UK yet to agree ‘one in, one out' migrant deal with France
The policy launch was set to be the centrepiece of President Macron's state visit to Britain.
Sir Keir Starmer and the French president have been working on a system that would allow the UK to send back to France illegal migrants who have crossed the Channel in small boats. In return, Britain would accept migrants with a legitimate case for joining relatives already in the UK.
Both sides hope the plan will reduce the pull factor that has led to a record number of people crossing the Channel in small boats this year.
However, the plan has been complicated by objections from at least five other European countries, which said they were concerned they could end up having to accept people returned from Britain to the Continent.
Five EU countries, including Greece, Malta and Cyprus, wrote to the European Commission late in June objecting to the proposals.
They fear that existing EU rules would allow France to deport illegal migrants they receive from the UK back to the first member state they entered.
Senior government sources said agreeing the deal with France was 'complex' and 'in the balance'. The source added: 'It is something we want to announce but we're not there yet. The next couple of days will be decisive.'
Macron will arrive in London on Tuesday night for a three-day state visit. It will end with a summit at Downing Street on Thursday at which the migration deal is due to be announced.
The president is also expected to lay out plans for French police to take a more proactive approach to stopping small boats setting sail for the UK.
At the weekend, gendarmes were pictured using jet skis to lay nets in shallow waters off the French coast, which could jam boat propellers. In a separate incident, police slashed one inflatable to prevent it from leaving.
The government has repeatedly pushed for French authorities to do more to prevent boats leaving the shore. It has called for changes to allow police officers to intervene when dinghies are in the water.
Yvette Cooper, the home secretary, said France was now using 'important new tactics' that could help to reduce crossings.
'No one should be making these small boat journeys across the Channel, which undermine our border security and put lives at risk,' she said. 'Over the last few months, we have been working together on new ways to crack down on the criminal gang operations, with the French now bringing in important new tactics to stop boats that are in the water. We need to stop at nothing to boost our border security and deliver our plan for change.'
There were no crossings on Saturday, according to the Home Office, although more than 500 people made the journey on Friday.
The tally has now pushed past 20,000 for 2025, the earliest point this has happened in a calendar year since data was first recorded in 2018.
Macron and the prime minister are understood to have discussed the 'one in, one out' plan on Saturday as they attempted to get the initiative over the line.
Downing Street said both men 'hoped to make good progress across a wide range of our joint priorities, including migration, growth, defence and security'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
18 minutes ago
- Telegraph
MPs to vote on making Premier League games free-to-air
MPs are to vote on a proposal to force the Premier League to make at least 10 games a season free-to-air by law. An amendment to the Football Governance Bill has been tabled by the Liberal Democrats, giving Parliament its first say on whether the world's richest league should remain entirely behind a paywall. A pledge to make at least 10 Premier League matches a season free-to-air was part of the Lib Dems' General Election manifesto but it failed to gain support from Labour and the Conservatives and there has been no sign of that having changed since. Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer would therefore be able to use his large parliamentary majority to crush the proposal by Sir Ed Davey's party upon it being put to a vote of MPs on Tuesday. The amendment being tabled would also require the new Independent Football Regulator to ensure that the League Cup final and the English Football League's play-off finals were shown free-to-air. But the Lib Dems' primary target is the Premier League, for which virtually every match has been exclusively behind a paywall since its inception 33 years ago. Davey's party cited analysis that showed armchair fans would have to cough up £660 to watch every game next season under the competition's latest TV deals with Sky Sports and TNT Sports, as well as figures showing viewership on the channels fell 10 per cent and 17 per cent, respectively, last term. It also pointed out that La Liga's partnership with streaming service DAZN included one free-to-air game a week. Max Wilkinson MP, Lib Dem spokesperson for Culture, Media and Sport said: 'I'm urging MPs of all stripes to back our amendment to tear down the paywall and make Premier League games available on free-to-air channels. 'For too long, the jewel in the crown of British football has been locked behind an expensive barrier that keeps fans out while lining the pockets of broadcasters. 'Fans are being rinsed of every last penny to watch the beautiful game, while the next generation of Bellinghams and Bronzes are priced out of the chance to see football played at the very top level. 'That must end today – with a free-to-air revolution that gives the Premier League back to the country.' The Premier League declined to comment but Telegraph Sport has been told that making games free-to-air would inevitably reduce the value of its UK broadcast contract and put at risk some of the millions it redistributes within football and to other causes. This is a political football – free-to-air Premier League action is years away There have long been calls for the Premier League to make some of its matches free-to-air but MPs have never voted on a proposal to force it to do so by law. And before anyone gets carried away – including at the likes of the BBC or ITV – they should take note of the fact that Tuesday's vote has been orchestrated by the Liberal Democrats. Indeed, there has been no sign of the Lib Dems' amendment to the Football Governance Bill being backed by Labour or the Conservatives, both of whom have had plenty of opportunities in the last 33 years to do something akin to what Sir Ed Davey's party is proposing. Of course, the latter knows this and is doubtless using the issue as a political football weeks after England fans turned on Sir Keir Starmer during the country's World Cup qualifier against Andorra. Given the crises engulfing the Prime Minister over issues such as his botched flagship welfare reforms and cuts to winter fuel payments, painting him as the celebrity Arsenal fan who refuses to support making some Premier League games free feels like an open goal in the current climate. According to analysis cited by the Lib Dems, both Sky Sports and TNT Sports experienced a decline in Premier League viewership last season. At least part of that decline would have been down to illegal streaming, with Telegraph Sport chronicling earlier this year how many fans appeared to have shunned expensive subscriptions in favour of cheap modified Fire Sticks. With more Premier League matches than ever being shown live in the UK next season – 270 versus 200 – via one fewer broadcaster, executives at Sky and TNT will be hoping that represents increased value for money.
The Independent
22 minutes ago
- The Independent
Angela Rayner to ban businesses from using NDAs to cover up harassment and discrimination
UK businesses will be barred from using non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) to silence victims of harassment and discrimination as a part of the government's bid to boost workers' rights. Angela Rayne r has proposed an amendment to the Employment Rights Bill which would void and prohibit such agreements against employees in such situations to prevent people from having to 'suffer in silence'. The deputy prime minister said the government had 'heard the calls from victims of harassment and discrimination', as she announced the move following repeated calls from campaigners and Labour politicians. Zelda Perkins, Weinstein's former assistant and founder of the campaign group Can't Buy My Silence UK, said the move was 'a huge milestone'. She said: 'For years, we've heard empty promises from governments whilst victims have continued to be silenced, to see this Government accept the need for nationwide legal change shows that they have listened and understood the abuse of power taking place. 'Above all though, this victory belongs to people who broke their NDAs, who risked everything to speak the truth when they were told they couldn't. Without their courage, none of this would be happening.' And, last month, the Commons Women and Equalities Committee called on the Government to ban NDAs to tackle misogyny in the music industry. The change comes after several high-profile cases of NDAs being used to silence victims of sexual harassment or bullying. In the case of former Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein, victims were forced to breach such agreements to come forward. Zelda Perkins, Weinstein's former assistant and founder of the campaign group Can't Buy My Silence UK, said the move was 'a huge milestone'. She said: 'For years, we've heard empty promises from governments whilst victims have continued to be silenced, to see this Government accept the need for nationwide legal change shows that they have listened and understood the abuse of power taking place. 'Above all though, this victory belongs to people who broke their NDAs, who risked everything to speak the truth when they were told they couldn't. Without their courage, none of this would be happening.' Ms Haigh, who has raised the issue several times in Parliament, said the decision was 'an incredible victory for victims and campaigners' after years of 'tireless campaigning'. She said: 'This victory belongs to them. Organisations like Can't Buy My Silence, led by the indefatigable Zelda Perkins, have exposed the harm caused by this toxic practice. 'Today's announcement will mean that bad employers can no longer hide behind legal practices that cover up their wrongdoing and prevent victims from getting justice.' Ministers had previously indicated they were considering a ban on NDAs in cases of harassment and discrimination, while employment minister Justin Madders also called for a 'cultural shift in employers' earlier this year. Announcing the amendments, Mr Madders said: 'The misuse of NDAs to silence victims of harassment or discrimination is an appalling practice that this Government has been determined to end. 'These amendments will give millions of workers confidence that inappropriate behaviour in the workplace will be dealt with, not hidden, allowing them to get on with building a prosperous and successful career.' Peers will debate the amendments when the Employment Rights Bill returns to the Lords on July 14 and, if passed, will need to be approved by MPs as well.
BBC News
22 minutes ago
- BBC News
Workplace misconduct and discrimination NDAs to be banned
Employers will be banned from using non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) to silence victims of workplace sexual misconduct or discrimination, the government has amendment to the Employment Rights Bill, which is expected to become law later this year, will void any confidentiality agreements seeking to prevent workers from speaking about allegations of harassment or Prime Minister Angela Rayner said it was "time we stamped this practice out".The use of NDAs to cover up criminality has been in the headlines ever since Zelda Perkins, the former assistant to Hollywood mogul Harvey Weinstein, broke her NDA in 2017 to accuse him of sexual abuse. More recently, the now deceased Mohamed Al Fayed, who used to own Harrods, was accused of deploying confidentiality clauses to silence women who accused him of rape and NDA is a legally binding document that protects confidential information between two parties. They can be used to protect intellectual property or other commercially sensitive information but over the years their uses have Perkins began campaigning for a change in the law more than seven years ago. She now runs the campaign group Can't Buy My Silence UK and said the amendment marked a ''huge milestone'' and that it showed the government had ''listened and understood the abuse of power taking place".But she said the victory ''belongs to the people who broke their NDAs, who risked everything to speak the truth when they were told they couldn't". The change in the law would bring the UK in line with Ireland, the United States, and some provinces in Canada, which have banned such agreements from being used to prevent the disclosure of sexual harassment and Perkins said that while the law was welcome, it was vital "to ensure the regulations are watertight and no one can be forced into silence again".Employment rights minister Justin Madders said there was "misuse of NDAs to silence victims", which he called "an appalling practice"."These amendments will give millions of workers confidence that inappropriate behaviour in the workplace will be dealt with, not hidden, allowing them to get on with building a prosperous and successful career," he will debate the amendments when the Employment Rights Bill returns to the House of Lords on 14 July and, if passed, will need to be approved by MPs as well.
