‘Worth anything': Fiery clash over workers
A revised proposal to reform workers compensation, specifically psychological injuries claims, was tabled last week by Industrial Relations Minister Sophie Cotsis.
Ms Cotsis said the compensation plan sought to instil a 'culture of prevention' in the scheme, and give clarity to employers on their rights and responsibilities.
Detractors argue the changes would lock many out of receiving damages – namely a new 30 per cent threshold for permanent impairment due to psychological injury.
While the Opposition is yet to formally announce its position on the bill, Liberal leader Mark Speakman questioned Ms Cotsis on Tuesday morning over the threshold. Opposition Leader Mark Speakman is yet to announce the Coalition's position on the reforms. NewsWire / Nikki Short Credit: News Corp Australia
Mr Speakman claimed during question time that Ms Cotsis had pledged to remove the provision – known as Section 39 – altogether prior to the 2023 state election.
'Are your promises worth anything?' Mr Speakman asked, sparking shouting across the chamber.
In the fiery exchange that ensued, Ms Cotsis shot back that she was 'more of a worker's friend than the Leader of the Opposition (is)'.
'Where were you when people died under your watch?,' Ms Cotsis said, referencing the former Coalition government.
'Where were you when review after review came out and said that you needed to fix work health and safety? You were nowhere.'
Police Minister Yasmin Catley, Roads Minister Jenny Aitchison, and Building Minister Anoulack Chanthivong were all also grilled over their position on Section 39. NS Industrial Relations Minister Sophie Cotsis tabled the bill last week. NewsWire / Jeremy Piper Credit: News Corp Australia
'I'm delighted to always get a question about workers in this place,' Mr Chanthivong said.
'Because there's only one party in this parliament to speak when it comes to workers – its actually us'.
The planned reforms have stirred controversy since they were first introduced earlier this year, with support from some of the businesses community.
The state's unions, including the NSW Teachers Federation, Unions NSW, and the NSW Nurses and Midwives Association, have instead opposed the bill.
Their members rallied outside parliament earlier this month, calling on the government to reconsider the plan and to engage with the unions. NSW Police Minister Yasmin Catley was also grilled over her position on Section 39. NewsWire / Nikki Short Credit: News Corp Australia
In tabling the bill last month, Ms Cotsis noted amendments had been made since its first iteration and that a tripartite review committee would be established, including Unions NSW.
The bill also seeks to address the NSW government's bottom-line, with Treasurer Daniel Moohkey ruling out any further payments to the state's self-insurer.
Business leaders told a parliamentary inquiry into the bill earlier this year that insurance premiums to businesses and charities had seen their premiums increase.
Treasury modelling released by the Daily Telegraph on Tuesday warned business and not-for-profits may be forced to fork out an extra $1bn per year if reforms aren't made.
A separate bill seeking to amend workplace health and safety legislation was also tabled in NSW parliament.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Courier-Mail
38 minutes ago
- Courier-Mail
Alarm bells as Russia, China team up in Indo-Pacific
Don't miss out on the headlines from Breaking News. Followed categories will be added to My News. Ukraine's ambassador is warning of a growing threat from China and Russia as Australia marks the end of World War II in the Pacific, saying what happens in his country could 'open a Pandora's box' in the region. On August 15, 1945, the Japanese unconditionally surrendered after the US dropped atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, killing hundreds of thousands and unveiling the terrifying might of nuclear weapons. The devastating attack came after nearly four years of heavy fighting that saw Japanese planes bomb Darwin – the only foreign attack on Australian soil. Most of the nearly 40,000 Australians who died fighting the Axis powers lost their lives defending the country against Japan's efforts to take the Pacific. In a statement to NewsWire, Veterans Affairs Minister Matt Keogh said August 15 was 'an important opportunity to acknowledge our greatest generation – both the veterans still with us and those long lost'. 'The sacrifices they made shall never be forgotten,' he said. The US dropped the first atomic bomb on Hiroshima on August 6, 1945, instantly killing at least 70,000. Picture: News Corp Australia / Archive The second atomic bomb dropped on Nagasaki on August 9, 1945, killed another 80,000. Picture: News Corp Australia / Archive Eighty years on, the spectre of conflict looms large in the region, with Xi Jinping's desires on Taiwan driving fears of an 'imminent' threat, as the Trump administration describes it. China is the big fish, but Russia too has a formidable presence in the region, as it showed just last week with 'routine' war games with the Chinese. Vasyl Myroshnychenko, Ukraine's envoy in Canberra, told NewsWire that Australia should keep a close eye on the deepening defence ties between Beijing and Moscow. 'Indonesia and Russia hosted joint naval exercises in November of last year – why?' he said. 'Why would Russian corvettes would need to be that close to Australia? 'Is there any specific reason why the Russians could be requesting from the Indonesians an air base to locate their strategic bombers? To do what?' 'Pandora's box' Mr Myroshnychenko is no stranger to Vladimir Putin's war schemes. The Russian President ordered the invasion of his country just weeks after his appointment as ambassador to Australia. Mr Putin is set to meet Donald Trump in Alaska on Friday (local time) to discuss a peace deal for Ukraine. The Ukrainian president, Volodymyr Zelensky, has not been invited. Mr Myroshnychenko was hesitant to pre-empt the talks but said if Ukraine is told to cede territory to Russia, it could be a 'blueprint' for Australia as it manages an increasingly militaristic rivalry with China. China and Russia are deepening their defence and economic ties. Picture: Russian Presidential Press Office / Handout 'This is dismantlement of the rules based international system,' he said. 'A permanent member of the UN Security Council, which has nuclear weapons, can change borders by force. 'That's a kind of blueprint which will be in place if the Russians are rewarded for their war of aggression.' He said it would 'open up a Pandora's box in the South China Sea'. 'It will embolden and inspire other authoritarian leaders, of which they all are authoritarian here in the region,' Mr Myroshnychenko said, noting a handful of exceptions, such as New Zealand and Japan. With few democracies around Australia and international norms crumbling, he said 'you need to be strong'. 'You need to have strong military,' Mr Myroshnychenko said. 'You need to have the available capabilities that could deter a potential enemy from taking over Australia, or hurting your interests, or even just projecting power and coercing you. 'That would be a huge win for China and a huge win for other authoritarian leaders.' He said the fact that Russia is a Pacific country means Australia has skin in the game in Ukraine. 'They have a huge Pacific fleet with strategic bombers, nuclear submarines, and they are interested in projecting global power,' Mr Myroshnychenko said. Ukrainian Ambassador to Ukraine Vasyl Myroshnychenko says Australia should keep an eye on deepening defence ties between China and Russia. Picture: Marin Ollman / NewsWire He is not the first to stress the links between events in Europe and the simmering Indo Pacific. China is pumping hundreds of billions into Russia's economy, fuelling the Kremlin's war machine. Meanwhile, growing numbers of North Korean troops are joining Moscow's forces on the front lines in Ukraine. The regional uncertainty is not lost on Canberra. Both Labor and the opposition often caution Australia is facing 'the most strategically challenging circumstances' since the Second World War. With self-evident parallels of warring parties in Europe and tinderbox conditions in the Indo-Pacific, Mr Keogh said Victory in the Pacific Day was a reminder of the 'relationships forged' out of the worst war ever waged. 'This day of commemoration is an important reminder of our place in the world, the importance of the relationships forged in the Second World War – alliances that continue to be important to this day, and the need to ensure stability in our region into the future,' he said. Originally published as Alarm bells as Russia, China team up in Indo-Pacific
Herald Sun
2 hours ago
- Herald Sun
James Campbell: Refugees a growing issue for Albanese government
It hasn't hit the headlines yet, but there's a refugee problem quietly brewing for Albo, which if left unattended, is going to become a major headache. I'm talking about the ballooning number of failed asylum seekers still in Australia. On Wednesday, in response to a senate motion, the government released the latest monthly stats on onshore asylum applications. The situation for July was roughly the same as it has been for every month for the past few years – roughly 2000 people applied for protection, with the largest cohort (365) coming from India followed by China (233). And as is also usual the number who applied for protection upon arrival at an airport was zero. During the same month, there were – again as usual – roughly 2200 decisions made, with 599 people successful and 1621 unsuccessful. Malaysians (186) were the nationals most likely to be deemed in need of protection, followed by Pakistanis (55) and Iranians (41), while very few Chinese (37) and Indians (15) were successful. All up, there are 27,100 asylum seekers waiting for their cases to be determined, which despite the fact the government has greatly improved the decision rate in the past three years, is roughly the same number as there were when they came office in May 2022. The problem for the government is the growth in the number of people who are still here despite exhausting all avenues of appeal against the decision not to grant them asylum. When Labor came to office, there were roughly 68,000 people who had been told they must leave who were still here. By the end of July, this number had reached 98,979, which without a doubt will be more than 100,000 when the government releases the numbers next month. A year ago, it was 84,000, which if repeated over this term of Albo-time will see roughly another 45,000 added to the pile. The reason you can be sure it won't shrink is simple – we basically don't deport failed asylum seekers. Seriously, we don't. Last month, only 10 people refused protection visas were deported – fewer than five of whom left involuntarily. This isn't a Labor thing either – in the last month of the Coalition government, only nine left. And if you think this failure is bizarre, consider the fact that as of February 2024 – 78 per cent of failed asylum seekers had the right to work and the same percentage had the right to study. In other words, we are spending God knows how much money running an asylum seeker assessment system in which the outcome for the successful and unsuccessful applicant is basically the same. Maybe you think we can muddle along like this because in reality adding 15,000 failed asylum seekers a year to the total already here won't make much of a difference in a world in which net overseas migration is growing by 350,000 a year. Put like that, isn't it really just a rounding error? But there are several reasons it should be worrying the government. The most obvious is because it's clearly going to be a pretty big pull factor if it becomes widely known that the reality is if you get to Australia you will stay in Australia (just don't come by boat!). But there are already reasons why this number is likely to grow over the next few years. The first is because the government has made it harder for students to obtain permanent residency, which will inevitably mean more of those who don't want to leave will try for asylum. It should be pointed out as an aside at this point that it is possible for an international 'student' to commence an application for asylum after having already spent the better part of a decade in Australia, shifting from course-to-course then running the clock fighting visa cancellations at the review tribunal and the Federal Circuit Court, all the while enjoying work rights. Then there's the thousands of people who were granted pandemic visas, which only finally closed in February – who knows how many of them will end up claiming a genuine fear of persecution if they go home? It would be bad enough if the years it can take to resolve an asylum application – during which the claimant enjoyed work rights – were encouraging bogus applications. What's even worse is a system which takes years to weed out bogus applicants, but which then allows them to stay forever anyway. But that is what we have at the moment and there's no sign the government has any interest in doing anything about it. James Campbell National weekend political editor James Campbell is national weekend political editor for Saturday and Sunday News Corporation newspapers and websites across Australia, including the Saturday and Sunday Herald Sun, the Saturday and Sunday Telegraph and the Saturday Courier Mail and Sunday Mail. He has previously been investigations editor, state politics editor and opinion editor of the Herald Sun and Sunday Herald Sun. Since starting on the Sunday Herald Sun in 2008 Campbell has twice been awarded the Grant Hattam Quill Award for investigative journalism by the Melbourne Press Club and in 2013 won the Walkley Award for Scoop of the Year.
Sydney Morning Herald
3 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Echoes of robo-debt: Lawyer warns Labor after hundreds illegally denied payments
A major law firm is warning the Albanese government it risks court action after a damning finding that hundreds of people were illegally denied income support and dozens more had payments cancelled even after the problem was noticed. The Commonwealth Ombudsman revealed last week that 964 people had their JobSeeker payments unlawfully terminated by an automated system, and even when the problem was noticed and seemingly rectified, a further 45 people had their payments cancelled. Gordon Legal partner Andrew Grech, who led a class action for victims of the robo-debt payment scandal – in which people had their earnings incorrectly calculated, leading to erroneous debt letters being sent – said there was an eerie familiarity between the two government payment problems. Warnings of court action over welfare payments will test Prime Minister Anthony Albanese on his first-term promise to protect vulnerable people and his criticism of the former Coalition government's handling of the robo-debt crisis. The investigation found cancellations were made through a digital system called the targeted compliance framework, designed to monitor if recipients were meeting the conditions of their welfare payments. This includes the requirement to search for work or report changes in income. This was contrary to law changes in 2022 after the robo-debt crisis, requiring consideration of a jobseeker's circumstances before deciding to cancel income support. 'The ombudsman report is deeply troubling and, like the much larger robo-debt scandal, it's another example of how government creep of deployment of automation influences the lives of our most vulnerable – it plays an inappropriate role,' Grech said. 'The government should move swiftly to address what's really mass-scale unlawful termination of payments.' Secretary of the Department of Employment and Workplace Relations Natalie James advised the ombudsman in December 2024 that decisions to cancel income support occurred automatically, affecting 964 jobseekers from April 2022 to July 2024.
