Groundbreaking DNA study reveals when humans likely began talking
There are some 7,000 identified languages spoken globally, and researchers say they all have a common origin back when early human groups started spreading across the world.
Our ancestors developed the cognitive ability for language, combining vocabulary and grammar into a system of expression, over millions of years of evolution.
The capacity to talk in humans first appeared at least 135,000 years ago, more than 100,000 years after the species first emerged in Africa.
The new review, detailed in the journal Frontiers in Psychology, examines over a dozen genetic studies published in the past 18 years to indicate an initial branching of humans about 135,000 years ago.
After groups of early humans went apart geographically, each subpopulation developed genetic variations. "Every population branching across the globe has human language and all languages are related,' study co-author Shigeru Miyagawa, from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in the US, said.
"I think we can say with a fair amount of certainty that the first split occurred about 135,000 years ago, so human language capacity must have been present by then, or before,' Dr Miyagawa explained.
The 15 genome studies reviewed in the current research collectively point to when the first geographic splits started taking place.
By analysing the genetic variations explained in the studies, the researchers could estimate the point in time at which Homo sapiens was still a single regionally undivided group. They say the data points to some 135,000 years ago as the likely time of the first split.
'Recent genome-level studies on the divergence of early Homo sapiens, based on single nucleotide polymorphisms, suggest that the initial population division within H sapiens from the original stem occurred approximately 135 thousand years ago,' they say.
Since all subsequent spread of human groups led to populations with full language capacity, scientists suspect the potential for language as a communication tool was present at the latest around 135,000 years ago, before the first division occurred.
'Had linguistic capacity developed later, we would expect to find some modern human populations without language or with some fundamentally different mode of communication. Neither is the case,' the researchers conclude. 'Based on the lower boundary of 135,000 years ago for language, we propose that language may have triggered the widespread appearance of modern human behavior approximately 100,000 years ago.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
2 days ago
- Daily Mail
Mysterious species found living alongside our earliest ancestors deemed missing link in evolution
A lost chapter in human evolution has been discovered among a collection of teeth that dates back 2.8 million years. Researchers from Arizona State University announced that they have found a previously unknown species of ancient humans that appear to have coexisted with members of the genus Homo, our direct ancestors, in Africa. The team added that this era, between 2.6 and 2.8 million years ago, was a critical period in human evolution because it marked the earliest appearance of the Homo species ever found. Researchers also discovered the oldest known stone tools at the Ledi-Geraru site in the Afar region of Ethiopia. In 2013, another team unearthed a 2.8-million-year-old Homo jawbone at the same site. However, the 13 teeth uncovered here recently do not belong to our direct ancestors. Instead, the research team found that they came from a new member of the Australopithecus species, a group closely related to modern humans who lived in Africa between two and four million years ago. Unlike previous fossils from the species Australopithecus afarensis, these teeth were noticeably different, showing that a new evolution of early humans developed in this region and overlapped with members of our family tree. Researchers said this lost Australopithecus species suggests that human evolution was complex, with multiple species coexisting, not just a simple progression from ape to human. The most famous member of the Australopithecus afarensis species has been a fossil named 'Lucy,' whose fossil skeleton was discovered in 1974 in Hadar, Ethiopia. Australopithecus walked upright, a key human trait, but examinations of skull fragments have found they had smaller brains and ape-like features, such as larger teeth and robust jaws for chewing tough plants. However, researchers have not been able to find any fossils at the Ledi-Geraru site that match Lucy's species. The differences in the 13 Australopithecus teeth unearthed there, along with the presence of the Homo species, suggest that Lucy's species did live beyond 2.95 million years ago, according to the study in Nature. ASU paleoecologist Kaye Reed said: 'This new research shows that the image many of us have in our minds of an ape to a Neanderthal to a modern human is not correct — evolution doesn't work like that.' 'Here we have two hominin species that are together. And human evolution is not linear; it's a bushy tree, there are life forms that go extinct,' Reed added in a statement. The 'bushy tree' theory Reed mentioned refers to the concept of multiple early human species living simultaneously in ancient times. Some would go extinct while others would lead to the development of modern humans, like the species Homo. Researchers added that the new fossils don't represent a single 'missing link' but rather show evidence of diverse overlap during this evolutionary period. 'We know what the teeth and mandible of the earliest Homo look like, but that's it,' Reed explained. 'This emphasizes the critical importance of finding additional fossils to understand the differences between Australopithecus and Homo, and potentially how they were able to overlap in the fossil record at the same location,' the study author continued. The genus Homo includes modern humans and our closest extinct relatives. The Ledi-Geraru Homo fossils, including the new teeth and the previously found jawbone, revealed that early Homo individuals likely had slightly larger brains and smaller teeth than Australopithecus. This suggests that the human diet was already shifting millions of years ago towards more meat or softer plants than Lucy's species ate. These humans also learned to use primitive tools, which the ASU researchers also found at the site. The fossils' age was determined by dating volcanic ash layers containing feldspar crystals, a method that pinpoints the time of eruptions sandwiching the fossils. The Ledi-Geraru landscape, once a vegetated area with rivers and lakes, was much different than today's arid badlands. The ASU team noted that future research will focus on tooth enamel to explore diet and potential interactions between the Homo and Australopithecus, such as whether these species competed for food or peacefully lived in different ecological regions of Africa.
STV News
4 days ago
- STV News
AI designs drugs to combat gonorrhoea and MRSA
Artificial intelligence has helped researchers to design antibiotics that can tackle hard-to-treat infections gonorrhoea and MRSA. A team at Massachusetts Institute of Technology used AI algorithms to design more than 36 million possible compounds and screen them for antimicrobial properties. The top candidates appeared to be different from any existing antibiotics, and researchers say they work through mechanisms that disrupt bacterial cell membranes. The use of AI allowed scientists to generate and test compounds that had never been seen before. Senior author of the study Professor James Collins said the team is 'excited' about the new possibilities opened up by this project. 'Our work shows the power of AI from a drug design standpoint, and enables us to exploit much larger chemical spaces that were previously inaccessible,' he said. The team used generative AI algorithms to design molecules based on a specific chemical fragment that showed antimicrobial activity, but they then also let the algorithms freely generate molecules that didn't require that specific fragment. Bacterial resistance to many antibiotics is also increasing – nearly five million deaths each year are caused by drug-resistant bacterial infections. 'We wanted to get rid of anything that would look like an existing antibiotic, to help address the antimicrobial resistance crisis in a fundamentally different way,' lead author Aarti Krishnan said. 'By venturing into underexplored areas of chemical space, our goal was to uncover novel mechanisms of action.' It is rare that new antibiotics are discovered and later approved by health authorities. Get all the latest news from around the country Follow STV News Scan the QR code on your mobile device for all the latest news from around the country
ITV News
5 days ago
- ITV News
AI designs drugs to combat gonorrhoea and MRSA
Health Antibiotics Science Artificial intelligence has helped researchers to design antibiotics that can tackle hard-to-treat infections gonorrhoea and MRSA. A team at Massachusetts Institute of Technology used AI algorithms to design more than 36 million possible compounds and screen them for antimicrobial properties. The top candidates appeared to be different from any existing antibiotics, and researchers say they work through mechanisms that disrupt bacterial cell membranes. The use of AI allowed scientists to generate and test compounds that had never been seen before. Senior author of the study Professor James Collins said the team is "excited" about the new possibilities opened up by this project. "Our work shows the power of AI from a drug design standpoint, and enables us to exploit much larger chemical spaces that were previously inaccessible,' he said. The team used generative AI algorithms to design molecules based on a specific chemical fragment that showed antimicrobial activity, but they then also let the algorithms freely generate molecules that didn't require that specific fragment. Bacterial resistance to many antibiotics is also increasing - nearly five million deaths each year are caused by drug-resistant bacterial infections. "We wanted to get rid of anything that would look like an existing antibiotic, to help address the antimicrobial resistance crisis in a fundamentally different way," lead author Aarti Krishnan said. "By venturing into underexplored areas of chemical space, our goal was to uncover novel mechanisms of action." It is rare that new antibiotics are discovered and later approved by health authorities.
