
As US aid evaporates in Ukraine, civilian heroes are stepping up
Alongside him died Nick Parsons, a 28-year-old former Australian Special Forces Explosive Ordnance Disposal operator.
I had the privilege of working with both men as part of a four-man bomb disposal unit just days before their deaths. Their loss illustrates a painful truth: As official U.S. government aid to Ukraine dries up, private citizens from America and around the world are stepping into the breach — sometimes at the ultimate cost.
The roughly $130 billion of American aid has been essential in maintaining Ukraine's struggle for survival. But that aid, for the moment at least, will not be continued with any new assistance packages from the U.S. government. This is why the work of civilian organizations has become even more critical.
During my three-week humanitarian trip to the Kyiv, Kharkiv and Donbas regions, I witnessed firsthand what dedication to a dangerous cause looks like.
Garrett and Parsons would drive past army checkpoints into areas littered with mines, burning fields and freshly dug trenches in anticipation of fighting to come. Between clearing lanes on minefields and warily eyeing the sky for lethal drones, they maintained an almost surreal humor and calm.
At one point on the road south from Izium, Garrett abruptly halted our truck after spotting a red fox standing in a field. 'Watch out for mines, buddy,' he muttered before driving off. Like navigating a minefield himself, he was always alert, scanning for anything out of place. Not afraid to confront danger.
There's a famous George Orwell quote that states, 'People sleep soundly in their beds at night because rough men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.'
Garrett was one of those rough men, and while he no longer did violence himself, his dangerous work allowed Ukrainians to sleep more soundly. In the 'most mined country on earth,' he made countless acres safer for civilians and soldiers alike.
Garrett and Parsons weren't alone. Prevail's teams operate across Ukraine, eliminating threats from landmines, unexploded ordnance and improvised explosive devices. Their medical teams deliver critical healthcare, transporting wounded civilians, police officers and military personnel to hospitals.
Another group, Task Force Antal, consisting of retired military combat veterans, has trained over 20,000 Ukrainian civilians in emergency response, with a waiting list of 50,000 more.
Prevail Together and Taskforce Antal are entirely volunteer organizations — warriors turned humanitarians. These organizations embody something profound about the global relationship with Ukraine: it transcends government policy.
While official U.S. aid may pause, the spirit of supporting those fighting for freedom continues through citizens from America and around the world willing to donate time, money and sometimes their lives. They deserve and need our continued support.
Beyond the humanitarian mission, there are strategic reasons we can't afford to abandon Ukraine. Russia is not America's friend; it is a hostile dictatorship, and Ukraine is fighting a courageous war of self-defense.
History has taught us to stop predators like Putin before they launch even larger wars. What message would Putin's success send to China regarding Taiwan, or to North Korea and Iran?
The Western world appeased Hitler, leading to World War II. We won't avoid World War III by appeasing Putin.
Despite the tragic loss of its founder, Prevail continues its mission in Ukraine. But it and other civilian groups like it need support — our support — to replace what the U.S. government has withdrawn.
When I think of Chris Garrett and Nick Parsons, I remember men who risked everything for people they had never meet. Their sacrifice demands we ask ourselves: If they were willing to give their lives, what are we willing to give?
Ukraine deserves peace, but not at the cost of sovereignty or territory. They deserve the just peace that brave defenders like Garrett and Parsons died trying to deliver.
As Americans, we may disagree about government policy, but we can still uphold our finest traditions by supporting the humanitarian heroes working on the ground.
Owen Pataki, who served in the 10th Mountain Division in Afghanistan, is an author and has recently returned from Ukraine's frontline regions as a humanitarian volunteer.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Elections watchdog agrees to help Kyiv counterpart plan for post-war votes
Britain's elections watchdog has agreed to help its Ukrainian counterpart plan for post-war votes. The co-operation deal will see the Electoral Commission share with Kyiv best practice on cybersecurity and voter education when Ukrainians next go to the polls. Elections are on hold in Ukraine while the country is under martial law, following Russia's invasion in February 2022. 'The delivery of well-run elections that command public confidence and trust is crucial to a healthy and free democracy,' said watchdog chief executive Vijay Rangarajan. He added: 'We are proud to welcome our colleagues and friends from Ukraine to the UK and sign this agreement of co-operation. 'There is a lot that we can learn from each other and deepening the ties between us will help us share expertise and learning in the coming years. 'We stand ready to support Ukraine as it prepares for future post-war elections.' The memorandum of understanding with the Central Election Commission of Ukraine, signed in London, will see the two organisations share information intended to assist the Ukrainian authorities in planning for future post-war elections. The Ukrainian delegation took part in several meetings while in the UK, according to the watchdog, on mis-information, foreign interference, physical security and cybersecurity, as well as discussions about political finance regulation. 'I would call the signing of the memorandum between our institutions a landmark moment that will promote our co-operation and, through the exchange of experience and the adoption of best practices, will help to strengthen democratic values in Ukraine,' chairman of the Ukrainian commission Oleh Didenko said. 'As we prepare for challenging post-war elections, establishing co-operation and familiarising ourselves with important processes such as voting abroad and combating disinformation will enable us to prepare effectively and efficiently for the most challenging elections in our country's history.'


The Hill
27 minutes ago
- The Hill
Democrats need to start using AI to help save democracy
As American democracy unravels at the hands of President Trump and his enabling congressional and Supreme Court majorities, millions of Americans are desperate to identify whatever possible countermeasures remain to slow the country's descent into fascism. The outcome of the 2026 midterms is unlikely to produce meaningful change, even if the Democrats take control of the House. Without a cooperative Senate, it will be impossible either to pass legislation or secure a conviction on impeachment charges. Oversight hearings can bring public attention to things like rampant corruption, but the threats Trump poses to the rule of law and democracy are already well-known. The courts can only do so much. There's another emerging tool, however: artificial intelligence. Trump seems to understands the transformative power of AI. Last month, the administration announced an ' AI Action Plan ' for 'winning the AI race.' Among other measures, it promises to remove 'onerous Federal regulations that hinder AI development and deployment, and seek private sector input on rules to remove.' As part of this initiative, the General Services Administration and OpenAI announced earlier this month that the company will be 'providing ChatGPT to the entire U.S. federal workforce' under a 'first-of-its-kind partnership.' Participating agencies will pay a nominal cost of $1 each for the first year to enable federal employees to 'explore and leverage AI.' The company is also 'teaming up with experienced partners Slalom and Boston Consulting Group to support secure, responsible deployment and trainings.' Last week, the AI company Anthropic likewise announced it had struck the same deal with GSA to enable federal agencies' access to its Claude model. The Trump administration's effort to streamline the federal government with AI models makes some sense. Research has shown that generative AI — particularly large language models, which consume vast amounts of data to understand and generate natural language content — can enhance government efficiency in data processing, analysis and drafting, among other potential advantages. But AI systems also increase the risk of widespread government surveillance, personalized misinformation and disinformation, systematic discrimination, lack of accountability and inaccuracy. According to a recent academic paper, 'although many studies have explored the ethical implications of AI, fewer have fully examined its democratic implications.' Trump's alliance with OpenAI head Sam Altman goes back to start of his second term, when he announced a $500 billion joint venture with OpenAI, Oracle and Softbank to build up to 20 large AI data centers. Trump called the venture 'Stargate.' The deal's details are murky, including who will have access to Stargate and how it will possibly benefit taxpayers. Although a spokesman for OpenAI told Fox News Digital that 'Sam Altman sort of planted a flag on democratic AI versus autocratic AI,' let's not forget that Altman is not a government official or employee. As a legal matter, it is unclear whether these ' fast-tracked ' deals will fully comply with traditional oversight and procurement laws and procedures. No major AI company is currently approved under the Federal Risk And Authorization Management Program, for example, which is the process for authorizing the use of cloud technologies by federal agencies. According the GSA website, the program aims to ensure 'security and protection of federal information' by imposing strict cybersecurity controls to protect against data breaches, hacking and unauthorized access, and requiring ongoing monitoring and reporting. Given that the GSA is reportedly working on 'developing a separate authorization' for generative AI systems like ChatGPT and Claude, the potential threats to national security and private citizens' personal information are significant. The Trump administration's lack of transparency also risks creating a black-box government run by proprietary algorithms that the public cannot inspect — centralizing control over federal AI in two companies whose interests clearly lie in market dominance, not the public good. This is why these kinds of decisions are best made through established legal procedures — including the Federal Competition in Contracting Act (requiring fair and open competition), the Privacy Act of 1974 (limiting how agencies can collect and disclose personal data), the Federal Records Act (requiring the proper retention and archiving of public records) and the Administrative Procedure Act (requiring public comment and input into major policy decisions). For now, OpenAI has promised that its 'goal is to ensure agencies can use AI securely and responsibly. ChatGPT Enterprise already does not use business data, including inputs or outputs, to train or improve OpenAI models. The same safeguards will apply to federal use.' This promise from Altman's company is no substitute for actual legal standards enforced by the federal government. Whether AI tools embedded in federal government systems could one day be used to sway elections to favor Trump and his cronies is a vital question. For now, what's clear is that Democrats need to get into the AI game, and fast. A Democratic political action committee called the National Democratic Training Committee recently unveiled on online course entitled 'AI For Progressive Campaigns,' which is designed to teach candidates how to use AI to help create social media content, draft speeches, craft voter outreach messaging and phone-banking scripts, conduct research into their constituencies and opponents, and develop internal training materials. The founder and CEO of the group, Kelly Dietrich, stated that 'thousands of Democratic campaigns can now leverage AI to compete at any scale.' This effort, although laudable, does not go far enough to capitalize on AI's potential to help outmaneuver authoritarianism in the U.S. There's much more that might be done, including using AI to educate citizens on the benefits of democracy, how institutions work and the facts underlying important issues; to create large-scale, moderated public deliberation and consensus around divisive issues; to detect and alert the public to manipulated media, thus combatting misinformation and disinformation and fostering public trust in an alternative to Trump; and to create and implement effective messaging strategies for alternative visions for the future of the country. AI could be American voters' best friend, not their enemy. It just needs to be asked.


The Hill
27 minutes ago
- The Hill
Macron pitches Switzerland for Putin-Zelensky meeting
French President Emmanuel Macron on Monday suggested Switzerland as a possible host nation for a meeting between Russian President Vladimir Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. In an interview that aired Tuesday on French news channel LCI, Macron said the bilateral talks could take place in Europe, though he specified they would not be held in France. 'It will be [hosted by] a neutral country, maybe Switzerland – I'm pushing for Geneva – or another country,' Macron said, according to a translation in the French newspaper, Le Monde. 'The last time there were bilateral talks, they were held in Istanbul,' he added, according to the news outlet. President Trump said he spoke to Putin on Monday about arranging a time and place for a bilateral talk with Zelensky. Trump said that, following that meeting, he would join for trilateral talks that would then be followed by a multilateral meeting with other European leaders. Putin is subject to an arrest warrant issued by the International Criminal Court (ICC), but Macron said in his latest interview that the Russian leader could be issued immunity during the talks, saying, 'Peace must move forward, so we must find a place,' according to a translation of the remarks. Swiss Foreign Minister Ignazio Cassis welcomed the prospect of hosting a summit for the talks, telling Swiss public broadcaster SRF: 'We are ready for such a meeting, and we also thank you for the trust placed in us. We have always signaled our willingness, but it naturally depends on the will of the major powers,' according to a translation. Cassis also suggested the ICC arrest warrant could be avoided if Geneva held the summit. 'We have clarified the legal situation,' Cassis said. 'We could hold such a meeting, and we know what needs to be done to ensure it goes smoothly. We can do this despite the arrest warrant against Putin because of our special role and Geneva's role as the European headquarters of the UN.'