&w=3840&q=100)
Rubio strips US visas from 8 of 11 Brazilian Supreme Court judges in a show of support to Bolsonaro
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio has reportedly stripped American visas of Brazil's eight Supreme Court judges in a show of support for the country's former President Jair Bolsonaro. The far-right Brazilian leader with strong ties with US President Donald Trump is on trial for allegedly masterminding a murderous plot to cling to power after losing the 2022 election to Brazil's current president, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva.
Bolsonaro is expected to be convicted by the Brazilian Supreme Court in the coming weeks and might face a jail sentence of up to 43 years. As the day of sentencing nears, Trump has been increasing pressure on Brazil to help out his 'friend'.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
In light of this, Trump announced on July 9 that he would impose 50% tariffs on all Brazilian imports as of August 1. The threat triggered nationalist sentiments in Brazil, with Lula threatening reciprocal tariffs. The Brazilian president went on to describe Trump's move as 'unacceptable blackmail'.
Who got their visa stripped?
On Friday, Brazil's federal police raided Bolsonaro's house and ordered him to wear an ankle tag in a bid to stop him from absconding. Soon after that, Rubio announced further moves in support of the former Brazilian president, who claimed that the case against him is a 'political witch hunt'.
Rubio announced the move in a post on X, formerly known as Twitter. He said that he had ordered visa revocations for the judge leading the investigation into Bolsonaro, Alexandre de Moraes, as well as 'his allies on the court' and their family members.
.@POTUS made clear that his administration will hold accountable foreign nationals who are responsible for censorship of protected expression in the United States. Brazilian Supreme Federal Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes's political witch hunt against Jair Bolsonaro created a… — Secretary Marco Rubio (@SecRubio) July 18, 2025
While the secretary of state did not mention the names of other judges, Brazilian newspaper Globo identified them as Luís Roberto Barroso, José Antonio Dias Toffoli, Cristiano Zanin, Flávio Dino, Cármen Lúcia Antunes Rocha, Luiz Edson Fachin and Gilmar Ferreira Mendes.
Interestingly, two other judges who were nominated to the court during Bolsonaro's 2019-23 presidency, André Mendonça and Kassio Nunes Marques, reportedly avoided the sanction along with a third judge, Luiz Fux.
STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD
Lula hits back
Meanwhile, the Brazilian president denounced what he described as 'another arbitrary and completely groundless measure from the US government'.
'Interference in another country's justice system is unacceptable and offends the basic principles of national sovereignty and respect between nations,' the president said on Saturday, adding: 'I'm certain that no kind of intimidation or threat – from whoever it may be – will compromise the most important mission of our nation's powers and institutions, which is to act permanently to defend and safeguard the democratic rule of law.'
Meanwhile, Trump's Alex Bruesewitz welcomed Rubio's announcement, describing Bolsonaro's treatment in the country as 'sick and wrong'.
Bolsonaro's son, Eduardo, went on to thank Rubio for his decision. 'Thank you very much for this fight in favour of free speech, we do believe in the same values,' tweeted Eduardo, who has been living in the US since February and has reportedly been lobbying officials there over his father's plight," Eduardo said in the post.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
28 minutes ago
- India.com
August 5: What Major Moves Could Modi Government Unveil Today? Kashmir To UCC On Watch
As the Monsoon Session of Parliament continues to run, there is speculation aplenty that the Modi government could announce some big things today, August 5th. This date is significant in the history of the administration, as it was the day the big decisions regarding Jammu & Kashmir and the Ayodhya Ram Temple foundation stone laying were announced in the past. The increased anticipation comes after an informal meeting between Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Home Minister Amit Shah, and President Droupadi Murmu on Sunday. Although details of their conversation are not revealed by Rashtrapati Bhavan or the Prime Minister's Office, the high-profile meeting, which took place just ahead of August 5th, has created widespread speculation. Sources indicate the government may be weighing landmark constitutional or political choices. There are buzzes going on around possibly sensitive legislations in the current Monsoon Session, from the revival of Jammu & Kashmir's statehood status to landmark actions on the Uniform Civil Code (UCC). There is also gossip of a major political appointment or a big decision at the presidential level. Why August 5 Holds Historical Significance August 5th has become a milestone date for the Modi government as a result of two critical decisions made on this day: August 5, 2019: The government abolished Article 370, scrapped the special status of Jammu & Kashmir, and split the state into two Union Territories, J&K and Ladakh. August 5, 2020: Prime Minister Narendra Modi will lay the foundation stone for the Ram Temple in Ayodhya after the Supreme Court ruled on the controversy. These steps, explicitly going to the heart of BJP and RSS agendas, have given August 5th specific political significance, resulting in the present public and media attention. Possible Announcements On August 5 The Sunday sitting of PM Modi, Home Minister Shah, and President Murmu is viewed as an important sign of action looming. Although the details are not known, most opine that the leaders apprised the President of a significant bill or decision to be introduced in Parliament today. Among the leading issues currently being debated: Restoration of Statehood of Jammu & Kashmir: Speculation is building regarding the restoration of full statehood to Jammu & Kashmir. Former J&K Chief Minister Omar Abdullah has recently taken a trip to Gujarat's Kevadia to give a boost to J&K's tourism, an act appreciated by PM Modi. In a separate meeting, All Jammu & Kashmir Shia Association President Imran Raza Ansari met Amit Shah in Delhi to analyze the issues of the residents of the Union Territory, including rehabilitation of terror-affected families. Union Home Minister Amit Shah has already said that the complete statehood of J&K would be restored at the right time. Six years after Article 370's revocation, a positive move on this side could prove to be an important political message. Launch of Uniform Civil Code (UCC): The Uniform Civil Code continues to be a BJP and RSS core agenda item after the Ram Temple has been built and Article 370 was scrapped. With the BJP government in Uttarakhand already having enacted UCC, and Assam and Gujarat showing similar intentions, it is expected that there will be a nationwide drive. The President's meeting with the administration has fueled rumors that the administration could be setting the stage to introduce UCC legislation, thereby delivering another major ideological commitment. Vice President Announcement: The session also occurred as the election process of the next Vice President has officially commenced. The Election Commission will release the formal notification for the election on the 7th of August, with nomination till the 21st of August and voting scheduled for the 9th of September. The conversation between PM Modi, Amit Shah, and the President might have involved the choice of the next Vice President candidate. 'One Nation, One Election' Bill: The Modi government had earlier brought the 'One Nation, One Election' bill to the Lok Sabha in December, which was referred to a standing committee. There has been speculation if the government is planning to bring back this bill on August 5th, which seeks simultaneous polls in the nation. National Special Intensive Revision (SIR) For Voter Rolls: Amidst a political row over the Election Commission's Special Intensive Revision (SIR) for voter rolls in Bihar, which the opposition is accusing of being voter manipulation, there are speculations that the PM-President meeting may have to do with a possible rollout of such a process on a national level, or even a bill regarding an integrated citizenship card. Everyone now looks to the government announcements made today as the country waits for what may be another major step by the Modi government on this date that holds historical significance.
Economic Times
28 minutes ago
- Economic Times
What to do when the president acts like a 5-year-old?
Synopsis President Trump's decision to fire the Bureau of Labor Statistics chief over unfavorable data is likened to "flipping the board," undermining the independence of crucial economic reporting. This action threatens investor trust, market stability, and public faith in government institutions. The integrity of U.S. statistics is foundational, and political interference erodes democracy. AP Trump speaks with reporters before boarding Air Force One at Lehigh Valley International Airport. MOST CHILDREN LEARN AT SOME POINT THAT FLIPPING THE BOARD DOESN'T MAKE THEM THE WINNER. Imagine a group of 5-year-olds playing a board game. The rules are clear, the goal is fair, and one child edges ahead -- until, suddenly, another child starts losing. That's when the trouble begins. "He cheated!" the losing child yells. "I'm the winner anyway!" he declares. And then, like clockwork, he flips the board. In the world of kindergarten conflict resolution, we expect this kind of behavior. We chalk it up to development. We teach better sportsmanship. What do we do when the president of the United States behaves this way? On Friday, President Trump fired the head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics -- the nation's workaday scorekeeper of employment, wages and productivity. Why? Because the data didn't make Mr. Trump look good. The statistics were inconvenient. So the president didn't just challenge the findings; he fired the statistician. That's not governing. That's board flipping. For over a century, the integrity of U.S. economic data has rested on a fragile but vital precept: independence. Agencies like the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the Census Bureau and the Bureau of Economic Analysis operate under the executive branch, but their mandates are to serve the truth, not the administration. Their job is to report what is, not what the White House wishes were true. Yes, legally, the president can fire the bureau's commissioner. The position is not protected by statute. But like many pillars of democracy -- free press, fair elections, impartial courts -- what protects the Bureau of Labor Statistics is not law but a common set of assumptions about how government should function. A basic idea that says: Presidents don't manipulate the scoreboard. Past presidents respected this boundary. Ronald Reagan didn't fire the head of the agency when it reported double-digit unemployment during his first term. Bill Clinton, George W. Bush and Barack Obama took bad news from official statistics on the chin. Mr. Trump has charted a different course. This is not his first tangle with truth. He has questioned unemployment numbers and dismissed Covid fatality figures as inflated. Removing the Bureau of Labor Statistics chief because the numbers were off narrative is a new breach. It is not only attacking the game; it is removing the referee. This may sound like inside baseball, of importance mostly to labor economists. But it's not. The credibility of American statistics is foundational. It undergirds investor trust. It guides fiscal and monetary policy. It tells businesses when to hire, when to expand and when to hold. When those numbers are tainted or appear to be, the ripple effects are vast. Markets can lose faith in the data and in the country that produces it. Yes, the BLS made some retroactive changes to its May and June reports, sharply cutting its assessments of job growth. These kinds of revisions are routine as the BLS incorporates new data, even if these were particularly large. The job of counting is getting harder as the response rate to its surveys falls. But this isn't malfeasance. What about citizens? When a government fires the umpire, we all have reason to wonder: What game are we playing? One danger certainly is that a future Bureau of Labor Statistics head might feel political pressure to fudge a jobs report. The deeper risk is cynicism, the quiet corrosion of faith in institutions. If we can't believe the numbers, how do we believe anything? Most children learn that flipping the board doesn't make them the winner. It just means the game is over. In a democracy, the same lesson holds. We need our referees. We need our scorekeepers. And most of all, we need leaders who understand that losing the game fairly is far more honorable than winning by force. Why so? Because when presidents flip the board, it's not just a game that ends. It's the pieces of democracy that get scattered to the floor. (Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this column are that of the writer. The facts and opinions expressed here do not reflect the views of
Economic Times
28 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Trump's 'shock and awe' tariff tactics won't break Indian resolve: Santosh Rao
"Right now, both sides are pretty entrenched. I expect more negotiations. There's an American delegation coming to India later this month, so discussions are ongoing at the official level. But at some point, perhaps Modi and Trump need to meet—we haven't yet seen executive-level engagement. Maybe that could help cool things down," says Santosh Rao, Manhattan Venture Partners. ADVERTISEMENT The situation seems to be taking an ugly U-turn. From accusing India of having a dead economy, we are now seeing Donald Trump saying he could substantially raise tariffs on India. Do you expect the situation and the dust to settle in the near term, or is it likely to continue for at least the next few days? Santosh Rao: Tempers need to cool. At this point, things are not very favorable. President Trump is unpredictable—he has a habit of doing the "shock and awe" routine, but sometimes he backs off. In this case, however, there's a narrative building that India has been the bad guy—profiting from cheap Russian oil, selling it to Europe, and making money from it. So, the perception is that India is playing the rogue actor in this whole now, both sides are pretty entrenched. I expect more negotiations. There's an American delegation coming to India later this month, so discussions are ongoing at the official level. But at some point, perhaps Modi and Trump need to meet—we haven't yet seen executive-level engagement. Maybe that could help cool things down. But this talk of a 100% tariff, or whatever he decides to impose, is not good for the economy. Still, I don't think India will just give in and accept whatever is thrown at it. There's going to be a lot of back-and-forth. It's unlikely to be resolved in the near term. We haven't heard the last of this—it's going to go on for a few more weeks, if not months. Like you said, India is unlikely to give in. August 7th is the day when tariffs are expected to take effect. What are your expectations, given that negotiations are likely to continue—and as you mentioned, they need to escalate to the top leadership level, with perhaps Trump and Modi engaging directly to reach a trade deal? Santosh Rao: Yes, the tariffs are expected to take effect on August 7th. India has responded with 25% tariffs on a reciprocal basis. On average, the reciprocal tariffs being implemented by the U.S. come to around 15%, up from the 3% that existed globally. So that's a big jump, and the market has largely absorbed it. What we don't know yet is whether Trump will immediately add the 100% on top of that, or if that will happen gradually. I haven't seen any formal language indicating that tariffs will go from 25% to 100% right away, but we still have a few days to go. He might still escalate it. ADVERTISEMENT Just a few hours ago, he posted that he intends to 'slam' India with 100% tariffs because, according to him, India isn't listening and is being stubborn. So, we'll have to wait and see. He's a tough negotiator—applies pressure, pushes people to the edge, presses every button, and then sometimes backs off a bit. That's been his style, and it has brought people to the negotiating table—even the European Union has struck a some point, he's expecting India to do the same. But it's not going to be straightforward. India has a strong domestic constituency to answer to, and its demands in trade negotiations are legitimate, based on the details I've seen. ADVERTISEMENT So yes, more discussions are needed, tempers need to cool, and eventually, one-on-one talks will happen—it's in the best interest of both countries. (You can now subscribe to our ETMarkets WhatsApp channel)
