
How AI is impacting trust among college students and teachers
But how do students feel about AI? And how is it affecting their relationships with peers, instructors and their coursework?
I am part of a group of University of Pittsburgh researchers with a shared interest in AI and undergraduate education. While there is a growing body of research exploring how generative AI is affecting higher education, there is one group that we worry is underrepresented in this literature, yet perhaps uniquely qualified to talk about the issue: our students.
Our team ran a series of focus groups with 95 students across our campuses in the spring of 2025 and found that whether students and faculty are actively using AI or not, it is having significant interpersonal, emotional effects on learning and trust in the classroom. While AI products such as ChatGPT, Gemini or Claude are, of course, affecting how students learn, their emergence is also changing their relationships with their professors and with one another.
'It's not going to judge you'
Most of our focus group participants had used AI in the academic setting—when faced with a time crunch, when they perceive something to be 'busy work,' or when they are 'stuck' and worry that they can't complete a task on their own. We found that most students don't start a project using AI, but many are willing to turn to it at some point.
Many students described positive experiences using AI to help them study or answer questions, or give them feedback on papers. Some even described using AI instead of a professor, tutor or teaching assistant. Others found a chatbot less intimidating than attending office hours where professors might be 'demeaning.' In the words of one interviewee: 'With ChatGPT you can ask as many questions as you want and it's not going to judge you.'
But by using it, you may be judged. While some were excited about using AI, many students voiced mild feelings of guilt or shame about their AI use due to environmental or ethical concerns, or just coming across as lazy. Some even expressed a feeling of helplessness, or a sense of inevitability regarding AI in their futures.
Anxiety, distrust and avoidance
While many students expressed a sense that faculty members are, as one participant put it, 'very anti-ChatGPT,' they also lamented the fact that the rules around acceptable AI use were not sufficiently clear. As one urban planning major put it: 'I feel uncertain of what the expectations are,' with her peer chiming in, 'We're not on the same page with students and teachers or even individually. No one really is.'
Students also described feelings of distrust and frustration toward peers they saw as overly reliant on AI. Some talked about asking classmates for help, only to find that they 'just used ChatGPT' and hadn't learned the material. Others pointed to group projects, where AI use was described as 'a giant red flag' that made them 'think less' of their peers.
These experiences feel unfair and uncomfortable for students. They can report their classmates for academic integrity violations—and enter yet another zone in which distrust mounts—or they can try to work with them, sometimes with resentment. 'It ends up being more work for me,' a political science major said, 'because it's not only me doing my work by myself, it's me double checking yours.'
Distrust was a marker that we observed of both student-to-teacher relationships and student-to-student relationships. Learners shared fears of being left behind if other students in their classes used chatbots to get better grades. This resulted in emotional distance and wariness among students. Indeed, our findings reflect other reports that indicate the mere possibility that a student might have used a generative AI tool is now undercutting trust across the classroom. Students are as anxious about baseless accusations of AI use as they are about being caught using it.
Students described feeling anxious, confused and distrustful, and sometimes even avoiding peers or learning interactions. As educators, this worries us. We know that academic engagement—a key marker of student success—comes not only from studying the course material, but also from positive engagement with classmates and instructors alike.
AI is affecting relationships
Indeed, research has shown that faculty-student relationships are an important indicator of student success. Peer-to-peer relationships are essential too. If students are sidestepping important mentoring relationships with professors or meaningful learning experiences with peers due to discomfort over ambiguous or shifting norms around the use of AI technology, institutions of higher education could imagine alternative pathways for connection. Residential campuses could double down on in-person courses and connections; faculty could be incentivized to encourage students to visit during office hours. Faculty-led research, mentoring and campus events where faculty and students mix in an informal fashion could also make a difference.
We hope our research can also flip the script and disrupt tropes about students who use AI as 'cheaters.' Instead, it tells a more complex story of students being thrust into a reality they didn't ask for, with few clear guidelines and little control.
As generative AI continues to pervade everyday life, and institutions of higher education continue to search for solutions, our focus groups reflect the importance of listening to students and considering novel ways to help students feel more comfortable connecting with peers and faculty. Understanding these evolving interpersonal dynamics matters because how we relate to technology is increasingly affecting how we relate to one another. Given our experiences in dialogue with them, it is clear that students are more than ready to talk about this issue and its impact on their futures.
Acknowledgment: Thank you to the full team from the University of Pittsburgh Oakland, Greensburg, Bradford and Johnstown campuses, including Annette Vee, Patrick Manning, Jessica FitzPatrick, Jessica Ghilani, Catherine Kula, Patty Wharton-Michael, Jialei Jiang, Sean DiLeonardi, Birney Young, Mark DiMauro, Jeff Aziz, and Gayle Rogers.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Rambus Inc (RMBS) Q2 2025 Earnings Call Highlights: Record Revenue and Strategic Growth in AI ...
Revenue: $172.2 million for Q2, exceeding expectations. Product Revenue: $81.3 million, marking a 7% sequential increase and 43% year-over-year growth. Royalty Revenue: $68.6 million. Licensing Billings: $66.4 million. Cash from Operations: Record $94 million. Operating Costs: Total operating costs, including COGS, were $93.2 million. Operating Expenses: $60.4 million. Non-GAAP Net Income: $67.1 million. Cash Equivalents and Marketable Securities: $594.8 million at quarter-end. Capital Expenditures: $10.4 million. Depreciation Expense: $7.4 million. Free Cash Flow: $84 million. Q3 Revenue Guidance: Expected between $172 million and $178 million. Q3 Non-GAAP Earnings Per Share Guidance: Expected between $0.58 and $0.66. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 4 Warning Sign with RMBS. Release Date: July 28, 2025 For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. Positive Points Rambus Inc (NASDAQ:RMBS) delivered a strong second quarter, exceeding expectations for both revenue and earnings. The memory interface chip business experienced a 43% year-over-year growth, contributing to record product revenue. The company generated record cash from operations of $94 million, showcasing efficient execution and a robust business model. Rambus Inc (NASDAQ:RMBS) has a balanced portfolio and diverse revenue streams across chips, silicon IP, and patent licensing, providing stability in a dynamic market. The company is strategically focused on advancing system memory bandwidth and capacity, aligning with long-term growth trends in AI and high-performance computing. Negative Points The contribution from new chips, including power management chips, is still modest, representing low single-digit percentages of product revenue. The economic environment remains dynamic, posing potential risks to future financial performance. Inventory levels are lean, which could pose challenges if demand surges unexpectedly. The market for DDR4 is declining, and while DDR5 is growing, the transition may not be seamless. The timeline for significant revenue contributions from new products, such as MRDIMM, is projected for the second half of 2026, indicating a delay in realizing potential growth. Q & A Highlights Q: How do you view the contribution from RCDs and the ramp of the PMIC opportunity in your product revenue growth? A: Luc Seraphin, CEO: We are pleased with our product business growth, with a 43% year-over-year increase in Q2. RCD remains strong, and we continue to gain market share with DDR5 expansion. We were slightly above 40% share at the end of 2024 and expect to continue gaining share. New chips, including power management chips, are contributing modestly but show momentum. We expect further demand as platforms transition from 12 to 16 channels. Q: Can you provide visibility into PMIC sales in the PC market and any client co-driver revenue? A: Luc Seraphin, CEO: We see high-end PC market requirements similar to data centers, leading to the introduction of clock drivers and PMIC products. We expect modest traction initially, with contributions visible in 2026. This year, we will see initial shipments for qualification and pre-production orders. Q: How is the AI ASIC market affecting demand for your silicon IP? A: Luc Seraphin, CEO: The AI market's growth increases demand for high-speed connectivity and memory interfaces, accelerating development for solutions like HBM4 and PCIe 7. We have several engagements in these technologies, and the need for data security is boosting sales of our silicon IP in the security area. Q: What is the impact of DDR-4 end-of-life announcements on Rambus? A: Luc Seraphin, CEO: DDR4 sales remain limited, and we don't see significant changes. Inventories are decreasing, and we expect DDR4 to remain low, with potential case-by-case last-time buy orders. Q: How is the mix of product revenue evolving with the increased contribution from companion chips? A: Luc Seraphin, CEO: New products, mostly companion chips, contributed low single digits to product revenue in Q2, expected to rise to mid-to-upper single digits in Q3. We see strong momentum in adoption, and contributions will continue to increase towards year-end and into 2026. For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
PCI Pal Launches Fraud Management Suite to Strengthen Contact Center Security
AI-powered risk scoring now available on the PCI Pal platform CHARLOTTE, N.C., July 29, 2025--(BUSINESS WIRE)--PCI Pal® (LON: PCIP) today announced the launch of its new Fraud Management Suite, beginning with AI-powered risk scoring for customer engagements. Designed to protect against rising card-not-present (CNP) fraud, the new capability delivers real-time risk insights to agents and AI bots before a payment is collected — reducing chargebacks and revenue loss without adding friction to the customer experience. CNP fraud remains one of the most costly threats for global businesses. While e-commerce channels benefit from tools like 3D Secure and biometric authentication, the voice channel — still central to many contact centers — has lacked equivalent protection. PCI Pal is closing that gap with a platform-led approach that combines security, compliance, and usability. "This is the first step in a multi-product journey to deliver continuous value to our customers and partners," said Alessandro Dalla Volta, VP of Product at PCI Pal. "By embedding risk scoring into our Secure Payments Suite via an intuitive agent interface and a single API, we're giving contact centers powerful tools to detect fraud early and authenticate their customers seamlessly — across agents and bots using digital channels as needed." A Smarter Way to Fight Fraud The new Fraud Management Suite helps organizations respond to evolving threats with: Real-time AI-powered risk scoring leveraging technology for early fraud detection in partnership with Telesign, a Proximus Global company Adaptive authentication, including 3D Secure and biometric wallet support Advanced analytics and chargeback defense tools Built for the Modern Contact Center "AI is transforming how we approach security — not just in detecting fraud, but in anticipating it," said Mufti Monim, CTO of PCI Pal. "This launch lays the groundwork for a more intelligent and adaptive platform, that secures payments across all channels while enhancing both customer and agent experiences. It's the first step in a broader roadmap to unify fraud prevention, compliance, and customer experience into one seamless, scalable platform." Availability AI-powered risk scoring is now available as part of the PCI Pal platform. Learn more at About PCI Pal PCI Pal® (LON: PCIP) is a leading provider of secure payment solutions for business communications. PCI Pal's mission is to safeguard reputations and trust by securing payments wherever customer engagement occurs. With its patented, cloud-based platform, PCI Pal enables organizations to take secure payments via voice, chat, email, and social, while ensuring compliance with industry standards such as PCI DSS. For more information, visit View source version on Contacts Media Contact Nicole Von
Yahoo
6 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Cadence Design Systems Inc (CDNS) Q2 2025 Earnings Call Highlights: Strong AI-Driven Growth ...
Total Revenue: $1.275 billion for Q2 2025. Revenue Growth: 20% year-over-year for Q2 2025. GAAP Operating Margin: 19% for Q2 2025. Non-GAAP Operating Margin: 42.8% for Q2 2025. GAAP EPS: $0.59 for Q2 2025. Non-GAAP EPS: $1.65 for Q2 2025. Cash Balance: $2.823 billion at quarter end. Operating Cash Flow: $378 million for Q2 2025. Debt Outstanding: $2.5 billion principal value. Share Repurchase: $175 million used to repurchase shares in Q2 2025. Core EDA Revenue Growth: 16% year-over-year in Q2 2025. IP Business Revenue Growth: Over 25% year-over-year in Q2 2025. System Design and Analysis Revenue Growth: 35% year-over-year in Q2 2025. Updated 2025 Revenue Outlook: $5.21 billion to $5.27 billion. Updated 2025 Non-GAAP EPS Outlook: $6.85 to $6.95. Updated 2025 Operating Cash Flow Outlook: $1.65 billion to $1.75 billion. Q3 2025 Revenue Outlook: $1.305 billion to $1.335 billion. Q3 2025 Non-GAAP EPS Outlook: $1.75 to $1.81. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 6 Warning Sign with CDNS. Release Date: July 28, 2025 For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. Positive Points Cadence Design Systems Inc (NASDAQ:CDNS) exceeded its Q2 revenue and EPS guidance, driven by strong demand across its AI-driven product portfolio. The company raised its financial outlook for 2025 to 13% revenue growth and 16% EPS growth, reflecting confidence in ongoing demand. Cadence's AI-driven portfolio, including the new Millennium M2000 AI supercomputer, is delivering significant performance and efficiency gains for customers. The company reported a 25% year-over-year growth in its IP business, driven by strong demand for AI and HPC use cases. Cadence's system design and analysis business achieved 35% year-over-year revenue growth, highlighting strong customer uptake of its 3D-IC technology. Negative Points Cadence faced export restrictions on China, which impacted its revenue, although strength in other regions offset this impact. The company had to reserve certain China bookings from its backlog due to restrictions, affecting its reported backlog at the end of Q2. Recurring revenue as a percentage of total revenue dipped to 78% in Q2, a multiyear low, due to strong demand for upfront businesses like IP and hardware. Cadence's settlement with the DOJ and BIS over past transactions with China resulted in a $141 million payment, impacting financials. The dynamic export control environment and geopolitical factors present ongoing risks and uncertainties for Cadence's operations in China. Q & A Highlights Q: How is the demand for physical AI impacting Cadence's bookings and customer spending? A: Anirudh Devgan, President and CEO, explained that there is significant optimism around AI, leading to increased customer investment in innovation and Cadence's products. Physical AI, which involves edge devices and autonomous systems, is expected to be a major growth area. It impacts both data center and edge silicon, requiring different design and simulation tools. The market is still evolving, but the customer environment is improving, with more investment in AI infrastructure and physical AI. Q: What led to Cadence's increased growth outlook despite not recognizing one month of China revenue? A: John Wall, CFO, noted that strong demand across all geographies offset any near-term softness related to China. The growth in bookings from AI, HPC, and system design workloads globally contributed to the increased outlook. The backlog at the end of Q2 was stronger than expected, indicating broad-based demand. Q: What is the near and long-term impact of China on Cadence's business? A: John Wall stated that while China was 9% of Q2 revenue, down from 11% in Q1, the outlook for China remains optimistic but prudent. The company expects China sales to be slightly up year-over-year. Anirudh Devgan added that while China will continue to invest in chip design, the rest of the world is also seeing significant investment, which may lead to a slight decrease in China's percentage of total revenue over time. Q: How is the transition to 3.5D advanced packaging architectures contributing to Cadence's bookings and revenue? A: Anirudh Devgan highlighted that the industry is moving towards chiplet-based architectures, especially in HPC and AI. Cadence is well-positioned with its Allegro platform and 3D-IC technology, which are critical for these new packaging architectures. The demand for advanced packaging is significant and contributes to the overall revenue, pulling in other products like analysis tools. Q: What are the adoption barriers for agentic AI, and how does Cadence plan to monetize it? A: Anirudh Devgan explained that Cadence packages agentic AI solutions separately from base tools, offering significant productivity and PPA benefits. The adoption barriers are not significant as customers are used to automation and face increasing workloads. Cadence focuses on delivering value and productivity, with various business models to monetize these solutions over time. For the complete transcript of the earnings call, please refer to the full earnings call transcript. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data