Six child sexual image offences a day in Wales, new figures show
One campaigner has criticised the use of disappearing messages on apps such as Snapchat, after the app was noted in 50% of cases involving social media platforms.
Children's charity NSPCC have called for tougher action from politicians and social media companies, as there can be "no excuse for inaction or delay".
The UK government said it was "committed to the robust implementation of the Online Safety Act", and had already passed laws to crack down on child sexual abuse online.
Most children don't tell family about online life
Have lockdowns put children at risk of grooming?
Almost half of children in Wales scammed online
Home Office figures showed 2,194 child sexual abuse image crimes were recorded in Wales last year,
South Wales Police recorded the most with 964, followed by North Wales, which had 535.
There were 503 child sexual abuse image crimes reported to Gwent Police, and 192 to Dyfed-Powys Police.
It covers a wide range of offences from possessing, making, distributing or publishing child abuse material, to sharing or coercing someone under-18 to send indecent images.
In a separate Freedom of Information request, the NSPCC found that of the offences in England and Wales where a social media platform used by the perpetrator was recorded, half had taken place on Snapchat.
Other social media sites included 11% on Instagram, 7% on Facebook and 6% on WhatsApp.
Last year Childline delivered 903 counselling sessions to children and young people relating to blackmail or threats to expose or share sexual images online - a 7% increase compared to 2022/23.
Mared Parry from Wales, who now lives in London, was 14 when she was groomed online by men who manipulated her into sending sexual images of herself.
The presenter and journalist is also an online safety campaigner who has worked with the NSPCC, and described the scale of the problem as "horrifying".
"Evolving technology seems to have made it easier for groomers to get away with their crimes when it should be the opposite," she said.
"Online abuse has very real consequences."
Snapchat being the platform used in half the recorded offences should also be a "wake-up call", said Ms Parry.
"Its disappearing messages, lack of accountability, and emphasis on privacy create the perfect conditions for abuse to go undetected.
"It's already difficult enough for victims to prove abuse, and features like this just make it even easier for offenders to cover their tracks.
"Yet, tech companies continue to prioritise user engagement over safeguarding, and the consequences are devastating."
Being threatened online when it comes to sexual images can be a frightening experience. The Internet Watch Foundation (IWF) has the following advice:
Remember that you are not at fault if approached or threatened online. The person trying to blackmail or sexually extort you is the one who is in the wrong, lots of other young people have been in a similar situation.
Stop all contact with anyone who is trying to threaten you, and do not share any more images or videos or pay any money of any sort. If you have been communicating on an app, there should be in-built tools to block and report the user.
You will not be in trouble with the police - report what has happened to your local police on 101 or by making a report to the National Crime Agency's CEOP Safety Centre, where a child protection advisor will make sure you get the help you need.
You can use an online tool called Report Remove. The IWF will then try to have the sexual images, videos, or links removed from the internet. You can also talk to Childline, who have provided support to others in the same situation.
For parents, it is also vital to have open and honest conversations with your children about the risks online and to listen to their concerns.
The NSPCC have issued a joint call with other charities, including Barnardo's and the Marie Collins Foundation, for the UK government to give regulator Ofcom greater powers.
Currently user-to-user services are only required to remove illegal content where it was "technically feasible", according to Ofcom, something the charities have criticised as an "unacceptable loophole".
The charities said children will not be protected from the worst forms of abuse on private messaging services under Ofcom's current plans.
But with most of the offences taking place on private messaging sites, the NSPCC also claim companies need to introduce "robust safeguards" so their sites are not "a safe haven for perpetrators of child sexual abuse".
"These offences cause tremendous harm and distress to children, with much of this illegal material being repeatedly shared and viewed online," said NSPCC chief executive Chris Sherwood.
"It is an outrage that in 2025 we are still seeing a blatant disregard from tech companies to prevent this illegal content from proliferating on their sites," he added.
"Having separate rules for private messaging services lets tech bosses off the hook from putting robust protections for children in place.
"This enables crimes to continue to flourish on their platforms even though we now have the Online Safety Act."
In a statement, a Home Office spokesperson described child sexual exploitation and abuse as despicable, and said tech company design choices cannot be used as an excuse not to root out "heinous crimes".
"UK law is clear: child sexual abuse is illegal and social media is no exception, so companies must ensure criminal activity cannot proliferate on their sites.
"We have already introduced four new laws to crack down on child sexual abuse online and we will not hesitate to go further to protect children from vile online predators."
A Snapchat spokesperson condemned any sexual exploitation on the platform and said it works with law enforcement agencies to identify information and content if necessary.
"Whether that's through our proactive detection efforts or confidential in-app reporting, we remove it, lock the violating account, and report to authorities.
"Snapchat is designed to make it difficult for predators to find and interact with young people and has extra safeguards in place to help prevent strangers from connecting with teens.
"Our Family Centre also allows parents to see who their teens are friends with and talking to on Snapchat.
"We work with expert NGOs, and industry peers to jointly attack these problems and don't believe the methodology used in this report reflects the seriousness of our collective commitment and efforts."
Data of four dead British teens may have been removed, says TikTok
Social media companies 'should help bereaved parents'
Snapchat says 'hearts go out' to catfishing victims
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Teenager shot at Summit County Fairgrounds after close of fair Saturday
SUMMIT COUNTY, Ohio (WJW) — An investigation is underway after a teenager was shot Saturday night at the Summit County Fairgrounds. According to police, the shooting happened in the parking lot around 11:15 p.m., after the fair had closed for the day. Lorain Officer Brent Payne, 1 of 3 officers injured in fatal shooting, released from hospital A Sunday morning news release from police said a man fired multiple shots into an occupied vehicle. A 17-year-old male inside the vehicle was hit by one of the bullets and hospitalized with non life-threatening injuries, police said. 'The suspect has been described as a black male wearing a Nike t-shirt with dreadlock-style hair and a tattoo on his neck. The suspect fled the scene in an unknown vehicle,' the release stated. The shooting was also addressed in a Facebook post from the Summit County Fairgrounds. The post reassured guests and community members that safety is the fair's top priority. 'Additional security measures have been put in place, and we remain committed to ensuring a safe, enjoyable experience for all who attend our events,' the post stated. The shooting is under investigations by the Summit County Sheriff's Detective Bureau. Anyone with information is asked to call 330-643-8087. Motorcyclist dead after Stark County crash As Fox 8 News previously reported, the fair was shut down early Friday after a series of trouble-making incidents. According to the fair's website, the fair runs through Sunday, July 27. Officials announced that to help ensure continued safety, a restriction on bag types will be enforced for the remainder of the fair. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Public memorial set for slain Lorain police officer Phillip Wagner Wednesday in Cleveland
[Watch previous FOX 8 News coverage in the player above.] CLEVELAND (WJW) — Community members can pay their respects to Lorain police officer Phillip Wagner, who was killed in the line of duty, at a public memorial on Wednesday. Wagner, 35, was one of three officers ambushed and shot by a gunman on Wednesday, July 23. He died Thursday, July 24, at a hospital, according to authorities. His Wednesday, July 30, funeral at Rocket Arena in downtown Cleveland is only for family members and fellow police officers. But a public memorial is set to begin later, at 11 a.m. at the arena. Officer killed in Lorain shooting described as 'true hero' Members of the public are being asked to enter through the Cliffs Entrance at the corner of Huron Road and East 6th Street, beginning at 10 a.m., according to a Monday news release from Lorain police. The recommended parking garage is the Metropolis Gateway East Garage at 650 Huron Road E. North Ridgeville police are preparing for the procession carrying Wagner to the funeral that morning. It's set to begin at 7:30 a.m. at Liston Funeral Home, 36403 Center Ridge Road. It will head to Rocket Arena in downtown Cleveland, where a funeral is set for his family members and fellow officers, according to the man's obituary. The procession route is expected to head east on Center Ridge Road, then turn south on Lear Nagle Road, then turn east on Lorain Road and get on Interstate 480 East, according to a Monday Facebook post from North Ridgeville police. 'Traffic along the route will be maintained; however, intersections will be temporarily closed as the procession passes to ensure safety and respect for the fallen officer,' reads the post. Center Ridge Road is set to be closed from Stoney Ridge Road to Maddock Road at 6:30 a.m. on Wednesday, July 30, to allow vehicles to stage for the procession, according to the post. 'We ask for patience during this time, and we extend our gratitude to our community for your support in honoring Officer Wagner's service,' reads the post. North Ridgeville streets were lined on Friday to pay respects as Wagner was carried to the Center Ridge Road funeral home. Funeral services announced for Lorain Officer Phillip Wagner Wagner, a father of three, served in the United States Marine Corps and joined the Lorain Police Department in 2022. The afternoon of Wednesday, July 23, he and fellow Lorain officer Peter Gale, 51, had parked their patrol cars at the dead-end River Bend Drive, to have lunch when they were ambushed by a gunman 'laying in wait' with an 'arsenal of weapons,' said Acting Police Chief Michael Failing. Officer Brent Payne, 47, responded to help and was also shot. Both Gale and Payne survived. The gunman was killed in the exchange of gunfire. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Voices: By likening Nigel Farage to Jimmy Savile, Peter Kyle has handed Reform a free gift
Just when Nigel Farage and his tiny parliamentary party were beginning to be exposed as shrill and clueless, Peter Kyle, one of the most promising cabinet ministers, handed them a free gift. By saying that the Reform leader is on the side of 'people like Jimmy Savile', Kyle destroys his own arguments for the Online Safety Act. The attempt to link Farage with a notorious child sex abuser is gratuitous and offensive. It makes Kyle seem desperate, and allows Farage to pose as the wronged party. Farage's criticisms of the Act seem more credible after Kyle's outburst than before. It is surprising that Kyle has chosen to use this slur when Labour people were so indignant – and rightly so – when Boris Johnson used it against Keir Starmer. That was when Johnson was desperate: Sue Gray's report on lockdown parties in Downing Street had just been published and Johnson wanted some way of deflecting attention. His attack on Starmer had nothing to do with Gray's report. It was an aside referring to Starmer's time as director of public prosecutions, during which, Johnson said, 'he spent most of his time prosecuting journalists and failing to prosecute Jimmy Savile, as far as I can make out'. But it was more relevant than Kyle's attack on Farage. It is factually correct that the Crown Prosecution Service failed to prosecute Savile when Starmer was in charge, and it is unclear whether it could have done more to bring Savile to justice at the time. But Farage has nothing to do with Savile – at all. Kyle's attempt to smear the Reform leader was phrased thus on Sky News: 'If people like Jimmy Savile were alive today, he'd be perpetrating his crimes online, and Nigel Farage is saying that he's on their side.' Nothing could be better calculated to distract from the real issue, which is whether Farage's pledge to repeal the Online Safety Act is a sensible one. The Reform rhetoric about 'authoritarian' and 'dystopian' legislation is overdone, and Farage admitted yesterday that he didn't know how he would protect children online instead. But rather of exposing the weakness of Farage's arguments, Kyle allowed his opponent to protest on X that his comment was 'disgusting' and to demand an apology. Kyle responded: 'If you want to overturn the Online Safety Act you are on the side of predators. It is as simple as that.' This is a terrible way to conduct a public debate. There are well-founded concerns about the Online Safety Act, which seems to put unworkable obligations on non-profit-making websites while doing little to ensure that the big tech companies behave more responsibly. A lot of well-informed people said it was badly drafted legislation even before it was passed by the Conservative government two years ago. Kyle is now overseeing the coming into effect of provisions of the Act relating to age-verification, and instead of acting on the concerns that have been expressed, he has ploughed ahead – in effect accusing anyone who has doubts, including for example Ella Dorn of the New Statesman, of being aligned with Savile. When Johnson gratuitously dragged Savile's name into his attempt to save his disintegrating premiership, the disgust at his deliberate attempt to invoke conspiracy theories driven by fears of paedophilia was felt across the political spectrum. Munira Mirza, Johnson's adviser who was consulted in advance, begged him not to do it, and resigned when he did. Kyle should not be using the same disreputable tactic, which not only speaks volumes about this government's self-confidence but also allows Reform off the hook. Only this morning, Sarah Pochin, Reform's newest MP, was struggling to explain what her party's policy on small boats actually is. All she could propose was that Britain should 'do something drastic', by which she seemed to suggest that we should let migrants drown in the Channel. If the next election really is a fight between Labour and Reform, Labour must fight it better than this.