James Campbell: Refugees a growing issue for Albanese government
I'm talking about the ballooning number of failed asylum seekers still in Australia.
On Wednesday, in response to a senate motion, the government released the latest monthly stats on onshore asylum applications.
The situation for July was roughly the same as it has been for every month for the past few years – roughly 2000 people applied for protection, with the largest cohort (365) coming from India followed by China (233).
And as is also usual the number who applied for protection upon arrival at an airport was zero.
During the same month, there were – again as usual – roughly 2200 decisions made, with 599 people successful and 1621 unsuccessful.
Malaysians (186) were the nationals most likely to be deemed in need of protection, followed by Pakistanis (55) and Iranians (41), while very few Chinese (37) and Indians (15) were successful.
All up, there are 27,100 asylum seekers waiting for their cases to be determined, which despite the fact the government has greatly improved the decision rate in the past three years, is roughly the same number as there were when they came office in May 2022.
The problem for the government is the growth in the number of people who are still here despite exhausting all avenues of appeal against the decision not to grant them asylum.
When Labor came to office, there were roughly 68,000 people who had been told they must leave who were still here.
By the end of July, this number had reached 98,979, which without a doubt will be more than 100,000 when the government releases the numbers next month.
A year ago, it was 84,000, which if repeated over this term of Albo-time will see roughly another 45,000 added to the pile.
The reason you can be sure it won't shrink is simple – we basically don't deport failed asylum seekers.
Seriously, we don't.
Last month, only 10 people refused protection visas were deported – fewer than five of whom left involuntarily.
This isn't a Labor thing either – in the last month of the Coalition government, only nine left.
And if you think this failure is bizarre, consider the fact that as of February 2024 – 78 per cent of failed asylum seekers had the right to work and the same percentage had the right to study.
In other words, we are spending God knows how much money running an asylum seeker assessment system in which the outcome for the successful and unsuccessful applicant is basically the same.
Maybe you think we can muddle along like this because in reality adding 15,000 failed asylum seekers a year to the total already here won't make much of a difference in a world in which net overseas migration is growing by 350,000 a year.
Put like that, isn't it really just a rounding error?
But there are several reasons it should be worrying the government.
The most obvious is because it's clearly going to be a pretty big pull factor if it becomes widely known that the reality is if you get to Australia you will stay in Australia (just don't come by boat!).
But there are already reasons why this number is likely to grow over the next few years.
The first is because the government has made it harder for students to obtain permanent residency, which will inevitably mean more of those who don't want to leave will try for asylum.
It should be pointed out as an aside at this point that it is possible for an international 'student' to commence an application for asylum after having already spent the better part of a decade in Australia, shifting from course-to-course then running the clock fighting visa cancellations at the review tribunal and the Federal Circuit Court, all the while enjoying work rights.
Then there's the thousands of people who were granted pandemic visas, which only finally closed in February – who knows how many of them will end up claiming a genuine fear of persecution if they go home?
It would be bad enough if the years it can take to resolve an asylum application – during which the claimant enjoyed work rights – were encouraging bogus applications.
What's even worse is a system which takes years to weed out bogus applicants, but which then allows them to stay forever anyway.
But that is what we have at the moment and there's no sign the government has any interest in doing anything about it. James Campbell National weekend political editor
James Campbell is national weekend political editor for Saturday and Sunday News Corporation newspapers and websites across Australia, including the Saturday and Sunday Herald Sun, the Saturday and Sunday Telegraph and the Saturday Courier Mail and Sunday Mail. He has previously been investigations editor, state politics editor and opinion editor of the Herald Sun and Sunday Herald Sun. Since starting on the Sunday Herald Sun in 2008 Campbell has twice been awarded the Grant Hattam Quill Award for investigative journalism by the Melbourne Press Club and in 2013 won the Walkley Award for Scoop of the Year.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


West Australian
an hour ago
- West Australian
Jimmy Lai's Hong Kong trial delayed over heart problems
The closing submissions in a national security trial against Hong Kong pro-democracy businessman Jimmy Lai have been delayed after his lawyer said he had suffered heart palpitations. The submissions will recommence on Monday after the court adjourned to allow Lai, 77, to obtain medication and a heart monitor. Lai, who founded the Apple Daily newspaper that was forced to close after a police raid and asset freeze in June 2021, has pleaded not guilty to two charges of conspiracy to collude with foreign forces, and a charge of conspiracy to publish seditious material. Some Western governments, including the United States, have called for Lai's immediate release, saying the trial is politically motivated under a years-long national security crackdown in the China-ruled financial hub. US President Donald Trump said in a media interview on Thursday that he would "do everything I can to save him", even though Chinese President Xi Jinping would not be "thrilled." "We'll see what we can do ... we're going to do everything we can," Trump said. Liu Pengyu, spokesman for China's embassy in Washington, said Lai had been "a key orchestrator and participant in anti-China, destabilising activities in Hong Kong". "We strongly oppose external forces using judicial cases as a pretext to interfere in China's internal affairs or to smear and undermine Hong Kong's rule of law," he said. Trump has said he would raise Lai's case as part of negotiations with China over trade and tariffs.


Perth Now
an hour ago
- Perth Now
Jimmy Lai's Hong Kong trial delayed over heart problems
The closing submissions in a national security trial against Hong Kong pro-democracy businessman Jimmy Lai have been delayed after his lawyer said he had suffered heart palpitations. The submissions will recommence on Monday after the court adjourned to allow Lai, 77, to obtain medication and a heart monitor. Lai, who founded the Apple Daily newspaper that was forced to close after a police raid and asset freeze in June 2021, has pleaded not guilty to two charges of conspiracy to collude with foreign forces, and a charge of conspiracy to publish seditious material. Some Western governments, including the United States, have called for Lai's immediate release, saying the trial is politically motivated under a years-long national security crackdown in the China-ruled financial hub. US President Donald Trump said in a media interview on Thursday that he would "do everything I can to save him", even though Chinese President Xi Jinping would not be "thrilled." "We'll see what we can do ... we're going to do everything we can," Trump said. Liu Pengyu, spokesman for China's embassy in Washington, said Lai had been "a key orchestrator and participant in anti-China, destabilising activities in Hong Kong". "We strongly oppose external forces using judicial cases as a pretext to interfere in China's internal affairs or to smear and undermine Hong Kong's rule of law," he said. Trump has said he would raise Lai's case as part of negotiations with China over trade and tariffs.


Perth Now
an hour ago
- Perth Now
Women urged to 'remain vigilant' to safeguard progress
Some young men believe women are receiving all the opportunities in a way that is impacting male rights, with Minister for Women Katy Gallagher calling it a "worrying trend". But while diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) policies are being wound back overseas, most notably by the Trump administration in the US, Australian workers are not experiencing the same pushback. "In Australia, our ethos of everyone having a fair go and treating people equally is really strong - certainly across business, community and government," Senator Gallagher told the Women in Media national conference on Friday. "There is a worrying trend emerging ... particularly with young men thinking that women are getting too much and that their rights are going backwards, and there's too much focus on women." Senator Gallagher wants to embed reforms in favour of women and diversity so they cannot be reversed by a change in government. The Australian Labor Party has the first gender-equal cabinet in the federal parliament's history, with a caucus comprising 56 per cent women. But Senator Gallagher remembered the "fierce resistance" from men within the party when affirmative action was first introduced decades ago. In 1994, the party agreed to introduce quotas for women, with a target to have women represent 35 per cent of Labor candidates preselected for winnable federal seats by 2002. "Our caucus is starting to look like the Australian people - our community that we're there to represent - but it wasn't easy and we've got to remain vigilant," Senator Gallagher said. "You can make gains but you cannot take your eye off the ball, because those gains can be taken away just as quickly as you reached them." In May, Opposition Leader Sussan Ley became the first female federal Liberal leader but the overall number of women in the party has not increased significantly in a decade. Just 33 per cent of MPs in the federal coalition are women. Hilma's Network founder Charlotte Mortlock said she had tried to talk about quotas for the Liberal Party "quietly" during the previous term of government, but nobody listened. "When you are accustomed to privilege, equality can feel like oppression," she said. "Nobody wants quotas, nobody wants DEI and we all wish that this would happen organically but when it's not, at what point do you say, 'OK, this is no longer working'?" Ms Mortlock said it was important not to demonise men in the pursuit of more opportunities and representation for women. "We have to be responsible in the language that we are using because when young men go off the rails, it impacts women," she said. "It is in (women's) interest to have really healthy, flourishing, well-rounded men."