
Iran-US nuclear talks: key points of contention
Vehicles of delegations leave the Omani embassy after a fifth round of nuclear talks between Iran and the United States, in Rome on Friday (AFP photo)
TEHRAN — Long-time adversaries Iran and the United States held a fifth round of Oman-mediated nuclear talks on Friday in Rome, but with no breakthrough reported.
However, both sides still described the meeting as constructive and expressed a willingness to continue the discussions.
Here are some of the main obstacles seen to be hampering progress:
Enrichment
Iran's enrichment of uranium remains the main sticking point.
The United States and Western countries suspect Iran of seeking to acquire nuclear weapons, but Iran denies having such ambitions.
It insists that its nuclear programme is solely for peaceful civilian purposes.
American officials including Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff, who has led Washington's delegation at the talks, have spoken out against Iran's enrichment programme.
Witkoff said before the talks that Washington "cannot allow even one percent of enrichment capacity" for Iran.
Tehran has called its enrichment "non-negotiable", arguing that such a demand prevents a deal.
"Zero nuclear weapons = we DO have a deal. Zero enrichment = we do NOT have a deal," Iran's top negotiator and foreign minister Abbas Araghchi posted on X.
Experts say the fifth round of talks saw a collision of red lines.
"This round was uniquely sensitive, marked by the collision of seemingly irreconcilable public red lines over uranium enrichment," Sina Toossi from the Center for International Policy told AFP.
Iran remains the only non-nuclear state enriching uranium to 60 percent, well above the 3.67 percent limit set under its 2015 accord with Western powers, but below the 90 percent needed for weapons-grade material.
The 2015 deal was torpedoed in 2018 during President Donald Trump's first term when he unilaterally withdrew the United States from the accord.
'Contradictory positions'
Iran wants the talks to remain strictly focused on its nuclear programme and lifting US sanctions, a stance it has held since April 12 when the first round was held in Oman.
Tehran has criticised what it calls "irrational" demands by Washington and inconsistent signals from US officials.
Araghchi warned that such "contradictory positions", if they persist, "will complicate the talks".
Before the negotiations began, some analysts suggested the United States might seek a broader deal that also addressed Iran's ballistic missile programme.
They believed the talks might touch on Tehran's support for the "axis of resistance", the network of anti-Israel armed groups that includes Hezbollah in Lebanon, Hamas in Gaza and Yemen's Huthi rebels.
On April 27, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu urged Washington to block not only Iran's enrichment of uranium but also its missile development under any possible deal.
Iran opposes non-nuclear issues being discussed in the talks, citing its sovereign rights and defence needs.
Sanctions
Even with diplomacy under way, the United States has imposed new sanctions on Iran.
Tehran denounces what it calls Washington's "hostile approach", noting that new sanctions were imposed just ahead of negotiations taking place.
On Wednesday, Washington sanctioned Iran's construction sector, citing its potential links to nuclear, military or missile activities.
"These sanctions ... further put to question the American willingness & seriousness for diplomacy," Iranian foreign ministry spokesman Esmaeil Baqaei posted on X.
In late April, before the third round of talks, Washington also slapped sanctions on Iran's oil and gas sector.
Military option
The Iran-US talks, their highest-level contacts since Washington quit the 2015 nuclear accord, came after Trump wrote to Iran's supreme leader Ayatollah Khamenei in March.
Trump urged Tehran to reach a deal diplomatically, but also warned of military action if talks fail.
Iran has issued warnings of its own.
On Friday, armed forces Chief of Staff Mohammad Bagheri warned that "any US misstep in the region will end like Vietnam and Afghanistan".
His remarks came after CNN, citing US officials, reported on Tuesday that Israel was preparing to attack Iranian nuclear sites.
"We believe that in the event of any attack on the nuclear facilities of the Islamic Republic of Iran by the Zionist regime, the US government will also be involved and bear legal responsibility," Araghchi said in a letter to the United Nations published on Thursday.
According to the US outlet Axios, Witkoff met Israeli officials shortly before Friday's Rome talks.
Ultra-conservative Iranian daily Kayhan wrote on Saturday that "coordination between Trump and Netanyahu is leading the negotiations towards deadlock".
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Al Bawaba
an hour ago
- Al Bawaba
Musk slams Trump's ‘big, beautiful bill' as ‘disgusting abomination'
ALBAWABA- Billionaire tech mogul Elon Musk has reignited tensions with former U.S. President Donald Trump by launching a scathing critique of the newly proposed tax and spending legislation, dubbing it a 'disgusting abomination' and a threat to America's fiscal health. In a series of posts on X (formerly Twitter), Musk tore into the Fiscal Year 2025 Congressional spending bill, hailed by Trump as 'one big, beautiful bill', warning it would balloon the U.S. budget deficit to $2.5 trillion and deepen unsustainable national debt. 'Congress is making America bankrupt,' Musk wrote, adding, 'I just can't stand it anymore.' I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore. This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it. — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) June 3, 2025 Musk's attack comes as Republican lawmakers continue to negotiate the $1.6 trillion bill, which extends Trump's 2017 tax cuts and includes fresh spending on defense and border security. Critics like Musk argue the bill is loaded with unnecessary 'pork-barrel' spending, funds directed toward specific regions or industries such as agriculture and pharmaceuticals, while slashing vital programs including Medicaid, food stamps, and clean energy tax credits. Despite internal GOP dissent, Trump has remained firm in backing the legislation. On his platform, Truth Social, he dismissed critics as 'grandstanders' and defended the bill's merits. 'So many false statements are being made about 'THE ONE, BIG, BEAUTIFUL BILL,'' Trump wrote. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt acknowledged Musk's opposition but stated the administration's stance remains unchanged: 'The president already knows where Elon Musk stood on this bill. It doesn't change his opinion.' Meanwhile, Musk also used the moment to spotlight SpaceX's financial strength, announcing the company expects to generate $15.5 billion in revenue this year, surpassing NASA's projected budget for commercial space ventures. 'SpaceX will out-earn NASA's commercial division next year,' Musk declared, underlining his company's dominance in the private space industry.


Al Bawaba
10 hours ago
- Al Bawaba
Former Blizzard employee slams Overwatch's new Pride Month video
ALBAWABA - In reference to the 2021 sexual harassment lawsuit and the toxic work environment allegations, Activision Blizzard is once again the talk of social media after a former employee criticized Overwatch's recently shared "Happy Pride Month" video. Blizzard's former game developer, who goes by the name "Kuro" on X (formerly known as Twitter), took to their account and accused the popular corporation of trying to "save face," despite facing a lawsuit from several former employees. Kuro wrote, "You guys enabled people to sexually assault me and other LGBT people at the company then tried to ruin our lives by running to HR claiming we were responsible for getting assaulted then hijacked the initiatives we created so you could try and save face while we were suing you." An X user took to the Overwatch team's defense, stating that they had nothing to do with the allegations mentioned above and wrote, "The Overwatch dev team had nothing to do with any of that stuff tho." Moreover, several others claimed that most sexual assault and toxic environment allegations were aimed at developers from the World of Warcraft team. you guys enabled people to sexually assault me and other LGBT people at the company then tried to ruin our lives by running to HR claiming we were responsible for getting assaulted then hijacked the initiatives we created so you could try and save face while we were suing you — kuro (@ashlykuro) June 1, 2025 This all comes in after the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH) filed a lawsuit against Blizzard in 2021, alleging that the company cultivated a hostile and toxic working environment, including the sexual harassment of female workers. Additionally, LGBTQ employees also reported suffering from a toxic environment during their time there, further claiming that they were targeted with stereotypical jokes about queer culture, as reported by Inverse. A former LGBTQ employee stated, "I never really felt like it was a safe place, to begin with." Three years ago, several employees who were nursing mothers reported that their breast milk had allegedly been stolen from fridges located in Blizzard's dedicated lactation facilities. Moreover, they also accused other employees of placing beer inside the fridges in question, sparking further outrage on social media, as reported by CNN.


Al Bawaba
15 hours ago
- Al Bawaba
Charlie Kirk: Islam is not compatible with Western civilization
ALBAWABA - American conservative political activist Charlie Kirk recently sparked outrage on X (formerly known as Twitter) after taking to his account and writing, "Islam is not compatible with Western civilization." As of recently, the far-right activist has been the subject of ongoing controversy for his political views and opinions on religion. His latest post on X is no exception, sparking a wave of division, with social media users either supporting Charlie Kirk or strongly opposing his views on Islam. Fellow X user Zhang Yong clapped back at Kirk and wrote, "Charlie your smile is not compatible with society," following a picture mocking the political activist's appearance. Another took to Kirk's defense and wrote, "This is, unfortunately, becoming more and more apparent." Charlie Kirk rose to fame after founding a non-profit organization named "Turning Point USA," which aims to advocate conservative views in educational institutions such as high schools and universities. Videos of his heated debates with students on campus garnered millions of views and followers across social media due to their controversial nature. The American conservative political activist presents himself as an individual who praises Christian nationalism and advocates for the teachings of Jesus Christ and against "Woke" culture. While he initially took a more secular and libertarian stance in politics, his views have undergone a drastic shift since then, leading to his current conservative and Christian nationalist stance.