Hartalega subsidiary gets RM101.36mil additional tax bill
The company said in a filing with Bursa Malaysia today that the notice, received on Aug 4, 2025, comprises additional tax assessments of RM13.92 million for 2017, RM36.35 million for 2018, RM10,695 for 2019, RM32.89 million for 2020, RM18.10 million for 2021 and RM90,625 for 2022.
"The company is currently seeking legal advice and evaluating its legal options, which may include initiating a formal appeal to the LHDN," Hartalega said.
It added that further announcements will be made as and when there are material developments.
"The announcement was made in compliance with Paragraph 9.03 of the Main Market Listing Requirements of Bursa Malaysia Securities," it said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Borneo Post
6 hours ago
- Borneo Post
How Malaysians are growing old and going broke
With a population rapidly ageing, and a fall in birth rates leading to a contracting tax base, the fear that future retirees may not have enough to get by is rising. – AI IMAGE PETALING JAYA (Aug 7): Concerns with readiness for retirement are intensifying, just three years after the government first allowed people to dip into their nest egg to get through job losses during the Covid-19 pandemic. Employees Provident Fund (EPF) CEO Ahmad Zulqarnain Onn couldn't have stressed the point more succinctly in his call for prompt measures to be taken to ensure Malaysians are both financially and socially prepared for longer lifespans. Every projection now indicates that life expectancy could reach 81 years by 2050, just a quarter of a century away. With a population rapidly ageing, and a fall in birth rates leading to a contracting tax base, the fear that future retirees may not have enough to get by is rising. FMT takes a look at the escalating challenges of retirement affordability in Malaysia and how potential reforms today can secure workers' financial future tomorrow. Overview of Malaysia's retirement savings system Malaysia's primary retirement mechanism is EPF, a defined contribution (DC) scheme where individual and employer contributions, alongside investment returns, constitute an employee's retirement savings. A legacy defined benefit (DB) pension that ensures monthly payments based on final salary and tenure remains in effect for civil servants. The DB model, though secure for beneficiaries, imposes substantial long-term costs on public finances. Conversely, the DC approach is increasingly regarded as more sustainable globally, as it transfers investment and longevity risk away from the government, offers individuals enhanced control and portability, and presents fewer fiscal management challenges. Impact of Covid‑19 withdrawals Economic volatility of recent years has put the predictability of the DC model to the test. More than 8.1 million EPF contributors withdrew over RM145 billion from their savings during the pandemic, often to offset job losses or settle debts. Many have almost or entirely emptied out their reserves, with half of those aged 55 and below having been left with less than RM10,000 each. The median balance now stands at only RM10,898. Rising life expectancy The concerns are compounded by the fact that Malaysians now live longer. Men now average 74.8 years and women 78.9 years, up from 68.7 years for men and 73.4 years for women in 1990. If one retires at 60, and assuming he or she needs RM1,500 a month to sustain a decent life, he will need at least RM360,000 in the bank to last him up to two decades. However, as of 2023, nearly 74 per cent of active EPF members had accumulated less than RM100,000 each, which is insufficient for even five to six years – without considering escalating healthcare and elderly care costs. Demographic and fiscal challenges As birth rates fall, the tax base is shrinking, making it unsustainable to continue with a DB pension system. Malaysia's tax-to-GDP ratio was just 12.6% in 2023, far below the Asia-Pacific average of 19.3 per cent and the OECD average of 34 per cent. At the same time, the country's life birth rate fell by 10.2 per cent to 100,732 in Q2 2024 compared with the previous corresponding period, according to data from the department of statistics. If this trend continues, there will be fewer taxpayers and EPF contributors going forward, slowing fund growth just as more people join the ranks of retirees. In contrast, countries with generous DB pensions can sustain their retirees because they collect higher taxes and have built a large reserve. On the other hand, Malaysia has limited tax revenue and a smaller reserve, making it impossible to sustain a fully tax-funded pay-as-you-go pension scheme without major reform. Potential solutions To safeguard against the risk of exhausting retirement reserves, Malaysia must promote greater financial literacy, enhance saving incentives, develop a modest social safety net, and establish integrated aged-care facilities to support its ageing population. Introducing a hybrid pension scheme could restore some benefits of the former DB system while retaining sustainability. Within this framework, employees would continue contributing to their EPF accounts. However, upon retirement, only a portion could be withdrawn as a lump sum, with the remainder distributed as monthly payments throughout their lifetime. Such an arrangement partially reinstates the protective features of the legacy civil-service pension – a guaranteed lifelong minimum income – while avoiding the fiscal strain of a fully tax-funded model. Singapore's CPF Life serves as a relevant example, blending personal savings with lifelong payouts to prevent retirees from outliving their resources. This proposed hybrid reform holds promise for ensuring retirees maintain a basic standard of living, even if individual savings are depleted. Moreover, initiatives aimed at bolstering financial education and facilitating easier EPF top-ups – whether through matching contributions, tax incentives, or voluntary programmes – could meaningfully replenish and grow retirement savings. Urgency is mounting for comprehensive reform. By integrating individual responsibility with inter-generational support, Malaysia can help ensure that today's workers do not become tomorrow's financially vulnerable retirees. *This article was first published by epf reform retirees savings social protection
Borneo Post
7 hours ago
- Borneo Post
How Malaysians are growing old and going broke as increasing lifespans, shrinking tax base threaten current pension scheme
With a population rapidly ageing, and a fall in birth rates leading to a contracting tax base, the fear that future retirees may not have enough to get by is rising. – AI IMAGE PETALING JAYA (Aug 7): Concerns with readiness for retirement are intensifying, just three years after the government first allowed people to dip into their nest egg to get through job losses during the Covid-19 pandemic. Employees Provident Fund (EPF) CEO Ahmad Zulqarnain Onn couldn't have stressed the point more succinctly in his call for prompt measures to be taken to ensure Malaysians are both financially and socially prepared for longer lifespans. Every projection now indicates that life expectancy could reach 81 years by 2050, just a quarter of a century away. With a population rapidly ageing, and a fall in birth rates leading to a contracting tax base, the fear that future retirees may not have enough to get by is rising. FMT takes a look at the escalating challenges of retirement affordability in Malaysia and how potential reforms today can secure workers' financial future tomorrow. Overview of Malaysia's retirement savings system Malaysia's primary retirement mechanism is EPF, a defined contribution (DC) scheme where individual and employer contributions, alongside investment returns, constitute an employee's retirement savings. A legacy defined benefit (DB) pension that ensures monthly payments based on final salary and tenure remains in effect for civil servants. The DB model, though secure for beneficiaries, imposes substantial long-term costs on public finances. Conversely, the DC approach is increasingly regarded as more sustainable globally, as it transfers investment and longevity risk away from the government, offers individuals enhanced control and portability, and presents fewer fiscal management challenges. Impact of Covid‑19 withdrawals Economic volatility of recent years has put the predictability of the DC model to the test. More than 8.1 million EPF contributors withdrew over RM145 billion from their savings during the pandemic, often to offset job losses or settle debts. Many have almost or entirely emptied out their reserves, with half of those aged 55 and below having been left with less than RM10,000 each. The median balance now stands at only RM10,898. Rising life expectancy The concerns are compounded by the fact that Malaysians now live longer. Men now average 74.8 years and women 78.9 years, up from 68.7 years for men and 73.4 years for women in 1990. If one retires at 60, and assuming he or she needs RM1,500 a month to sustain a decent life, he will need at least RM360,000 in the bank to last him up to two decades. However, as of 2023, nearly 74 per cent of active EPF members had accumulated less than RM100,000 each, which is insufficient for even five to six years – without considering escalating healthcare and elderly care costs. Demographic and fiscal challenges As birth rates fall, the tax base is shrinking, making it unsustainable to continue with a DB pension system. Malaysia's tax-to-GDP ratio was just 12.6% in 2023, far below the Asia-Pacific average of 19.3 per cent and the OECD average of 34 per cent. At the same time, the country's life birth rate fell by 10.2 per cent to 100,732 in Q2 2024 compared with the previous corresponding period, according to data from the department of statistics. If this trend continues, there will be fewer taxpayers and EPF contributors going forward, slowing fund growth just as more people join the ranks of retirees. In contrast, countries with generous DB pensions can sustain their retirees because they collect higher taxes and have built a large reserve. On the other hand, Malaysia has limited tax revenue and a smaller reserve, making it impossible to sustain a fully tax-funded pay-as-you-go pension scheme without major reform. Potential solutions To safeguard against the risk of exhausting retirement reserves, Malaysia must promote greater financial literacy, enhance saving incentives, develop a modest social safety net, and establish integrated aged-care facilities to support its ageing population. Introducing a hybrid pension scheme could restore some benefits of the former DB system while retaining sustainability. Within this framework, employees would continue contributing to their EPF accounts. However, upon retirement, only a portion could be withdrawn as a lump sum, with the remainder distributed as monthly payments throughout their lifetime. Such an arrangement partially reinstates the protective features of the legacy civil-service pension – a guaranteed lifelong minimum income – while avoiding the fiscal strain of a fully tax-funded model. Singapore's CPF Life serves as a relevant example, blending personal savings with lifelong payouts to prevent retirees from outliving their resources. This proposed hybrid reform holds promise for ensuring retirees maintain a basic standard of living, even if individual savings are depleted. Moreover, initiatives aimed at bolstering financial education and facilitating easier EPF top-ups – whether through matching contributions, tax incentives, or voluntary programmes – could meaningfully replenish and grow retirement savings. Urgency is mounting for comprehensive reform. By integrating individual responsibility with inter-generational support, Malaysia can help ensure that today's workers do not become tomorrow's financially vulnerable retirees. *This article was first published by epf reform retirees savings social protection
Free Malaysia Today
7 hours ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Wee defends call to reform tax appeals system
Ayer Hitam MP Wee Ka Siong yesterday called for the LHDN to be made an independent statutory body that reports to Parliament. (Bernama pic) PETALING JAYA : MCA president Wee Ka Siong has defended his call for the tax appeals system to be reformed, which led to a call for him to be referred to Parliament's rights and privileges committee. The Ayer Hitam MP had cited the legal dispute between Tenaga Nasional Bhd and the Inland Revenue Board (LHDN) yesterday when calling for LHDN to be made an independent statutory body reporting to Parliament. He said such an approach would be a key reform to ensure LHDN was free from political interests or pressure. TNB is facing a RM5.05 billion tax bill following a Federal Court ruling that it is not eligible to claim reinvestment allowance. The apex court had earlier overturned a Court of Appeal ruling that found TNB to be in the business of manufacturing electricity. The Federal Court said TNB should actually have been considered a utility company under Schedule 7B of the Income Tax Act 1967 (ITA). The dispute arose when LHDN disallowed TNB's claim under Schedule 7A of the ITA on the basis that the generation, distribution and transmission of electricity was not manufacturing of electricity. In a statement today, Wee said that no one was disputing the court's ruling that TNB should have applied under Schedule 7B, nor was it about the company's status as a utility or manufacturer. 'The real issue is the fate of RM5 billion in rakyat's savings,' he said. He said what DAP's Chong Zhemin 'conveniently ignores' was that TNB was majority-owned by public savings funds through Amanah Saham Nasional Bhd, EPF, the Retirement Fund Inc (KWAP), Lembaga Tabung Haji and others. If the government, via LHDN, enforced the court ruling, the RM5 billion would go into its coffers, he said. He said the law clearly gave the finance minister absolute power to approve TNB's appeal and re-application under Section 7B to waive the disputed amount. Yesterday, Wee and Chong, who is the Kampar MP, traded bards in the lower house when Wee claimed that it would be 'daylight robbery' if the government decided to enforce the ruling. This led to Chong claiming that the 'daylight robbery' remark was inaccurate, and accused Wee of misleading the house. Chong also demanded Wee retract the claim and threatened to refer him to the rights and privileges committee.
