logo
In pictures: Modi leads record attempt as India marks International Day of Yoga

In pictures: Modi leads record attempt as India marks International Day of Yoga

Independent20 hours ago

People across the world marked the 11th International Day of Yoga on Saturday with mass yoga sessions, community events and awareness drives to highlight this year's theme – Yoga for One Earth, One Health.
In India, large events were held in every state and union territory, with prime minister Narendra Modi leading the main celebration from Visakhapatnam in Andhra Pradesh.
The beachfront yoga session, held along a 28km stretch of the city's coastline, aimed to double the previous Guinness World Record for the largest yoga lesson – set in Gujarat on this day two years ago at 147,952 participants. Andhra Pradesh's chief minister claimed 303,000 people attended on Saturday morning, though the final official tally was yet to be confirmed by Guinness World Records.
Indian military personnel also took part in Yoga Day celebrations, performing yoga on the icy heights of the Siachen Glacier in the Himalayas and aboard naval ships in the Bay of Bengal.
The United Nations first adopted 21 June as International Yoga Day in 2014 after a proposal by India was unanimously supported by the General Assembly. The date was chosen to coincide with the summer solstice in the Northern Hemisphere, considered an auspicious time.
In a post on X, formerly Twitter, Mr Modi shared photos and video from the celebrations at Visakhapatnam.
'Unfortunately, today the entire world is going through some tension. Unrest and instability have been increasing in many regions. In such times, yoga gives us the direction of peace. Yoga is the pause button that humanity needs to breathe, balance, and become whole again,' he said in his address.
Officials in Jammu and Kashmir's Reasi district held a special session held at the recently inaugurated Chenab Rail Bridge, the world's highest railway bridge.
In London, the Indian High Commission held a public yoga session on the Strand in collaboration with King's College London, where high commissioner Vikram Doraiswami read out a special message from King Charles III.
'The theme of this year's day, Yoga for One Earth, One Health, reminds us how vitally important it is that the world comes together to secure a happy and healthy future for present and future generations,' read the King's message from Buckingham Palace.
'Year on year, Yoga is increasing in popularity across the United Kingdom, with millions of people in our country reaping its benefits.
'Yoga is a powerful means of enabling anyone to improve their physical and mental health and fosters a sense of wellbeing and togetherness within communities,' he said.
In New York, the Consulate General of India organised a large public yoga session at Times Square, drawing locals, tourists, and yoga practitioners to the heart of Manhattan. Held in collaboration with Times Square NYC, the event transformed the iconic intersection into an open-air yoga studio, where hundreds of participants performed asanas beneath towering billboards.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Fordow: What we know about Iran's secretive 'nuclear mountain' - and why it was so well protected
Fordow: What we know about Iran's secretive 'nuclear mountain' - and why it was so well protected

Sky News

time2 hours ago

  • Sky News

Fordow: What we know about Iran's secretive 'nuclear mountain' - and why it was so well protected

Deep beneath a mountain, hundreds of centrifuges were kept safe, used for enriching Iran's uranium that Israel suspects is destined for a nuclear weapon. The Fordow plant was protected by tonnes upon tonnes of dirt and rock, far away from prying eyes - and foreign missiles. But in the early hours of Sunday, its status was thrown into question after President Donald Trump said it had been "obliterated" along with sites at Natanz and Isfahan. It was thought that only the American B-2 stealth bomber and its massive payload could breach the so-called "nuclear mountain", and it is this plane that was involved in the recent strikes. Iran has repeatedly denied that it is seeking a nuclear weapon and the head of the UN's nuclear watchdog said in June that it has no proof of a "systematic effort to move into a nuclear weapon". What is the Fordow facility? The Fordow enrichment plant is one of three key pieces of nuclear infrastructure in Iran - the others being the Natanz enrichment plant and research facilities in Isfahan. It is thought to be buried around 80m deep into the side of the mountain. It was previously protected by Iranian and Russian surface-to-air missile systems, but these may have wholly or partially knocked out during Israel's recent attacks. Construction is believed to have started in around 2006 and it first became operational in 2009 - the same year Tehran publicly acknowledged its existence. In November 2020, it was believed there were 1,057 centrifuges at Fordow. These are used to separate isotopes and increase the concentration of uranium-235, needed for nuclear fuel and weapons. In 2023, the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) - the nuclear watchdog - found uranium particles enriched to 83.7% purity - near the 90% needed for a bomb - at Fordow, the only Iranian facility where this has been found. In June 2024, the Washington Post reported on a major expansion at Fordow, with nearly 1,400 new centrifuges earmarked for the subterranean facility. 1:51 A key target for Israel Israel has made no secret of its desire to cripple or remove Iran's nuclear programme, describing it as an existential threat. It's not the only site in Iran capable of producing and using nuclear material, however. "But of course the real big piece remains at Fordow still and this has been in the headlines quite a bit," says Dr Alexander Bollfrass, an expert on nuclear weapons from the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) thinktank. Bunker buster bombs There has been a lot of talk about bunker buster bombs. These are munitions that explode twice - once to breach the ground surface and again once the bomb has burrowed down to a certain depth. The Israelis used 60 to 80 of them in the strike that killed Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah in September last year, according to Martin "Sammy" Sampson, a former air marshal and executive director at the IISS. But Nasrallah was only 10-15m underground, Mr Sampson said, while Fordow is believed to be 80m beneath the surface. "An awful lot of planes would be in the same place for an awful long time" to drop enough bombs to have a chance of getting to the buried facility, he added. It's perhaps this that prompted the US, which operates the much more powerful GBU-57 bomb, to intervene directly in the conflict and strike Fordow. "My sense is that it would still take multiple strikes," Mr Sampson said, putting it in "more and more unknown territory". "It would be pretty disastrous... if you put 400 planes over the top of Fordow, or you put the might of the US over Fordow, and it survived." According to Mr Trump, Fordow was "obliterated" in the attack. Israel's 'contingencies' for dealing with Fordow Israel had suggested that it could destroy or cripple Fordow without using bombs dropped from the air. Speaking to Sky's Yalda Hakim earlier this week, former Mossad director of intelligence Zohar Palti said it was "much easier for the Americans to do it", possibly referring to the GBU-57. "But as you see, we know how to run things alone," he added. "And if we need to do some other stuff alone, we will do it." 23:28 Israel's ambassador to the US, Yechiel Leiter, said last weekend that Israel has "a number of contingencies... which will enable us to deal with Fordow". "Not everything is a matter of, you know, taking to the skies and bombing from afar," he told ABC News. There has been talk of using special forces to raid the facility on the ground, but that has its downsides as well. "This would be an incredibly high risk mission if you were to do something on the ground," said Mr Sampson. There was also the possibility Israel could replicate what happened at the Natanz enrichment plant, where the IAEA said 15,000 centrifuges were likely destroyed in the IDF bombardment of Iran. This was possibly due to an Israeli airstrike disrupting the power supply to the centrifuges, rather than actual physical damage to the centrifuge hall, according to the nuclear watchdog.

World leaders react to US attack on Iran
World leaders react to US attack on Iran

Reuters

time2 hours ago

  • Reuters

World leaders react to US attack on Iran

June 22 (Reuters) - The reaction of world leaders after U.S. forces struck three Iranian nuclear sites on Sunday Iran time ranged from Israel lauding President Donald Trump's decision to the U.N. calling for de-escalation and some countries condemning the attacks. ISRAEL PRIME MINISTER BENJAMIN NETANYAHU, RECORDED STATEMENT: "Congratulations, President Trump. Your bold decision to target Iran's nuclear facilities with the awesome and righteous might of the United States will change history... History will record that President Trump acted to deny the world's most dangerous regime the world's most dangerous weapons." "I am gravely alarmed by the use of force by the United States against Iran today. This is a dangerous escalation in a region already on the edge – and a direct threat to international peace and security. There is a growing risk that this conflict could rapidly get out of control – with catastrophic consequences for civilians, the region, and the world. I call on Member States to de-escalate and to uphold their obligations under the UN Charter and other rules of international law. At this perilous hour, it is critical to avoid a spiral of chaos. There is no military solution. The only path forward is diplomacy. The only hope is peace." VENEZUELA FOREIGN MINISTER YVAN GIL, ON TELEGRAM: "Venezuela Condemns U.S. Military Aggression Against Iran and Demands an Immediate Cessation of Hostilities. The Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela firmly and categorically condemns the bombing carried out by the United States military, at the request of the State of Israel, against nuclear facilities in the Islamic Republic of Iran, including the Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan complexes." MEXICO FOREIGN MINISTRY, ON X: "The ministry urgently calls for diplomatic dialogue for peace between the parties involved in the Middle East conflict. In keeping with our constitutional principles of foreign policy and our country's pacifist conviction, we reiterate our call to de-escalate tensions in the region. The restoration of peaceful coexistence among the states of the region is the highest priority." CUBA PRESIDENT MIGUEL DIAZ-CANEL, ON X: "We strongly condemn the US bombing of Iran's nuclear facilities, which constitutes a dangerous escalation of the conflict in the Middle East. The aggression seriously violates the UN Charter and international law and plunges humanity into a crisis with irreversible consequences."

‘We had seconds to decide if India's missile was nuclear'
‘We had seconds to decide if India's missile was nuclear'

Times

time6 hours ago

  • Times

‘We had seconds to decide if India's missile was nuclear'

As President Trump deliberated over whether to enter Israel's war with Iran, there was another potential conflict taking his attention last week. His unexpected guest on Wednesday was Field Marshal Asim Munir, Pakistan's army chief, for a closed-door lunch in the cabinet room, the first time a US president had hosted a Pakistan military chief who was not also the head of state. With Trump was Marco Rubio, his secretary of state, and Steve Witkoff, the former property developer turned special representative for the Middle East. Munir was accompanied only by Lieutenant General Asim Malik, the national security adviser. There were no civilian officials, perhaps reflecting whom Trump sees as holding power in Pakistan. 'The reason I had him here was that I wanted to thank him for not going into the war [with India],' said Trump. 'And I want to thank PM [Narendra] Modi as well, who just left a few days ago.' Pakistan has said that although all-out war between the two nuclear powers was narrowly averted by US intervention last month after the deadliest fighting in decades, the conflict in a region that is home to 1.6 billion people is far from resolved. As a result Pakistan and India were now closer to nuclear war than at any previous point, Bilawal Bhutto Zardari, the former foreign minister, told The Sunday Times. • No ceasefire will let India and Pakistan escape their history On the final day of clashes, he said, India had deployed a dual-use cruise missile capable of holding a nuclear warhead and Pakistan had had to make an immediate decision about whether it was under nuclear attack. 'In that atmosphere you've got only a few seconds to decide looking at an image: is this missile going to be used within the nuclear connotation or not? And in those split seconds decisions are made.' 'The escalation ladder was rising so fast,' Bhutto Zardari said. The situation in the region remained 'incredibly perilous'. He said: 'We've achieved a ceasefire but we haven't achieved peace. And that's problematic because following this recent conflict we have lowered the threshold for full-blown military conflict to the lowest it has ever been, to what I believe are dangerously low levels.' Bhutto Zardari was speaking while visiting London as head of a nine-member delegation of MPs sent by Shehbaz Sharif, the prime minister, to 'pitch for peace' and call for international talks to resolve the problem of Kashmir over which the two nations have fought three wars. He said Pakistan had agreed to the ceasefire because it was promised such a summit, which has not materialised. India has sent a rival delegation of politicians and diplomats led by the Congress MP Shashi Tharoor to London, Washington and elsewhere to argue that Pakistan is a sponsor of cross-border terrorism and a threat to global stability. The fighting between the two broke out last month after an April terrorist attack in the Indian-controlled part of Kashmir, which India blamed on Pakistan. Twenty-six people were shot dead in a meadow in the tourist resort of Pahalgam. • How the Kashmir massacre unfolded Islamabad denied responsibility but India launched strikes deep in Pakistan against what it claimed were terrorist training camps. Pakistan claimed that it shot down six Indian fighter planes before a US-brokered ceasefire came into force on May 10. Bhutto Zardari, 36, is leader of the Pakistan People's Party (PPP), which is in coalition with the ruling party, and the son of the president. His mother, Benazir Bhutto, was Pakistan's first female prime minister –— an office she held twice, the first time in 1988 just two months after giving birth to him. He insists that Pakistan had nothing to do with the Pahalgam attack, which was initially claimed by a little-known organisation called the Resistance Front that India says is an offshoot of Lashkar-e-Taiba (L-e-T), a Pakistani terrorist group long linked to Pakistan's military intelligence. The Resistance Front later retracted the claim. MUZAMMIL AHMED/AFP/GETTY IMAGES 'To this day, they [the Indian government] haven't provided the Indian public, their allies, or us, or the media, with names of the individuals involved in this attack,' Zardari said. 'If they did indeed come from Pakistan, who are they? Where did they come from? What border crossing points did they use? Who facilitated them? One of the largest and supposedly most efficient intelligence agencies in the world should be able to share this information.' Groups that Delhi claims are proxies for Pakistan have a long history of attacks in India — most notably the Mumbai massacre in 2008 in which terrorists laid siege to five-star hotels, going door to door shooting guests, murdering 166 people. The only attacker captured alive said the terrorists were members of L-e-T. Bhutto Zardari admits Pakistan has 'a credibility problem', adding: 'I'm not denying Pakistan has a complicated past.' That past is personal for him. He was thrust into frontline politics in 2007, when he was 19 and his mother was assassinated by terrorists. His grandfather, who founded the PPP, was executed by the military. Both his uncles met mysterious ends. For years Pakistan's military differentiated between militant groups, using some for their own purposes while pursuing others. He argues things have changed. 'This credibility and perception problem is rooted in deep biases, tainted by Islamophobia, and obfuscates from our actual effort to combat terrorism. 'I grew up during 9/11. My mother championed the fight against terrorism — she warned the world then. She gave her life doing that. Ever since she was assassinated, I at every point have opposed appeasement with any groups. We took the fight to these guys and my generation living in Pakistan now has nothing to do with it. 'I don't believe we should punish the children of Pakistan today for whatever happened in the past, particularly when we've fought against these groups and continue to as we've proven before international forums and under extreme scrutiny. We can't be condemned for past mistakes.' Bhutto Zardari accused the West of worsening Pakistan's security situation by abandoning Afghanistan and 'leaving a vacuum' there. Pakistan's military intelligence historically had close links to the Taliban but since the group took power in 2021 it has turned against its former backers. 'The rest of the world may have moved on from Afghanistan and exited Kabul, but we're fighting terrorism from there,' Bhutto Zardari said. 'The single largest number of terrorist attacks anywhere in the world is Pakistan.' At a meeting in London with Hamish Falconer, the Middle East minister, the Speaker and MPs, Bhutto Zardari raised the subject of an international conference on Kashmir. Pakistan sees the UK as having a particular responsibility, given that the conflict dates back to the British partition of India in 1947. Bhutto Zardari said: 'At a time where the Pakistani army believes that we had a military upper hand in the conflict, we agreed to a ceasefire because we believed there was a commitment from the United States that we'd go on to have a dialogue in a neutral location on all friction points. 'Now that isn't happening. We don't want the international community to get a false sense of ease as a result of the ceasefire. There's still a very real threat.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store