California has a $6.2 billion Medicaid funding gap partly due to expanding immigrant coverage
SACRAMENTO, Calif. (AP) — California faces a $6.2 billion budget gap in the state's Medicaid services, which could force Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom and Democratic lawmakers to reevaluate future coverage for some of the 15 million people who receive health care through the program, including immigrants.
The shortfall comes a year after California launched an ambitious coverage expansion to provide free health care to all low-income adults regardless of their immigration status. That's costing far more than the state projected.
California also is bracing for major budget hits if Republicans in Congress follow through with a plan to slash billions of dollars in Medicaid and potentially jeopardize coverage for millions of people. California provides free health care to more than a third of its 39 million people.
Here's what to know about California's Medicaid gap:
Did expanding coverage to adult immigrants cause the gap?
Partly. California first extended health care benefits to low-income children without legal status in 2015 and later added the benefits for young adults and people over the age of 50. The program was expanded again last year to cover adults ages 26 to 49.
The cost of the recent expansion to cover all low-income adults is $2.7 billion more than the state budgeted because California underestimated the number of people who would sign up for services. California officials said they only had a month of data last year when the state had to produce projections for the budget.
The state hasn't said how many people have enrolled through the expansion. Last year, the state projected about 700,000 state residents who are living in the U.S. illegally would gain full health coverage to access preventive care and other treatment.
Other factors that are putting pressures on state budgets across the country also played a role in California, state officials said. Those included $540 million in rising pharmacy costs and $1.1 billion from other issues, such as a larger enrollment by older people.
In Illinois, which also expanded coverage in recent years to more low-income residents regardless of immigration status, Democratic Gov. JB Pritzker is proposing a $330 million cut to coverage for immigrants ages 42 to 64, citing rising costs.
What is California doing about the shortfall?
Newsom's administration last week told lawmakers it took out a $3.44 billion loan, the maximum allowed under state law, from the general fund to make payments for this month.
The Department of Health Care Services, which oversees the state's Medicaid program, this week said it will need an additional $2.8 billion to cover costs already committed through June. That money will need to be approved by the Legislature in April.
The state has proposed ending pandemic-era protections that have prevented it from disenrolling people from Medicaid. Newsom's administration is also bracing for 'significant variability' after President Donald Trump's immigration crackdown.
Will California roll back coverage for immigrants without legal status?
Newsom told reporters this week that rolling back the coverage expansion 'is not on my docket.'
Other Democratic leaders, including Speaker Robert Rivas and Senate President Pro Tempore Mike McGuire, also vowed to safeguard benefits for immigrants but acknowledged 'tough choices ahead.'
The budget hole has reignited criticism from Republican lawmakers about the expansion.
'Californians should not be forced to shoulder the burden of radical Democrats' reckless financial mismanagement,' state Sen. Brian Jones said in a social media post this week.
Newsom recently defended the expansion in one of his podcast episodes, adding that making preventive care accessible to all low-income people helps save the state money in the long run.
How will Congress' plan to cut Medicaid funding affect California?
The $6.2 billion budget gap is 'solvable,' lawmakers said this week. But Congress' threats of a Medicaid funding cut could add further strain.
California would have to cut coverage, limit enrollment or raise taxes to help cover the costs if Congress follows through.
State officials said they're certain it would upend coverage for millions of people in the state.
Even with the largest state budget in the country at roughly $322 billion, California doesn't have the capacity to backfill services funded by the federal government, officials said.
More than half the state's Medicaid funding comes from the federal government. For the next fiscal year, that's roughly $112.1 billion. Federal funding doesn't cover costs related to preventive care for immigrants without legal status.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Maxwell: DeSantis orders Orlando Sentinel to stop investigating his scandal. That's not happening.
Late last week, Gov. Ron DeSantis' administration publicly threatened the Orlando Sentinel reporter who has been investigating the Hope Florida scandal. Welcome to the 'Free State of Florida,' where the governor feels free to live out authoritarian fever dreams surrounded by staff who are apparently unwilling to tell Mao ZeRon that emporers can't control journalism in this country. Just after noon on Friday, Florida's Department of Children and Families issued what it labeled a 'cease and desist' demand that Sentinel reporter Jeff Schweers stop his reporting efforts after saying it had 'heard' that Jeff might be 'threatening or coercing' foster families in Florida. There was no proof. No specifics. The letter wasn't even signed by anyone — maybe because no reputable attorney would put their name on a document that looked like it was written by a Twitter bot trying to cosplay as a lawyer. It was just an anonymous, undocumented claim that someone had heard something about harassment, which the governor then tweeted along with the comment: 'Bottom feeders gonna bottom feed…' The governor's tweet — which included Jeff's email address — prompted the kind of online reaction DeSantis surely expected. One of the governor's followers called for Jeff to be arrested. Others responded to the governor's name-calling with more name-calling, either opting for antisemitism or just blanket statements like: 'Journos are some the worst people alive. Scum of the earth.' By this point, you might be wondering: So what did Jeff do? Well, for months now, he's been trying to track down how the DeSantis administration has been spending money — some of it public, some of it private donations that are supposed to be carefully accounted for the IRS. That apparently scared the hell out of the governor and his staff. Specifically, Jeff was trying to find out what happened to public money given to the beleaguered Hope Florida program championed by Ron and Casey DeSantis. And Jeff isn't the only one. Legislative Republicans have flat-out said they believe crimes were committed. A prosecutor is looking at the issue as well. But apparently Jeff was getting too close to the truth for comfort. So the DeSantis administration bogusly claimed he was 'threatening' foster families and ordered him to stop his reporting. Well, that ain't gonna happen. As the Sentinel's executive editor, Roger Simmons said: 'We stand by our stories and reject the state's attempt to chill free speech and encroach on our First Amendment right to report on an important issue.' Editorial: Intimidation won't make the Sentinel back down on Hope Florida story Reporting, after all, is what newspapers do. We search for answers. And Jeff has been doing it for years. In fact, before he started working for the Sentinel a few years ago, Jeff worked for the Tallahassee Democrat where he investigated scandalous behavior by Andrew Gillum. Gillum, as you may recall, was the Democratic candidate for governor against … wait for it … Ron DeSantis. And some of Jeff's reporting was so damning to Gillum that the stories generated by Jeff and his colleagues were used by the DeSantis campaign to help DeSantis eke out a 0.4% victory. So to recap: When newspapers investigate a Democrat, everyone should pay attention. But if they investigate DeSantis, it's bottom-feeding that needs to be shut down. The latest scandal involves Hope Florida — the moniker for both a state program and affiliated private charity that the DeSantises have championed. The couple say the programs have been successful at getting struggling citizens off welfare. But GOP legislators (yes, lawmakers from the governor's own party) say they believe public money was inappropriately 'laundered' to political causes and campaigns. For journalists, a common mantra is: Follow the money. But that's been particularly challenging in this story that involves two entities by the same name, money transfers and incomplete financial records. Maxwell: Scandals for Dummies. Breaking down the Hope Florida fiasco It has been my experience that, when financial stories are complicated, that's often intentional. Someone doesn't want you to follow the money. But Jeff and other Florida reporters have kept on digging. And that's what has the DeSantis administration nervous. Last month, Jeff tracked down one of the few, specific people Hope Florida had touted as a success story for being weaned off public assistance only to learn that she appeared 'no better off than she was. She lives with her three youngest daughters in a double-wide mobile home … not working, and she and her children are still on Medicaid … just as they were three years ago.' Financial independence eludes Hope Florida 'graduate' 3 years later This week, Jeff combed through IRS records to learn that a golf-tournament fundraiser staged by the Hope Florida Foundation actually reported losing $17,000 — only to have the foundation's attorney say that the foundation would soon be filing an amended report. How fortuitous for the charity that Jeff was able to help it sort out its finances. Hope Florida Foundation to amend tax return to show golf tourney made more money And those are just the stories Jeff was able to ferret out with access to limited records. He said he's still waiting for the state to provide specific details about how it spent more than $20 million in federal relief funds — a request he filed back in October 2024 If Hope Florida looks like a three-alarm dumpster fire right now, one wonders how many alarms would go off if journalists and the public ever get to see the full financial picture. To that end, when the governor of America's third-largest state took to Twitter to try to debase and bully, Jeff responded with a pretty simple, nine-word question: 'Why not respond to my numerous public records requests?' The answer to that is becoming increasingly obvious. Because the more the facts get out, the worse things look for DeSantis. So the state's top elected official is trying to use all the influence he can to stop journalists from even asking questions. smaxwell@


CBS News
33 minutes ago
- CBS News
700 Marines arrive in L.A. area amid ICE protests as Newsom files suit to block deployment
Washington — About 700 active-duty Marines have arrived in the Los Angeles area to join National Guard troops who were sent to the city to respond to protests over federal immigration enforcement, a defense official said Tuesday morning, as California Gov. Gavin Newsom asked a federal court to block the deployment of troops onto city streets. The Marines join approximately 2,100 members of the California National Guard who are now on location in the greater L.A. area, operating in Los Angeles, Paramount and Compton. A top Pentagon official testified to Congress that the estimated cost of deploying the National Guard and the Marines is roughly $134 million. In a 28-page filing in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California on Thursday afternoon, California Attorney General Rob Bonta asked a federal judge for a temporary restraining order to "prevent the use of federalized National Guard and active duty Marines for law enforcement purposes on the streets of a civilian city." "Federal antagonization, through the presence of soldiers in the streets, has already caused real and irreparable damage to the City of Los Angeles, the people who live there, and the State of California," the filing said. "They must be stopped, immediately." Notably, the filing says the state "does not seek to prevent any of those forces from protecting the safety of federal buildings or other real property owned or leased by the federal government, or federal personnel on such property," but instead "seeks narrow relief tailored to avoid irreparable harm to our communities and the rule of law that is likely to result" if Marines and the National Guard are used for immigration and law enforcement. The U.S. Northern Command said in a statement Monday evening that Marines from 2nd Battalion, 7th Marines, 1st Marine Division had been activated to prepare for the deployment. The Marines are based in Twentynine Palms, a city east of Los Angeles. Northern Command said the Marines would "seamlessly integrate" with hundreds of members of the National Guard to protect "federal personnel and federal property." They have been trained in "de-escalation, crowd control and standing rules for the use of force," the military added. A U.S. military official said the Marines are at a staging area in the greater L.A. area awaiting specific instructions. Appearing before the Armed Services Committee, Marine Corps Commandant Gen. Eric Smith referred specific questions to Northern Command but said the Marines who have been deployed have received crowd-control training and have equipment like shields and batons. He said the Marines "don't have arrest authority" and are there "to protect federal property and federal personnel." Under federal law, active-duty military cannot be used for domestic law enforcement purposes without the president invoking what's known as the Insurrection Act, a step President Trump has not taken. Asked about whether he would invoke the law on Tuesday, Mr. Trump responded, "If there's an insurrection I would certainly invoke it. We'll see." Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth said Monday that around 700 Marines "are being deployed to Los Angeles to restore order." Hegseth said the Marines were being deployed from Camp Pendleton, south of Los Angeles. The defense chief was appearing before lawmakers on Capitol Hill on Tuesday, telling a House committee that "we believe ICE agents should be allowed to be safe in doing their operations and we have deployed National Guard and the Marines to protect them in the execution of their duties because we ought be able to enforce immigration law in this country." Newsom suggested late Monday he would take legal action over the planned use of Marines, calling it illegal. In a post on X, he wrote, "U.S. Marines serve a valuable purpose for this country — defending democracy. They are not political pawns. The Secretary of Defense is illegally deploying them onto American streets so Trump can have a talking point at his parade this weekend. It's a blatant abuse of power. We will sue to stop this. The Courts and Congress must act. Checks and balances are crumbling. This is a red line — and they're crossing it. WAKE UP!" A demonstrator holds an upside-down U.S. flag as California National Guard members stand guard outside the Federal Building during a protest in response to federal immigration operations in Los Angeles, on June 9, 2025. RONALDO SCHEMIDT/AFP via Getty Images Los Angeles Police Chief Jim McDowell said in a statement that the agency has decades of experience managing large-scale public demonstration and can handle the protests. "The arrival of federal military forces in Los Angeles — absent clear coordination — presents a significant logistical and operational challenge for those of us charged with safeguarding this city," he said in response to the possible deployment of Marines, adding that there needs to be open communication between all agencies to prevent confusion and avoid escalation. The military said Monday it was mobilizing another 2,000 members of the California National Guard to respond to the protests. Mr. Trump deployed National Guard troops to downtown Los Angeles over the weekend to respond to tense protests over Immigration and Customs Enforcement arrests. The Trump administration argues the deployment is necessary to protect federal property and ICE agents from violence. Mr. Trump has accused local leaders of not doing enough to deal with violent clashes at the protests. Newsom opposed the deployment, and the state of California is already suing the Trump administration over what it argues is an illegal federalization of the National Guard. Some local officials have argued the deployment could aggravate an already caustic situation in downtown Los Angeles, and say state and local police agencies can handle the protests themselves. "We didn't have a problem until Trump got involved," Newsom posted on X Monday. contributed to this report.


Washington Post
34 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Ahead of UN climate talks, Brazil fast-tracks oil and highway projects that threaten the Amazon
MANAUS, Brazil — Months before hosting the U.N.'s first climate talks held in the Amazon , Brazil is fast-tracking a series of controversial decisions that undercut President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva's lofty environmental rhetoric and show widening divisions within his cabinet. The country's federal environmental agency approved plans for offshore drilling near the mouth of the Amazon and rock blasting along another river in the rainforest, while Congress is moving to make it harder to recognize Indigenous land and easier to build infrastructure in the rainforest.