
Thieves grab $2 million in jewelry in Seattle heist that took less than 2 minutes
Video from the West Seattle store's surveillance cameras shows four masked suspects shattering the locked glass front door with hammers and then ransacking six display cases Thursday.
One display held around $750,000 worth in Rolex watches, police said in a statement, and another had an emerald necklace valued at $125,000.
A masked suspect threatened workers with bear spray and a Taser, police said, but no one was injured.
'We're pretty shook up as a staff,' Josh Menashe, vice president of the family-owned store, said by phone Friday. 'We're gonna be closed for a while.'
Menashe said workers finished cleaning up the broken glass and were working on a full inventory of the losses.
Police said they responded to the robbery but the suspects had already fled in a getaway car and eluded a search of the area.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
13 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Got the scoop: Bear takes over California ice cream shop
A curious bear on the hunt for something sweet found itself behind the counter of a California ice cream shop over the weekend. The big animal appeared to be making itself right at home when sheriff's deputies turned up to investigate in the resort city of South Lake Tahoe early Sunday. Officers shooed the ursine server out of the shop, but not before snapping a few pictures of their encounter. "With some encouragement, the bear ultimately left, but only after showing interest in the strawberry ice cream," said a post on the Facebook page of El Dorado County Sheriff's Office. "Thankfully, Fuzzy the bear caused barely any property damage and there was barely any cleanup." Bears are common in California and frequently go looking for food in human settlements, including entering homes or vehicles. Attacks on people are rare, but the animals can sometimes cause damage, especially when they cannot find a way out. hg


New York Times
15 minutes ago
- New York Times
Judge Orders That ‘Alligator Alcatraz' Detention Center Be Shut Down for Now
A federal judge on Thursday ordered that no more immigrant detainees be sent to a center in the Florida Everglades, and that much of the facility be dismantled. The ruling rebuked the state and federal governments for failing to consider potential environmental harms before building the facility, known as Alligator Alcatraz. The judge gave both branches of the government 60 days to move out existing detainees and begin to remove fencing, lighting, power generators and other materials. The order also prohibits any new construction at the site. The decision is a major legal setback for the detention center, the nation's first state-run facility for federal immigration detainees, which has faced several lawsuits and numerous complaints about poor conditions and other problems. The state is expected to appeal. Judge Kathleen M. Williams of the Federal District Court in Miami found that the state and federal governments had violated a federal law that requires an environmental review before any major federal construction project. Judge Williams partly granted a preliminary injunction sought by environmentalists and the Miccosukee Tribe, whose members live in the area. The detention center is surrounded by protected lands that form part of the sensitive Everglades ecological system. The detention center presents risks to wetlands and to communities that depend on the Everglades for their water supply, including the Miccosukee, Judge Williams found. 'The project creates irreparable harm in the form of habitat loss and increased mortality to endangered species in the area,' she wrote. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.


CBS News
15 minutes ago
- CBS News
Erik Menendez denied parole after decades in prison
California officials denied Erik Menendez parole on Thursday after he spent decades behind bars for the killing of his parents, Kitty and Jose Menendez, in 1989. Erik Menendez must wait at least three years before his next parole hearing. State law requires the parole board to schedule another hearing three, five, seven, 10 or 15 years in the future, according to the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation. Menendez can ask the parole board to review the case for factual errors that could have resulted in a different outcome. Menendez appeared virtually from the Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility in San Diego to argue he no longer poses a threat to public safety, will not re-offend and to take full responsibility for his crimes. The parole panel was tasked with determining whether an inmate currently poses an "unreasonable risk of danger to society" if they are released from prison, according to the CDCR. In 1996, Erik and his brother Lyle Menendez were sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole, until their sentences were reduced by a judge to 50 years to life, making them eligible for parole under California's youth offender law because they were under the age of 26 when they committed their crimes. Over the years, the brothers have claimed they acted in self-defense after suffering years of alleged sexual, physical and emotional abuse at the hands of their parents. The Menendez brothers' appellate attorney, Mark Geragos, has said he believes the brothers have rehabilitated and are suitable for release. Los Angeles County District Attorney Nathan Hochman has been an outspoken opponent of the brothers' possible release from prison. He's claimed they have "never fully accepted responsibility for the horrific murders of their parents" and have lied about the alleged abuse. "Justice should never be swayed by spectacle," said a statement shared by Hochman on Wednesday, just hours before the hearings were slated to begin. He said that parole hearings must be based on fact and law, not focusing on the recent series of documentaries and television series based on the brothers. Hochman also spoke with CNN on Tuesday to further discuss the parole hearings. "If and when the Menendez brothers finally come clean, and say that those lies that they've been telling for 35 years are just that ... then at that point we believe they'll be qualified for parole," Hochman said. "Until that happens, we believe they're not."