
Families forever scarred 4 years on from Kabul plane deaths
Four years later, their families still relive those desperate acts and endure wounds they say will never heal. The images sped around the world: hundreds of people running alongside a military plane about to take off, with some clinging to it. Other videos show figures falling from the C-17, plummeting through the air.
One of them was Shafiullah Hotak. Aged 18, he dreamt of becoming a doctor, but lacking the money for his studies, was forced to work doing odd jobs. On August 16, 2021, the day after the Taleban seized Kabul, Hotak was swept up by rumors that the departing Americans, after 20 years of war, were taking with them Afghans eager to flee.
'I'm leaving for the United States!' he told his parents at dawn that day, with only 50 Afghanis (less than a dollar today) in his pocket. The airport was swarmed with families clutching any scrap of paper they thought might help them leave with the swiftly departing foreigners. 'Shafiullah had hope. He said that if he made it to the United States, I could stop working, that he would repay us for everything we had done for him,' recalled his mother, Zar Bibi Hotak.
'I gave him his ID card and he left. Then we heard he was dead.' More than 120,000 people were evacuated in August 2021 by NATO countries, including 2,000 who had directly worked with the organization against the Taleban. Thousands of others left the country in the following months. 'We were told stories about the previous Taleban regime, how even flour was hard to find,' said Intizar Hotak, Shafiullah's 29-year-old brother, referring to the Taliban's first rule in 1996-2001. 'With those stories in mind, we were worried. We thought there would be no more work.'
In the eastern Kabul neighborhood where they live, crisscrossed by foul-smelling drainage channels, the only people who managed to get by were those with family sending money from abroad. 'Shafiullah said the situation wouldn't improve, that it was better to leave,' his mother said, clinging to a portrait of the young man with neatly combed hair and piercing eyes, posing next to a rose bush. His body landed on the roof of a house in northern Kabul, a few kilometers (miles) from the airport. So did that of 24-year-old Fida Mohammad Amir, who according to his father Payanda Mohammad Ibrahimi, hated the Taleban. On August 16, he pretended to have an appointment at his dental clinic and left the family home in Paghman, a quiet village west of Kabul.
Later that morning his family tried to reach him. When the phone finally rang early in the afternoon, a stranger claiming to be at the airport asked, 'Do you know Fida? He fell from a plane.'
The young dentist had slipped his father's number into his pocket—just in case. Zar Bibi Hotak was alerted by relatives who saw a photo of Shafiullah shared on Facebook by witnesses at the airport. 'I screamed, I ran like a madwoman. Some neighbors were embarrassed, unsure how to react. Another grabbed me and brought me back home,' she said. To this day, the number of those who died during the evacuation remains unknown. In 2022, the US military cleared the plane's crew of wrongdoing.
The crew had 'decided to depart the airfield as quickly as possible' due to a deteriorating security situation as 'the aircraft was surrounded by hundreds of Afghan civilians who had breached the airport perimeter', according to a spokesperson.
It's not enough, said all the families interviewed by AFP, who said their grief was only made worse by the lack of accountability. 'No one has called us—not the previous government, not the Taliban, not the Americans,' said Zar Bibi Hotak.
'The planes have cameras... the pilot knew what he was doing, that it was dangerous, he could have stopped,' said Zakir Anwari, whose brother Zaki was crushed by the plane on the tarmac.
A promising football player at 17 years old, Zaki went to the airport out of curiosity with another of his brothers. But in seeing the crowd, he decided to take his chances, Anwari believes. 'Everyone wondered how Zaki, so smart, took such a risk. But he wasn't the only one: I met at the airport a father of six who proudly said he had tried three times to climb onto a plane,' Anwari said.
At the airport, where he rushed to try to find his brother, he recalled bodies piled into a pickup, blood on the ground, and being struck by a Taleban fighter. 'I had nightmares for a year. Impossible to forget,' he said. – AFP

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Kuwait Times
a day ago
- Kuwait Times
‘Stop production': Small firms battered by shifting tariffs
WASHINGTON: When US President Donald Trump announced tariffs on almost all trading partners in April, Ben Knepler contacted the factory in Cambodia producing his company's outdoor furniture. 'Stop production,' he ordered. The announcement involved a 10-percent levy on imports from most partners, set to rise further for many of them. For Cambodia, the planned duty was a staggering 49 percent. 'That night, we spoke to our factory,' Knepler told AFP. 'We literally cannot afford to bring our own product into the US with that kind of tariff.' The decision was even more painful for Knepler and his Pennsylvania-based company, True Places, given that he had previously shifted production of his outdoor chairs to Cambodia from China, following tariffs on Chinese imports imposed by Trump during his first presidency. 'We were facing 25-percent tariffs in China, and there were zero-percent tariffs in Cambodia,' Knepler recalled. It took him a year to move the massive equipment and molds to Cambodia only to see another steep levy. With Trump's 'reciprocal' tariff hikes taking effect last Thursday, these Cambodia-made chairs face a lower—though still significant - 19 percent duty. 'Wheel of misfortune' Knepler's experience echoes that of many US companies producing everything from yo-yos to clothing abroad, after years of offshoring American manufacturing. To cope, businesses use various strategies. Some pass on the new costs as a surcharge to customers. Others halted imports when duties reached prohibitive levels, hoping Trump would strike bilateral trade deals that would make their businesses viable again. Trump frames his tariffs as paid for by other countries, touting tens of billions in revenue this year—but firms contest this description. 'We make the tariff payments when the product comes into the US,' Knepler stressed. 'Before we sell it, we're the ones who pay that tariff.' Now saddled with hundreds of thousands of dollars in debt he took on to relocate the company's production to Cambodia, Knepler worries if his business will survive. He likens the rapid policy changes to spinning a 'wheel of misfortune,' resulting in a new tariff each time. Over four months this year, the planned tariff rate on Cambodian exports has gone from 0 to 49 percent, to 10 percent, to 36 percent, to 19 percent, he said. 'No one knows what it's going to be tomorrow,' he added. 'It's impossible to have any kind of confidence in what the rate will be in three- or four-months' time.' Economists warn that tariffs could fuel inflation and drag on growth. EY chief economist Gregory Daco noted that the duties effective Thursday raise the average tariff rate to 17.6 percent from 2.8 percent at the start of the year—the highest level since the early 1930s. While Trump lauds the limited effects his duties have had on US prices so far, experts say tariffs take time to filter through to consumers. Many of Trump's sweeping levies also face legal challenges over his use of emergency economic powers. The global tariffs are especially hard to avoid. Barton O'Brien said he accelerated production and borrowed money to bring in as much inventory as possible before Trump took office. On the election campaign trail, the Republican leader had floated a 60-percent tariff on imports from China, where O'Brien makes most of his products. The Maryland-based veteran selling dog harnesses and other accessories rented a container to ship as many products as he could before Trump's new tariffs would take effect. 'I had dog life jackets in the bathroom,' he told AFP. There is 'no way' to produce domestically, he said, adding that comparable American-made products sell for nearly six times his retail prices. He makes some items too in India and Vietnam. But Chinese products face an additional 30-percent duty this year, even under an extended truce now expiring in November. The rates for India and Vietnam are 25 percent and 20 percent respectively. 'If you look at the brands I compete with, we're all made in the same countries. We're all going to have to raise prices together,' said O'Brien.- AFP


Arab Times
a day ago
- Arab Times
Degrees' hunter: Exposing fake grads
The title of this article is inspired by the famous movie 'Butterfly Hunter' and the book 'Spy Hunter' by British author Peter Wright. The 'degree hunter' is Saudi activist Muwafaq Al-Ruwaili, who never accepted the widespread allegations of forgery, impersonation, and false academic titles, including fake or unrecognized master's and doctoral degrees that he saw. Determined to take action, he has devoted much of his time to exposing such individuals and reporting them to the authorities to the best of his ability. The latest revelation is a video of a so-called 'non-gala' party held by a British university with the more enticing name 'American' to celebrate the graduation of its final-year students. The video showed several 'graduates,' most of whom were from Kuwait, with their names and photos displayed as they received their degrees. However, these individuals never left their offices or homes to attend any classes or receive any education in exchange for their degrees. The university is commercial and unrecognized, yet its degrees are held by a 'constellation' of influential, reputed, and respected individuals in society. Recently, a citizen was sentenced to seven years in prison for using a forged high school diploma at his job, along with a fine of KD 143,000, equivalent to twice the salary he received based on his fake academic certificate. This is part of the government's efforts to verify academic certificates of employees in both the public and private sectors, albeit progressing slowly. Government sources have reiterated the issue's priority and promised to set a timetable for quick completion. However, seven months have passed since that announcement, and it remains unclear whether the wheels of reform have begun to turn with the urgency required. It is worth noting that high-level directives have been issued to government agencies to identify employees who have refused to submit their certificates and to take legal action against them. The inspection and verification process must also be expedited, with those involved referred to the Public Prosecution Office. They face serious charges, including embezzlement of public funds, forgery, and fraud to unlawfully obtain benefits and privileges. These offenses carry prison terms of up to seven years, and those found guilty must repay double the salaries and bonuses they received. Since the announcement of these strict measures, hundreds of employees who previously refused to submit their certificates have filed retirement applications, raising suspicions about their credentials. Employment records will be thoroughly reviewed and scrutinized, even for those hired years ago. Legal action will be taken against anyone suspected of forgery. Also, the government has instructed cultural offices abroad to intensify communication with foreign universities to verify the authenticity of certificates issued by them. Government sources have confirmed that the verification of certificates will extend beyond the public sector to include private sector employees as well. The Public Authority for Manpower has already started requiring all non- Kuwaiti employees to submit their academic certificates for data verification as a condition for renewing work and residency permits. The sources also stated that local certificates will be examined to ensure their authenticity and to detect any forgery. They confirmed that all administrative procedures are being conducted in coordination with the relevant authorities.

Kuwait Times
2 days ago
- Kuwait Times
Europe races to try to influence US position ahead of Trump-Putin talks
EU leaders worried Trump, Putin could dictate unfavorable terms BRUSSELS: European leaders and Ukraine's Volodymyr Zelensky will speak to US President Donald Trump this week ahead of his summit with Russian leader Vladimir Putin, amid fears Washington may dictate unfavorable peace terms to Ukraine. Trump announced last week he would meet Putin on Friday in Alaska to negotiate an end to the 3-1/2-year war, which began with Russia's full-scale invasion of its neighbor. Ukraine and its European allies fear that Trump, keen to claim credit for making peace and also hoping to seal lucrative joint business deals with Moscow, could align with Putin to cut a deal that would be deeply disadvantageous to Kyiv. Germany said it was convening a series of top-level video conferences on Wednesday to prepare for the summit including one at 1500 CET (1300 GMT) between European leaders, Zelensky, Trump and US Vice President JD Vance. It will be the first time Zelensky and Trump have spoken since the Alaska summit was announced. European leaders and EU and NATO officials would coordinate their approach beforehand, a German government spokesperson said. Zelensky said on Monday that concessions to Moscow would not persuade it to stop fighting in Ukraine and that there was a need to ramp up pressure on the Kremlin. 'Russia refuses to stop the killings, and therefore must not receive any rewards or benefits,' Zelensky wrote on X. He later held separate phone calls with the leaders of India and Saudi Arabia - which both have cordial ties with Moscow - in an effort to bolster international support for Kyiv's position ahead of the Trump-Putin talks. European Union foreign ministers discussed their support for Kyiv and the upcoming meeting in a video conference on Monday afternoon. 'Transatlantic unity, support to Ukraine and pressure on Russia is how we will end this war and prevent future Russian aggression in Europe,' EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas wrote on X following the discussion on Ukraine. 'EU Foreign Ministers today expressed support for US steps that will lead to a just peace,' Kallas wrote. 'Meanwhile, we work on more sanctions against Russia, more military support for Ukraine and more support for Ukraine's budgetary needs and accession process to join the EU,' she added. Italy's Foreign Minister Antonio Tajani told his counterparts on the call that 'we support President Trump's efforts and we see some progress,' according to Italian officials. 'Any diplomatic solution must protect Ukraine's sovereignty, its territorial integrity, and its freedom to choose its own future, including its path toward the EU,' Tajani said. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer's spokesperson said London supported Trump's efforts to end the war in Ukraine but believed Kyiv must be involved in any settlement on ending the fighting. 'We will never trust President Putin as far as you can throw him, but we will support Ukraine and President Trump and European nations as we enter these negotiations,' Starmer's spokesperson told reporters. 'Any peace must be built with Ukraine, not imposed upon it, and we will not reward aggression or compromise sovereignty.' The Alaska meeting comes as Trump has hardened his stance towards Moscow, agreeing to allow additional US weapons to reach Ukraine and threatening tariffs against buyers of Russian oil. Even so, the prospect of Trump hosting Putin - on US soil, in what will be the first meeting between leaders of the United States and Russia since 2021 - has revived fears that he might agree to a deal that forces big concessions from Kyiv or weakens European security. Trump has said any peace deal would involve 'some swapping of territories to the betterment of both' Russia and Ukraine, prompting consternation in Kyiv and European capitals. 'Regarding territorial issues, the Russian position is framed as a territorial swap, but it appears as a rather one-sided swap,' a European Commission official said on Sunday. Russia currently occupies about a fifth of Ukrainian territory, while Ukraine holds barely any Russian territory. European leaders have underscored their commitment to the idea that international borders cannot be changed by force, fearing any deal forced on Kyiv could create a dangerous precedent. 'The most robust security guarantee would be that there are no limitations on Ukrainian armed forces and third countries' support to Ukraine,' the Commission official said. — Reuters