&w=3840&q=100)
Consumer protection: Legal heir, not nominee, is beneficiary of policy
Kusum purchased 15 life insurance policies in the name of her unmarried daughter, Ranjeeta, and appointed herself as the nominee. Later, Ranjeeta married Anand Kumar and gave birth to a baby girl. Ranjeeta passed away when the child was just 11 months old.
Following her daughter's death, Kusum claimed the insurance proceeds. However, before the claims could be settled, her son-in-law, Kumar, filed a civil suit under the Indian Succession Act, asserting that he and his minor daughter were entitled to the insurance benefits. Kusum was not even made a party to the suit. The matter was referred to the Lok Adalat, where it was decided that the policy claims would be paid to Anand Kumar.
Upon learning of this decision, Kusum filed a writ petition challenging the order. The petition was dismissed on the ground that she had not first pursued the remedy of filing a civil revision before the Unnao court. Subsequently, Kusum filed a revision before the Unnao civil court, which directed her to deposit the claim amounts in fixed deposits in the name of her granddaughter until she attained majority at the age of 18 years.
Unwilling to accept this, Kusum approached the Allahabad High Court, contending that she alone was entitled to the insurance proceeds by virtue of being the sole nominee. The court observed that there was no dispute over the fact that Ranjeeta had died intestate and that her daughter was one of the heirs entitled to her estate under the Indian Succession Act. The core issue was whether a nominee had a beneficial interest in the insurance claims or whether the legal heir, in this case, the granddaughter, was entitled to the proceeds.
The court observed that, prior to the 2015 amendment to Section 39 of the Insurance Act, a nominee was considered merely a custodian of the insurance amount, responsible for distributing it to the legal heirs. This principle was laid down by the Supreme Court in Sarbati Devi vs Usha Devi. The 2015 amendment to Section 39 changed this position, granting the nominee a beneficial interest in the insurance claim.
Emphasising that the rights of parties must be determined according to the legal provisions prevailing on the date the cause of action arises, the court acknowledged a conflict between the Insurance Act and the Succession Act. It distinguished between a 'beneficiary nominee' and a 'collector nominee', clarifying that only specific categories —namely, parents, spouse, children, or spouse and children — qualify as beneficial nominees. Siblings do not fall within this category.
The court further held that an insurer is not competent to adjudicate disputes between legal heirs, nor is it responsible for ensuring that the rightful heirs under personal succession law ultimately receive the proceeds. The purpose of naming a nominee is to enable the insurer to discharge its obligations by making payment to the nominee.
In its judgment dated April 30, 2025, delivered by Justice Pankaj Bhatia, .the high court concluded that the Insurance Act is a general law that governs insurance contracts, whereas the Succession Act is a special law that governs inheritance rights.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Supreme Court allows medical exam body to reschedule NEET PG to August 3
The Supreme Court has allowed the National Board of Examinations' (NBE) request to postpone the NEET PG 2025 examination to August 3. The exam was initially scheduled for June 15.A bench comprising Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra and Justice Augustine George Masih allowed the application filed by the NBE for extension of time to conduct the NEET bench said that the request made by the NBE was based on technical constraints. "Request made by NBE saying 3rd August is the earliest possible date given by its technology partner TCS," the court reviewing the documents submitted by the board, the court said, "Having gone through the papers annexed, we are satisfied that prayer for extension and rescheduling is bonafide." The apex court also clarified that this extension will be final. "Accordingly, the time allowed by our earlier order to hold the NEET exam is extended. No further extension will be granted," it the hearing today, the bench initially questioned the NBE on the need for postponing the exam until August 3. In response, the NBE's counsel explained that the exam was originally scheduled across 450 centres for over 2.5 lakh candidates. However, following the Court's directive to conduct the exam in a single shift, the number of centres now needs to be doubled. Identifying suitable centres and ensuring necessary security arrangements will require additional time, as reported by the Live candidates must be informed about the updated centres to make their selections accordingly — a process that is inherently the NBE had informed the apex court that it would be unable to conduct the exam before August 3. This update followed the Supreme Court's directive that NEET PG must be held in a single shift across the country — unlike last year's two-shift its affidavit, NBE said that the time until August 3 is crucial for proper planning. It cited inputs from Tata Consultancy Services (TCS), its technology partner, which highlighted the massive coordination required for the computer-based test. Personnel to be arranged include system operators, lab managers, registration staff, and also stressed that NEET PG is a high-stakes examination and that all possible steps must be taken to prevent any malpractice. This includes enhanced coordination with law enforcement agencies and tighter centre push for a single-shift exam came after a petition by the United Doctors Front, which argued that different shifts could result in varying levels of difficulty. The Supreme Court agreed with the concern, noting the risk of unfairness in a multi-shift then proposed August 3 as the most viable date, with the exam to be conducted from 9:00 am to 12:30 pm, subject to the Court's final approval — which has now been inputs from Live Law. IN THIS STORY#Supreme Court#NEET
The Print
3 hours ago
- The Print
More subscribers but low tariffs—why India's telecom sector is under stress
On the handset side, the stats are equally impressive. From importing 75 per cent of the handsets till not very long ago, the country has moved to exporting mobile phones worth ~1.8 trillion a year. And India has wowed the world with 1.8 billion digital transactions annually. Mobile subscribers in the country are close to 1.2 billion, out of 9.1 billion globally. Internet subscribers in India are pegged at over 970 million, compared to 5.56 billion around the world. India's broadband subscribers stand at more than 940 million, against the global figure of 5.3 billion. The Indian telecom story, seen through numbers, could dazzle anyone. But, is it a happy story, 30 years after the first mobile call was made in India in July 1995? First, the numbers. As Telecom Minister Jyotiraditya Scindia told this newspaper in a recent interview, the telecom growth story of India has become the envy of the globe. While that may be the case, the high subscriber numbers and the impressive digital transaction volumes are accompanied by rock-bottom tariffs. Mobile call rates have fallen to around 0.03 paise a minute, from 50 paise a minute 10 years ago. And data cost has seen a steep fall to ~ 9 per GB, from ~287 per GB 10 years ago. Against the average global data cost of $2.49 per GB, India's is 11 cents ($0.11). That gives India an advantage like none other in terms of digital connectivity. However, being the cheapest data capital (a title India may get in the near future) has its own problems — something that policymakers can't wish away. When telecom service providers don't hike tariffs (both calling rates and data prices) for years at a stretch, there's a problem. When 5G data comes at the same price as 4G, there's a problem. When the industry debt runs into trillions of dollars, there's a problem. When leading telcos want conversion of their pending dues into government equity, there's a problem. And when preventing a duopoly in the industry becomes a burden, there's a problem. Beyond the high growth in subscriber numbers and data consumption, the Indian telecom story reflects stress. The number of private telecom players is down to three, and there's been a looming threat of a duopoly for some years now. The government holds a 49 per cent stake in one of the private telcos — Vodafone Idea. The company is in conversation with the government for further relief after the Supreme Court dismissed a joint plea seeking relaxation of dues related to adjusted gross revenue (AGR) — a term used to calculate the government's share of a telco's revenues. While the government does not want to pick up any further equity in Vodafone Idea, as that would theoretically turn the telco into a public sector unit, the company continues to be in talks with the Department of Telecommunications (DoT) to explore some kind of relief. With banks not willing to lend to a stressed telco and promoters not wanting to invest further, another round of relief from the government seems to be the last resort in preventing a duopoly. Meanwhile, another private telco — Bharti Airtel — has approached the government for relief on its AGR dues. The DoT is yet to take a call on the matter. Adding to the uncertainty in the telecom space is the clash between existing telcos and proposed entrants in satellite broadband over the recommendations of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (Trai) on spectrum pricing. Telcos, which get spectrum through highly competitive auctions, argue that Trai's recommendation on pricing overlooks the issue of a level-playing field. Satellite broadband players will get spectrum through an administered allocation process, and Trai has recommended 4 per cent of the companies' AGR as the spectrum price. Satellite broadband is expected to play a critical role in connecting the unconnected in India's rural and remote parts, and any delays in its rollout would hurt the country's telecom story. In the 30-year journey of India's mobile telephony — from the age when missed calls were the coolest thing to today's new normal of living life through apps — the digital divide between urban and rural has only been partially bridged, despite the large subscriber numbers and low tariffs. A large part of rural and remote places still falls in no-go data zones, where last-mile connectivity is either not available or patchy. BharatNet, a government project to provide data connection to gram panchayats and villages, has made progress, but the last mile remains an issue. More than anything else, India's telecom story needs a tariff fix. Low tariffs are indeed good for consumers — to a point — but they harm the industry. On 5G alone, the telecom industry has invested trillions of dollars and has hardly seen any returns. Without tariff rationalisation, telcos may not invest where it's needed most — in quality of service. That's already hurting consumers in terms of poor signal and weak data link. Nivedita Mookerji @nivmook is the Executive Editor of Business Standard. Views are personal. (Edited by Aamaan Alam Khan)
Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
For clean & green Delhi, 200 e-buses flagged off
Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Thursday flagged off 200 electric buses , which will be deployed as part of the Delhi Transport Corporation (DTC) and Cluster Scheme bus services under the Delhi govt. Modi said, "This initiative will contribute to building a clean and green Delhi . It will also improve the 'ease of living' for the people of Delhi." In a post on X, PM said: "Flagged off electric buses under an initiative of the Delhi govt aimed at boosting sustainable development and clean urban mobility. This will also improve 'ease of living' for the people of Delhi." Describing the buses as a "a tremendous asset for Delhi", chief minister Rekha Gupta said, "These are highly comfortable buses equipped with cameras and panic buttons for passenger safety. They have a low floor and are air-conditioned." She further stated, "By 2027, the entire fleet of buses provided by the Delhi govt will be electric. We are also working on a new EV policy." Last month, Gupta had flagged off 400 electric buses under the Delhi Electric Vehicle Interconnector (DEVI) scheme and announced that an additional 2,080 electric buses would be introduced by the end of this year. The Delhi govt plans to deploy 900 electric buses in the coming months as around 5,000 of the city's 7,500 buses are due to be retired this year. Currently, Delhi operates about 7,500 buses, including both DTC and cluster services. The govt aims to expand the fleet rapidly as many buses are aging and approaching retirement. Transport minister Pankaj Singh stated that orders for thousands of new buses have been placed to maintain adequate public transport services. Singh also mentioned that approximately 4,000 buses will be phased out this year, to be replaced gradually by electric buses. In 2018, the Delhi govt informed the Supreme Court that the city requires 11,000 buses to meet its transportation needs. The upcoming purchases include both 12-metre and smaller nine-metre buses. To reduce traffic congestion and improve passenger convenience, DTC is also implementing route rationalisation to increase bus availability in high-density areas. According to data, DTC recorded an average daily ridership of 25.99 lakh in 2023-24, while cluster buses saw a lower daily ridership of 16.44 lakh. Under the Delhi Electric Vehicle Interconnector (DEVI) scheme, BJP govt has introduced small nine-metre buses, designed to serve areas inaccessible to larger 12-metre buses.
