Air traffic controller union is … out of control
Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy came up with a smart, fast fix to the immediate staffing crisis (which brings serious safety concerns as well as delayed/cancelled flight chaos): keep senior controllers working a bit longer.
He'd offer cash bonuses to controllers below the mandatory retirement age of 56 to keep them on the job, and maybe work out waivers so some could serve past 56 until turning 61.
Advertisement
(He has other, longer-term plans as well, including moving fast to address the aging-equipment mess left behind by his Biden-era predecessor, Pete Buttigieg.)
Extra pay for crucial work, on a totally voluntary basis with an eye to ending a terrible and worsening problem: Who could have a problem with that?
Why, the National Air Traffic Controllers Association: The union hates the idea, and has voted to punish any controller who signs a waiver with a seniority cap (i.e., you stop accruing seniority the day you take Duffy's offer).
Advertisement
The union's rationale: 'Each waiver puts early retirement at risk by showing the Agency [the FAA] and Congress that mandatory retirement is unnecessary.'
That is, a policy that plays a crucial role in driving controller shortages might be 'unnecessary,' and NATCA doesn't want that fact exposed: It would rather the crisis continue.
And the union has the chutzpah to state this publicly.
Advertisement
Looks like President Ronald Reagan didn't go far enough after smashing PATCO, the original controllers union: He should've salted the earth rather than let NATCA form.
Via NATCA, todays controllers are acting neither in the best interests of the taxpayers who cover their salaries nor the air travellers whose safety they are responsible for.
Duffy and the president need to hit back twice as hard, before this crisis spirals fully out of control.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
2 hours ago
- Politico
Appeals court clears way for deep cuts, restructuring at CFPB
Pillard's dissent accused Katsas and Rao of taking too narrow a view of the court's ability to prevent the Trump administration from violating the law. 'The President's chosen CFPB leadership may — within those constraints — run the Bureau as it determines best serves the public interest. But it is emphatically not within the discretion of the President or his appointees to decide that the country would benefit most if there were no Bureau at all,' Pillard wrote. 'The notion that courts are powerless to prevent the President from abolishing the agencies of the federal government that he was elected to lead cannot be reconciled with either the constitutional separation of powers or our nation's commitment to a government of laws.' As the legal fight over the CFPB has played out in court, Trump and Republicans have successfully slashed the bureau's funding. The GOP tax and spending megalaw Trump signed in July cuts by roughly half the amount of funding the CFPB can request to finance its operations from the Federal Reserve. And even with the legal roadblocks, Trump administration officials have already moved to curtail much of the agency's work. In recent months the CFPB has dropped lawsuits against companies, reversed settlements and is seeking to drastically reduce its oversight of a range of industries. At the same time, the White House is enlisting the CFPB in its fight against 'debanking,' a crackdown on allegations that banks closed the accounts of conservatives or conservative-aligned industries for political purposes. The CFPB is among the regulators Trump tasked earlier this month with examining whether banks were engaged in that practice. The CFPB has also announced that it plans to rewrite a sweeping Biden-era regulation governing financial data-sharing. Crypto executives and financial technology firms have been lobbying Trump to enforce a Biden-era policy that prohibits banks from charging fees for that data-sharing — which fintechs and crypto firms use to power their services and make it easier for customers to set up accounts and move money.
Axios
3 hours ago
- Axios
Trump is moving fast on private equity in 401(k) plans
It's been a week since President Trump issued an executive order to encourage 401(k) investment in private equity, and the biggest surprise so far is how quickly the rest of his administration has activated. Why it matters: There will be a steep learning curve for all participants, but it can't really begin until the White House does its foundational work. Driving the news: The Labor Department on Tuesday rescinded a Biden-era statement that cautioned retirement plan fiduciaries against including private equity in 401(k) plans. According to DOL, that statement "had a chilling effect on the market and took a dismissive view of alternative assets and the capabilities of plan fiduciaries." But wait, there's more: Also on Tuesday, the Council of Economic Advisors published a 31-slide presentation on the implications of 401(k) plans including alt asset options. Not surprisingly, it finds there to be "significant benefits." Not only for retail investors and PE fund managers, but also for the broader economy. Per the report: "We estimate that a full loosening of the cap would lead retirement plans to allocate around 20% of their portfolio to private equity, which translates into an extra $35 billion in aggregate output, or around 0.12% of GDP." One big caveat is that much of the CEA's underlying data is based on PE funds with vintages running through 2014, which may not fully capture the more recent DPI disappearance. Flashback: All of this is a far cry from what happened during Trump 1.0, when the Labor Department issued guidance to smooth the path for PE participation in 401(k) plans. That initiative came near the end of his term, and quickly was overwhelmed by campaign politics and left to wither on the vine (before Biden took office and reversed Trump's policy).
Axios
5 hours ago
- Axios
Which Seattle-area industries rely most on noncitizen workers
Foreign-born noncitizens make up more than 12% of the Seattle-area's workforce, and an even higher share of the region's tech and agricultural employees, census data shows. Why it matters: The numbers highlight which local industries could be most affected by the Trump administration's mass deportation push — particularly as federal officials roll back programs that have allowed some noncitizens to work in the U.S. legally. By the numbers: In the Seattle metro area, foreign-born noncitizens — including legal permanent residents and those on work visas — account for 12.7% of the civilian workforce age 16 and older, based on a 2019–2023 average of U.S. Census Bureau estimates. That's well above the U.S. average of 8.3%, meaning the Seattle area relies on noncitizen workers more than the nation as a whole. Zoom in: Among local industries, the Seattle-area information sector has the highest concentration of foreign-born noncitizen workers, at more than 21% of its workforce. In the Seattle metro, these workers also make up 20.7% of employees in agriculture and mining; 19.6% in professional services; 16.9% in construction; and 14.3% in accommodations, food service and recreation. What they're saying:"Immigrants are our neighbors and they are integral to the social and cultural fabric of Seattle and Washington state," Catalina Velasquez, executive director of the Washington Immigrant Solidarity Network, wrote in an emailed statement to Axios. Malou Chávez, executive director of the Northwest Immigrant Rights Project, told Axios that because of shifting federal policies, many immigrants in the U.S. will soon lose their ability to work legally. That will affect not only those individuals and their families, but also local economies, per Chávez. "This is not how it should be. People have already been given the authorization to work, and now they are being taken away from their communities," Chávez said. State of play: Some of the Trump administration's recent policy changes have included the termination of a Biden-era humanitarian parole program for Cubans, Haitians, Nicaraguans and Venezuelans, and a push to end Temporary Protected Status for migrants from certain countries. Those are distinct from the administration's efforts to target and deport undocumented immigrants. In June, Trump acknowledged his crackdown was hitting farm and hospitality workers especially hard and vowed to make changes — but so far, no major policy decision has been announced, Axios' Alex Fitzpatrick and Kavya Beheraj write. What we're watching: Farmers "are getting frustrated with the delays" on a big White House plan for undocumented workers, Politico reports, while some farm workers say they're being "hunted like animals" in immigration raids, per The Guardian.
