Zelenskyy says Ukraine should take part in US negotations with Russia
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Jamestown primary set for council contest
JAMESTOWN — A forum next month in Jamestown will give voters a chance to hear from the candidates running this fall in the primary race that will narrow the number of Town Council candidates for the general election. The forum will be held in the Town Council chambers at Jamestown Town Hall from 6-8 p.m. on Sept. 10, said Councilwoman Martha Wolfe, who isn't seeking another term this year. The forum is sponsored by the Jamestown Business Association. Seven candidates filed last month for two council seats: Jim Gibson, Phyllis Bridges, Cliff Paddock, Richard Clapp, Darren Myers, Jim Westmoreland and Shakinah Simeona-Lee. The top four vote-getters in the Oct. 7 primary will advance to the general election. There won't be a primary in the race for mayor because only two candidates filed to run: Councilwoman Rebecca Mann Rayborn and Susan Clinard Dickenson. Incumbent Lynn Montgomery isn't seeking another term. The general election will be Nov. 4. The Jamestown races are nonpartisan, meaning the party affiliation of the candidates won't appear on the ballot. Municipalities in Guilford, Davidson and Randolph counties are holding local elections this year with three exceptions. The city of High Point won't hold its next local elections until 2027 while the cities of Archdale and Trinity won't hold local elections until next year. pjohnson@ | 336-888-3528 | @HPEpaul Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
8 minutes ago
- Yahoo
MAGA Republicans try to run from the racism in their redistricting plan
Republicans are waging a propaganda push to hide the racist impact of their efforts to gerrymander congressional districts ahead of next year's midterm elections. A couple of weeks back, Rep. Al Green, flanked by fellow members of the Texas Democratic congressional delegation, browbeat members of the media at a news conference. Green's gripe? That the mainstream press wasn't, in his view, doing an effective job of conveying the functional racism at play in the Donald Trump-backed gerrymandering effort in Texas, which is deliberately designed to target majority-Black and majority-Latino districts. Unfortunately, we have grown to the point in this country where you can use racism against people of color, but people of color can't respond and say, 'That's racism.' If we do, you're not going to print it. You're not going to carry it. What you're going to do is allow the racist statement to prevail. And what we try to do to fight it — by indicating that it IS racist — you allow that to just be words that evaporate into nothingness. It was a warning that conservatives can obscure the true intent or result of this discriminatory assault on democracy if members of the press won't plainly depict it as such. And as Republicans spread misinformation over their gerrymandering efforts, it's hard to argue with him. The examples are mounting. Just last week, Harmeet Dhillon, the civil rights-averse head of the DOJ's civil rights division, claimed during an interview that the racist gerrymandering effort in Texas isn't truly racist but, instead, an effort to dismantle the 'racial spoils' that Democrats have purportedly reaped from laws designed to combat racist gerrymandering. This, of course, is not true. My colleague Hayes Brown recently wrote an excellent op-ed explaining how Texas Republicans are making a mockery of the Voting Rights Act. And, as my former colleague Joy Reid detailed in a recent Substack post, it's abundantly clear that the Texas GOP's plan will disenfranchise nonwhite voters — particularly, Black ones. But seemingly not to be outdone by Dhillon's propaganda, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott claimed in a Fox News interview over the weekend that Rep. Jasmine Crockett, a Texas Democrat, is the real racist — for having the gall to highlight the racism in the gerrymandering effort. Abbott essentially claimed that the GOP plan couldn't possibly be racist, because it would create additional Hispanic-majority districts, though that obviously doesn't preclude the maps from being racist to Black people — and it's worth noting that the new districts were were drawn specifically to favor conservative-leaning Hispanics. And Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis is in on the propaganda push, as well. During an appearance on Sean Hannity's Fox News show, DeSantis said he's entitled to further gerrymander his state's congressional map because then-President Barack Obama and then-Attorney General Eric Holder 'gerrymandered brutally across the country in this decade's census.' That's another lie, though Obama and Holder have advocated against gerrymandering. In reality, Florida Republicans — who controlled their state's most recent redistricting process — drew gerrymandered maps that DeSantis pressured them to gerrymander further with a proposal from his office that diluted Black voter power. Nonetheless, the governor portrayed Florida's map as unfairly weighted in favor of minority groups and claimed 'there's some racial gerrymandering that's still lingering that we have to correct, per a recent Florida Supreme Court decision.' Indeed, Florida's Republican-packed Supreme Court ruled last month that DeSantis could move forward with his gerrymandering plan, but the court also acknowledged that the plan would diminish the power of Black voters. All this to say, evidence abounds that Republicans are waging a racist assault on the American voting system — even as they wage a propaganda campaign to present this push as something else entirely. This article was originally published on
The Hill
10 minutes ago
- The Hill
White House puts a low bar for Trump-Putin summit
Trump and other administration officials have indicated Friday's summit in Alaska is not meant to be one that will bring an end to the fighting in Ukraine, using terms like 'listening session' and 'feel-out meeting' to describe the planned discussion about the war in Ukraine. The president and his team have also largely avoided predicting any deliverables that might come out of the meeting and noted that it will likely take a follow-up summit involving both Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky for any concrete progress to be made on a ceasefire. 'There's a very good chance that we're going to have a second meeting that will be more productive than the first,' Trump said Wednesday. 'Because the first is I'm going to find out where we are and what we're doing.' The White House has steered clear of making any firm commitments about what will come out of Friday's gathering in Anchorage, and details have been scarce as officials work to rapidly pull the event together on one week's notice. The president himself has offered mixed signals about what will happen. Trump is expected to meet one-on-one with Putin, press secretary Karoline Leavitt said, and the event will take place at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson. But other logistics were still being sorted out as the summit approached. 'This is a listening exercise for this president,' Leavitt told reporters on Tuesday. 'Look, only one party that's involved in this war is going to be present. And so this is for the president to go and to get, again, a more firm and better understanding of how we can hopefully bring this war to an end.' Trump is a wild card in Friday's meeting. He has avoided setting expectations for the event, telling reporters earlier this week that the conversation with Putin 'will be good, but it might be bad.' Trump on Wednesday threatened 'severe consequences' if Russia did not stop the fighting after this week's summit, then minutes later acknowledged that he is unlikely to be able to get Putin to stop targeting Ukrainian civilians. And he said he hoped to arrange a second meeting quickly involving Putin and Zelensky, or that perhaps a second meeting would not happen at all. 'If the first one goes OK, we'll have a quick second one. I would like to do it almost immediately,' Trump said. 'I think the second meeting – if the second meeting takes place. Now there may be no second meeting, because if I feel it's not appropriate to have it because I didn't get the answers that we have to have, then we're not going to have a second meeting.' Some critics have bemoaned that Trump is giving Putin a win simply by holding the meeting on U.S. soil without Zelensky or leadership from Ukraine present. And European allies have approached Friday's meeting with caution, expressing appreciation for Trump's efforts while bracing for the possibility that he may go off script. Trump has in recent days suggested Ukraine may have to give up land to Russia as part of a peace agreement, something Ukrainian leaders have said is a non-starter.
