Iran demands US compensation for ‘the damage that they have done' before new nuclear talks
'They should explain why they attacked us in the middle of ... negotiations, and they have to ensure that they are not going to repeat that (during future talks),' Abbas Araghchi told FT in an interview in Tehran.
'And they have to compensate (Iran for) the damage that they have done.'
The report said Araghchi and US special envoy Steve Witkoff exchanged messages with each other during and since the war, with the Iranian official emphasising to his American counterpart the need for a 'win-win solution' to end the long-running standoff over Iran's nuclear programme.
Iran's chief nuclear negotiator told the newspaper that Iran needs real confidence-building measures from their side after Witkoff proposed resuming talks.
He said this should include financial compensation, without giving details, and assurances that Iran would not be attacked during negotiations again, according to FT.
Satellite image © 2025 Maxar Technologies
The US launched strikes in June on Iranian nuclear facilities that Washington says were part of a programme geared toward developing nuclear weapons.
Tehran maintains that its nuclear programme is for purely civilian purposes.
The White House and the US State Department did not immediately respond to Reuters' request for comment.
The US Treasury Department announced fresh sanctions on Wednesday on over 115 Iran-linked individuals, entities and vessels, in a sign the Trump administration is doubling down on its 'maximum pressure' campaign after bombing Tehran's key nuclear sites in June.
READ | Russia slams report Putin urged Iran to accept zero nuclear enrichment as 'political defamation'
The sanctions broadly target the shipping interests of Mohammad Hossein Shamkhani, the son of Ali Shamkhani, who is himself an adviser to Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.
Khamenei.Ir/AFP
The US Treasury said it was the most significant Iran-related sanctions action since 2018, during President Donald Trump's first administration.
According to Treasury, Shamkhani controls a vast network of container ships and tankers through a complex web of intermediaries that sell Iranian and Russian oil and other goods throughout the world.
Treasury accused Shamkhani of using personal connections and corruption in Tehran to generate tens of billions of dollars in profits, much of which is used to prop up the Iranian regime.
Overall, the new sanctions target 15 shipping firms, 52 vessels, 12 individuals and 53 entities involved in sanctions evasion in 17 countries, ranging from Panama to Italy to Hong Kong.
A US official said the new sanctions would make it 'much more difficult' for Iran to sell its oil, but added that the administration did not anticipate any sustained disruption to global oil markets.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tesla board approves $30 billion alternative pay deal for Musk
Tesla's (TSLA) board approved a $30 billion alternative compensation plan for its billionaire CEO, Elon Musk, as the company and Musk continue a court battle to reinstate his $58 billion pay award, which a Delaware judge struck down. The company announced the new plan in a Securities and Exchange Commission filing on Monday, emphasizing its goal to incentivize Musk to focus on Tesla. The new accord must be approved by Tesla's shareholders. It would act as an alternative method to pay Musk in the event that his original pay deal, first reached in 2018, is ultimately struck down in court. Musk has not been paid under his original deal. 'Today we announce an important first step in compensating Elon Musk for his extraordinary work at Tesla,' the company's directors Robyn Denholm and Kathleen Wilson-Thompson, who approved the plan, wrote in a letter to shareholders. 'As you know, Elon has not received meaningful compensation for eight years since the 2012 CEO Performance Award was last earned in 2017,' the board members added. 'To recognize what Elon has accomplished and the extraordinary value he delivered to Tesla and our shareholders, we believe we must take action to honor the bargain that was struck in 2018.' Tesla's stock came under pressure on July 24 after the company posted an earnings and revenue miss in the second quarter. Musk hinted at a "few rough quarters" amid sagging sales. For the second quarter, Tesla reported revenue of $22.50 billion versus $22.64 billion expected, per Bloomberg consensus. The revenue decrease was 12% lower than Tesla's second quarter last year, when it brought in $25.05 billion. The new compensation plan grants Musk 96 million Tesla shares of common stock at $23.34 per share so long as he remains in continuous service until Aug. 3, 2027, as CEO or as an executive officer of Tesla responsible for product development or operations. The share grant, which matches the exercise price of his 2018 CEO award, is also subject to a mandatory holding period of five years from the grant date, except to cover tax payments or the purchase price of the shares. If the Delaware Supreme Court overturns the Delaware Chancery Court's decision to invalidate the 2018 plan in a non-appealable judgment, any shares granted to Musk under the new plan must be immediately forfeited and returned to Tesla. The case is pending before the court, and there is no set date for a ruling. Musk's original pay plan was thrown into question when a Tesla shareholder sued the company in June 2018, alleging that the shareholder vote that approved the plan was invalid. Delaware Chancery Court judge Kathaleen McCormick agreed with the claim and denied the compensation package once in January 2024 and again for a second time in December, after Tesla shareholders reapproved it. The ruling raised new concerns about Musk's motivations to give as much time as he has to Tesla. Even before the 2018 pay package was invalidated by the Delaware court, Musk's attention was divided between his ventures SpaceX ( (formerly Twitter), and the Boring Co., among other pursuits. That attention was further divided in January when Musk joined the Trump administration to launch the budget-cutting endeavor DOGE. The novel question at the heart of the ongoing lawsuit could not only validate or invalidate Musk's original pay deal but could remake the rules of corporate law: Can stockholders ever overrule a judge? Chancellor McCormick initially voided Musk's 2018 pay pact because of what she called "extensive ties" between Musk and the Tesla board members negotiating the pay package and a lack of public disclosure about Musk's relationships with those who approved the deal. She ruled that Musk, a minority owner of Tesla, held enough influence over the electric car company to count as its de facto controlling shareholder, who must be held to a stricter level of legal scrutiny. When Tesla shareholders approved the pay package a second time in June 2024, Tesla argued that the additional stamp of approval should be enough for McCormick to toss out her initial decision. A single independent director, Kathleen Wilson-Thompson, a former executive at Walgreens Boots Alliance and Kellogg, approved the second package. However, McCormick did not address whether Wilson-Thompson's due diligence fulfilled Delaware's requirements. One reason Tesla fought to reinstate the original accord rather than fashion a new one is the potential cost to replace it. In its 2018 proxy statement, Tesla said it took a $2.3 billion accounting charge in connection with the package. Later, in a court filing in the litigation, Tesla said an equivalent deal would require it to take a charge exceeding $25 billion. That impact on Tesla won't be known until the appeals process plays out. Denholm and Wilson-Thompson stressed in their letter to Tesla shareholders the importance of retaining and motivating talent in the intensifying war to build AI-powered technology, where nine-figure cash compensation packages for non-founder, individual AI engineers have become a norm. Wedbush technology analyst Dan Ives echoed that message in a note on Monday. "We believe this grant will now keep Musk as CEO of Tesla at least until 2030 and removes an overhang on the stock," Ives said, adding that the Big Tech AI talent wars were fully underway. "Musk remains Tesla's big asset and this comp issue has been a constant concern of shareholders once the Delaware soap opera began."Alexis Keenan is a legal reporter for Yahoo Finance. Follow Alexis on X @alexiskweed.
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Is Nvidia Stock Still a Buy?
Key Points A major policy reversal on Chinese AI chip exports has significantly improved the company's revenue outlook and enhanced its competitive positioning in the world's second largest economy. The semiconductor giant's data center business has exploded from $3 billion to $115 billion in annual revenue over just five years, yet supply constraints suggest this growth story is far from over. While trading at a premium valuation, the company's wide economic moat and expanding addressable market across AI training, inference, and emerging applications provide multiple avenues for growth. 10 stocks we like better than Nvidia › Nvidia (NASDAQ: NVDA) is the epicenter of the artificial intelligence (AI) boom. In 2025, it became the most valuable company on Earth, minting millionaires and reshaping global tech. But with shares trading at 56 times trailing sales and the stock far outpacing the S&P 500, investors have a tougher question to ask now. Is Nvidia still a buy? Here's what the market is getting right -- and what it might be missing about this core AI stock. China changes everything for Nvidia's growth trajectory A major shift in U.S. policy has reopened a crucial revenue stream for Nvidia. Regulators recently approved shipments of the company's H20 graphics processors to China -- just weeks after restricting their sale. This reversal changes the calculus. Nvidia had taken a $5.5 billion write-down earlier this year, tied to unsellable China inventory, and analysts feared it had lost access to one of its largest AI markets. But with H20 shipments now cleared, Wall Street expects Nvidia to generate $5 billion in China revenue over the next two quarters -- and as much as $30 billion across fiscal 2027 and beyond. Though the H20 is throttled to comply with export rules, it remains in high demand. China's aggressive AI buildout makes even these constrained chips valuable -- and for now, irreplaceable. More strategically, this decision keeps Chinese AI firms tied to U.S. hardware and software infrastructure. Rather than pushing demand toward domestic alternatives like Huawei, the policy reversal reinforces Nvidia's dominance. It strengthens the company's competitive moat just as the global AI infrastructure buildout hits escape velocity. The data center dominance story is far from over Nvidia's evolution from a gaming chipmaker into the backbone of global AI infrastructure is one of the most successful pivots in corporate history. Its data center revenue surged from around $3 billion in fiscal 2020 to over $115 billion by fiscal 2025 -- a five-year run of hypergrowth few companies have ever matched. And it's not demand that's holding Nvidia back -- it's supply. The company remains constrained by manufacturing capacity, with graphics processing unit (GPU) availability expected to stay tight through at least December. Cloud giants such as Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT), Amazon (NASDAQ: AMZN), and Alphabet (NASDAQ: GOOGL) show no signs of easing their AI infrastructure spending. Several customers have said they'd buy every chip Nvidia can deliver. This demand is no longer just about training large models. While training powered Nvidia's early surge, the inference market -- where deployed models generate real-time outputs -- is emerging as a bigger, longer-term opportunity. As generative AI tools spread across industries, both training and inference workloads are growing fast, supporting Nvidia's multibillion-dollar revenue streams even as the market matures. Competitive threats are real -- but contained The most credible risk to Nvidia's dominance comes from intensifying competition, both from traditional chip rivals and cloud giants building their silicon. Advanced Micro Devices (NASDAQ: AMD) is ramping up its GPU lineup with the MI300 series, while hyperscalers such as Alphabet, Amazon, Microsoft, and Meta Platforms (NASDAQ: META) continue to roll out custom AI chips for internal use. But hardware is only part of the story. Nvidia's moat is as much about software as it is about silicon. The company's Compute Unified Device Architecture platform powers nearly every major AI model in production today, and migrating those codebases to alternative stacks is costly, complex, and time-intensive. For now, most developers simply aren't willing to switch. Then there's networking, a less flashy but equally critical layer of Nvidia's strategy. Large AI models don't run on stand-alone chips; they run on interconnected clusters of GPUs. Nvidia's NVLink interconnect and its InfiniBand-based networking gear (inherited from the Mellanox acquisition) allow these clusters to function as a single, cohesive AI engine. This integrated stack -- chips, interconnects, software, and systems -- makes Nvidia more than a parts supplier. It's the orchestrator of modern AI infrastructure, and that role is far harder to dislodge than many assume. Valuation reflects optimism, but fundamentals support a premium At 56 times trailing earnings, Nvidia's stock isn't cheap by traditional metrics. However, these multiples must be viewed against robust growth and broadening market opportunity. The company delivered $130.5 billion in total revenue in fiscal 2025, up 114% year over year, with data center revenue alone reaching $115 billion. Gross margin simultaneously expanded to 75%. The key question isn't whether Nvidia deserves a premium valuation -- it does given its dominant market position and growth prospects. Rather, investors must assess whether the current premium adequately reflects both the upside potential and inherent risks in the AI infrastructure buildout. The China policy reversal provides a concrete catalyst for near-term revenue acceleration, while growing use cases in automotive, robotics, and edge computing offer additional growth vectors beyond the core data center business. Looking ahead, Nvidia's three-year GPU roadmap through 2027 demonstrates the company's commitment to maintaining its technological edge. With new architectures planned annually and processing capabilities expanding dramatically, Nvidia appears well positioned to stay ahead of both traditional competitors and in-house alternatives from hyperscale customers. Early innings or peak hype determine the buy case For investors considering Nvidia at current levels, the investment thesis boils down to one fundamental question: Is the AI revolution in its early innings or approaching maturity? The evidence suggests we're still in the opening act. China's market reversal, persistent supply constraints, and Nvidia's roadmap dominance through 2027 with Blackwell, Rubin, and beyond point to expanding opportunities that dwarf today's already massive market. The risks are real. Demand cyclicality, intensifying competition from hyperscalers building custom chips, and geopolitical uncertainties all merit careful consideration. Yet for investors convinced that artificial intelligence represents a generational shift, Nvidia's unique positioning at the intersection of hardware, software, and AI infrastructure makes it one of the most compelling ways to capitalize on this transformation. Should you buy stock in Nvidia right now? Before you buy stock in Nvidia, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Nvidia wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $624,823!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,064,820!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,019% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 178% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of July 29, 2025 George Budwell has positions in Microsoft and Nvidia. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Advanced Micro Devices, Alphabet, Amazon, Meta Platforms, Microsoft, and Nvidia. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Is Nvidia Stock Still a Buy? was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
11 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tesla board approves $30 billion alternate pay deal for Musk
Tesla (TSLA)'s board approved a $30 billion alternate compensation plan for its billionaire CEO Elon Musk, as the company and Musk continue a court battle to reinstate his $58 billion pay award struck down by a Delaware judge. The company announced the new plan in a Securities and Exchange Commission filing on Monday, emphasizing its goal to incentivize Musk to focus on Tesla. The new accord must be approved by Tesla's shareholders. It would act as an alternative method to pay Musk in the event that his original pay deal, first reached in 2018, is ultimately struck down in court. Musk has not been paid under his original deal. 'Today we announce an important first step in compensating Elon Musk for his extraordinary work at Tesla,' the company's directors Robyn Denholm and Kathleen Wilson-Thompson, who approved the plan, wrote in a letter to shareholders. 'As you know, Elon has not received meaningful compensation for eight years since the 2012 CEO Performance Award was last earned in 2017,' the board members added. 'To recognize what Elon has accomplished and the extraordinary value he delivered to Tesla and our shareholders, we believe we must take action to honor the bargain that was struck in 2018.' Tesla's stock came under pressure on July 24 after it posted an earnings and revenue miss in the second quarter. Musk hinted at a "few rough quarters" amid sagging sales. For the second quarter, Tesla reported revenue of $22.50 billion vs. $22.64 billion expected, per Bloomberg consensus. The revenue decrease was 12% lower than Tesla's second quarter last year where it drove in $25.05 billion. The new compensation plan grants Musk 96 million Tesla shares of common stock at $23.34 per share so long as he remains in continuous service until August 3, 2027 as CEO or as an executive officer of Tesla responsible for product development or operations. The share grant, which matches the exercise price of his 2018 CEO award, is also subject to a mandatory holding period of five years from the grant date, except to cover tax payments or the purchase price of the shares. If the Delaware Supreme Court overturns the Delaware Chancery Court's decision to invalidate the 2018 plan in a non-appealable judgement, any shares granted to Musk under the new plan must be immediately forfeited and returned to Tesla. The case is pending before the court with no set date for a ruling. Musk's original pay plan was thrown into question when a Tesla shareholder sued the company in June 2018 alleging that the shareholder vote that approved the plan was invalid. Delaware Chancery Court judge Kathaleen McCormick agreed with the claim and denied the compensation package once in January 2024, and again for a second time in December, after Tesla shareholders reapproved it. The ruling raised new concerns about Musk's motivations to give as much time as he has to Tesla. Even before the 2018 pay package was invalidated by the Delaware court, Musk's attention was divided between his ventures SpaceX, (formerly Twitter), and the Boring Co., among other pursuits. That attention was further divided in January when Musk joined the Trump administration to launch the budget-cutting endeavor DOGE. The novel question at the heart of the ongoing lawsuit could not only validate or invalidate Musk's original pay deal but could remake the rules of corporate law: Can stockholders ever overrule a judge? Chancellor McCormick initially voided Musk's 2018 pay pact because of what she called "extensive ties" between Musk and the Tesla board members negotiating the pay package and a lack of public disclosure about Musk's relationships with those who approved the deal. She ruled that Musk, a minority owner of Tesla, held enough influence over the electric car company to count as its de facto controlling shareholder, who must be held to a stricter level of legal scrutiny. When Tesla shareholders approved the pay package a second time in June 2024, Tesla argued that the additional stamp of approval should be enough for McCormick to toss out her initial decision. A single independent director, Kathleen Wilson-Thompson, a former executive at Walgreens Boots Alliance and Kellogg, approved the second package. However, McCormick did not address whether Wilson-Thompson's due diligence fulfilled Delaware's requirements. One reason Tesla fought to reinstate the original accord, rather than fashion a new one, is the potential cost to replace it. In its 2018 proxy statement, Tesla said it took a $2.3 billion accounting charge in connection with the package. Later, in a court filing in the litigation, Tesla said an equivalent deal would require it to take a charge exceeding $25 billion. That impact on Tesla won't be known until the appeals process plays out. Denholm and Wilson-Thompson stressed in their letter to Tesla shareholders the importance of retaining and motivating talent in the intensifying war to build AI-powered technology, where nine-figure cash compensation packages for non-founder, individual AI engineers has become a norm. Wedbush technology analyst Dan Ives echoed that message in note on Monday. "We believe this grant will now keep Musk as CEO of Tesla at least until 2030 and removes an overhang on the stock," Ives said, adding that the Big Tech AI talent wars were fully underway. "Musk remains Tesla's big asset and this comp issue has been a constant concern of shareholders once the Delaware soap opera began." Alexis Keenan is a legal reporter for Yahoo Finance. Follow Alexis on X @alexiskweed. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
