Pakistan opposition leader given 10 years for Imran Khan protests
Among them was Omar Ayub Khan, the opposition leader in the National Assembly, who did not attend the protests.
He was convicted at an anti-terrorism court in the eastern city of Faisalabad of abetting violence and conspiring to incite riots and arson.
"We are going to challenge this in the upper court," PTI chairman Gohar Ali Khan told reporters.
"Such verdicts are bad for democracy and the country altogether."
The party officials have been on bail during the trial and have not yet been taken to jail.
Nationwide protests that targeted sensitive military installations erupted on May 9 when Khan was briefly arrested in the capital, Islamabad.
Khan, who was prime minister between 2018 and 2022, has been in jail for nearly two years on charges he says are politically motivated.
His supporters and senior party leaders have also faced a severe crackdown, with thousands rounded up and Khan's name censored from television.
Sayed Zulfikar Bukhari, the London-based spokesman for PTI said the latest sentences were "a black day for demoracy".
"Convicting opposition leaders one after another is not a good omen for any democratic system, and it will seriously damage our already fragile democracy," he said.
© 2025 AFP
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sustainability Times
35 minutes ago
- Sustainability Times
China's "Military Colossus" Exposed: Satellite Images Show World's Largest Base Stretching Over 4,000 Football Fields; U.S. Officials Sound the Alarm
IN A NUTSHELL 🛰️ Satellite imagery reveals China's construction of the world's largest underground military command center near Beijing, showcasing its strategic ambitions. 🔍 The project underscores China's desire to compete with the United States and shift the balance of power globally. and shift the balance of power globally. ⚔️ Advanced technology and strategic depth are key features of this ambitious military endeavor. and strategic depth are key features of this ambitious military endeavor. 🌐 Regional reactions vary, with countries reassessing their security strategies amid rising geopolitical tensions. In a rapidly evolving geopolitical landscape, China's latest military development has captured significant global attention. Recent satellite imagery has unveiled the construction of what is believed to be the world's largest underground military command center near Beijing. This ambitious project underscores China's strategic aspirations to challenge the United States' global influence. Experts and analysts are keenly observing these developments with a mix of intrigue and concern. As tensions mount in Asia, understanding the broader implications of this undertaking is essential for both regional stability and international security. China's Ambitious Military Vision China's latest military endeavor reflects a long-term strategic vision that harks back to the Cold War era. Since the 1980s, China has focused on developing specialized teams to construct underground shelters designed to withstand even the most potent bombs. This strategy is reminiscent of the Cold War period, marked by an arms race where countries like the Soviet Union and Germany invested heavily in subterranean defenses. Today, China is elevating this concept to unprecedented heights by constructing what may become the largest underground military command center ever built. The sheer scale of this project indicates China's intent to safeguard its military assets against potential threats. With geopolitical tensions escalating, particularly in Asia, this development underscores China's commitment to strengthening its defense infrastructure. It also highlights the evolving nature of military strategies in the 21st century, where technological advancements and strategic deployment are pivotal components of national security. 'China Wants to Catch Ghosts Under the Sea': World's Largest Underwater Telescope Could Unlock the Most Dangerous Secrets of the Universe Implications for Global Security The construction of China's underground military complex carries substantial implications for global security. As China continues to expand its military capabilities, nations around the world are reassessing their security strategies. This development goes beyond mere military prowess; it signifies a shift in the balance of power in Asia and beyond. The strategic significance of this project cannot be overstated, as it has the potential to alter military alliances and defense strategies worldwide. China's actions may prompt reactions from other global powers, potentially igniting an arms race akin to the Cold War era. The United States, in particular, may feel compelled to bolster its military presence in the region to counterbalance China's growing influence. This scenario raises critical questions about the future of international relations and the potential for conflict or cooperation in addressing shared security challenges. As China's Bullet Train Readies for Launch, Americans Ask 'Why Can't We Build Anything That Actually Works?' Technological Sophistication and Strategic Depth Central to China's military project is a focus on technological sophistication and strategic depth. The underground command center is expected to feature advanced technologies, including state-of-the-art communication systems and cutting-edge defense mechanisms. This technological prowess reflects China's broader ambitions to emerge as a leading military power, capable of rivaling the technological advancements of the United States and other military giants. The strategic depth of this project underscores China's long-term vision for its defense strategy. By investing in subterranean infrastructure, China is ensuring the resilience and sustainability of its military capabilities. This approach not only shields its assets from conventional threats but also positions China as a formidable force in potential future conflicts. As such, this development marks a new chapter in China's military history, characterized by innovation and strategic foresight. China Stuns the World With a 'Terrifying New Weapon' That Launches Missiles at Mach 7 Using Cutting-Edge Electromagnetic Railgun Technology Regional Reactions and Future Prospects The unveiling of China's underground military complex has elicited varied reactions across the region. Neighboring countries are closely monitoring the situation, with some expressing concerns over the potential implications for regional stability. Others are considering strategic partnerships and alliances to counterbalance China's growing military presence. This development has undoubtedly sparked a reevaluation of defense strategies across Asia as nations navigate the shifting geopolitical landscape. Looking ahead, the future prospects of this project will depend on China's ability to manage its regional relationships and address international concerns. The success of this undertaking could redefine China's role on the global stage, potentially paving the way for new alliances and diplomatic engagements. However, it also raises important questions about the potential for conflict and cooperation in a world increasingly defined by military prowess and strategic competition. As China's military ambitions continue to unfold, the world watches with bated breath. The construction of this underground command center signals China's determination to assert its influence and secure its interests. In this era of rapid geopolitical changes, how will other nations respond to China's growing military might? Will this development lead to increased cooperation or heightened tensions among global powers? This article is based on verified sources and supported by editorial technologies. Did you like it? 4.3/5 (24)
France 24
7 hours ago
- France 24
New push to reach plastic polution pact
The coming 10 days of talks involving delegates from nearly 180 nations follows a failure to reach a deal last December on how to stop millions of tonnes of plastic waste entering the environment each year. Plastic pollution is so ubiquitous that microplastics have been found on the highest mountain peak, in the deepest ocean trench and scattered throughout almost every part of the human body. In 2022, countries agreed they would find a way to address the crisis by the end of 2024, but the talks in Busan, South Korea failed to overcome fundamental differences. One group of countries sought an ambitious globally binding agreement to limit production and phase out harmful chemicals. However, a group of mostly oil-producing nations rejected production limits and wanted to focus on treating waste. The stakes are high. If nothing is done, global plastic consumption could triple by 2060, according to OECD projections. Meanwhile, plastic waste in soils and waterways is expected to surge 50 percent by 2040, according to the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), which is acting as the secretariat for the talks. Some 460 million tonnes of plastic are produced globally each year, half of which is single-use. And less than 10 percent of plastic waste is recycled. Plastics break down into bits so small that not only do they find their way throughout the ecosystem but into human blood and organs, recent studies show, with largely unknown consequences on the health of current and future generations. 'Forever chemicals' Despite the complexity of trying to reconcile the diverging interests the environment, human health, and industry "it's very possible to leave Geneva with a treaty," UNEP Executive Director Inger Andersen told the press in the runup to the talks. The text published after the failed talks in South Korea contained 300 points that still needed to be resolved. "You have over 300 brackets in the text, which means you have over 300 disagreements," said Bjorn Beeler, executive director and international coordinator at IPEN, a global network aimed at limiting toxic chemicals. "So 300 disagreements have to be addressed." The most divisive issue is whether to restrict production of new plastic, with petroleum-producing nations like Saudi Arabia, Iran and Russia opposing limits. Another contentious point: establishing a list of chemicals considered dangerous, such as per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), a family of synthetic chemicals often called forever chemicals as they take an extremely long time to break down. Bjorn Beeler, head of the IPEN network of activist groups working to eliminate pollutants said that no one wants the talks to go to a third round and the diplomats need to show progress. The "context is difficult," a diplomatic source acknowledged on condition of anonymity, saying they could not ignore the changed US attitude towards multilateral initiatives under Donald Trump's administration. Lobbyists at work Meanwhile, developing nations are keenly interested in talks "either because they are plastic producers with a risk of a strong impact on their economies or because they suffer from plastic pollution and demand accountability," said the same source. In Nice in June, at the UN Oceans Conference, 96 countries, ranging from tiny island states to Zimbabwe, including the 27 members of the European Union, Mexico and Senegal, called for an ambitious treaty, including a target to reduce the production and consumption of plastics. Ilane Seid, chair of the Alliance of Small Island states (AOSIS), said "the treaty should cover the full life cycle of plastics and this includes production. It should not be a waste management treaty." "Governments must act in the interest of people, not polluters," said Graham Forbes, the head of Greenpeace's delegation at the talks, who denounced the presence of industry lobbyists. IPEN's Beeler said negotiators want to avoid another round of talks, but that does not assure an all-encompassing deal will be reached. "The escape hatch is most likely a skeleton that's going to be called a treaty, that needs to have finance, guts, and a soul to be actually something effective," he said.
France 24
20 hours ago
- France 24
Missing Kenya football tickets blamed on govt protest fears
Kenya has seen multiple deadly protests for more than a year over economic stagnation and police brutality, leaving dozens dead or missing. It is hoping for a more positive vibe as it co-hosts the African Nations Championship (CHAN) with Tanzania and Uganda this month. But local fans are puzzled over the difficulty of securing tickets for Kenya's first match, against Democratic Republic of Congo, at Nairobi's 48,000-capacity Kasarani Stadium on Sunday. Tickets have been sold out since Monday evening -- the result of a "more than eager" fanbase, according to Nicholas Musonye, head of the local organising committee, speaking to AFP. Some die-hard supporters find that hard to believe. "We haven't found any fan who managed to buy a ticket," said a Kenyan sports journalist interviewed by AFP, who requested anonymity for fear of reprisals by the government due to the "political" nature of the issue. He accuses the government of President William Ruto of buying up tickets in a bid to avoid chants like "Ruto Must Go" and "Wantam" (meaning "one term") that have become widely used since the protests began. In March, "the last time Kenya played at home, against Gabon, there were many anti-government chants", which are still visible online, he said, adding that the government was likely handing tickets to people less likely to be critical. Registering supporters PropesaTV, an online media critical of Ruto, told its 150,000 followers on X that the government had "bought over half of the Kenya Vs Congo CHAN opening match tickets for the Sunday clash in a bid to stop or avoid the Wantam and Ruto Must Go chants". It said tickets were being distributed to "government supporters" who will be transported to the stadium by bus from Kibera, a huge Nairobi slum that has seen fewer protests against the president than other areas. A resident of the neighbourhood, also asking to remain anonymous for fear of reprisals, told AFP he saw a "massive" group of people hired by local officials to "register" and collect personal data in exchange for tickets to Sunday's match. Kariuki Ngunjiri, a national youth leader for the president's party, told AFP he had "not seen the accusations". "Tickets are available online, we are encouraging a lot of people to come in large numbers on Sunday and enjoy the game," he said, though tickets could not be found then or since by AFP. Meanwhile, tickets were still available for the tournament's first match in Tanzania, who play Burkina Faso on Saturday. Kenyan Football Federation president Hussein Mohammed told AFP he was not responsible for ticketing, which falls under Confederation of African Football (CAF). CAF did not respond to a request for comment. Last week, Musonye of the organising committee told the Kenyan parliament that "the current prevailing situation in the country, concerning the Gen Z protests, has been identified as a potential risk that can affect the safe delivery of the tournament".
