismanagement. "We now urge all involved to put their differences behind them and allow the charity to focus on its work and beneficiaries".
North Wales Chronicle
40 minutes ago
- North Wales Chronicle
Rachel Reeves should exempt defence pledge from budget rules, says Gordon Brown
The former prime minister said the commitment to spend 5% of GDP on national security by 2035 should be dealt with jointly as a 'Nato initiative', with costs shared across Europe. Leading economists have warned the Chancellor will likely have to raise taxes in the autumn budget to plug a £51 billion black hole in the public finances. Ms Reeves is currently on track to miss one of her borrowing rules by £41.2 billion and needs to rebuild a fiscal buffer of nearly £10 billion that has been wiped out, the National Institute of Economic and Social Research (Niesr). Mr Brown, who served as chancellor for a decade in Sir Tony Blair's Labour administration, said on Thursday that the rise in defence spending should be treated as 'exceptional', as it has been in Germany. 'When you come to the fiscal position, look, there's one thing that's happened over the last few months that has been quite unprecedented – to spend 5% on defence expenditure as we want to spend by the 2030s,' he told BBC Radio 4's Today programme. 'But this is a Nato initiative, this is a European initiative. We should be doing this jointly. 'We should have either jointly issued bonds or a Nato defence fund, and we should be sharing the cost across the continent, and that should be regarded as something extraordinary and exceptional, outside the fiscal rules. 'That would create the kind of headroom that Rachel Reeves needs.' Germany has voted to exempt some defence spending from its self-imposed borrowing constraints as Nato allies seek to boost funding following pressure from US President Donald Trump for them to shoulder more of the burden of European defence. Mr Brown said: 'If you look around Europe at the moment, you see that the Germans are looking at what they can do outside the fiscal rules… the French are looking at ways of doing it, the Polish have already done that. 'What I'm actually asking for is a European-wide initiative. 'Let's do it jointly, either jointly issued bonds or individually issued bonds that are simultaneous and therefore seen by the markets as an extraordinary issue.' When she entered the Treasury, Ms Reeves set out two key fiscal rules: the first to ensure that day-to-day spending is matched by tax revenues, and the second to reduce net financial debt as a share of the economy. Ministers have already announced a cut to overseas aid to fund a boost in defence spending but economists have said the new Nato target of 5% by 2035 could increase expenditure by a further £38.6 billion. The Treasury has been contacted for comment.
