logo
Spy cockroaches and AI robots: Germany plots the future of warfare, Digital News

Spy cockroaches and AI robots: Germany plots the future of warfare, Digital News

AsiaOne6 days ago
MUNICH/BERLIN/FRANKFURT — For Gundbert Scherf — the co-founder of Germany's Helsing, Europe's most valuable defence start-up — Russia's invasion of Ukraine changed everything.
Scherf had to fight hard to attract investment after starting his company — which produces military strike drones and battlefield AI — four years ago.
Now, that's the least of his problems. The Munich-based company more than doubled its valuation to US$12 billion (S$15.2 billion) at a fundraising last month.
"Europe this year, for the first time in decades, is spending more on defence technology acquisition than the US," said Scherf.
The former partner at McKinsey & Company says Europe may be on the cusp of a transformation in defence innovation akin to the Manhattan Project — the scientific push that saw the US rapidly develop nuclear weapons during World War Two.
"Europe is now coming to terms with defence."
Reuters spoke to two dozens executives, investors and policymakers to examine how Germany — Europe's largest economy — aims to play a central role in the rearming the continent.
Chancellor Friedrich Merz's government views AI and start-up technology as key to its defence plans and is slashing bureaucracy to connect startups directly to the upper echelons of its military, the sources told Reuters.
Shaped by the trauma of Nazi militarism and a strong postwar pacifist ethos, Germany long maintained a relatively small and cautious defence sector, sheltered by US security guarantees.
Germany's business model, shaped by a deep aversion to risk, has also favoured incremental improvements over disruptive innovation.
No more. With US military support now more uncertain, Germany — one of the biggest backers of Ukraine — plans to nearly triple its regular defence budget to around 162 billion euros (S$243 billion) per year by 2029.
Much of that money will go into reinventing the nature of warfare, the sources said.
Helsing is part of a wave of German defence start-ups developing cutting-edge technology, from tank-like AI robots and unmanned mini-submarines to battle-ready spy cockroaches.
"We want to help give Europe its spine back," said Scherf.
Some of these smaller firms are now advising the government alongside established firms — so-called primes such as Rheinmetall and Hensoldt — that have less incentive to focus primarily on innovation, given their long backlogs for conventional systems, one of the sources said.
A new draft procurement law, approved by Merz's cabinet on Wednesday, aims to reduce hurdles for cash-strapped start-ups to join tenders by enabling advance payment to these firms.
The law would also entitle authorities to limit tenders to bidders inside the European Union.
Marc Wietfeld, CEO and founder of autonomous robots maker ARX Robotics, said a recent meeting with German defence minister Boris Pistorius hammered home how deep the rethink in Berlin goes.
"He told me: 'Money is no longer an excuse — it's there now'. That was a turning point," he said. Germany in the lead
Since Donald Trump's return to the political stage and his renewed questioning of America's commitment to Nato, Germany has committed to meet the alliance's new target of 3.5 per cent of GDP on defence spending by 2029 — faster than most European allies.
Officials in Berlin have emphasised the need to foster a European defence industry rather than rely on US companies. But the hurdles towards scaling up industry champions in Germany — and Europe more broadly — are considerable.
Unlike in the United States, the market is fragmented in Europe. Each country has its own set of procurement standards to fulfil contracts.
The United States, the world's top military spender, already has an established stable of defence giants, like Lockheed Martin and RTX, and an advantage in key areas, including satellite technology, fighter jets and precise-guided munitions.
Washington also began boosting defence tech startups in 2015 — including Shield AI, drone maker Anduril and software company Palantir — by awarding them parts of military contracts.
European startups until recently languished with little government support.
But an analysis by Aviation Week in May showed Europe's 19 top defence spenders — including Turkey and Ukraine — were projected to spend 180.1 billion this year on military procurement compared, to 175.6 billion for the United States. Washington's overall military spending will remain higher.
Hans Christoph Atzpodien, head of Germany's security and defence sector association BDSV, said one challenge was that the military's procurement system was geared toward established suppliers and not well suited to the fast pace that new technologies require.
Germany's defence ministry said in a statement it was taking steps to accelerate procurement and to better integrate startups in order to make new technologies quickly available to the Bundeswehr.
Annette Lehnigk-Emden, head of the armed forces' powerful procurement agency, highlighted drones and AI as emerging fields that Germany needs to develop.
"The changes they're bringing to the battlefield are as revolutionary as the introduction of the machine gun, tank, or airplane," she told Reuters. Spy cockroaches
Sven Weizenegger, who heads up the Cyber Innovation hub, the Bundeswehr's innovation accelerator, said the war in Ukraine was also changing social attitudes, removing a stigma towards working in the defence sector.
"Germany has developed a whole new openness towards the issue of security since the invasion," he said.
Weizenegger said he was receiving 20-30 Linkedin requests a day, compared to maybe 2-3 weekly back in 2020, with ideas for defence technology to develop.
Some of the ideas under development feel akin to science fiction - like Swarm Biotactics' cyborg cockroaches that are equipped with specialised miniature backpacks that enable real-time data collection via cameras for example.
Electrical stimuli should allow humans to control the insects' movements remotely. The aim is for them to provide surveillance information in hostile environments - for example information about enemy positions.
"Our bio-robots - based on living insects - are equipped with neural stimulation, sensors, and secure communication modules," said CEO Stefan Wilhelm. "They can be steered individually or operate autonomously in swarms.
In the first half of the 20th century, German scientists pioneered many military technologies that became global standards, from ballistic missiles to jet aircraft and guided weapons. But following its defeat in World War II, Germany was demilitarised and its scientific talent was dispersed.
Wernher von Braun, who invented the first ballistic missile for the Nazis, was one of hundreds of German scientists and engineers transported to the United States in the wake of World War II, where he later worked at NASA and developed the rocket that took Apollo spacecraft to the Moon.
In recent decades, defence innovation has been a powerful driver of economic progress. Tech like the internet, GPS, semiconductors and jet engines originated in military research programmes before transforming civilian life.
Hit by high energy prices, a slowdown in demand for its exports and competition from China, Germany's US$4.75 trillion economy contracted over the last two years. Expanding military research could provide an economic fillip.
"We just need to get to this mindset: a strong defence industrial base means a strong economy and innovation on steroids," said Markus Federle, managing partner at defence-focused investment firm Tholus Capital. Escaping 'the valley of death'
Risk aversion among European investors had in the past disadvantaged startups, which struggled to get the capital they need to survive the 'valley of death' — the critical early stage when costs are high and sales low.
But a boost in defence spending by European governments following Russia's invasion of Ukraine has investors looking for opportunities.
Europe now boasts three start-ups with a unicorn valuation of more than US$1 billion: Helsing, German drone maker Quantum Systems, and Portugal's Tekever, which also manufactures drones.
"There's a lot of pressure now on Germany being the lead nation of the European defence," said Sven Kruck, Quantum's chief strategy officer.
Germany has become Ukraine's second-biggest military backer after the United States. Orders that might once have taken years to approve now take months and European startups have had the opportunity to test their products quickly in the field, several sources said.
Venture capital funding of European defence tech hit US$1 billion in 2024, up from a modest US$373 million in 2022, and is expected to surge even more this year.
"Society has recognised that we have to defend our democracies," said Christian Saller, general partner at HV Capital, an investor in both ARX and Quantum Systems.
Venture capital funding has grown faster in Germany than elsewhere, according to a data analysis by Dealroom for Reuters. German defence startups have received US$1.4 billion in the last five years from investors, followed by UK, the data shows.
Jack Wang, partner at venture capital firm Project A, said many German defence startups — rooted in the country's engineering prowess — are good at integrating established components into scalable systems.
"Quality of talent in Europe is extremely high, but as a whole, there's no better country, no better talent that we've seen other than in Germany," he said.
Weakness in Germany's automotive industry means there is production capacity to spare, including in the Mittelstand: the small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) that form the backbone of Germany's economy.
Stefan Thumann, CEO of Bavarian startup Donaustahl, which produces loitering munitions, said he receives three to five applications daily from workers at automotive companies.
"The startups just need the brains to do the engineering and prototyping," he said. "And the German Mittelstand will be their muscles."
[[nid:715348]]
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

No clarity yet on baseline or pharmaceutical tariffs with US: DPM Gan
No clarity yet on baseline or pharmaceutical tariffs with US: DPM Gan

Straits Times

time44 minutes ago

  • Straits Times

No clarity yet on baseline or pharmaceutical tariffs with US: DPM Gan

Deputy Prime Minister Gan Kim Yong said he has told US officials that Singapore would be keen to negotiate its baseline tariff rate if the opportunity arises. SINGAPORE – The US government did not negotiate its tariffs on Singapore and did not want to commit on whether the 10 per cent baseline tax could rise or fall in the future, said Deputy Prime Minister Gan Kim Yong. DPM Gan, who visited the US from July 20 to 26 , added that he did not get to further discussions on pharmaceutical tariffs being contemplated by the Trump administration. He told the SG60 IPS-SBF Conference on July 29 that these talks did not take place as he did not get the chance to meet Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick. He did, however, meet other officials, including Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Trade Representative Jamieson Greer. They discussed ways to keep up the long and mutually beneficial bilateral economic relationship, as well as potential collaboration in areas like the digital economy. DPM Gan also met business leaders in New York, and congressional leaders handling trade issues in Washington. He also visited an ST Engineering aerostructures factory in Maryland. The US administration was 'not in the mood to discuss any discount to the baseline tariff', DPM Gan said at a dialogue moderated by Mr David Rennie, The Economist's geopolitics editor. 'We also wanted to know whether the baseline tariff will stay at 10 per cent or will it be higher or lower? The answer was non-committal. They are still reviewing the tariff and, in time to come, they will make the appropriate announcement. So we just have to wait and see.' Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Grace Fu apologises for Tanjong Katong sinkhole, says road may stay closed for a few more days Singapore Terrorism threat in Singapore remains high, driven by events like Israeli-Palestinian conflict: ISD Singapore Liquidators score victory to recoup over $900 million from alleged scammer Ng Yu Zhi's associates Singapore Man on trial for raping woman who hired him to repair lights in her flat Sport IOC president Kirsty Coventry a 'huge supporter' of Singapore Singapore 7, including child and firefighter, taken to hospital after fire breaks out in Toa Payoh flat Singapore S'pore can and must meaningfully apply tech like AI in a way that creates jobs for locals: PM Wong Singapore Doctor who forged certificates for aesthetic procedures gets 4 months' jail DPM Gan, who is also Minister for Trade and Industry, said he has told US officials that Singapore would be keen to negotiate its baseline tariff rate if the opportunity arises. Pharmaceuticals and semiconductors, which are key exports from Singapore to the US, are currently exempt from baseline tariffs. But US President Donald Trump had earlier in 2025 threatened to end an exemption for pharmaceutical imports, saying tariffs would be imposed 'at a level that you haven't really seen before'. The US is a major market for Singapore-based drugmakers including American multinationals like Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson. DPM Gan said official-level discussions between Singapore and the US Department of Commerce, which commenced before his trip, are still ongoing. 'I can't go into detail because negotiation is ongoing and there's a bit of a confidentiality we need to maintain on both sides,' he said when asked what the US was looking to secure through these talks. He added that the US generally had concerns about what the country experienced during the Covid-19 pandemic, when supplies of critical pharmaceuticals were disrupted. 'They want to make sure that they have a secure supply line of pharmaceuticals. They do want to see whether they can onshore this production, so that they can produce (it) themselves. But they also know that it's not possible to onshore everything, because some of the raw materials are actually (from) outside of America,' he said. 'They do need to think about how they can work with partners, trusted partners, to make sure that their supply chain is secure and reliable. So that is what they are looking for in their partners, including Singapore,' he added. 'I think the administration's focus now is to finish the negotiation of reciprocal tariffs. Then it will start to engage countries on specific sectoral tariffs in pharmaceuticals and semiconductors.' DPM Gan said Singapore has yet to engage the US on the prospect of semiconductor tariffs . However, he added that discussions to preserve the country's access to artificial intelligence equipment and semiconductors are under way. Speaking at the same conference earlier in the day, Prime Minister Lawrence Wong said Singapore's trade and investment relationship with America, even with the tariffs, remains important. 'We would prefer to have zero tariffs of course, but if it is the baseline rate, then we are at the lowest category. We can live with it, and we can still do business and there will still be many opportunities for trade with the US, because whatever is happening in America now, the economy is still resilient, and there is still tremendous innovation happening in American companies, and so there will still be opportunities there,' he said. DPM Gan in his dialogue said the US economy continues to be relatively resilient. He said that based on the feedback from US businessmen he met on his trip, the outlook for the US economy seems cautiously optimistic, adding that Mr Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill , which includes tax cuts and business support measures, may have contributed to this. He said Singapore continues to have a good working relationship with the US. The US was Singapore's second-largest trading partner in 2024, while Singapore was its 16th-largest trading partner. Singapore was also the third-largest Asian investor in the US. More than 250 Singapore companies operate across 45 states, supporting around 350,000 jobs in the US, according to the Republic's Ministry of Trade and Industry. The US also has a longstanding trade surplus and free trade agreement with Singapore. The recent deals between the US and several countries, as well as the European Union economic bloc, are good news, DPM Gan said. 'This gives us a sense that there's good progress in the tariff negotiation. But I also come back with the sense that there remains significant uncertainty. I'm not sure whether the uncertainty has really been eliminated or even reduced,' he added. He cited the lack of clarity on the rules of origin that will be used to determine where products originate from. He also said it is unclear how reciprocal tariffs will be implemented, and how components from different countries and transshipped goods will be assessed. This comes on top of the uncertainty around sectoral tariffs, which are yet to be determined. There is also uncertainty about whether the investments that countries have pledged to the US under tariff deals are new contributions, or money that is currently invested in another country, DPM Gan said. 'For example, the EU has committed to make an investment... over a period of time. Japan has also committed investments into the US. Japan has been a major investor in Singapore. Whether the Japanese investment in Singapore will be diverted to the US is a question that is yet to be seen,' he said. 'There are (also) uncertainties as to how countries will respond to the outcome of the tariff negotiation. Some countries have also committed to purchase more from the US, and they would have been purchasing these products from other countries. Whether now, instead of purchasing from country A, country B, they will now purchase from the US, and therefore exports from these countries to affected countries will be changed,' he added. 'I think these uncertainties (are) second derivative uncertainties. No one is paying much attention yet, because we need to have a tariff settled, then we work out how the secondary impact would be.' Global supply chains will also be restructured if countries move their investments from destinations facing higher US tariffs to those facing lower tariffs, he added. 'The overall global trading system, what we call the rules-based multilateral trading system, that we depend on rules, respecting trade agreements with one another, and not change at will, is something that has been challenged,' DPM Gan said. 'Today, we can agree with one another on a certain tariff, but tomorrow, something happens. We start to change our tariff rate, and that is something that is very uncertain, and that has been seen over the last few months.'

US: S&P 500, Nasdaq open at record highs with earnings, Fed meeting in focus
US: S&P 500, Nasdaq open at record highs with earnings, Fed meeting in focus

Business Times

timean hour ago

  • Business Times

US: S&P 500, Nasdaq open at record highs with earnings, Fed meeting in focus

[NEW YORK] The S&P 500 and Nasdaq opened at fresh record highs on Tuesday (Jul 29), as investors assessed a slew of earnings reports from major US companies and looked ahead to the Federal Reserve's upcoming two-day policy meeting. The Dow Jones Industrial Average down 3.8 points, or 0.01 per cent, at the open to 44,833.74. The S&P 500 rose 15.8 points, or 0.25 per cent, at the open to 6,405.62​, while the Nasdaq Composite rose 108.1 points, or 0.51 per cent, to 21,286.725 at the opening bell. REUTERS

Liquidators score victory to recoup over $900 million from scammer Ng Yu Zhi's associates
Liquidators score victory to recoup over $900 million from scammer Ng Yu Zhi's associates

Straits Times

timean hour ago

  • Straits Times

Liquidators score victory to recoup over $900 million from scammer Ng Yu Zhi's associates

Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Court documents state that Ng's three companies received about $1.09 billion, US$277.2 million and €980,000 (S$1.4 million) in investor funds. SINGAPORE - The liquidators for three companies of Ng Yu Zhi, the alleged nickel-trading fraudster at the centre of a $1.5 billion nickel trading scam, scored a legal victory on July 29 to recover more than $900 million from nine former directors and employees for their role in Singapore's biggest Ponzi scheme. In 2021, the liquidators of Envy Asset Management (EAM), Envy Global Trading (EGT) and Envy Management Holdings (EMH) sued Ng, former directors Lee Si Ye and Ju Xiao, and former employee Cheong Ming Feng. Court documents state that Ng's three companies received about $1.09 billion, US$277.2 million and €980,000 (S$1.4 million) in investor funds, supposedly for nickel trading. Of those sums, $593 million, US$192.2 million and €880,000 remain outstanding to investors. In a 180-page judgment issued July 29, the liquidators, who are represented by lawyers Daryl Fong and Lin Ruizi of Shook Lin & Bok, were awarded damages after Ms Lee, Mr Ju and Mr Cheong were found to have breached their duties as directors. They also received damages for fraudulent trading by Mr Ju. The trio were also ordered to pay back about $27 million in commission payments, profit sharing, bonuses, CPF payments, directors' fees and dividends. The High Court, however, ruled that the July 29 judgment is 'not binding' on Ng, who was made bankrupt in December 2022. Civil proceedings against the former managing director of EGT and EAM stopped as a result. Ng's criminal trial on 42 charges ended on July 7 after he opted not to take the stand. He had faced a total of 108 charges over offences including cheating, forgery, fraudulent trading, money laundering and criminal breach of trust. In awarding damages to the liquidators, High Court Judicial Commissioner Mohamed Faizal found that the nickel trading scheme did not exist and none of the investors' monies were used to buy nickel from Poseidon Nickel. This is the Australian firm that Ng claimed to have bought nickel from. Instead the funds were transferred to Ng through Envy Asset Management Trading (EAMT), paid as directors' fees to Ng and Ms Lee, and as commission payments, profit sharing fees to the defendants and other employees. The funds were also used to pay referral fees or 'profits' in excess of the invested principal to investors; and transferred or paid to other companies owned by Ng or his Envy companies, the judicial commissioner found. The High Court also found that the Envy companies were 'hopelessly insolvent and unable to pay their debts. Neither EGT nor EMH had any legitimate, revenue-generating business and there was no other meaningful business undertaken by the Envy companies.' There was also 'compelling evidence of the shocking level of ineptitude and nonchalance' on the part of Ms Lee, who allegedly helped Ng cover up details of fraudulent transfers of $416.5 million and US$17.7 million to his own bank accounts under false pretences, according to the ruling. She was found to be 'grossly negligent' but 'did not have actual knowledge' of the Ponzi scheme as she herself was being duped by Ng, with her own family members and loved ones also invested in the scheme, the judicial commissioner pointed out. As for Mr Ju, the High Court found that he was in breach of his directors' duties and liable for fraudulent trading, among other things. 'That he was willing to forge documents, fraudulently change the paid-up capital sums for EGT and mislead investors ... spoke to his entire approach to his role as a director and employee of the company. These actions also reflect his willingness to be complicit in whatever he was asked to do. This made a mockery of his duties as a director of EGT,' the judicial commissioner said. Mr Cheong, the ex-employee, knew that he was creating forgeries, and also became aware that these were being circulated to both internal employees and external investors, but the High Court found that he did not know that such actions were being done to prop up a sham scheme. For one thing , Mr Cheong was 'not particularly sophisticated and possessed a rather rudimentary understanding of the business'. His own investments 'started even before he joined the Envy companies and he had assisted some of his friends to do the same, which suggests that he himself bought into the logic of the purported nickel trading,' the judicial commissioner said. Regardless of whether Ms Lee, Mr Ju or Mr Cheong had knowledge of the Ponzi scheme, they were still ordered to return most of the monies they had received from the Envy companies. In a separate 62-page judgment released July 29, the High Court ordered six other former employees of the Envy companies to cough up more than $42 million in fictitious profits, commission payments, profit sharing and referral fees paid to them. This award is subject to a deduction of income tax payments made by these six employees. Former employees Lau Lee Sheng, Benjamin Teo Wei Wen, Ms Shen Xuhuai, Koh Hong Jie (Xu Hongjie), Guo Yujia and Jordan Chua Wei Jian were named defendants in this suit brought by the liquidators. The High Court allowed the liquidators to claw back monies paid to them after finding that the Envy companies 'were never under any obligation to pay the commission payments and profit sharing payments to the defendants because the (companies) never made any actual profit.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store