Nuked Blood: Post Office victims and Hillsborough survivors urge Met inquiry
Survivors of multiple tragedies and state cover-ups have thrown their weight behind a plea from nuclear veterans for the Met Police to investigate crimes by the British state against its own troops.
Former sub postmaster Lee Castleton, Hillsborough campaigner Margaret Aspinall and the parents of Zane Gbangbola, who were wrongly blamed for his death after hydrogen cyanide from an old dump leaked into their home during floods, have all called on the Policing Minister and Victims Commissioner to intervene.
They are joined by members of the Covid-19 Bereaved Families for Justice campaign, and 100 nuclear veterans, widows, wives and descendants, demanding the Met be told to investigate a complaint about a criminal cover-up at the highest levels of the Establishment.
The Mirror reported yesterday how officers had refused to consider 500 pages of evidence about wrongdoing at the Ministry of Defence, and passed the complaint instead to another force.
Steve Purse, who has been unlawfully denied access to blood tests taken from his dad during a series of toxic plutonium experiments in the Outback, said: "It feels like they're refusing to look over the garden fence in case it upsets the neighbours."
Despite documents which appear to show people still working today in Westminster misled ministers, courts, and Parliament as recently as 2024, the Met decided it was "non-recent" and not in their jurisdiction. They referred it to Thames Valley Police, on the grounds that the Atomic Weapons Establishment is in Berkshire.
"It is our view that, after reviewing the evidence, TVP will simply refer it back to the Met, and there will be a game of official ping-pong while the veterans of these tests, who have an average age of 87 and more than 9 chronic health conditions each, die at the rate of one a week," say campaigners.
"We appreciate that it's a very unwelcome complaint with many political ramifications, but it is a vital one if our country is to remain a place of justice and freedom, if our veterans are to get the correct medical diagnosis and treatment, and our future troops can have full faith in the duty of care displayed by those in charge of the armed forces."
* You can support the nuclear veterans' fight for justice HERE
The Nuked Blood Scandal blew open in 2022 after the discovery of a memo between atomic weapons scientists discussing the " gross irregularity" in the blood of Group Captain Terry Gledhill, who had flown repeated missions through the mushroom clouds to gather samples.
It has since led to the discovery of dozens of orders for blood testing, covering thousands of men in all three armed forces, and Commonwealth troops and civilians, for more than a decade. Veterans have found the results are now missing from their records. Some have been found on a secret database at the AWE, which ministers have ordered to be published.
But there is also evidence that officials covered up the monitoring. In 2018, Parliament was told the MoD "holds no information" about blood tests. 2022, the AWE said it held "one blood test for one member of service personnel". And in repeated court cases, lawyers who should have had access to the AWE files told judges they had seen no evidence of such information.
Last year, officials drafted responses from ministers in letters and Parliament claiming that the AWE held no medical records. Yet when 4,000 pages from the AWE were released, they contained blood tests, blood data, and completed medical record forms, as well as faxes between officials agreeing "lines to take" with ministers and the press that blood tests were never done.
The campaigners have written to Policing Minister Diana Johnson, Victims Commissioner Baroness Helen Newlove, Mayor of London Sadiq Khan and London Victims Commissioner Clare Waxman to urge them to raise the case with Met Police Commissioner Sir Mark Rowley.
Their letter asks the minister and others to "ensure that our case is assessed and investigated as a criminal allegation of national importance, centred on Whitehall, and that all the appropriate resources are given to it for that investigation to be both rapid and thorough".
The Home Office was approached for comment.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Glasgow Times
26 minutes ago
- Glasgow Times
George Galloway to stand for Holyrood 2026 election
The former Labour MP, who now leads the Workers Party, told The Herald his party will contest Glasgow's Southside following Nicola Sturgeon's announcement that she is stepping down in May. Yvonne Ridley, a former member of Alex Salmond's Alba Party and journalist, will also contest the Glasgow Pollok seat for Galloway's party following former first minister Humza Yousaf's plans to step down next year. Galloway said he will top the Workers Party list for next year's Holyrood election and that his party are going to 'put everything' into winning Glasgow's Southside. 'We're going all out for it and we've got a lot of support,' he said. Asked if he was confident of winning, Galloway said: 'I wouldn't say confident.' He added: 'We're hopeful that we can win in it. We're going to put everything into trying to do so.' Galloway said momentum for the Workers Party was growing in Glasgow and that he has had people ask if they can stand in seats in Inverness and Edinburgh. 'But these seats in Glasgow are our current and number one target,' he said, adding: 'We're strong there.' (Image: PA) According to The Herald, his Holyrood campaign will strongly focus on the crisis in Gaza, and the end to Israel's genocidal campaign. The veteran politician has also said he would back a second referendum on Scottish independence. In June, Galloway came out in support of a Scottish independence referendum despite having been opposed to Scotland having the right to self-determination for his entire political life. In 2021, he pledged to 'tackle the scourge of separatism' when All for Unity launched their Scottish Parliament election manifesto. But in June, Galloway made the surprise announcement that he had changed his view as he said in a social media post: 'We support the right of the Scots to self-determination. Eleven years after they last did so, we believe the time for another referendum is close. 'Given the collapsing authority of the British state the pitiful prime minister Starmer the moral decline of British society the result cannot easily be predicted. Britain has become a cesspit.' Galloway founded the Workers Party of Britain in 2019 and has served as an MP across five different constituencies, including Glasgow Hillhead between 1987 and 1997 and Glasgow Kelvin from 1997 to 2005.
The Herald Scotland
39 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Badenoch suggests migrants held in ‘camps' as crossings near 50,000 under Labour
Latest Home Office figures show that 49,797 people have arrived on British shores by small boat since Labour won last year's general election. Children were seen wrapped in blankets as they arrived into the Port of Ramsgate, Kent, by a lifeboat vessel following a small boat incident in the Channel on Monday. The Conservative Party has claimed the figure has surpassed 50,000 following Monday's arrivals, but the official numbers are yet to be confirmed. At Epping's Black Lion pub, Mrs Badenoch told members of the community: 'We've got to turn things around very quickly. We cannot use rules from 1995, or 2005, or even 2015 for 2025. 'Our world is changing very quickly, and we need to adapt to it.' She added: 'Is it possible for us to set up camps and police that, rather than bringing all of this hassle into communities?' Asked what she meant by the suggestion, Mrs Badenoch told the PA news agency: 'We need to make sure that communities like Epping are safe. What a lot of the parents – the mothers and even some of the children – have said to me is that they don't feel safe. 'It is unfair to impose this burden on communities.' The MP for North West Essex said that 'lots of people here have been talking about being harassed by a lot of people in the hotels' and continued: 'Not everyone here is a genuine asylum seeker. People are arriving in our country illegally and that is why we have a plan to make sure that people who arrive here illegally are deported immediately. 'We need to close down that pathway to citizenship that means that lots of people get here not making any contributions, claiming welfare, claiming benefits. 'And we also need a deterrent.' Conservative Party leader Kemi Badenoch called for a deterrent (Lucy North/PA) The Government has previously set out its intention to close asylum hotels by the end of the Parliament. 'My worry is that things are actually going to get worse as Labour tries to move people out of hotels and into private accommodation – I think that is going to be a much worse situation,' Mrs Badenoch said. She had earlier told members of the community: 'As a party, we need to also hear from the community about what you think the solutions are. We don't have all the answers; it's important that we make sure that the community is part of the problem solved.' Police outside the Bell Hotel in Epping, Essex where there has been a number of demonstrations (Yui Mok/PA) Referring to protests outside the Bell Hotel in Epping, Mrs Badenoch said: 'I think there can be a balance. 'There is a big difference between local people protesting about something that's happening in their midst and 'professional protesters' who turn up at lots of different events. 'They are not equivalent, and I think that there needs to be some recognition that people can be in their neighbourhood talking about something there, and other people who have an academic or a theoretical or political belief joining that to have a counter-protest. 'Also this is your home, this is your community, and that in my view is quite important. People should have some kind of precedence in their own communities versus other people randomly passing through, otherwise we start to change the nature of what protest is.' Protesters outside the former Bell Hotel in Epping (Jordan Pettitt/PA) Demonstrations began on July 13 after an asylum seeker was charged with allegedly attempting to kiss a 14-year-old girl. Hadush Gerberslasie Kebatu, 38, denies sexual assault and is due to stand trial this month. A group of refugee organisations and charities have urged party leaders to take a 'strong and united stand' after a wave of anti-migrant protests on the weekend. Hundreds of protesters in Nuneaton marched through the Warwickshire town on Saturday after two men, reported to be Afghan asylum seekers, were charged over the rape of a 12-year-old girl. Signatories to an open letter, published on Monday, told politicians they hold a responsibility to 'end the divisive politics, racist rhetoric and demonising language of the past'. The letter, co-ordinated by campaign coalition Together With Refugees and signed by groups including Oxfam and Amnesty, said: 'Many of the people targeted have already suffered unimaginably, having fled for their lives from countries such as Afghanistan, Eritrea, Iran, Sudan and Syria. 'Now, due to unacceptable delays and a broken system, they are housed in hotels, a collective target of hostility, banned from working, with limited control over their lives or futures.' The coalition added that an 'outpouring of support from communities condemning the hatred is a powerful reminder that these views do not represent the vast majority'. Some protesters, also protesting against asylum hotels and houses of multiple occupation, held signs reading 'What about our girls' human right to safety' at the Nuneaton demonstration. The End Violence Against Women Coalition – another signatory to the open letter – said the 'far-right has long exploited the cause of ending violence against women and girls to promote a racist, white supremacist agenda' and added the 'attacks against migrant and racialised communities are appalling and do nothing to improve women and girls' autonomy, rights and freedoms'.
Metro
an hour ago
- Metro
The big questions the government needs to answer over Palestine Action
On March 31 1990, Londoners gathered in Trafalgar Square to protest Margaret Thatcher's poll tax. Windows were smashed and premises were set alight. 339 people were arrested. That is thought to be the record number arrested at a single protest in the UK – until last Saturday. The demonstration at the weekend was a very different affair. While six people were arrested for allegedly assaulting police officers, the overwhelming majority – 522 – were arrested for holding up placards reading 'I oppose genocide. I support Palestine Action'. As of last month, Palestine Action (PA) is officially considered a terrorist group by the British government. The direct action network, which targets businesses and factories in a bid to draw attention to Israel's actions in Palestine, was proscribed by Parliament on the same day as the Russian Imperial Movement and the Maniacs Murder Cult. Speaking to the media today, a government spokesperson suggested some of those arrested on Saturday might not be aware of how the organisation they were supporting operates in real life. Asked if Keir Starmer thinks the demonstrators – average age 54 – are terrorists or supporters of a terrorist group, the spokesperson said: 'We've said that many people may not yet know the reality of this organisation.' He added that the assessments made by the Joint Terrorism Analysis Centre were 'very clear', and PA is a 'violent organisation' that has committed 'violent, significant injuries and extensive criminal damage'. Hello, I'm Craig Munro and I'm Metro's man in Westminster. Every Wednesday, I write our Alright, Gov? newsletter with insights from behind the scenes in the Houses of Parliament – and how the decisions made there will end up affecting you. Last week we had a look inside Labour's split on trans women – and answered a question from a reader about if Sir Keir Starmer is likely to suspend more MPs in the future. Click here to sign up If the government believes people attended Saturday's protest without understanding who they were supporting, that means one of two things. Either they don't realise the extent of the crimes committed by PA, or they know about the crimes but don't believe they should be considered terrorism. If it's the first, ministers might need to work on publicising what exactly the group has done – and maybe even figure out a way to make public some of the details Home Office Minister Alex Davies-Jones said the government 'cannot disclose because of national security' in an LBC interview today. If it's the second, ministers might need to clearly explain to the public why PA's acts have passed the legal threshold for terrorism. Dr Jessie Blackbourn, an expert in counter-terrorism law at Durham University, said this appeared to be the first time a group has been proscribed largely based on criminal damage rather than 'serious violence against people' such as murder or torture. One example of 'terrorism' defined under the Terrorism Act 2000 is 'serious damage to property' – a controversial clause in the legislation that has rarely been used until now. Dr Blackbourn told Metro: 'Obviously, the Home Secretary is convinced that she's applied the definition of terrorism correctly in proscribing this organisation. 'But I think if you ask someone on the street what terrorism looks like, they would be more likely to think of it as being something like the IRA or al Qaeda or Islamic State than Palestine Action.' When announcing the proscription, the Home Office pointed to three 'attacks' carried out by PA: one in 2022 at the Thales defence factory in Glasgow, and two last year at Instro Precision in Kent and Elbit Systems UK in Bristol. The incident at Thales 'caused over £1 million worth of damage to parts essential for submarines', the department said, adding: 'Staff fled for safety as pyrotechnics and smoke bombs were thrown in evacuation areas.' A few days before the announcement, two activists from the group also broke into RAF Brize Norton and damaged a pair of aircraft with red paint. Outlining the reasons for proscription to the House of Commons the following day, Security Minister Dan Jarvis said: 'Palestine Action's attacks are not victimless crimes. 'Employees have experienced physical violence, intimidation and harassment, and they have been prevented from entering their place of work. 'We would not tolerate this activity from organisations motivated by Islamist or extreme right-wing ideology, and we cannot tolerate it from Palestine Action.' Following Saturday's protest, Amnesty International UK chief executive Sacha Deshmukh said: 'We have long criticised UK terrorism law for being excessively broad and vaguely worded and a threat to freedom of expression. More Trending 'These arrests demonstrate that our concerns were justified.' On July 30, the High Court ruled the proscription of Palestine Action could be reviewed after lawyers for the group's co-founder Huda Ammori argued the move gagged legitimate protest. However, Judge Mr Justice Chamberlain also refused a request to pause the ban temporarily until the outcome of the challenge. That raises the possibility of further demonstrations and even more arrests – unless the government is able to explain why the protesters shouldn't bother. Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: Man 'throws water and grabs throat' of protester demanding release of Israeli hostages MORE: Netanyahu says Israel has 'no choice but to finish the job' in Gaza MORE: Netanyahu 'will have blood of hostages on his hands' if more are killed in Gaza takeover
