logo
Is Transnet another Eskom? Government to offer financial support

Is Transnet another Eskom? Government to offer financial support

The Citizen22-05-2025

Transnet's profits declined from R5 billion in 2019 to a net loss of R5.7 billion in 2023, and in 2024, it carried a staggering debt burden of R120 billion. Which means it was R1 billion per month to service its debts.
Many state-owned enterprises (SOEs) rely on the government as a constant safety net, stepping in with financial support whenever things fall apart, just like teenagers counting on their parents to fix their mess.
But unlike some parents, who eventually say 'enough is enough' and teach tough love, the government keeps bailing SOEs out. Will it ever stop? How else will SOEs learn to stand on their own?
The cash-strapped logistics company Transnet is increasingly resembling Eskom — South Africa's bulk electricity supplier — as it continues to rely on government financial support.
ALSO READ: Budget 3.0: not austerity budget, but a redistributive budget
Transnet to be bailed out
Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana delivered the third budget speech on Wednesday in Cape Town, where he said little to nothing about lending a hand to struggling SOEs.
The only struggling SOE he mentioned was Transnet, which government is considering providing financial support to.
'The government will also consider government guarantee support to Transnet, to enable the entity to refinance maturing debt, and to enable the execution of its capital investment programme,' said Godongwana.
The South African Broadcasting Corporation (SABC) is another struggling SOE that the public expected the minister to mention after it reported being technically insolvent.
Transnet in trouble
Moody's Ratings Agency recently reviewed Transnet for a downgrade last week, as it believes the cash-strapped entity might run out of money within the next three months. This view supports the notion that the government should provide additional support to the embattled entity.
This additional support can be used to refinance upcoming debt maturities and secure funds for its expanded capital expenditure programme.
'We believe the government remains supportive of Transnet and will provide additional guarantees or other assistance to prevent default on its upcoming debt maturities. However, the lack of a formal announcement so far creates uncertainty and heightens default risk,' said Moody's.
Recovery plan
Transnet's profits declined from R5 billion in 2019 to a net loss of R5.7 billion in 2023. In 2024, it carried a staggering debt burden of R120 billion, which means it was R1 billion per month to service its debts.
Therefore, the company had to develop a recovery plan, which CEO Michelle Phillips believed would meet its 170 million tonne target by the end of its financial year.
In 2024, she said she has always been clear that Transnet, under her leadership, will never ask the government for a bailout.
'In my tenure at Transnet, we were always very clear that we would not approach government for a bailout to ensure that we are never a drain on the fiscus.'
ALSO READ: 'It's been two and a half years, and the case hasn't started': Transnet corruption trial to start in 2026, 70 witnesses to testify
What went wrong?
Transnet's challenges are due to a lack of maintaining infrastructure, failure to invest or under-investment in necessary infrastructure and not focusing on generating revenue.
Moody's acknowledged that Transnet's operational performance has improved under the recovery programme launched at the end of 2023. However, progress remains slower than planned, to some extent due to the continued high occurrence of theft, vandalism, and adverse weather conditions.
However, Transnet's debt burden remains excessively high, resulting in unsustainable interest payments.
Bailouts result in poor service delivery
In late 2024, the Standing Committee on Appropriations was informed by Treasury that poor service delivery was attributed to the decision to bail out struggling state-owned enterprises (SOEs).
SOEs have received R456.5 billion of taxpayers' money in bailouts for nine years. By the end of the current financial year, this amount is expected to increase to R520.6 billion.
The bulk of that money went to Eskom. By the 2025/2026 financial year, the power utility would have received R496 billion in bailouts since 2008/2009.
The power utility is owed billions by private and public entities, municipalities, and government departments.
Government guarantee or bailout
In the budget speech, Godongwana did not specify whether Transnet will receive a government guarantee support or a bailout in this current financial year.
In 2023, the Government awarded Transnet a R47 billion guarantee as part of its involvement and commitment to the recovery and transformation of the SOE.
'The R47 billion is a guarantee which will merely allow Transnet to borrow more money,' said Phillips.
What is Transnet?
Transnet is the largest freight logistics chain in South Africa, delivering goods. The entity delivers thousands of tons of goods throughout the country, via its pipelines and to and from its ports. It moves cargo onto ships for export while unloading goods from overseas.
There are Transnet Freight Rail, Transnet Rail Engineering, Transnet National Ports Authority, Transnet Port Terminals, and Transnet Pipelines.
In 2023, it was estimated that Transnet's performance would negatively impact South Africa's economy, with studies estimating a loss of around 5% of GDP.
This translates to a potential GDP loss of approximately R353 billion, or around R1 billion per day, due to inefficient logistics and increased transport costs for businesses.
NOW READ: Are threats against Transnet over? CCMA sends revised offer to halt strike

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why the EFF went to court about the fuel levy, a regressive tax that punishes the poor and violates budgetary processes
Why the EFF went to court about the fuel levy, a regressive tax that punishes the poor and violates budgetary processes

IOL News

time8 hours ago

  • IOL News

Why the EFF went to court about the fuel levy, a regressive tax that punishes the poor and violates budgetary processes

EFF National Chairperson Noluthando Nolutshungu and Mathibe Mohlala, convener of deployers to the Western Cape, outside the Cape High Court where the Party challenged the legality to increase the fuel levy by the Minister of Finance who wants to raise extra revenue. Image: Ian Landsberg / Independent Newspapers By Carl Niehaus On May 21, 2025, South Africa's Minister of Finance, Enoch Godongwana, announced a 16-cent fuel levy increase as part of the revised 2025/26 Budget, breaking a three-year freeze on such levies. The government claims this will generate R4 billion in revenue, but at what cost? The Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) have taken a bold stand, filing an urgent court application on May 28, 2025 in the Western Cape High Court to interdict this levy. The EFF argues that it's not only economically disastrous and regressive but also illegal and unconstitutional, as the Minister has bypassed critical budgetary approval processes. Moreover, the EFF's clarion call for a wealth tax offers a progressive alternative to fund public services without burdening the poor. This levy must be stopped, and here's why. The fuel levy is a direct assault on South Africa's working class and poor, who are already buckling under a relentless cost-of-living crisis. The January 2025 Household Affordability Index paints a grim picture: a minimum-wage worker earns just R4,854.08 per month, with R2,802.97—57.7%—going to electricity and transport alone, leaving a mere R2,051.11 for all other expenses, including food. Yet, the average food basket costs R5,433.70, leaving these workers short by over R3,000 just to meet basic nutritional needs. In towns like Springbok, a single food basket costs R773.13—more than many can afford even weekly. Now, add the burden of this fuel levy. For a worker already on the edge, this increase could mean the difference between eating and going hungry, between getting to work or losing a job. The ripple effects of this levy are profound. It will drive up transport costs for commuters relying on taxis, buses, or private cars. It will increase the price of food, as transportation costs cascade through the supply chain, making essentials like bread and vegetables unaffordable for many. It will raise electricity costs, as diesel powers backup generators and critical infrastructure logistics, especially for off-grid communities and businesses. There is no 'zero-rating' escape from fuel costs—this levy will touch every aspect of life, and it's the poorest among us who will bear the brunt. Unlike VAT, which is charged at the point of sale, the fuel levy cascades through the economy, inflating prices at every level, whether you drive or not. It's a regressive tax that deepens inequality, exacerbating an already dire cost-of-living crisis. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading Regional disparities further highlight the injustice. South Africans are already paying up to R2 per litre more than our neighbours due to levies and taxes. In Gauteng, fuel costs R21.40 per litre, while in Botswana it's R19.50, in Lesotho R19.30, and in Namibia R20.67. Why are we being punished while fuel is supplied to these countries at lower rates? This disparity is a slap in the face to South Africans already struggling to make ends meet. The fuel levy's imposition is also illegal, and it cannot be implemented on June 4, 2025 because the Minister of Finance has bypassed critical budgetary approval processes mandated by South African law and the Constitution. Section 77 of the Constitution requires that any tax or levy, such as the fuel levy, must be introduced through a Money Bill passed by Parliament. This process ensures democratic oversight, transparency, and accountability, involving stages like tabling the budget proposal in the National Assembly, debates, committee reviews, public hearings, and a final vote by both the National Assembly and the National Council of Provinces. As of June 1, 2025, no Money Bill incorporating this levy has been tabled, debated, or passed. The May 21 announcement left less than two weeks for this process—a timeline that makes compliance with these constitutional requirements impossible. Public hearings, a constitutional necessity, have not occurred, and parliamentary committees have not had the chance to scrutinize the proposal or consult affected communities. This mirrors the unlawful process used in the rejected VAT increase, which the EFF also opposed. The EFF's court application argues that the Minister's actions violate the Constitution by sidestepping Parliamentary oversight and that the levy disproportionately burdens the poor, violating principles of fairness and equality. The legal challenge also highlights the lack of transparency—no socio-economic impact assessments or public consultations were conducted, and there's no evidence of a progressive fiscal policy review or exploration of alternative revenue sources. The broader context of the 2025/26 Budget reveals a troubling picture. The EFF, through Senior Researcher Dr. Gumani Tshimomola's presentation to the Joint Standing Committee on Finance on 28 May 2025, has rejected this budget as weak, misguided, and disconnected from South Africans' lived reality. Dr. Tshimomola emphasised that the National Treasury's fiscal framework prioritises neoliberal austerity over the needs of the people, undermining Parliament's constitutional role in budgeting. He stated: 'Parliament must reclaim its constitutional role in budgeting to ensure that fiscal policy serves the people, not the interests of capital.' He criticised the regressive nature of the fuel levy and the failure to explore progressive alternatives like a wealth tax—a long-standing EFF clarion call. A wealth tax on the richest South Africans would target the top 1%, who hold a disproportionate share of the nation's wealth, to fund public services without burdening the poor. This progressive measure could raise billions to support education, health, and social development, reducing inequality and fostering inclusive growth, unlike the fuel levy, which punishes the most vulnerable. Dr. Tshimomola's presentation revealed that between the March and May versions of the budget, over R28 billion was cut from non-interest spending, including reductions in education, health, social development, and the criminal justice system. These cuts weaken the state's ability to deliver basic services at a time when unemployment, poverty, and infrastructure collapse are at their worst. This is not a growth budget—it's an austerity budget that prioritises fiscal consolidation over the needs of the people. The government claims debt will stabilise at 76.2% of GDP, but this comes at the expense of investment in transformative sectors and job creation. South Africa spends over R382 billion annually on servicing a debt of more than R6.2 trillion, with little to show for it. More than 11 million people are jobless, despite the fiscal space to drive labor-absorptive growth. The budget fails to propose state-led industrialisation, doubling down on neoliberal policies that prioritise profit over national developmental interests. The Standing Committee on Finance's report on the 2025 Fiscal Framework, dated 1 April 2025, supports this critique, noting that the Treasury's austerity measures—through regressive taxes like the fuel levy and cuts to key sectors—hinder socio-economic rights and economic transformation. EFF President Julius Malema has been unequivocal: 'This fuel levy is a tax on the poor, plain and simple. The Minister of Finance is playing a dangerous game with the lives of South Africans, and we will not stand by while he pushes millions deeper into poverty.' We must ask the Minister: Why impose a levy that's just as destructive as the withdrawn VAT hike? Why not adopt a wealth tax instead? The EFF demands an urgent review of the fuel levy, transparent alternatives like a wealth tax to fund public services, and immediate relief for working-class families. This is not just a technical change—it's a tax that punishes the poor and violates our Constitution. We call on all South Africans to join this fight—in the courts, on the streets in the picket lines. The people united will never be defeated, and together, we will achieve economic freedom in our lifetime. * Carl Niehaus is an EFF Member of Parliament (MP) ** The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the views of IOL or Independent Media.

KZN Finance MEC highlights says municipalities are paying the price for poor national decisions
KZN Finance MEC highlights says municipalities are paying the price for poor national decisions

IOL News

time8 hours ago

  • IOL News

KZN Finance MEC highlights says municipalities are paying the price for poor national decisions

KwaZulu-Natal Finance MEC Francois Rodgers and provincial treasury's municipal finance chief director Farhad Cassimjee addressing representative of municipalities in Pietermaritzburg on Wednesday. Image: Bongani Hans KwaZulu-Natal Finance MEC Francois Rodgers, who described himself as a straight talker when it comes to money matters, has blamed the national government's 'bad policy decisions' for the suffering of the municipalities and key provincial government departments. He was addressing mayors, municipal managers, and chief financial officers of seven municipalities who attended a workshop on the implementation of the Cash Management System (CMS) in Pietermaritzburg on Wednesday. The CMS is expected to help the municipalities monitor and control the movement of money in and out of their fiscal system. He said most municipalities were not interested in their financial flow until they ran out of money to deliver services, service debts, and pay salaries. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading He said the Government of Provincial Unity (GPU) inherited a process of budgeting that would 'never get us out of trouble.' He said the province was facing a huge crisis in the education, health and social development, and transport departments. 'Lots of what we are facing now is not out of our own making, [but] it is because post-COVID, and by some really bad policy decisions at the national level, like paying R600 million to state-owned entities when that money could have come to our provincial and local governments. 'We now have R5.7 trillion debt and we have to pay R1.2 billion interest on that debt,' said Rodgers. He said bad policy decisions led to the government failing to save money, but instead, inequitable shares had to be cut by R70 billion over four years. He addressed the municipalities a few hours after the provincial cabinet and Premier Thami Ntuli held a meeting about the state of local governments. 'One of the issues that the premier made clear is that both Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs, and Treasury, need to ensure that we get clean audits in the entire province,' he said. Rodgers said when it came to money matters, he makes sure that 'there has to be straight talk'. 'There is no grey area when it comes to money, and if you are gonna spend money and you put politics ahead of principles, you are gonna make the wrong decisions. 'But if you put principles ahead of politics, and you implement your Municipal Finance Management Act and Public Finance Management Act, and any other legislations, then you are deciding for the right reasons,' said the DA provincial leader. He said only political will would help the municipalities to transform their pattern of expenditure and patterns of poor fiscal control.

Third time's the charm: Godongwana's 2025 budget finally approved
Third time's the charm: Godongwana's 2025 budget finally approved

IOL News

time9 hours ago

  • IOL News

Third time's the charm: Godongwana's 2025 budget finally approved

Minister of Finance, Enoch Godongwana's 2025 National Budget has finally been approved following the adoption of the fiscal framework that is the backbone of the budget. Image: Independent Newspapers Minister of Finance, Enoch Godongwana's 2025 National Budget has finally been approved following the adoption of the fiscal framework that is the backbone of the budget. This was Godongwana's third attempt to get the National Budget passed after an outcry over two proposals to increase VAT. During a joint meeting with Standing Committee on Finance, and the Select Committee on Finance, Members of Parliament adopted the document that establishes economic policy and revenue projections and sets the overall limits for government spending. The process, which took three hours on Wednesday, was not without its issues, with some members arguing that the process was flawed and that not everyone was able to make their voice heard. Insults also flew, with one member saying that her peers should 'learn to read'. In presenting the May 21 National Budget, Godongwana said there were no austerity measures, although government spending was held back. The fuel levy as well as sin taxes were increased. The budget invests over R1 trillion in critical infrastructure to lift economic growth prospects and improve access to basic services, Godongwana said on May 21. He added that this would be done without compromising the fiscal strategy of sustainable public finances. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading Government has achieved its balancing act by reducing additional spending over the medium term by R68 bilion after facing a R75bn revenue hole as VAT was not being increased. In May, Godongwana added that the government would continue to pay large amounts to service debt, which would amount to more than R1.3 trillion over the next three years. 'Put differently, this means in 2025/26 alone we are spending around R1.2bn per day to service our debt,' he said. IOL

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store