It's always a good time to invest in stocks — as long as you're patient
If you have either a low risk threshold or need the money in a few years' time, it's probably not a good time to buy.
But if you possess the magical combination of having time on your side and the ability to shrug off volatility, history shows it's virtually always a good time to buy.
The equity-investing landscape has been especially difficult during the Trump era. The reaction to the president's wide-reaching tariff proposals extended a post-inauguration sell-off that pulled the S&P 500 nearly 20% lower in a matter of weeks. But as Trump has backtracked on certain levies, and as the economic picture has remained robust, the index has swiftly recovered well over half of that.
This dynamic was in full force on Monday as major US indexes soared more than 3% after the US and China agreed to substantial tariff cuts for 90 days.
This is the fourth installment of BI's six-part series on making major life decisions in periods of immense policy-driven change. We've already covered best practices for:
What historical data says
If you have a longer-term time horizon, history is on your side, according to Jeff Schulze, the head of economic and market strategy at ClearBridge Investments.
On a recent Franklin Templeton podcast, Schulze pointed out that in the 34 times over the last 75 years when a drawdown of 10% has occurred, the S&P 500 has averaged positive returns over the next 12 months. The forward one-year return is even stronger when a recession hasn't materialized, averaging 14% over time. And even when a recession has struck, 12-month returns have been positive, although to a lesser degree.
Still, every market cycle is different, and there are reasons to be concerned that a potential bear market this time around could be more severe.
For one, valuations on the Samp;P 500 have recently been at some of their highest levels in history. The Shiller cyclically adjusted price-to-earnings ratio, which looks at current stock prices compared to a rolling 10-year average of earnings, is still at about 33. That's higher than at the market's peak before the 1929 crash.
GuruFocus
Stock valuations greatly inform 10-year forward returns. This has led top strategists like David Kostin of Goldman Sachs and Mike Wilson of Morgan Stanley to warn of lackluster returns for the S&P 500 in the decade ahead.
Trump's 10% baseline tariffs are also seen potentially raising consumer prices while slowing economic growth — a 1970s-style stagflation scenario that investors are increasingly worried about.
On an overall basis, however, stocks seemingly always recover and have delivered strong returns over multi-decade periods. For example, the S&P 500 is up 244% since its late 2007 peak just before the financial crisis.
How to get around trying to time the market
If you'd bought in at the market bottom in 2009, you'd be up nearly 700% in the period since. But there's no way to time the bottom perfectly.
One way to mitigate this risk is by dollar-cost averaging. That's a fancy way of saying buying into the market at set intervals — perhaps every Friday, for example, or on the first of every month.
So, if you had $10,000, you could buy in $500 at a time over the course of 20 weeks or months. That way, you buy when the market is up and when it is down. You take the risk of missing a rally over that time, but you also benefit from a more attractive buying point over the long term if the market falls further in the months ahead.
Whichever way you decide to approach entering the market, your returns are likely to be good over the long run, if history is an accurate guide. Warren Buffett once said you should be OK with losing 50% or more of your money — on paper, at least — when you invest in stocks. In other words, you should have the stomach to withstand short-term volatility because you're in it for the long haul anyway.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Congress' Newly Passed Bill Means Homeowners Could Save Thousands In Taxes
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. While President Donald Trump's newly passed "big, beautiful bill" makes sweeping changes to programs such as Medicaid and SNAP that have drawn significant opposition, there's some good news for homeowners. A key provision included in the law will raise the cap on the State and Local Tax (SALT) deduction to $40,000. That's four times the previous $10,000 limit, meaning homeowners could save thousands of dollars in taxes each year, depending on where they live. Why It Matters Trump signed the massive spending plan into law on Friday, offering significant boosts to homeowners. For those living in places with high income taxes and property bills, the new SALT cap could result in thousands of dollars saved, potentially affecting the greater housing market affordability in those areas. A "for sale" sign is displayed outside a home on August 16, 2024, in Los Angeles. A "for sale" sign is displayed outside a home on August 16, 2024, in Los Angeles. PATRICK T. FALLON/AFP via Getty Images What To Know While the SALT deduction cap was previously set at $10,000, the new Trump and largely Republican-endorsed law has raised the amount to $40,000. A little over 65 percent of Americans own their homes, translating to roughly 230 million homeowners, according to Simply Insurance. But homeowners who live in states with high income taxes are much more likely to benefit from the changing SALT cap. In New Jersey, for example, nearly 40 percent of properties are taxed over $10,000, with New York falling close behind at 25.9 percent, according to "Increasing the SALT cap from $10,000 to $40,000 will have the greatest impact on homeowners in areas with highest state and local taxes, or those in the most expensive homes," senior economist Jake Krimmel told Newsweek. "An additional $30,000 in deductions could amount to about $10,500 in annual tax savings for such homeowners, assuming a 35 percent federal marginal tax rate." The newly approved bill also extends the deductibility of mortgage insurance premiums, which originally expired after tax year 2021. Middle-class homeowners can use this deduction to get some additional tax relief. What People Are Saying Krimmel also told Newsweek: "While the deduction provides tax relief for higher-income homeowners, it may also affect certain local housing markets. Raising the SALT cap creates a greater incentive to own in expensive, high tax neighborhoods, such as affluent suburbs with high property taxes and good schools. As demand for these neighborhoods rises, expect home prices to edge up there, too." Kevin Thompson, CEO of 9i Capital Group and host of the 9innings podcast, told Newsweek: "The SALT deduction is going to be a major win for the people in blue states like New York and California. This brings back a much needed tax deduction for those high tax areas." Alex Beene, financial literacy instructor for the University of Tennessee at Martin, told Newsweek: "The SALT cap was one of the most contested components to tax legislation during the first Trump presidency. Its increase offers a huge boost to taxpayers in states like New York and California that have homeowners with higher property tax costs and is mostly good news for residents in certain states dealing with the same inflationary pressures others are." What Happens Next There could be a surge of homebuyers in previously expensive real estate markets with high taxes due to the SALT cap increase. Florida and Texas residents especially could see some housing cost relief as a result, experts say. "You can start seeing a positive increase in people moving to areas where taxes are a bit higher due to being able to offset some of the cost using a higher SALT deduction," Thompson said. "In previous years, there was a migration out of those states but now there could possibly be less of a migration and people willing to stay in those high tax areas."

Wall Street Journal
an hour ago
- Wall Street Journal
Xi Has Spent Decades Preparing for a Cold War With the U.S.
In the U.S.-China conflict, President Trump is waging an economic assault. But Chinese leader Xi Jinping is fighting a Cold War. Xi is entering trade negotiations with a grand strategy he has prepared for years—one that, according to policy advisers in Beijing, is inspired by his understanding of what the Soviet Union got wrong during the first Cold War.


The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
Musk doubles down on third party threat with Independence Day poll
Tech billionaire Elon Musk on Friday leaned into his proposal for a third party amid his growing feud with President Trump over the 'big, beautiful' spending and tax bill with an Independence Day poll online. Hours before Trump signed the sprawling reconciliation package into law, Musk asked followers on social platform X whether he should move forward with creating the 'America Party.' He first floated the idea after his first public spat with the president early last month. 'Independence Day is the perfect time to ask if you want independence from the two-party (some would say uniparty) system!' he wrote. 'Should we create the America Party?' The Tesla CEO, who also owns X, reupped the survey several times throughout the day and even gave a glimpse into his potential strategy. 'One way to execute on this would be to laser-focus on just 2 or 3 Senate seats and 8 to 10 House districts,' he shared in a subsequent post. 'Given the razor-thin legislative margins, that would be enough to serve as the deciding vote on contentious laws, ensuring that they serve the true will of the people.' The poll, similar to one he set up for followers last month, is just the latest way Musk sought to get under Trump and GOP lawmakers' skin as the bill made its way to Trump's desk. The House passed the final bill on Thursday, after hours of tense negotiations with GOP holdouts. While the Senate worked to pass its own version of the megabill earlier this week, Musk threatened to back primary challengers of those who supported the legislation. In response, the president warned the billionaire that he could cut government contracts for his many companies and also left open the possibility of deporting the South African CEO. Musk left his senior Trump administration adviser position in late May, after his special government employee designation lapsed. He had originally been tapped to lead the president's Department of Government Efficiency — a commission created to root out waste and fraud within the federal government. While many questioned how long the relationship between the world's richest man and Trump would last, the rift only began after Musk criticized the reconciliation package as a 'disgusting abomination' and said it would be 'political suicide' for Republicans. The president said he was disappointed with the billionaire's analysis, which led to a tense back-and-forth between the men online. Tesla sales have plunged since the squabble. Musk admitted at one point that his comments 'went too far' and the ice seemed to be thawing, but the feud was reignited earlier this week over the bill — which includes an extension on Trump's 2017 tax breaks and sweeping cuts to Medicaid and energy tax credits. During a signing ceremony at the White House Friday, Trump said, 'We made promises, and it's really promises made, promises kept, and we've kept them.' 'This is a triumph of democracy on the birthday of democracy,' he continued. 'And I have to say, the people are happy.'