American (53) confirms he was suspect arrested for questioning about Mike Gaine
A 53-year-old American has confirmed he is the man who was arrested for questioning about the suspected murder of
Kerry
farmer
Michael Gaine
(56).
Mike Kelley, from Maine, denies he had anything to do with the Kerry farmer's disappearance.
He confirmed to The Irish Times that an earlier interview with the Irish Mirror, in which he said he was the man gardaí arrested for questioning about Mr Gaine's death, was 'fair and accurate'.
Mr Kelley also confirmed earlier to that newspaper that he was denying any involvement in Mr Gaine's death and said it is 'a matter of record' that he was arrested by gardaí and questioned about the killing.
READ MORE
[
Michael Gaine homicide case: The full story so far
Opens in new window
]
He also alleged that he was being framed for the killing by criminals.
'There may be elements that want to string me up – people who have an interest in organised crime – people who are involved in organised crime,' he told the newspaper.
Mr Gaine disappeared on March 20th after calling to a shop in Kenmare. His vehicle was later found at the farmyard at the old Gaine family home at Carrig East, 6km from Kenmare where he had invited Mr Kelley to stay in return for doing jobs on the farm.
Gardaí initially treated Mr Gaine's disappearance as a missing persons investigation but, on April 29th, they upgraded their investigation to a homicide inquiry after searches exhausted the possibility that Mr Gaine had either self-harmed or suffered a fatal accident.
[
Michael Gaine case: Investigators believe most human remains at farm have been recovered
Opens in new window
]
Human remains found in the search for the missing Co Kerry farmer have been confirmed as those of missing farmer Michael Gaine. Photograph: Garda/ PA Wire
On May 16th, body parts were found by Mr Gaine's nephew, Mark O'Regan, while spreading slurry on the Gaine family farm at Carrig East. Gardaí immediately declared the farm a crime scene and cordoned off the area.
Gardaí arrested Mr Kelley on May 18th at an address in Tralee where he had been living for around three weeks since leaving Mr Gaine's farmhouse.
He was approached by The Irish Mirror while busking in the town, playing traditional music on the flute. He confirmed to the newspaper the details of his arrest, but he refused to be drawn on what he believed happened to Mr Gaine or about their relationship.
'It would be incautious for me to comment on that on the advice of my solicitor,' he said, adding that his comments to gardaí at interview are 'privileged between the guards, the solicitor and myself'.
He said he was upset over Mr Gaine's death and, when asked why he believed gardaí arrested him for questioning about Mr Gaine's death, he said it was 'because I lived there'.
Mr Kelley grew up in Waldo County in Maine. He confirmed to The Irish Times that he had been a soldier with US Armed Forces but said he had not been a marine as reported in some media. He said he has been living in Ireland for some years.
Mr Kelley moved to Kenmare about five years ago working with a man harvesting seaweed in Kenmare Bay, but he later lived in a tent in woodland before being offered accommodation by Mr Gaine at the old family farmhouse at Carrig East.
Gardaí spoke to Mr Kelley as part of their initial missing persons investigation into the disappearance of Mr Gaine, which involved extensive searches of the 1,000-acre hillside farm and the farmyard, including a slurry tank.
Army Personnel close to the farm of Michael Gaine near Kenmare in Co Kerry after partial remains were found. Photograph: Noel Sweeney/ PA Wire
The slurry tank was drained of liquid on March 24th, and members of the Kerry Fire Service using breathing apparatus then searched the remaining solids with poles and rods but they found no trace of Mr Gaine's body.
However, since the discovery of body parts, searches of the slurry tank and the surrounding fields where slurry was spread have resulted in the discovery of more remains, which DNA analysis has since confirmed are those of Mr Gaine.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
35 minutes ago
- Irish Times
A key plank of Ireland's social housing delivery now hangs in the balance
There are debates about where the State should and should not get involved in the housing market – but no argument that one area where it needs to step in is the provision of social housing for those who do not have the resources to rent or buy in the private market. Like many areas of the housing market, there are shortages here, as shown via long local authority housing lists and homelessness figures. So when a key Government scheme to provide more social housing is in danger of falling apart, it is noteworthy and the circumstances need to be examined. It is also clear that the decision of the Government to pull out of a public-private partnership (PPP) agreement to provide almost 500 social houses puts the whole process of using these kinds of deals to build social houses for local authorities in doubt. With future deals in the pipeline due to deliver another 1,000 social homes, this poses questions for the Government and Minister for Housing James Browne . [ Why is the housing crisis Ireland's most enduring failure? Opens in new window ] Late last week, as first reported in The Journal, Government officials deciding to pull the plug on a pubic private partnership programme where a private investment consortium was to deliver almost 500 social homes in Dublin, Kildare, Sligo and Wicklow. READ MORE The reason, according to the Department of Housing, was on cost grounds, with the decision made 'on a value for money basis.' Minister for Housing James Browne has said the department and the relevant local authorities remain fully committed to delivering the social housing in PPP Bundle three. Photograph Nick Bradshaw/ The Irish Times Nobody is saying much about the exact circumstances of this, but we can safely assume that the Department of Public Expenditure and Reform was heavily involved. A key unanswered question is why it took the Government so long to decide to pull the plug on a deal where a preferred bidder had been chosen six months ago, at which time the cost details were all known. These public/private partnerships had become an important route for delivery of social homes. Close to 1,000 homes were delivered under the first two partnership programmes, or ' bundles' as they are called. The one which has now been cancelled was to be the so-called Bundle three. Four more bundles are in the pipeline involving around 3,000 further homes and the Department says these are now being reviewed. Given the cost issues with Bundle three, there must now be serious doubt about whether these will go ahead. So a key plank of Government social housing delivery now hangs in the balance. PPPs involve a range of players. The houses are financed and constructed by a consortium – involving financiers, builders and housing managers – who then provide maintenance and tenancy management services for a 25-year period. The homes remain in the ownership of the local authorities and are handed back to them after the end of the 25-year period. The preferred bidders for Bundle three – who had also built out the second bundle – was a consortium called Torc , led by international financiers Equitix and the Kajima Partnerships. The consortium also involves construction companies JJ Rhatigan and the Spanish firm, Obrascon Huarte Lain SA (OHLA). Tenancy management services are provided by Tuath Housing and facilities management by Derwent for a 25-year service period. Minister Browne has said that the department and the relevant local authorities remain fully committed to delivering the social housing in PPP Bundle three through 'an alternative procurement and delivery strategy.' Planning permission has been granted in all cases and while the department will not comment on what happens next, one possible course of action would be for the local authorities to seek tenders to get the houses built, operating on a more traditional basis which does not involve a PPP contract to manage and maintain the properties afterward. Another option would be to re-enter talks with the consortium to see if the deal could be saved, or even if it might move forward on a different basis. Sources close to the consortium say it is keen to look at all the options. Sinn Féin housing spokesman Eoin Ó Broin has called on the Government to provide funding to the local authorities to ensure that the houses are delivered as soon as possible. Ó'Broin has been critical of the PPP model in the past arguing that it does not deliver best value for the State. The build costs under previous two social housing PPPs have appeared broadly in line with the market, he said, but significant additional costs are built into the contract for financing, maintenance and management over the subsequent 25 years, raising questions about value for money. Dealing with problems which emerge can also be complicated for tenants, he says, given the complexity of the arrangements. The Dáil Public Accounts Committee also questioned the value-for-money achieved through expenditure of €639 million on the first two bundles of PPPs which delivered almost 1,000 social housing units in Dublin, Cork, Galway, Waterford, Clare, Kildare, and Roscommon. The total construction and life cycle costs were approximately €640,000 per unit, it pointed out. A breakdown of this figure was not provided to the committee beyond it being told that actual construction costs per unit were €222,000 and €277,000 respectively for the first two bundles. The PAC said it was 'concerned that it cannot evaluate whether the units delivered through this PPP programme represent good value-for-money, as commercial sensitivity means the total cost, minus construction costs, in the tenderers' models will remain confidential 'until a specified period of time has elapsed'.' Now, it appears, this value for money issue has come to a head. Sources say that the per unit cost – including construction but also all the other expenditure over the 25-year period – has risen sharply beyond the €640,000 per unit referenced in the PAC report, due – presumably – to rising build costs and general inflation. Some sources say that the increase could have been 20 -25 per cent or more per unit, though the figure could not be confirmed. The costs appear to have sounded alarm bells in the Department of Public Expenditure and Reform (Dper). What is odd is that this seemed to take so long to happen – the preferred consortium had been chosen last October, there had been extensive contacts since then, contracts were about to be signed and builders were close to going on site. Crucially, sources close to the consortium say that there had been no increase in the costs involved in the project since last October, when it had been chosen as the preferred bidder. So why did it take so long for the plug to be pulled? The agreement would have been assessed by Dper under what is called a public sector benchmark, to ensure value for money as compared to other possible forms of delivery. But this would presumably have been done before the preferred bidden decision. The Minister for Housing says that it is determined to get the projects moving in some form. But the questions now are what delivery mechanism will be used, what will it cost and, crucially, what the delay will now be in delivery. Public procurement rules will be an issue here in finding a way forward. Sources believe that with bundle three now in trouble, the subsequent four – which are at varying stages in the process and which were set on up exactly the same basis – are also now in doubt. The Department says that these will be reviewed 'to ensure the most appropriate procurement strategies for the delivery of these homes is selected and advanced.' This would appear to indicate uncertainty about the whole PPP approach. In turn this means problems for one area of social housing delivery on which the Government and the local authorities would have been relying to help to meet targets. It also sends out some decidedly mixed messages to international investors at a time when the Government is trying to attract more of them to build here under its rental reform programme. Had the plug been pulled late last year, when the costs were clear and before a preferred bidder was appointed, then there would have been more time to reassess the best way forward. Now, however, there is a messy situation with the bidding consortium and most other players – including the National Development Finance Agency (NDFA) who helps advise on these bundles – all apparently taken unawares. The consortium has also spent significant amounts of money, including hiring staff, with a reasonable expectation that the deal would go ahead. While sources close to the consortium say they wish to find a way forward, legal action – potentially- delaying matters further must surely be a possibility if some compromise is not found. This one still has a way to run and it is difficult to see how the delivery of the planned social housing will not now be subject to serious delay.
Sunday World
an hour ago
- Sunday World
Woman charged in connection to St Stephen's Day hit-and-run that killed married couple
Georgina Hogg Moore (39) and her husband Anthony Hogg (40) died when they were struck by a vehicle near Blanchardstown Shopping Centre on December 26, 2024. A woman arrested in connection with a hit-and-run incident that killed a married couple on St Stephen's Day has been charged and is due to appear before the courts next week. The woman, aged in her 30s, has been released on bail and will appear before Blanchardstown District Court on Tuesday, June 17 at 10.30am. A man, aged in his 40s who was also arrested, has been released without charge and a file will now be prepared of the Director of Public Prosecutions. Anthony Hogg and Georgina Hogg Moore Today's News in 90 Seconds - June 12 2025 Georgina Hogg Moore (39) and her husband Anthony Hogg (40) died when they were struck by a vehicle near Blanchardstown Shopping Centre on December 26, 2024. Ms Hogg Moore was pronounced dead at the scene. Mr Hogg was seriously injured and later died at Connolly Hospital Blanchardstown. Gardaí have said investigations into the incident are ongoing.
Irish Times
an hour ago
- Irish Times
Department of Social Protection fined €550,000 over facial scans
The Department of Social Protection has been fined €550,000 after data protection watchdogs found 'a number of deficiencies' in its compliance with European data privacy rules concerning the use of facial scans in issuing Public Services Cards. The Department was also ordered to come up with a valid lawful basis for the use of facial scans and facial matching software for the registration of Public Services Cards within nine months, or it must stop using it. The decision is the result of an inquiry that the Data Protection Commission commenced in July 2021, examining the department's processing of biometric facial templates and the use of facial matching technologies as part of the registration process for the Public Services Card. The department uses Safe 2 registration to verify identity when accessing public services. The process involves a photo of the applicant, which is then run through software to check against images used in other Safe 2 registrations. This is designed to prevent duplicate registrations. READ MORE The registration is mandatory for applying for a Public Services Card, of which 3.2 million are in existence, and is necessary for certain services, including welfare payments. [ 'No legal basis' for photo database created using Public Services Card Opens in new window ] However, that means there is ongoing collection, storage and processing of sensitive personal data on a large scale by the DSP, which requires precise legal justification, the DPC said. The inquiry looked at whether the DSP had a lawful basis for collecting biometric data for conducting facial matching as part of Safe 2 registration, if it could retain that data, if it complied with transparency obligations, and if it had carried out an adequate Data Protection Impact Assessment. The DPC found the department had infringed data protection regulations on a number of fronts. In its decision, the regulator said it failed to identify a valid lawful basis for the collection of biometric data for Safe 2 registration at the time of the inquiry. As a result, it also infringed GDPR by retaining biometric data collected as part of Safe 2 registration. The DPC also penalised the department for infringing its obligations on transparency, and for failing include certain details in the Data Protection Impact Assessment that it carried out. The DPC said it had reprimanded the Department of Social Protection and issued the administrative fines. The department must also stop biometric data in connection with Safe 2 registration within nine months of this decision, if it cannot identify a valid lawful basis for the data collection. 'It is important to note that none of the findings of infringement identified, nor the corrective powers exercised by the DPC, pertain to the roll-out of Safe 2 registration by the DSP as a matter of principle. The DPC did not find any evidence of inadequate technical and organisational security measures deployed by the DSP in connection with Safe 2 registration in the context of this inquiry,' said deputy commissioner Graham Doyle. 'This inquiry was concerned with assessing whether the legislative framework presently in place for Safe 2 registration complies with the requirements of data protection law and whether the DSP operates Safe 2 registration in a data protection-compliant manner, and the findings announced today identify a number of deficiencies in this regard.' A previous inquiry into the processing of personal data in connection with the issuing of Public Services Cards was concluded in 2019, with the department initially appealing the DPC's decision before withdrawing the action and coming to an agreement with the watchdog.
